Английская Википедия:4.2-kiloyear event

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description

Файл:Global distribution of the Bond Holocene IRD Event 3 also named 4.2 kiloyear event. The hatched areas were affected by wet conditions or flooding and the dotted areas by drought or dust storms.jpg
Global distribution of the 4.2 kiloyear event. The hatched areas were affected by wet conditions or flooding, and the dotted areas by drought or dust storms.[1]

The 4.2-kiloyear (thousand years) BP aridification event (long-term drought), also known as the 4.2 ka event,[2] was one of the most severe climatic events of the Holocene epoch.[3] It defines the beginning of the current Meghalayan age in the Holocene epoch.

Starting around 2200 BC, it probably lasted the entire 22nd century BC. It has been hypothesised to have caused the collapse of the Old Kingdom in Egypt, the Akkadian Empire in Mesopotamia, and the Liangzhu culture in the lower Yangtze River area.[4][5] The drought may also have initiated the collapse of the Indus Valley Civilisation, with some of its population moving southeastward to follow the movement of their desired habitat,[6] as well as the migration of Indo-European-speaking people into India.[7] Some scientists disagree with that conclusion, citing evidence that the event was not a global drought and did not happen in a clear timeline.[8]

Causes

Modelling evidence suggests that the 4.2 ka event was the result of a significant weakening of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC), disrupting global ocean currents and generating precipitation and temperature changes in various regions.[9][10] The Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) abruptly shifted southward.[11][12] Evidence suggests increased El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) variability also played a role in generating the climatic conditions associated with the event.[13] Explosive volcanism in Iceland has also been proposed as a cause,[14] though the low sulphur content of Icelandic volcanoes has led other studies to suggest it had a negligible impact on global climate.[15]

Evidence

Файл:Greenland Gisp2 Temperature.svg
Central Greenland reconstructed temperature. Unlike the 8.2-kiloyear event, the 4.2-kiloyear event has no prominent signal in the Gisp2 ice core that has an onset at 4.2 ka BP.Шаблон:Citation needed

A phase of intense aridity about 4.2 ka BP is recorded across North Africa,[16] the Middle East,[17] the Red Sea,[18] the Arabian Peninsula,[19] the Indian subcontinent,[6] and midcontinental North America.[20] Glaciers throughout the mountain ranges of western Canada advanced about that time.[21] Iceland also experienced glacial advance.[15] Evidence has also been found in an Italian cave flowstone,[22] the Kilimanjaro ice sheet,[23] and in Andean glacier ice.[24] The onset of the aridification in Mesopotamia in about 4100 BP also coincided with a cooling event in the North Atlantic, known as Bond event 3.[3][25][26] Despite the geographic diversity of these examples, evidence for the 4.2 ka event in Northern Europe is ambiguous, which suggests that the origins and effects of the event are spatially complex.[2]

In 2018, the International Commission on Stratigraphy divided the Holocene epoch into three periods,[27] with the late Holocene from approximately 2250 BC onwards designated as the Meghalayan stage/age.[28] The boundary stratotype is a speleothem in Mawmluh cave in India,[29] and the global auxiliary stratotype is an ice core from Mount Logan in Canada.[30] However, justification for this division is debated as the event was not a global drought and did not happen within a clear timeframe. Jessica Tierney, a paleoclimatologist at the University of Arizona in Tucson, states that proponents of the new partitioning mistakenly "lumped together evidence of other droughts and wet periods, sometimes centuries away from the event."[8]

Effects

Europe

British Isles

In Ireland, there is little definitive record of the 4.2 ka event outside of a brief isotopic excursion in some cave speleothem records. The manner in which this climatic event manifested itself in the region is thus unclear.[31] In Great Britain as in Ireland, the nature of the 4.2 ka event is ambiguous and unclear.[2]

Eastern Europe

Analysis of sediments from Lake Spore reveals that in Poland, winters became colder between 4250 and 4000 BP, with this cooling likely responsible for a podzolisation (generation of boreal forest soil type) event around 4200 BP, whereas summer temperatures remained constant. Humidity levels were not affected by the 4.2 ka event.[32]

Iberian Peninsula

In the Alboran Sea, the western Mediterranean, a dry phase occurred from about 4400 BP to 4300 BP but was abruptly followed by a shift towards wetter conditions, suggesting a more complex pattern of climate change than other regions during the 4.2 ka event.[33]

On the Iberian Peninsula, the construction of motillas-type settlements in the period after 2200 BC is believed to be the consequence of the severe aridification that affected this area. According to M. Meíjas Moreno, who reported the first palaeohydrogeological interdisciplinary research in La Mancha, Spain, these motillas may represent the oldest, most ancient system of groundwater collection in the Iberian Peninsula and their construction might have been directly connected to the prolonged, harsh drought and other climatic perturbations brought by the 4.2 ka event. The authors' analysis verified a relationship between the geological substrate and the spatial distribution of the motillas.[34]

Italian Peninsula

In the Gulf of Genoa, mean annual temperature dropped, winters became drier, and summers became wetter and cooler, a phenomenon most likely caused by the southward retreat of the ITCZ in summer that weakened the high pressure and reduced ocean warming over the western Mediterranean, which led to retarded evaporation rates in the autumn and early winter.[35] The 4.2 ka event appears to have wettened the climate in the Alps.[36] Lake Petit saw increased precipitation during the ice-free season, evidenced by an increase in δ18Odiatom.[37] Southern Italy, in contrast, experienced intense aridification.[36] A major decline in forests occurred in Italy as a result of the climatic perturbation.[38]

North Africa

At the site of Sidi Ali in the Middle Atlas, δ18O values indicate not a dry spell but a centennial-scale period of cooler and more humid climate.[39] In c. 2150 BC, Egypt was hit by a series of exceptionally low Nile floods that may have influenced the collapse of the centralised government of the Old Kingdom after a famine.[40]

Middle East

The south-central Levant experienced two phases of dry climate punctuated by a wet interval in between and thus the 4.2 ka event in the region has been termed a W-shaped event.[41]

Enhanced dust flux coeval with δ18O peaks is recorded in Mesopotamia from 4260 to 3970 BP, reflecting intense aridity.[42] The aridification of Mesopotamia may have been related to the onset of cooler sea-surface temperatures in the North Atlantic (Bond event 3), as analysis of the modern instrumental record shows that large (50%) interannual reductions in Mesopotamian water supply result when subpolar northwest Atlantic sea surface temperatures are anomalously cool.[43] The headwaters of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers are fed by elevation-induced capture of winter Mediterranean rainfall.

The Akkadian Empire in 2300 BC was the second civilisation to subsume independent societies into a single state (the first being ancient Egypt in around 3100 BC). It has been claimed that the collapse of the state was influenced by a wide-ranging, centuries-long drought.[44][45] Archaeological evidence documents widespread abandonment of the agricultural plains of northern Mesopotamia and dramatic influxes of refugees into southern Mesopotamia, around 2170 BC,[46] which may have weakened the Akkadian state.[47] A 180-km-long wall, the "Repeller of the Amorites", was built across central Mesopotamia to stem nomadic incursions to the south. Around 2150 BC, the Gutian people, who originally inhabited the Zagros Mountains, defeated the demoralised Akkadian army, took Akkad and destroyed it around 2115 BC. Widespread agricultural change in the Near East is visible at the end of the 3rd millennium BC.[48] Resettlement of the northern plains by smaller sedentary populations occurred near 1900 BC, three centuries after the collapse.[46]

In the Persian Gulf region, there was a sudden change in settlement pattern, style of pottery and tombs. The 22nd century BC drought marks the end of the Umm Al Nar culture and the change to the Wadi Suq culture.[19] A study of fossil corals in Oman provides evidence that prolonged winter shamal seasons, around 4200 years ago, led to the salinization of the irrigated field, which made a dramatic decrease in crop production trigger a widespread famine and eventually the collapse of the ancient Akkadian Empire.[49][50]

South and Central Asia

The Siberian High increased in area and magnitude, which blocked moisture-carrying westerly winds, causing intense aridity in Central Asia.[51]

The Indian Summer Monsoon (ISM) and Indian Winter Monsoon (IWM) both declined in strength, leading to highly arid conditions in northwestern South Asia.[52] The ISM's decline is evident from low Mn/Ti and Mn/Fe values in Rara Lake from this time.[53] The area around PankangTeng Tso Lake in the Tawang district of Arunachal Pradesh had cold and dry conditions and was dominated by subalpine vegetation.[54] Though some proxy records suggest a prolonged, multicentennial dry period, others indicate that the 4.2 ka event was a series of multidecadal droughts instead.[55][56]

Effects on the Indus Valley civilisation

Шаблон:Main

In the 2nd millennium BC, widespread aridification occurred in the Eurasian steppes and in South Asia.[7][57] On the steppes, the vegetation changed, driving "higher mobility and transition to the nomadic cattle breeding."[57]Шаблон:Refn Water shortage also strongly affected South Asia: Шаблон:Quote

Urban centers of the Indus Valley Civilisation were abandoned and replaced by disparate local cultures because of the same climate change that affected the neighbouring regions to the west.[58] Шаблон:As of, many scholars believed that drought and a decline in trade with Egypt and Mesopotamia caused the collapse of the Indus civilisation.[59] The Ghaggar-Hakra system was rain-fed,[60][61][62] and water supply depended on the monsoons. The Indus Valley climate grew significantly cooler and drier from about 1800 BC, which is linked to a contemporary general weakening of the monsoon.[60] Aridity increased, with the Ghaggar-Hakra River retracting its reach towards the foothills of the Himalayas,[60][63][64] leading to erratic and less-extensive floods, which made inundation agriculture less sustainable. Aridification reduced the water supply enough to cause the civilisation's demise, and to scatter its population eastward.[6][65][66][67]

East Asia

The 4.2 ka event resulted in an enormous reduction in the strength of the East Asian Summer Monsoon (EASM).[68] This profound weakening of the EASM has been postulated to have resulted from a reduction in the strength of the AMOC;[69] the cooling of North Atlantic waters led to retardation of northward movements of the EASM and diminished rainfall on its northern margin.[68] A stark humidity gradient emerged between northern and southern China because of the EASM's southward move.[70] Northeastern China was strongly affected;[71] proxy records from Hulun Lake in Inner Mongolia reveal a major dry event from 4210–3840 BP.[68] δ18O values from Yonglu Cave in Hubei confirm that the region became characterised by increased aridity and show that the onset of the event was gradual but that its end was sudden.[72]

In the Korean Peninsula, the 4.2 ka event was associated with significant aridification, measured by the large decline in arboreal pollen percentage (AP).[73]

The Sannai-Maruyama site declined during the same period;[74] the growing population of the Jomon culture gradually turned to decline after that.[75]

Rebun Island experienced an abrupt, intense cooling around 4,130 BP believed to be associated with the 4.2 ka event.[76]

Effects on Chinese civilisation

The drought may have caused the collapse of Neolithic cultures around Central China in the late 3rd millennium BC.[77][78] In the Yishu River Basin (a river basin that consists of the Yi River (沂河) of Shandong and Shu River), the flourishing Longshan culture was affected by a cooling that severely reduced rice output and led to a substantial decrease in population and to fewer archaeological sites.[79] In about 2000 BC, Longshan was displaced by the Yueshi culture, which had fewer and less-sophisticated artifacts of ceramic and bronze.The Liangzhu civilization in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River also declined during the same period.[80] The 4.2 ka event is also believed to have helped collapse the Dawenkou culture.[81] The 4.2 ka event had no discernible impact on the spread of millet cultivation in the region.[82]

Southern Africa

Stalagmites from northeastern Namibia demonstrate the region became wetter thanks to the southward shift of the ITCZ.[83] The Namibian humidification event had two pulses.[84]

Mascarenes

No signal of the 4.2 ka event has been found in Rodrigues.[85]

See also

Шаблон:Portal

Notes

Шаблон:Reflist

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Further reading

External links

  1. Another map for reference in Шаблон:Cite journal The initial source where this map comes from had the map caption the wrong way around: Шаблон:Cite journal
  2. 2,0 2,1 2,2 Шаблон:Cite journal
  3. 3,0 3,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  4. Шаблон:Cite journal
  5. Шаблон:Cite journal
  6. 6,0 6,1 6,2 Шаблон:Cite journal
  7. 7,0 7,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  8. 8,0 8,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  9. Шаблон:Cite journal
  10. Шаблон:Cite journal
  11. Шаблон:Cite journal
  12. Шаблон:Cite journal
  13. Шаблон:Cite journal
  14. Шаблон:Cite journal
  15. 15,0 15,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  16. Шаблон:Cite journal
  17. Шаблон:Cite journal
  18. Шаблон:Cite journal
  19. 19,0 19,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  20. Шаблон:Cite journal
  21. Шаблон:Cite journal
  22. Шаблон:Cite journal
  23. Шаблон:Cite journal
  24. Шаблон:Cite journal
  25. Шаблон:Cite journal
  26. Шаблон:Cite web
  27. Шаблон:Cite news
  28. Шаблон:Cite news
  29. Шаблон:Cite web
  30. Шаблон:Cite web
  31. Шаблон:Cite journal
  32. Шаблон:Cite journal
  33. Шаблон:Cite journal
  34. Mejías Moreno, M., Benítez de Lugo Enrich, L., Pozo Tejado, J. del y Moraleda Sierra, J. 2014. "Los primeros aprovechamientos de aguas subterráneas en la Península Ibérica. Las motillas de Daimiel en la Edad del Bronce de La Mancha". Boletín Geológico y Minero, 125 (4): 455–474 Шаблон:ISSN
  35. Шаблон:Cite journal
  36. 36,0 36,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  37. Шаблон:Cite journal
  38. Шаблон:Cite journal
  39. Шаблон:Cite journal
  40. Шаблон:Cite journal
  41. Шаблон:Cite journal
  42. Шаблон:Cite journal
  43. Шаблон:Cite journal
  44. Шаблон:Cite journal
  45. Cullen, H. M. et al., "Climate change and the collapse of the Akkadian empire: Evidence from the deep sea", Geology, vol. 28, iss. 4, pp. 379–382, 2000
  46. 46,0 46,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  47. Шаблон:Cite book
  48. Шаблон:Cite journal
  49. Шаблон:Cite journal
  50. Шаблон:Cite web
  51. Шаблон:Cite journal
  52. Шаблон:Cite journal
  53. Шаблон:Cite journal
  54. Шаблон:Cite journal
  55. Шаблон:Cite journal
  56. Шаблон:Cite journal
  57. 57,0 57,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  58. Шаблон:Cite web
  59. Шаблон:Cite journal
  60. 60,0 60,1 60,2 Шаблон:Cite journal
  61. Clift et al., 2011, "U–Pb zircon dating evidence for a Pleistocene Sarasvati River and capture of the Yamuna River", Geology, 40, 211–214 (2011).
  62. Шаблон:Cite journal
  63. Шаблон:Cite web
  64. Шаблон:Cite web
  65. Шаблон:Cite journal
  66. Шаблон:Cite journal
  67. Шаблон:Citation
  68. 68,0 68,1 68,2 Шаблон:Cite journal
  69. Шаблон:Cite journal
  70. Шаблон:Cite journal
  71. Шаблон:Cite journal
  72. Шаблон:Cite journal
  73. Шаблон:Cite journal
  74. 三内丸山遺跡について三内丸山遺跡とは(公式サイト)。
  75. (a) Shuzo Koyama, "Jomon Subsistence and Population", Senri Ethnological Studies no. 2, 1–65 (1978). (b) 小山修三, 『縄文時代』, 中央公論社, 1983. なお『縄文時代』では遺跡数に乗じる係数を、弥生時代57人、縄文時代中期以降24人、縄文時代早期8.5人と紹介しているが、実際の数値計算に合わせ、本文のように修正した。
  76. Шаблон:Cite journal
  77. Шаблон:Cite journal
  78. Шаблон:Cite journal
  79. Шаблон:Cite journal
  80. Шаблон:Cite web
  81. Шаблон:Cite journal
  82. Шаблон:Cite journal
  83. Шаблон:Cite journal
  84. Шаблон:Cite journal
  85. Шаблон:Cite journal