Английская Википедия:2020 California Proposition 17

Содержание

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Infobox referendum Шаблон:ElectionsCA The 2020 California Proposition 17 is a ballot measure that appeared on the ballot in the 2020 California elections on November 3. Prop 17 amended the Constitution of California to allow people who are on parole to vote. Due to the passage of this proposition, more than 50,000 people in California who are currently on parole and have completed their prison sentence are now eligible to vote and to run for public office. This proposition also provides that all those on parole in the future will be allowed to vote and run for public office as well. The work of Proposition 17 comes out of a history of addressing felony disenfranchisement in the United States. California voters approved this measured by a margin of roughly 18 percentage points.

Background

Appearing on ballot in the 2020 California elections on November 3, 2020, the proposed state constitutional amendment was originally introduced as California Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 6 (ACA 6) by Assemblymember Kevin McCarty in January 2019. ACA 6 passed the California State Assembly by a vote of 54-19 on September 5, 2019, and was approved by the California State Senate by a vote of 28-9 on June 24, 2020. After being put on the ballot, ACA 6 was given the ballot designation of Proposition 17.

Under California law, there is a distinction between probation and parole. Probation is the part of the criminal sentence, and allows those with felonies to finish their sentence outside of the prison. Parole begins upon release from prison when their sentence ends. As of July 2020, the Constitution of California allows someone on probation to vote, but prohibits people on parole from voting until their parole is completed. The effect of Proposition 17 is that all individuals on probation or parole are allowed to vote.

Voting rights in other states

States where people do not lose their right to vote (even if they are incarcerated).	Maine, Vermont
States where people's voting rights are lost while incarcerated, but restored after release (able to vote if they are on parole).	Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Utah
States where people's voting rights are restored after they complete their sentence (including parole and/or probation and pay any fees/fines).	Alaska, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin
States where people's voting rights are lost indefinitely for specific offenses and can require a waiting period after their sentence is completed and/or a Governor's pardon.	Alabama, Arizona, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nebraska, Tennessee, Virginia, Wyoming

Reference:

Support

ACA 6 was co-sponsored by #Cut50, All of Us or None, American Civil Liberties Union of California, Anti-Recidivism Coalition, Californians United for a Responsible Budget, Initiate Justice, League of Women Voters of California, Legal Services for Prisoners with Children, People Over Profits San Diego, Secretary of State Alex Padilla, Vote Allies, White People 4 Black Lives. It was also supported by 118 organizations and local governments. The official Argument in Favor was submitted by Carol Moon Goldberg, President of the League of Women Voters of California, Jay Jordan, executive director of Californians for Public Safety, and Assemblymember Kevin McCarty.

Political endorsements

• Alice B. Toklas LGBTQ Democratic Club
• Beverly Hill Democratic Club
• Black Women Organizing for Political Action
• California Democratic Party
• California Young Democrats
• Clairemont Democratic Club
• Democratic Socialists of America - Los Angeles
• Democratic Socialists of America - Orange County
• Democratic Socialists of America - San Diego
• Democratic Socialists of America - Santa Cruz
• Democratic Socialists of America - Silicon Valley
• East Bay Young Democrats
• Green Party of California
• Harvey Milk LGBTQ Democratic Club
• Libertarian Party of California
• Los Angeles County Democratic Party
• Peace and Freedom Party
• Pilipino American Los Angeles Democrats
• Richmond Progressive Alliance
• Sacramento County Democratic Party
• San Diego Democrats for Equality
• San Francisco Eastern Neighborhoods Democratic Club
• San Francisco Green Party
• San Francisco Women's Political Committee
• San Mateo County Democratic Party
• Santa Barbara County Democratic Party
• Santa Clara County Libertarian Party
• Silicon Valley Stonewall Democrats
• United Democratic Club
• Valley Grassroots for Democracy
• Ventura County Democratic Party
• West Hollywood Democratic Club

Union endorsements

• AFSCME California
• California Federation of Teachers
• California Labor Federation
• SEIU California State Council
• SEIU-UHW West

Newspaper editorials

Newspaper Editorials that Support Prop 17

Newspaper Editorial	Position
La Times Newspaper	Support
Orange County Register	Support
Palo Alto Online	Support
San Diego Union-Tribune	Support
Mercury News	Support
Redlands Community News	Support
San Francisco Chronicle	Support
Santa Cruz Sentinel	Support
The Sacramento Bee	Support

Opposition

ACA 6 was opposed by Election Integrity Project California, Inc. The official Argument Against was submitted by Harriet Salarno, Founder of Crime Victims United of California, Jim Nielsen, retired Chairman of the California Board of Prison Terms, and Ruth Weiss, Vice President of the Election Integrity Project California.

Newspaper editorials

Newspaper Editorials That Oppose Prop 17

Newspaper Editorial	Position
San Mateo Daily Journal	Oppose
Bakersfield California Editorial Board	Oppose
The Desert Sun Editorial Board	Oppose

Polling

In order to pass, it needs a simple majority (>50%).

Poll source	Date(s) administered	Sample sizeШаблон:Efn	Margin of error	For Proposition 17	Against Proposition 17	Undecided
SurveyUSA	September 26–28, 2020	588 (LV)	± 5.4%	55%	19%	26%

Results

Choice	Votes	%
For	9,985,568	58.55
Against	7,069,173	41.45
Blank votes	730,410	-
Total	17,785,151	100
Registered voters/turnout	22,047,448	80.67
Source: elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov