Английская Википедия:2022 Chilean constitutional referendum

A constitutional referendum was held in Chile on 4 September 2022,^[1] in order to determine whether the public agreed with the text of a new Political Constitution of the Republic drawn up by the Constitutional Convention. It was commonly referred to as the "exit plebiscite" (plebiscito de salida).^[2]^[3]

The proposed constitution, which had faced "intense criticism that it was too long, too left-wing and too radical",^[4] was rejected by a margin of 62% to 38%.^[5]^[6]

Date

Файл:Votación en el Estadio Nacional, Plebiscito Nacional de Chile 2022.jpg

The election at the National Stadium in Santiago.

Файл:Cierre de campaña del Rechazo en plaza Pedro de Valdivia, Santiago de Chile, septiembre de 2022.jpg

'Rechazo' campaign, 1 September 2022.

According to the itinerary originally proposed for the constituent process, it was estimated that the plebiscite to approve or reject the text of the new Constitution would take place in September 2021, if the Constitutional Convention met its term of nine months and did not request the three-month extension, or in March 2022, if it requested such an extension.^[7] In addition, the exit plebiscite could not be held 60 days before or after another election, nor could it be held in January or February, which would have placed it on the first Sunday in March if an extension were requested.^[8]^[9]

As a result of the postponement of the first plebiscite to 25 October 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the date of the exit plebiscite was also modified. It was projected to take place during the third quarter of 2022, in September at the latest.^[10] In April 2022, it was announced that the referendum would be held on 4 September.^[1]

Format

Article 142 of the 1980 Political Constitution of the Republic of Chile indicates the text of the ballot in the plebiscite:^[8]

Шаблон:BlockquoteThere was no contingency plan in place as to what will happen if the new constitution is rejected. Chilean human rights lawyer Dinka Benítez stated that "given that 80 percent of those who voted in the plebiscite want a new constitution, it seems that Chile … will necessarily have to find a way to have a new constitution" in some form, and that a "reject" vote would not necessarily be a death knell for constitutional reform.^[11]

Proposed new constitution

Шаблон:Main

Party positions

Choice	Parties			Political orientation	Leader	Ref
Шаблон:Tick Approve	colspan=2 style="background-color: Шаблон:Party color" \|	Файл:Apruebo Dignidad logo.svg Apruebo Dignidad (AD)	Progressivism	Gabriel Boric	^[12]
	rowspan=7 style="background-color: Шаблон:Party color" \|	style="background-color:Шаблон:Party color"\|	Файл:Logo of the Democratic Revolution.svg Democratic Revolution (RD)	Democratic socialism		Juan Ignacio Latorre
	style="background-color:Шаблон:Party color"\|	Файл:Convergencia Social (recorte).png Social Convergence (CS)	Libertarian socialism	Alondra Arellano
	style="background-color:Шаблон:Party color"\|	Файл:Partido Comunes Circulo.png Commons	Socialism of the 21st century	Marco Velarde
	style="background-color:Шаблон:Party color"\|	Файл:Partido Comunista de Chile.svg Communist Party of Chile (PCCh)	Communism	Guillermo Teillier
	style="background-color:Шаблон:Party color"\|	Файл:Federacion Regionalista Verde Social (recorte).png Social Green Regionalist Federation (FREVS)	Regionalism	Flavia Torrealba Diaz
	style="background-color:Шаблон:Party color"\|	Файл:Logo de Acción Humanista Chile.png Humanist Action (AH)	Humanism	Tomás Hirsch
	style="background-color:Шаблон:Party color"\|	Файл:Logo of the Unir Movement.svg Unir Movement (UNIR)	Progressivism	Marcelo Díaz
	colspan=2 style="background-color:Шаблон:Party color \|	Democratic Socialism (SD)	Social democracy
		style="background-color:Шаблон:Party color"\|	Файл:Emblem of the Socialist Party of Chile.svg Socialist Party of Chile (PS)	Social democracy		Paulina Vodanovic
		style="background-color:Шаблон:Party color"\|	Файл:Partido por la Democracia emblema.svg Party for Democracy (PPD)	Progressivism		Natalia Piergentili
		style="background-color:Шаблон:Party color"\|	Файл:Emblema Partido Radical Chile.svg Radical Party of Chile (PR)	Social liberalism		Leonardo Cubillos
			Файл:Logo nuevo Partido Liberal de Chile.png Liberal Party of Chile (PL)	Social liberalism		Vlado Mirosevic
	colspan=2 style="background-color: Шаблон:Party color" \|	Файл:Logopdc2020.svg Christian Democratic Party (PDC)	Christian democracy	Felipe Delpin	^[13]
	colspan=2 style="background-color: Шаблон:Party color" \|	Файл:Partido Humanista (corto).svg Humanist Party (PH)	Universal humanism	Natalia Ibáñez	^[14]
	colspan=2 style="background-color: Шаблон:Party color" \|	Файл:Partido Ecologista Verde de Chile.svg Green Ecologist Party (PEV)	Green politics	Félix González Gatica	^[15]
Шаблон:Cross Reject	colspan=2 style="background-color: Шаблон:Party color" \|	Файл:Chile Vamos corto.png Chile Vamos (ChV)	Liberal conservatism	Sebastián Sichel	^[16]
	rowspan="3" style="background-color: Шаблон:Party color" \|	style="background-color:Шаблон:Party color"\|	Файл:UDI 2017 (recorte).svg Independent Democratic Union (UDI)	Conservatism		Javier Macaya
	style="background-color:Шаблон:Party color"\|	Файл:Logo del Partido político Renovación Nacional (RN), Chile.svg National Renewal (RN)	Conservatism	Francisco Chahuán
	style="background-color:Шаблон:Party color"\|	Файл:Evópoli2.png Political Evolution (Evópoli)	Classical liberalism	Luz Poblete Coddou
	colspan=2 style="background-color: Шаблон:Party color" \|	Файл:Partido Republicano (Chile, 2019).svg Republican Party (PLR)	National conservatism	Rojo Edwards	^[17]
	colspan=2 style="background-color: Шаблон:Party color" \|	Party of the People (PDG)	Populism	Franco Parisi	^[18]

Opinion polls

The tables below list opinion polling results in reverse chronological order, showing the most recent first and using the dates when the survey fieldwork was done, as opposed to the date of publication. Where the fieldwork dates are unknown, the date of publication is given instead. The highest percentage figure in each polling survey is displayed with its background shaded in the leading option's color. The "Lead" column on the right shows the percentage-point difference between the options in a poll.

Voting intention estimates

Шаблон:Graph:Chart The table below lists weighted voting intention estimates. Refusals are generally excluded from the party vote percentages, while question wording and the treatment of "don't know" responses and those not intending to vote may vary between polling organizations.

Шаблон:Smaller

Шаблон:Smaller

Polling firm/Commissioner	Fieldwork date	Sample size	Approve	Reject	Lead
Polling firm/Commissioner	Fieldwork date	Sample size			Lead

2022 Chilean national plebiscite	4 Sep 2022	—	38.1	61.9	–23.8

AtlasIntel^{[p 1]}	1–3 Sep 2022	3,270	41.9	58.1	–16.2
Cadem^{[p 2]}	31 Aug–2 Sep 2022	1,415	47.1	52.9	–5.8
UDD^{[p 3]}	17–19 Aug 2022	8,691	44.3	55.7	–11.4
Cadem^{[p 4]}	17–19 Aug 2022	1,007	44.6	55.4	–10.8
AtlasIntel^{[p 5]}	16–19 Aug 2022	2,735	41.6	58.4	–16.8
Activa^{[p 6]}	16–19 Aug 2022	2,089	41.8	58.2	–16.5
Signos^{[p 7]}	14–19 Aug 2022	1,095	48.1	51.9	–3.8
Cadem^{[p 8]}	10–12 Aug 2022	1,015	45.2	54.8	–9.5
Activa^{[p 9]}	10–12 Aug 2022	1,514	43.3	56.7	–13.4
Signos^{[p 10]}	7–11 Aug 2022	728	46.5	53.5	–7.0
Data Influye^{[p 11]}	5–7 Aug 2022	1,650	47.3	52.7	–5.4
Cadem^{[p 12]}	3–5 Aug 2022	704	44.0	56.0	–12.0
Activa^{[p 13]}	2–5 Aug 2022	1,224	40.2	59.8	–19.6
Signos^{[p 14]}	31 Jul–4 Aug 2022	715	45.4	54.6	–9.2
MORI/FIEL^{[p 15]}	28 Jul–2 Aug 2022	1,500	48.4	51.6	–3.3
Criteria^{[p 16]}	29 Jul–1 Aug 2022	1,000	44.4	55.6	–11.2
Cadem^{[p 17]}	27–29 Jul 2022	706	44.2	55.8	–11.6
Signos^{[p 18]}	24–28 Jul 2022	778	43.9	56.1	–12.2
Criteria^{[p 19]}	22–26 Jul 2022	1,512	45.0	55.0	–10.0
Cadem^{[p 20]}	20–22 Jul 2022	701	45.3	54.7	–9.4
Activa^{[p 21]}	19–22 Jul 2022	1,241	39.6	60.4	–20.8
UDD^{[p 22]}	20–21 Jul 2022	8,542	43.2	56.8	–13.6
Signos^{[p 23]}	18–21 Jul 2022	701	42.5	57.5	–15.0
Cadem^{[p 24]}	13–15 Jul 2022	702	41.6	58.4	–16.8
Signos^{[p 25]}	11–14 Jul 2022	703	36.9	63.1	–26.2
Cadem^{[p 26]}	6–8 Jul 2022	708	39.8	60.2	–20.4
Activa^{[p 27]}	5–8 Jul 2022	1,205	37.3	62.7	–24.6
Signos^{[p 28]}	4–7 Jul 2022	710	39.3	60.7	–21.6
Feedback^{[p 29]}	4–6 Jul 2022	2,842	39.5	60.5	–21.0
Data Influye^{[p 30]}	1–4 Jul 2022	1,555	47.1	52.9	–5.8
Criteria^{[p 31]}	30 Jun–4 Jul 2022	1,018	39.2	60.8	–21.6
Cadem^{[p 32]}	29 Jun–1 Jul 2022	707	40.0	60.0	–20.0
UDD^{[p 33]}	28–29 Jun 2022	1,044	42.2	57.8	–15.6
Signos^{[p 34]}	26–29 Jun 2022	841	39.1	60.9	–22.2
Cadem^{[p 35]}	22–24 Jun 2022	702	39.3	60.7	–21.4
Activa^{[p 36]}	20–24 Jun 2022	1,005	36.0	64.0	–28.0
MORI/FIEL^{[p 37]}	9–24 Jun 2022	1,000	47.0	53.0	–6.0
Signos^{[p 38]}	18–22 Jun 2022	803	40.4	59.6	–19.2
Cadem^{[p 39]}	15–17 Jun 2022	703	44.6	55.4	–10.8
Cadem^{[p 40]}	8–10 Jun 2022	702	47.6	52.4	–4.8
Activa^{[p 41]}	6–10 Jun 2022	1,247	41.5	58.5	–17.0
Cadem^{[p 42]}	2–3 Jun 2022	702	48.3	51.7	–3.4
Criteria^{[p 43]}	27–31 May 2022	1,059	44.3	55.7	–11.4
CEP^{[p 44]}	13 Apr–29 May 2022	1,355	48.1	51.9	–3.8
Data Influye^{[p 45]}	27–29 May 2022	1,451	47.1	52.9	–5.8
Cadem^{[p 46]}	25–27 May 2022	704	45.1	54.9	–9.8
Activa^{[p 47]}	23–27 May 2022	1,015	38.7	61.3	–22.6
Cadem^{[p 48]}	18–20 May 2022	708	44.6	55.4	–10.8
Datavoz^{[p 49]}	11–17 May 2022	1,337	37.3	62.7	–25.4
Cadem^{[p 50]}	11–13 May 2022	706	45.2	54.8	–9.6
Activa^{[p 51]}	10–13 May 2022	1,016	37.3	62.7	–25.4
Black&White^{[p 52]}	9–11 May 2022	?	38.1	61.9	–23.8
Cadem^{[p 53]}	4–6 May 2022	705	42.2	57.8	–15.6
Data Influye^{[p 54]}	29 Apr–2 May 2022	1,651	44.6	55.4	–10.8
Criteria^{[p 55]}	28 Apr–2 May 2022	1,640	44.3	55.7	–11.4
Cadem^{[p 56]}	27–29 Apr 2022	703	43.9	56.1	–12.2
Activa^{[p 57]}	25–29 Apr 2022	1,043	42.2	57.8	–15.6
La Cosa Nostra^{[p 58]}	9–26 Apr 2022	600	40.8	59.2	–18.4
Studio Publico^{[p 59]}	23–25 Apr 2022	?	33.7	66.3	–32.6
UDD^{[p 60]}	24 Apr 2022	?	43.8	56.2	–12.4
Cadem^{[p 61]}	20–22 Apr 2022	704	44.6	55.4	–10.8
Cadem^{[p 62]}	12–14 Apr 2022	702	45.8	54.2	–8.4
Criteria/Zoom^{[p 63]}	12–14 Apr 2022	?	49.2	50.8	–1.6
Activa^{[p 64]}	11–14 Apr 2022	1,326	46.7	53.3	–6.6
Cadem^{[p 65]}	6–7 Apr 2022	707	47.0	53.0	–6.0
UDD^{[p 66]}	5–6 Apr 2022	1,002	47.8	52.2	–4.4
Criteria^{[p 67]}	31 Mar–4 Apr 2022	813	47.6	52.4	–4.6
Data Influye^{[p 68]}	1–3 Apr 2022	1,671	50.6	49.4	+1.2
Cadem^{[p 69]}	30 Mar–1 Apr 2022	707	46.5	53.5	–7.0
Activa^{[p 70]}	28 Mar–1 Apr 2022	1,521	47.2	52.8	–5.6
Datavoz^{[p 71]}	15–31 Mar 2022	1,650	46.0	54.0	–8.0
Studio Publico^{[p 72]}	25–28 Mar 2022	914	39.4	60.6	–21.2
Cadem^{[p 73]}	23–25 Mar 2022	704	56.1	43.9	+12.2
UDD^{[p 74]}	22–23 Mar 2022	?	53.1	46.9	+6.5
Activa^{[p 75]}	18–19 Mar 2022	1,004	54.7	45.3	+9.4
Cadem^{[p 76]}	16–18 Mar 2022	702	58.2	41.8	+16.4
Feedback^{[p 77]}	16–18 Mar 2022	1,804	48.2	51.8	–3.6
Cadem^{[p 78]}	9–11 Mar 2022	708	54.5	45.5	+9.0
UDD^{[p 79]}	7–8 Mar 2022	1,028	52.6	47.4	+5.2
Data Influye^{[p 80]}	3–6 Mar 2022	1,466	59.2	40.8	+18.4
Cadem^{[p 81]}	2–4 Mar 2022	713	54.3	45.7	+8.6
Criteria^{[p 82]}	25–28 Feb 2022	872	63.2	36.8	+26.4
Studio Publico^{[p 83]}	22–28 Feb 2022	1,158	41.8	58.2	–16.4
Cadem^{[p 84]}	23–25 Feb 2022	712	59.5	40.5	+19.0
MORI/FIEL^{[p 85]}	5–16 Feb 2022	1,000	67.9	32.1	+35.8
Cadem^{[p 86]}	9–11 Feb 2022	706	55.3	44.7	+10.6
Datavoz^{[p 87]}	22 Jan–7 Feb 2022	1,413	56.1	43.9	+12.2
Studio Publico^{[p 88]}	25–31 Jan 2022	1,037	53.1	46.9	+6.2
UDD^{[p 74]}	30 Jan 2022	?	62.7	37.3	+25.4
Cadem^{[p 89]}	26–28 Jan 2022	707	62.9	37.1	+25.8
UDD^{[p 74]}	16 Jan 2022	?	66.7	33.3	+33.4
UDD^{[p 74]}	28 Nov 2021	?	56.9	43.1	+13.8
UDD^{[p 74]}	14 Nov 2021	?	57.8	42.2	+15.6

Voting preferences

The table below lists raw, unweighted voting preferences.

Polling firm/Commissioner	Fieldwork date	Sample size	Approve	Reject	Шаблон:Qmark	Lead
Polling firm/Commissioner	Fieldwork date	Sample size			Шаблон:Qmark	Lead

2022 Chilean national plebiscite	4 Sep 2022	—	37.3	60.6	2.1	–23.3

Cadem^{[p 2]}	31 Aug–2 Sep 2022	1,415	40	45	15	–5
UDD^{[p 3]}	17–19 Aug 2022	8,691	39	49	12	–10
Cadem^{[p 4]}	17–19 Aug 2022	1,007	37	46	17	–9
AtlasIntel^{[p 5]}	16–19 Aug 2022	2,735	39.0	54.8	6.2	–15.8
Activa^{[p 6]}	16–19 Aug 2022	2,089	32.9	45.8	21.3	–12.9
Signos^{[p 7]}	14–19 Aug 2022	1,095	42.6	45.9	11.5	–3.3
Cadem^{[p 8]}	10–12 Aug 2022	1,015	38	46	16	–8
Activa^{[p 9]}	10–12 Aug 2022	1,514	33.9	44.4	21.7	–10.5
Signos^{[p 10]}	7–11 Aug 2022	728	38.2	43.9	17.9	–5.7
Data Influye^{[p 11]}	5–7 Aug 2022	1,650	43	48	9	–5
Cadem^{[p 12]}	3–5 Aug 2022	704	37	47	16	–10
Activa^{[p 13]}	2–5 Aug 2022	1,224	29.9	44.5	25.6	–14.6
Signos^{[p 14]}	31 Jul–4 Aug 2022	715	38.1	45.8	16.1	–7.7
MORI/FIEL^{[p 15]}	28 Jul–2 Aug 2022	1,500	44	47	9	–3
Criteria^{[p 16]}	29 Jul–1 Aug 2022	1,000	36	45	19	–9
Cadem^{[p 17]}	27–29 Jul 2022	706	38	48	14	–10
Signos^{[p 18]}	24–28 Jul 2022	778	37.0	47.3	15.7	–10.3
Criteria^{[p 19]}	22–26 Jul 2022	1,512	36	44	20	–8
Cadem^{[p 20]}	20–22 Jul 2022	701	39	47	14	–8
Activa^{[p 21]}	19–22 Jul 2022	1,241	30.1	46.0	23.9	–15.9
UDD^{[p 22]}	20–21 Jul 2022	8,542	38	50	12	–12
Signos^{[p 23]}	18–21 Jul 2022	701	35.4	47.8	16.8	–12.4
Cadem^{[p 24]}	13–15 Jul 2022	702	37	52	11	–15
Signos^{[p 25]}	11–14 Jul 2022	703	29.6	50.7	19.7	–21.1
Cadem^{[p 26]}	6–8 Jul 2022	708	35	53	12	–18
Activa^{[p 27]}	5–8 Jul 2022	1,205	28.0	46.3	25.7	–18.3
Signos^{[p 28]}	4–7 Jul 2022	710	32.4	50.1	17.5	–17.7
Feedback^{[p 29]}	4–6 Jul 2022	2,842	34	2	14	–18
Data Influye^{[p 30]}	1–4 Jul 2022	1,555	41	46	13	–5
Criteria^{[p 31]}	30 Jun–4 Jul 2022	1,018	31	48	21	–17
Cadem^{[p 32]}	29 Jun–1 Jul 2022	707	34	51	15	–17
UDD^{[p 33]}	28–29 Jun 2022	1,044	38	52	10	–14
Signos^{[p 34]}	26–29 Jun 2022	841	29.9	46.5	23.6	–16.6
Cadem^{[p 35]}	22–24 Jun 2022	702	33	51	16	–18
Activa^{[p 36]}	20–24 Jun 2022	1,005	25.0	44.4	30.6	–19.4
MORI/FIEL^{[p 37]}	9–24 Jun 2022	1,000	31	35	34	–4
Signos^{[p 38]}	18–22 Jun 2022	803	31.5	46.5	22.0	–15.0
Cadem^{[p 39]}	15–17 Jun 2022	703	37	46	17	–9
Cadem^{[p 40]}	8–10 Jun 2022	702	39	43	18	–4
Activa^{[p 41]}	6–10 Jun 2022	1,247	29.7	41.9	28.4	–12.2
Cadem^{[p 42]}	2–3 Jun 2022	702	42	45	13	–3
Criteria^{[p 43]}	27–31 May 2022	1,059	31	39	30	–8
CEP^{[p 44]}	13 Apr–29 May 2022	1,355	25	27	48	–2
Data Influye^{[p 45]}	27–29 May 2022	1,451	40	45	15	–5
Cadem^{[p 46]}	25–27 May 2022	704	37	45	18	–8
Activa^{[p 47]}	23–27 May 2022	1,015	28.5	45.2	26.3	–16.7
Cadem^{[p 48]}	18–20 May 2022	708	37	46	17	–9
Datavoz^{[p 49]}	11–17 May 2022	1,337	28	47	25	–19
Cadem^{[p 50]}	11–13 May 2022	706	38	46	16	–8
Activa^{[p 51]}	10–13 May 2022	1,016	27.1	45.5	27.4	–18.4
Black&White^{[p 52]}	9–11 May 2022	?	32	52	17	–20
Cadem^{[p 53]}	4–6 May 2022	705	35	48	17	–13
Data Influye^{[p 54]}	29 Apr–2 May 2022	1,651	37	46	17	–9
Criteria^{[p 55]}	28 Apr–2 May 2022	1,640	31	39	30	–8
Cadem^{[p 56]}	27–29 Apr 2022	703	36	46	18	–10
Activa^{[p 57]}	25–29 Apr 2022	1,043	29.1	40.5	30.4	–11.4
La Cosa Nostra^{[p 58]}	9–26 Apr 2022	600	40	58	2	–18
Studio Publico^{[p 59]}	23–25 Apr 2022	?	30.4	59.7	9.9	–29.3
UDD^{[p 60]}	24 Apr 2022	?	32	41	26	–9
Cadem^{[p 61]}	20–22 Apr 2022	704	37	46	17	–9
Cadem^{[p 62]}	12–14 Apr 2022	702	38	45	17	–7
Criteria/Zoom^{[p 63]}	12–14 Apr 2022	?	31	32	37	–1
Activa^{[p 64]}	11–14 Apr 2022	1,326	32.2	36.8	31.0	–4.6
Cadem^{[p 65]}	6–7 Apr 2022	707	39	44	17	–5
UDD^{[p 66]}	5–6 Apr 2022	1,002	33	36	31	–3
Criteria^{[p 67]}	31 Mar–4 Apr 2022	813	30	33	37	–3
Data Influye^{[p 68]}	1–3 Apr 2022	1,671	39	38	23	+1
Cadem^{[p 69]}	30 Mar–1 Apr 2022	707	40	46	14	–6
Activa^{[p 70]}	28 Mar–1 Apr 2022	1,521	32.0	35.8	32.2	–3.8
Datavoz^{[p 71]}	15–31 Mar 2022	1,650	40.9	48.0	11.2	–7.1
Studio Publico^{[p 72]}	25–28 Mar 2022	914	34.9	53.6	11.6	–18.7
Cadem^{[p 73]}	23–25 Mar 2022	704	46	36	18	+10
UDD^{[p 74]}	22–23 Mar 2022	?	43	38	21	+6.5
Activa^{[p 75]}	18–19 Mar 2022	1,004	37.7	31.2	31.1	+6.5
Cadem^{[p 76]}	16–18 Mar 2022	702	46	33	21	+13
Feedback^{[p 77]}	16–18 Mar 2022	1,804	41	44	16	–3
Cadem^{[p 78]}	9–11 Mar 2022	708	42	35	23	+7
UDD^{[p 79]}	7–8 Mar 2022	1,028	40	36	24	+4
Data Influye^{[p 80]}	3–6 Mar 2022	1,466	45	31	24	+14
Cadem^{[p 81]}	2–4 Mar 2022	713	44	37	19	+7
Criteria^{[p 82]}	25–28 Feb 2022	872	36	21	43	+15
Studio Publico^{[p 83]}	22–28 Feb 2022	1,158	34.5	48.1	17.5	–13.6
Cadem^{[p 84]}	23–25 Feb 2022	712	47	32	21	+15
MORI/FIEL^{[p 85]}	5–16 Feb 2022	1,000	36	17	47	+19
Cadem^{[p 86]}	9–11 Feb 2022	706	47	38	15	+9
Datavoz^{[p 87]}	22 Jan–7 Feb 2022	1,413	46	36	17	+10
Studio Publico^{[p 88]}	25–31 Jan 2022	1,037	40.5	35.8	23.6	+4.7
UDD^{[p 74]}	30 Jan 2022	?	42	25	33	+17
Cadem^{[p 89]}	26–28 Jan 2022	707	56	33	11	+33
UDD^{[p 74]}	16 Jan 2022	?	42	21	37	+21
UDD^{[p 74]}	28 Nov 2021	?	37	28	35	+9
UDD^{[p 74]}	14 Nov 2021	?	37	27	36	+10
2020 Chilean national plebiscite	25 Oct 2020	—	77.9	21.6	0.5	+56.3

Results

Шаблон:Referendum results

Analysis

Файл:Celebraciones por el triunfo del Rechazo a una Nueva Constitución en Chile, septiembre de 2022.jpg

Celebrations for the triumph of the Rejection of a New Constitution in Chile, 4 September 2022.

Chileans' views on the new constitution changed throughout the process of the Constitutional Convention. When the Constitutional Convention started meeting in August 2021, participants in a national poll were asked if they believed that the new constitution resulting from the process would help solve Chile's problems, have no effect, or worsen the current situation, 49% said it would have a positive effect, and 15% said it would have a negative effect. By May 2022, 36% of Chileans said that they believed the new constitution would have a positive effect, a drop from the previous poll.^[19] In a study carried out by the independent think tank Espacio Público-IPSOS in July 2022, 38% of respondents believed that the new constitution would bring about several negative changes for the country, while 23% believed it would bring positive changes.^[20]

Doubts about the representativeness of the Constitutional Convention's members may have led to its rejection. Respondents to Espacio Público-IPSOS' survey felt the members of the Constitutional Convention were unrepresentative of Chileans as a whole; 59% of respondents said they did not believe the composition of the Constitutional Convention was a good representation of the diversity of Chilean society, and 63% of respondents said they did not feel represented by the Constitutional Convention.^[20]

Chileans were also skeptical of particular elements of the new constitution. The indigenous justice system, the plurinational state, and the role of Congress created the most concern. The language of the new constitution declared, "Chile is a Plurinational and Intercultural State that recognizes the coexistence of diverse nations and peoples within the framework of the unity of the State."^[21] Regarding an indigenous justice system, the new constitution also declared that "pre-existing indigenous peoples and nations, as well as their members, are entitled to the full exercise of their collective and individual rights by virtue of their self-determination."^[21] These new elements generated fears about internal divisions and competing sources of justice to the generally centrist Chilean citizenry.^[22]^[20] Participants believed that the new constitution would worsen the sale and consumption of drugs, unemployment, poverty and political corruption.^[20]^[23]

Throughout the process, right-wing groups and conservative media in Chile led a negative campaign that spread misinformation about the proposed constitution and the members drafting it.^[24]

Aftermath

Boric announced a new process for drafting a new constitution, with Al Jazeera writing, "Most Chileans and their politicians have agreed the constitution that dates from the dictatorship must change." Boric called on the heads of all political parties for a meeting on Monday, 5 September 2022, to chart a path forward.^[25] As a result of the rejection, the incumbent 1980 Constitution will remain in force, with The Guardian writing that "Chile's future looks decidedly uncertain," and that, "Boric has expressed a willingness to repeat the constitutional process, but the basis for reform is still very much up for debate."^[26] Colombian president Gustavo Petro lamented the win of the rejection vote, considering that Chile had decided to "revive Augusto Pinochet".^[27]

The Economist considered that "common sense" had led Chileans to reject the proposed constitution, it also called the result a "blow" for the government of Gabriel Boric.^[28]

In the aftermath of the plebiscite the internal division that the Christian Democratic Party's official support for the "Approve" option had created resurfaced, with various calls for a renewed leadership, and some calling for the explusion of members who had supported the "Reject" option.^[29]

References

Opinion poll sources

Шаблон:Reflist

Other

Шаблон:Reflist

External links

Шаблон:Commonscatinline

Шаблон:Chilean elections

Ошибка цитирования Для существующих тегов <ref> группы «p» не найдено соответствующего тега <references group="p"/>

[pleb0409-1] 1,0 ^1,1 Шаблон:Cite web

[2] Шаблон:Cite web

[3] Шаблон:Cite news

[4] Шаблон:Cite news

[5] Шаблон:Cite web

[6] Шаблон:Cite news

[7] Шаблон:Cite web

[cpr80-8] 8,0 ^8,1 Шаблон:Cite web

[9] Шаблон:Cite web

[10] Шаблон:Cite web

[11] Шаблон:Cite web

[12] Шаблон:Cite web

[13] Шаблон:Cite web

[14] Шаблон:Cite web Шаблон:Unreliable source?Шаблон:Dead link

[15] Шаблон:Cite web

[16] Шаблон:Cite web

[17] Шаблон:Cite news

[18] Шаблон:Cite web

[108] Шаблон:Cite book

[:0-109] 20,0 ^20,1 ^20,2 ^20,3 Шаблон:Cite web

[:1-110] 21,0 ^21,1 Шаблон:Cite web

[111] Шаблон:Cite web

[112] Шаблон:Cite web

[113] Шаблон:Cite web

[114] Шаблон:Cite web

[115] Шаблон:Cite web

[116] Шаблон:Cite web

[117] Шаблон:Cite news

[118] Шаблон:Cite news

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[p 1]

[p 2]

[p 3]

[p 4]

[p 5]

[p 6]

[p 7]

[p 8]

[p 9]

[p 10]

[p 11]

[p 12]

[p 13]

[p 14]

[p 15]

[p 16]

[p 17]

[p 18]

[p 19]

[p 20]

[p 21]

[p 22]

[p 23]

[p 24]

[p 25]

[p 26]

[p 27]

[p 28]

[p 29]

[p 30]

[p 31]

[p 32]

[p 33]

[p 34]

[p 35]

[p 36]

[p 37]

[p 38]

[p 39]

[p 40]

[p 41]

[p 42]

[p 43]

[p 44]

[p 45]

[p 46]

[p 47]

[p 48]

[p 49]

[p 50]

[p 51]

[p 52]

[p 53]

[p 54]

[p 55]

[p 56]

[p 57]

[p 58]

[p 59]

[p 60]

[p 61]

[p 62]

[p 63]

[p 64]

[p 65]

[p 66]

[p 67]

[p 68]

[p 69]

[p 70]

[p 71]

[p 72]

[p 73]

[p 74]

[p 75]

[p 76]

[p 77]

[p 78]

[p 79]

[p 80]

[p 81]

[p 82]

Партнерские ресурсы
Криптовалюты	Обмен криптовалют - www.bestchange.ru Криптовалютная биржа CoinEx Криптовалютная биржа Binance HIVE OS - операционная система для майнинга e4pool - Мультивалютный пул для майнинга.
Магазины	AliExpress — глобальная виртуальная (в Интернете) торговая площадка, предоставляющая возможность покупать товары производителей из КНР; computeruniverse.net - Интернет-магазин компьютеров(Промо код 5 Евро на первую покупку:FWWC3ZKQ);
Хостинг	DigitalOcean - американский провайдер облачных инфраструктур, с главным офисом в Нью-Йорке и с центрами обработки данных по всему миру;
Разное	Викиум - Онлайн-тренажер для мозга Like Центр - Центр поддержки и развития предпринимательства. Gamersbay - лучший магазин по бустингу для World of Warcraft. Ноотропы OmniMind N°1 - Усиливает мозговую активность. Повышает мотивацию. Улучшает память. Санкт-Петербургская школа телевидения - это федеральная сеть образовательных центров, которая имеет филиалы в 37 городах России. Lingualeo.com — интерактивный онлайн-сервис для изучения и практики английского языка в увлекательной игровой форме. Junyschool (Джунискул) – международная школа программирования и дизайна для детей и подростков от 5 до 17 лет, где ученики осваивают компьютерную грамотность, развивают алгоритмическое и креативное мышление, изучают основы программирования и компьютерной графики, создают собственные проекты: игры, сайты, программы, приложения, анимации, 3D-модели, монтируют видео. Умназия - Интерактивные онлайн-курсы и тренажеры для развития мышления детей 6-13 лет SkillBox - это один из лидеров российского рынка онлайн-образования. Среди партнеров Skillbox ведущий разработчик сервисного дизайна AIC, медиа-компания Yoola, первое и самое крупное русскоязычное аналитическое агентство Tagline, онлайн-школа дизайна и иллюстрации Bang! Bang! Education, оператор PR-рынка PACO, студия рисования Draw&Go, агентство performance-маркетинга Ingate, scrum-студия Sibirix, имидж-лаборатория Персона. «Нетология» — это университет по подготовке и дополнительному обучению специалистов в области интернет-маркетинга, управления проектами и продуктами, дизайна, Data Science и разработки. В рамках Нетологии студенты получают ценные теоретические знания от лучших экспертов Рунета, выполняют практические задания на отработку полученных навыков, общаются с экспертами и единомышленниками. Познакомиться со всеми продуктами подробнее можно на сайте https://netology.ru, линейка курсов и профессий постоянно обновляется. StudyBay Brazil – это онлайн биржа для португалоговорящих студентов и авторов! Студент получает уникальную работу любого уровня сложности и больше свободного времени, в то время как у автора появляется дополнительный заработок и бесценный опыт. Автор24 — самая большая в России площадка по написанию учебных работ: контрольные и курсовые работы, дипломы, рефераты, решение задач, отчеты по практике, а так же любой другой вид работы. Сервис сотрудничает с более 70 000 авторов. Более 1 000 000 работ уже выполнено. StudyBay – это онлайн биржа для англоязычных студентов и авторов! Студент получает уникальную работу любого уровня сложности и больше свободного времени, в то время как у автора появляется дополнительный заработок и бесценный опыт.

Английская Википедия:2022 Chilean constitutional referendum

Содержание