Английская Википедия:2019 in amphibian paleontology

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Year nav topic5

New taxa

Name Novelty Status Authors Age Type locality Country Notes Images

Anthracobamus[1]

Gen. et comb. nov

Valid

Werneburg

Late Carboniferous

Шаблон:Flag
Шаблон:Flag

An amphibamiform temnospondyl, possibly a member of the family Micropholidae. The type species is "Platyrhinops" fritschi Werneburg (2012); genus also includes "Protriton" fayoli Thevenin (1906).

Branchierpeton saberi[2]

Sp. nov

Valid

Werneburg et al.

Carboniferous (Kasimovian)

Souss Basin

Шаблон:Flag

A micromelerpetid temnospondyl.

Branchiosaurus commentryensis[1]

Sp. nov

Valid

Werneburg

Carboniferous (Gzhelian)

Шаблон:Flag

Cratopipa[3]

Gen. et sp. nov

Valid

Carvalho et al.

Early Cretaceous (Aptian)

Crato Formation

Шаблон:Flag

A frog belonging to the group Pipimorpha. Genus includes new species C. novaolindensis.

Diabloroter[4]

Gen. et sp. nov

Valid

Mann & Maddin

Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian)

Mazon Creek fossil beds

Шаблон:Flag

A short-bodied recumbirostran. Genus includes new species D. bolti.

Hassiacoscutum[5]

Gen. et sp. nov

Valid

Witzmann et al.

Late Permian

Шаблон:Flag

A chroniosuchian belonging to the family Bystrowianidae. Genus includes new species H. munki.

Infernovenator[6]

Gen. et sp. nov

Valid

Mann, Pardo & Maddin

Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian)

Mazon Creek fossil beds

Шаблон:Flag

A member of Lysorophia. Genus includes new species I. steenae.

Linglongtriton[7]

Gen. et sp. nov

Valid

Jia & Gao

Late Jurassic (Oxfordian)

Tiaojishan Formation

Шаблон:Flag

A stem-hynobiid salamander. Genus includes new species L. daxishanensis.

Mattauschia[8]

Gen. et comb. nov

Valid

Milner

Late Carboniferous (Moscovian)

Kladno Formation

Шаблон:Flag

A trematopid temnospondyl. Genus includes "Limnerpeton" laticeps Fritsch (1881).

Montceaubatrachus[1]

Gen. et sp. nov

Valid

Werneburg

Carboniferous/Permian (Gzhelian/Asselian)

Шаблон:Flag

An amphibamiform temnospondyl. The type species is M. platyrynchus.

Nevobatrachus[9]

Nom. nov

Valid

Mahony

Early Cretaceous

Шаблон:Flag

A frog belonging to the group Pipimorpha; a replacement name for Cordicephalus Nevo (1968).

Nyranerpeton montceauense[1]

Sp. nov

Valid

Werneburg

Carboniferous/Permian (Gzhelian/Asselian)

Шаблон:Flag

A micromelerpetid temnospondyl.

Panthasaurus[10]

Gen. et comb. nov

Valid

Chakravorti & Sengupta

Late Triassic (late Carnian to early Norian)

Maleri Formation
Tiki Formation

Шаблон:Flag

A metoposaurid temnospondyl. Genus includes "Metoposaurus" maleriensis Roy Chowdhury (1965).

Parmastega[11]

Gen. et sp. nov

Valid

Beznosov et al.

Devonian (Famennian)

Sosnogorsk Formation

Шаблон:Flag
(Шаблон:Flag)

A basal tetrapod. Genus includes new species P. aelidae.

Patagopipa[12]

Gen. et sp. nov

Valid

Rolando, Agnolin & Corsolini

Eocene

Huitrera Formation

Шаблон:Flag

A frog belonging to the group Pipimorpha. Genus includes new species P. corsolini.

Rhinella loba[13]

Sp. nov

Valid

Pérez-Ben, Gómez & Báez

Chapadmalalan

Chapadmalal Formation

Шаблон:Flag

A true toad, a species of Rhinella.

Trypanognathus[14]

Gen. et sp. nov

Valid

Schoch & Voigt

Carboniferous-Permian boundary

Шаблон:Flag

A dvinosaurian temnospondyl. Genus includes new species T. remigiusbergensis.

Research

  • A study on changes of the skeletal anatomy of the pelvic and pectoral appendages during the transition from fins to limbs in vertebrate evolution, as indicated by data from fossil lobe-finned fishes and early tetrapods, is published by Esteve-Altava et al. (2019).[15]
  • An outline of a new interpretative scenario for the origin of tetrapods, based on data from tetrapod body fossils and from putative tetrapod trace fossils from Poland and Ireland that predate earliest tetrapod body fossils, is presented by Ahlberg (2019).[16]
  • A historical review of the fossil record of Devonian tetrapods and basal tetrapodomorphs from East Gondwana (Australasia, Antarctica) is published by Long, Clement & Choo (2019).[17]
  • A study on the macroevolutionary dynamics of shape changes in the humeri of all major grades and clades of early tetrapods and their fish-like forerunners is published by Ruta et al. (2019).[18]
  • A study on the phylogenetic relationships of early tetrapods is published by Marjanović & Laurin (2019).[19]
  • A study on the anatomy of the palate and neurocranium of Whatcheeria deltae is published by Bolt & Lombard (2019).[20]
  • A study on the morphology of the postcranial skeleton of Crassigyrinus scoticus is published by Herbst & Hutchinson (2019).[21]
  • Herbst et al. (2019) report new evidence of bone healing in the hindlimbs of Crassigyrinus scoticus and Eoherpeton watsoni, and evaluate the implications of these findings for the knowledge of the evolution of bone healing mechanisms in early tetrapods.[22]
  • Description of a new specimen of Oestocephalus from Five Points, Ohio, preserving much of the posterior braincase, is published by Pardo, Holmes & Anderson (2019), who also evaluate the implications of this specimen for inferring the phylogenetic placement of aïstopods.[23]
  • A study on the holotype specimen of Acherontiscus caledoniae is published by Clack et al. (2019), who consider this taxon to be the earliest known heterodont and durophagous tetrapod.[24]
  • A limb bone and a possible ilium on an early tetrapod are described from the Carboniferous (Bashkirian) Clare Shale Formation (Ireland) by Doyle & Ó Gogáin (2019), representing the oldest stratigraphically weill-constrained tetrapod skeletal fossil material from Ireland reported so far.[25]
  • Description of fossils of embolomeres collected in 1915 by Walter A. Bell from the Mississippian-aged Point Edward Formation (Nova Scotia, Canada) is published online by Adams, Mann & Maddin (2019).[26]
  • A study on patterns of shape and size changes of the orbits and vacuities in the skulls of temnospondyls and other early tetrapods is published by Witzmann & Ruta (2019).[27]
  • A study evaluating whether the intraspecific integration of morphological traits significantly affected the evolution of the skull roof of temnospondyls over geological time is published by Pérez-Ben & Gómez (2019).[28]
  • A study on patterns of ontogenetic allometry in the skull roof of temponspondyls, and on their relationship with adult morphological evolution, is published online by Pérez-Ben, Báez & Schoch (2019).[29]
  • Tracks produced by an edopoid temnospondyl are described from the Carboniferous (Viséan) Alston Formation (North Yorkshire, United Kingdom) by Bird et al. (2019), representing the stratigraphically oldest known tetrapod trackway from the United Kingdom reported so far and the oldest known record of Edopoidea.[30]
  • A study on the structure of stapes of Edops craigi is published by Schoch (2019).[31]
  • A fragment of a skull roof of a possible basal dvinosaur is described from the Carboniferous (Viséan) Ortelsdorf Formation (Germany) by Werneburg, Witzmann & Schneider (2019), representing the oldest known tetrapod record in Germany and, together with Balanerpeton, the oldest temnospondyl reported so far.[32]
  • A study on the evolution of the braincase anatomy of dissorophoid temnospondyls, and on its implications for the knowledge of the evolution of the lissamphibian braincase, is published by Atkins, Reisz & Maddin (2019).[33]
  • Description of new fossil material of dissorophoid temnospondyls from the early Permian locality of Richards Spur (Oklahoma, United States) is published by Gee, Bevitt & Reisz (2019).[34]
  • Complete skull and mandibles of a small-bodied trematopid of uncertain phylogenetic placement, most closely resembling members of the genus Acheloma, is described from the Early Permian karst deposits near Richards Spur (Oklahoma, United States) by Gee, Bevitt & Reisz (2019), who also evaluate the implications of this specimen for the knowledge of trematopid ontogeny and taxonomy.[35]
  • A study on the anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of Nanobamus macrorhinus is published online by Gee & Reisz (2019).[36]
  • A study on the phylogenetic relationships of stereospondylomorph temnospondyls is published by Eltink, Schoch & Langer (2019), who name a new clade Superstes.[37]
  • Rediscovery of the original type specimen of Sclerocephalus haeuseri is reported by Schoch, Ebert & Robert (2019).[38]
  • A humerus of a member or a relative of the genus Cyclotosaurus is described from Rhaetian sediments of Exter Formation (Germany) by Konietzko-Meier et al. (2019), representing the geologically youngest record of a non-brachyopoid temnospondyl reported so far.[39]
  • A study on the palaeobiology and lifestyle adaptations of Cherninia denwai and Paracyclotosaurus crookshanki, as indicated by limb bone anatomy and histology, is published online by Mukherjee, Sengupta & Rakshit (2019).[40]
  • Redescription of the Angusaurus, based on a new specimen providing new information of the skull anatomy of this taxon, is published by Fernández-Coll et al. (2019).[41]
  • A study on the anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of Trematosaurus brauni is published by Schoch (2019).[42]
  • A study on the morphology of the mandibular sutures in Metoposaurus krasiejowensis, using histological thin sections, is published by Gruntmejer et al. (2019).[43]
  • Redescription of holotypes of metoposaurid species Anaschisma browni and A. brachygnatha is published online by Gee, Parker & Marsh (2019), who consider Anaschisma brachygnatha and Koskinonodon perfectus to be junior synonyms of Anaschisma browni.[44]
  • A study on the biomechanical role of sutures in the skull of Metoposaurus krasiejowensis is published by Gruntmejer et al. (2019).[45]
  • A study on the anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of "Metoposaurus" azerouali is published by Buffa, Jalil & Steyer (2019), who transfer this species to the genus Arganasaurus.[46]
  • A revision of Triassic temnospondyl fossil material from the Folakara area of Madagascar (Isalo Group, Morondava Basin), including fossils attributed to the species "Metoposaurus" hoffmani, is published by Fortuny et al. (2019).[47]
  • A study on the age of the fossils of Siderops kehli is published by Todd et al. (2019).[48]
  • A study on long bone histology of specimens of the cryptobranchid species Eoscapherpeton asiaticum of different age is published by Skutschas et al. (2019).[49]
  • Fossils of members of Salientia, possibly more closely related to crown-group Anura than to Early Triassic taxa Triadobatrachus and Czatkobatrachus, are described from the Upper Triassic Chinle Formation (Arizona, United States) by Stocker et al. (2019), representing both the first Late Triassic and the earliest equatorial record of Salientia.[50]
  • A study on the two‐dimensional morphology of extant and fossil anuran skulls, evaluating whether phylogeny, development or ecology is a greater influence on anuran skull morphology, and quantifying how anuran skull morphology changed through time, is published by Bardua, Evans & Goswami (2019).[51]
  • A study on the ecomorphological diversity of the Early Cretaceous (Barremian) frogs from the Iberian Peninsula is published by Gómez & Lires (2019).[52]
  • Redescription of the Cretaceous frog Wealdenbatrachus jucarensis is published by Báez & Gómez (2019).[53]
  • A specimen of a frog Genibatrachus baoshanensis with a complete adult salamander belonging or related to the genus Nuominerpeton in its gut is described from the Lower Cretaceous Guanghua Formation (China) by Xing, Niu & Evans (2019).[54]
  • Fossils of the painted frog Latonia gigantea are described from the Miocene of the Vallès-Penedès Basin (Spain) by Villa et al. (2019), representing the first known record of the species from the Iberian Peninsula.[55]
  • Fossils of Latonia cf. gigantea are described from the early Miocene of Greece (representing the first record of the species from that country) by Georgalis et al. (2019), along with other amphibian and reptile fossils.[56]
  • A study on the anatomy of the skull of Latonia seyfriedi is published by Syromyatnikova, Roček & van de Velde (2019), who consider Latonia gigantea to be a likely junior synonym of L. seyfriedi.[57]
  • A study on the morphological diversification of pipimorph frogs and on the impact of ecological and developmental constraints on the evolution of the sacro-caudo-pelvic complex of pipid frogs, as indicated by data from extant and extinct taxa, is published by Gómez & Pérez-Ben (2019).[58]
  • A neurocranium of a clawed frog is described from the Oligocene Nsungwe Formation (Tanzania) by Blackburn et al. (2019), providing the earliest evidence for the genus Xenopus in sub-Saharan Africa reported so far.[59]
  • A study on the developmental stage, physical condition, health, behavior, death, and burial of an exceptionally well-preserved tadpole of a European spadefoot toad from the Miocene (Turolian) konservat-lagerstätte deposit near Tresjuncos (Province of Cuenca, Spain) is published by Talavera, Bustillo & Sanchiz (2019).[60]
  • A redescription of Pelobates praefuscus from the Pliocene of Moldova is published by Syromyatnikova (2019), who considers this taxon to be a species distinct from Pelobates fuscus.[61]
  • A revision of the fossil material attributed to members of the genus Ceratophrys is published by Nicoli (2019).[62]
  • Four new, three-dimensionally preserved specimens of Discosauriscus pulcherrimus, providing new information on the anatomy of the skull of this species, are described from the Lower Permian lacustrine sediments of the Boskovice Basin (Czech Republic) by Klembara & Mikudíková (2019).[63]
  • A study on the morphology of the skeleton of Keraterpeton is published by Milner (2019).[64]
  • New fossil material of Llistrofus pricei, providing new information on the anatomy of this taxon, is described from Permian (Sakmarian) cave deposits of Richards Spur, Oklahoma by Gee et al. (2019), who interpret their findings as indicating that Hapsidopareion lepton is not synonymous with L. pricei.[65]
  • A study on the anatomy of the postcranial skeleton of Carrolla craddocki is published by Mann, Olori & Maddin (2019).[66]
  • A study aiming to determine plausible gaits of Orobates pabsti is published by Nyakatura et al. (2019).[67]
  • A study on the anatomy of the inner ear of seymouriamorphs and diadectomorphs, and on its implications for the knowledge of the phylogenetic relationships of these groups, is published online by Klembara et al. (2019).[68]
  • A study on the relationship between geographic range, climate and extinction risk throughout the evolutionary history of amphibians is published online by Tietje, Rödel & Schobben (2019).[69]

References

Шаблон:Reflist

  1. 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 Шаблон:Cite journal
  2. Шаблон:Cite journal
  3. Шаблон:Cite journal
  4. Шаблон:Cite journal
  5. Шаблон:Cite journal
  6. Шаблон:Cite journal
  7. Шаблон:Cite journal
  8. Шаблон:Cite journal
  9. Шаблон:Cite journal
  10. Шаблон:Cite journal
  11. Шаблон:Cite journal
  12. Шаблон:Cite journal
  13. Шаблон:Cite journal
  14. Шаблон:Cite journal
  15. Шаблон:Cite journal
  16. Шаблон:Cite journal
  17. Шаблон:Cite journal
  18. Шаблон:Cite journal
  19. Шаблон:Cite journal
  20. Шаблон:Cite journal
  21. Шаблон:Cite journal
  22. Шаблон:Cite journal
  23. Шаблон:Cite journal
  24. Шаблон:Cite journal
  25. Шаблон:Cite journal
  26. Шаблон:Cite journal
  27. Шаблон:Cite journal
  28. Шаблон:Cite journal
  29. Шаблон:Cite journal
  30. Шаблон:Cite journal
  31. Шаблон:Cite journal
  32. Шаблон:Cite journal
  33. Шаблон:Cite journal
  34. Шаблон:Cite journal
  35. Шаблон:Cite journal
  36. Шаблон:Cite journal
  37. Шаблон:Cite journal
  38. Шаблон:Cite journal
  39. Шаблон:Cite journal
  40. Шаблон:Cite journal
  41. Шаблон:Cite journal
  42. Шаблон:Cite journal
  43. Шаблон:Cite journal
  44. Шаблон:Cite journal
  45. Шаблон:Cite journal
  46. Шаблон:Cite journal
  47. Шаблон:Cite journal
  48. Шаблон:Cite journal
  49. Шаблон:Cite journal
  50. Шаблон:Cite journal
  51. Шаблон:Cite journal
  52. Шаблон:Cite journal
  53. Шаблон:Cite journal
  54. Шаблон:Cite journal
  55. Шаблон:Cite journal
  56. Шаблон:Cite journal
  57. Шаблон:Cite journal
  58. Шаблон:Cite journal
  59. Шаблон:Cite journal
  60. Шаблон:Cite journal
  61. Шаблон:Cite journal
  62. Шаблон:Cite journal
  63. Шаблон:Cite journal
  64. Шаблон:Cite journal
  65. Шаблон:Cite journal
  66. Шаблон:Cite journal
  67. Шаблон:Cite journal
  68. Шаблон:Cite journal
  69. Шаблон:Cite journal