Английская Википедия:ABS-CBN franchise renewal controversy

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Use Philippine English Шаблон:Infobox event

The renewal of the congressional franchise of the Philippine media network ABS-CBN to continue broadcasting was a dispute between the administration of President Rodrigo Duterte and the media conglomerate arising on the terms and conditions of the franchise renewal agreement.[1][2][3] Amid the controversy, the Congress of the Philippines, country's legislature, was unable to renew the franchise before its expiration date. The congressional franchise expired on May 4, 2020, as the Philippines was dealing with the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the enhanced community quarantine in Luzon.[4] The next day, exercising constitutional powers, the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) then issued a cease-and-desist order demanding ABS-CBN to cease all of its free TV and radio broadcasting immediately. ABS-CBN complied with the government order and shut down all of its radio stations and free television channels later that day.[1] On June 30, 2020, the NTC released two alias cease-and-desist orders against ABS-CBN TV Plus and Sky Direct.[5]

Beginning in 2014 (during the presidency of Benigno Aquino III), the network had repeatedly applied for the renewal of their broadcast franchise through private bills that had been pending in the House of Representatives but had not been addressed by the 16th, 17th, and 18th congresses of the Philippines.[1][2][6] Prominent figures in ABS-CBN Corporation, the political opposition in the Philippines, media advocacy groups,[2] and the international press[1][4] have labeled the refusal of Congress to renew the franchise as a result of Duterte's pressure for ABS-CBN to cease broadcasting and a direct attack on the country's democracy and press freedoms, although sources from the previous administration reported that there was lack of support for renewal because "Mr. Aquino’s allies felt the criticisms against the President were too personal and offensive and went to the point of nitpicking."[7] Duterte's ruling coalition maintains a supermajority in both chambers of Congress,[8][9] and Duterte criticized the ABS-CBN Network for their allegedly biased and unfavorable news coverage against Duterte beginning with his presidential campaign in the 2016 Philippine presidential election,[10] repeatedly voicing his opposition against the renewal of the network's congressional franchise.[11] ABS-CBN subsequently appealed to the Supreme Court of the Philippines to nullify as unconstitutional the cease-and-desist order.

The resulting franchise expiration and withdrawal of its broadcast rights marked the first time ABS-CBN, considered a historical and cultural icon in the Philippines, had been off the air since the 1986 revolution, having been seized and liquidated by the authoritarian government of the Martial Law dictatorship from 1972 until the regime's collapse in 1986.[1] Critics of the Duterte government consider the NTC's cease-and-desist order and the denial of the franchise application as contributing to a growing democratic backsliding in the Philippines under the Duterte administration.[12]

Background

Congressional franchise to operate television and radio stations

As prescribed by the American Insular government-era Act No. 3846, or the Radio Control Act, which became effective in 1931 (later amended in 1963), broadcasting networks require a congressional franchise to operate television and radio stations, which usually lasts for up to 25 years.[13] ABS-CBN, which had been operating since June 13, 1946, made its first television broadcast on October 23, 1953, had last been granted a 25-year franchise extension on March 30, 1995, under Republic Act No. 7966 (but later implemented on May 4, 1995). This expired on May 4, 2020, as upheld by the Department of Justice (DOJ).[14]

Press freedom and democracy issues

The Philippines is touted to have the "freest and liveliest press" in Asia,[15][16][17] where media is considered a watchdog[18] and a "fourth estate" helping to maintain the checks and balances of democratic governance.[19][20]

Despite this, the country is consistently ranked as one of the world's most dangerous countries for journalists.[21][22][23] In May 2020, it slipped two spots down to 136th place (out of 180 countries) in the World Press Freedom Index.[24]

Media watchdogs such as Reporters Without Borders,[25] the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility,[26] Amnesty International,[27] the Photojournalists' Center of the Philippines (PCP), Foreign Correspondents Association of the Philippines (FOCAP), and the Consortium on Democracy and Disinformation (D&D)[28] have noted that various forms of attacks against the press have increased since the Duterte administration came to power in 2016 – with the Philippine Daily Inquirer, news website Rappler, nonprofit media organizations like Vera Files and the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism, and ABS-CBN being particular targets because of coverage critical of the administration.[28][21][29]

Many of these media watchdogs[28] have issued statements placing the ABS-CBN broadcast stoppage in the context of systemic attacks against press freedom in the Philippines.[28][29] Media groups and people's organizations denounced the shutdown order for being a loss of democracy, freedom of expression, and freedom of the press.[30][31] Some groups also placed the matter in the context of attacks and harassment aimed at those that criticize the government.[32][31]

ABS-CBN market share

The ABS-CBN broadcast network is acknowledged to be one of the Philippines' oldest and most influential media networks, run by the Lopez family.[3] The company generates about 50 to 60 percent of the group's total annual revenue, mainly from selling airtime of its television and radio properties to advertisers. The remaining revenue is generated from consumer sales through the distribution of cable and international channels, operations of over-the-top platform services, and a family entertainment center in Taguig. According to the Philippine Competition Commission (PCC), ABS-CBN Corporation controlled "somewhere between 31% and 44%" of the Philippines' total television market as of 2020.[33]

Prior broadcast stoppage under Ferdinand Marcos

Шаблон:Main Before the 2020 stoppage, ABS-CBN had been closed down on September 23, 1972, when martial law under Ferdinand Marcos was announced and the station's television and radio stations were sequestered.[34][35] Marcos' Letter of Instruction No. 1-A, signed September 22, 1972, and addressed to the Secretary of the Department of National Defense, accused ABS-CBN and the Associated Broadcasting Corporation (now known as TV5) of delivering "deliberately slanted and overly exaggerated news stories and commentaries," of promoting the ends of the Communist Party of the Philippines, and of having been instrumental in an assassination attempt on Marcos.[36] This stoppage lasted until July 1986, when the sequestered stations were recovered, and the frequencies returned to ABS-CBN.

During those 13 years, use of the company's frequencies (except DZXL-AM 620, awarded to KBS/RPN as DWWW, DZMM-AM 1000, awarded to GMA (later Nation Broadcasting Corporation) as DWXX (now DZAR Sonshine Radio), DZMY-AM 1160 awarded to BBC as DWWA, DZQL-AM 830, awarded to Office of Civil Defense as DZCA, and DZXL-TV 4, awarded to the government-owned National Media Production Center for the launch of Government Television as DWGT-TV in 1974) was awarded to the Banahaw Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) owned by Marcos crony and sugar plantation owner Roberto Benedicto and was launched on November 4, 1973. Under martial law, BBC formed a de facto media monopoly with Kanlaon Broadcasting System/Radio Philippines Network (KBS/RPN), Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation (IBC, acquired in 1975), and government-owned Government Television/Maharlika Broadcasting System (GTV/MBS). The company's headquarters, the ABS-CBN Broadcasting Center, was also sequestered without compensation from the network's owners and was renamed as Broadcast Plaza to serve as headquarters of BBC, KBS/RPN, GTV/MBS and, from 1980, the Bureau of Broadcasts (BB).[35][37] Moreover, copies of the old pre-Martial Law ABS-CBN shows had also been lost due to the raid by Marcos troops.[38]

Marcos was eventually deposed by the People Power Revolution of February 1986. The newly created revolutionary government agency Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) sequestered and later dissolved BBC and returned the frequencies to ABS-CBN in July 1986, eventually resuming broadcast on September 16, 1986.[39][40]

History

Шаблон:ABS-CBN franchise renewal

Early renewal initiatives during the 16th Congress

Шаблон:See also In 2014 and 2015, ABS-CBN requested the 16th Congress to tackle the extension of its franchise early, although its renewal was not due until six years later, in 2020.[2]

Media sources in the legislature indicated that the network's 2016 initiative was the result of having been "particularly singled out" by supporters of President-elect Rodrigo Duterte because of the perception that they "consistently showed him in a negative light".[2] The Philippine Daily Inquirer reported that a member of the House legislative franchise committee said ABS-CBN "did not want to risk going through the renewal under an 'unfriendly' administration".[41]

The Inquirer's source also said that the initiative "lacked support from President Benigno Aquino III's allies in the House" because they felt that ABS-CBN's criticisms against Aquino were "too personal and offensive and went to the point of nitpicking".[41][2]

ABS-CBN eventually had to withdraw these franchise renewal initiatives due to time constraints.[2]

Ad controversies during the 2016 Philippine presidential campaign

Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte attributed his objection to the franchise renewal of ABS-CBN to an election ad controversy during the campaign leading up to the 2016 Philippine presidential election. He said the network refused to air his 2016 presidential campaign ads and favored the negative political ads paid by then-vice presidential candidate Antonio Trillanes critical of his remarks on the campaign trail.[42][43]

On February 24, 2020, the network's president and chief executive officer Carlo López Katigbak apologized to Duterte for not airing his political advertisements during his 2016 polls. Duterte accepted the apology, leaving the franchise's renewal to Congress.[44][45] ABS-CBN also offered to return the money spent for these advertisements, which Duterte declined, stating that the money should be donated to a charity instead.[44]

Meanwhile, Commission on Elections spokesperson James Jimenez defended the controversial ad as well within Election Law, under "Partisan Political Activity".[46][47]

Renewal initiatives during the 17th and 18th Congress

Non-renewal assertions by Congress

Throughout his term, which coincides with the 17th and 18th Congress, Duterte publicly reiterated that he would oppose the franchise renewal of ABS-CBN.[11][48]

Opposition lawmakers, as well as labor groups, objected to Duterte's stand on ABS-CBN as the franchise non-renewal will compromise the employees of the network; stating that the blocking of the franchise renewal had no merit.[49] Opposition groups have expressed their opinions that the non-renewal of the franchise violates press freedom.[28]

Duterte later changed his stance after the network's apology, stating that he would not interfere with the franchise renewal in Congress. However, Duterte did not say whether he would veto the bill or not.[44][45]

17th Congress

In November 2016, Nueva Ecija representative Micaela Violago filed House Bill 4349 in the 17th Congress to renew the network's franchise.[50][51] The 17th Congress adjourned sine die with the bill never getting out of committee.[52]

Deliberations during the 18th Congress

During the 18th Congress of the Philippines, at least 12 house representatives and two senators filed their versions for a new network franchise. House Speaker Alan Peter Cayetano made assurances that Congress will tackle the franchise with fairness.[53]

Bills filed in the 18th Congress for ABS-CBN's franchise renewal
Bill number Author/s Date filed Ref
HB 676 Micaela Violago July 1, 2019 [54]
HB 3064 Jericho Nograles July 29, 2019 [55]
HB 3521 Rose Marie "Baby" Arenas August 6, 2019 [56]
HB 3713 Joy Myra Tambunting, Joseph Stephen Paduano (withdrew on July 9, 2020) August 8, 2019 [57]
HB 3947 Sol Aragones August 14, 2019 [58]
SB 981 Ralph Recto August 28, 2019 [59]
HB 4305 Vilma Santos-Recto September 2, 2019 [60]
HB 5608 Aurelio Gonzales, Johnny Pimentel, Salvador "Doy" Leachon November 25, 2019 [61]
HB 5705 Rufus Rodriguez December 4, 2019 [62]
HB 5753 Josephine Ramirez-Sato December 9, 2019 [63]
HB 6052 Carlos Zarate, Ferdinand Gaite, Eufemia Cullamat, France Castro, Sarah Jane Elago January 27, 2020 [64]
HB 6138 Mark Go January 30, 2020 [65]
HB 6293 Loren Legarda February 13, 2020 [66]
SB 1403 Ramon "Bong" Revilla Jr. March 5, 2020 [67]
Bills filed in the 19th Congress for ABS-CBN's franchise renewal
Bill number Author/s Date filed Ref
HB 00431 Johnny Pimentel June 30, 2022 [68]

On January 6, 2020, Albay representative Edcel Lagman filed House Resolution 639, urging the House Committee on Legislative Franchises for its immediate action on the several bills lodged to the committee.[69] At least 91 other representatives signed the resolution.[70]

On February 24, 2020, the Congress finally made its decision to tackle their franchise renewal.[71] During a Senate hearing on the same day, public services panel chair Grace Poe stated they were to tackle ABS-CBN's compliance with the terms and conditions of its franchise.[72] The conclusion was that there was no breach of laws or franchise terms. The following is a summary of the findings:

  1. The Bureau of Internal Revenue stated that ABS-CBN had fully complied with the tax requirements of the government. Sir Cabantac Jr., BIR Large Taxpayers Service head stated that the company had paid P14.298 billion from 2016 to 2019. In 2019, ABS-CBN also settled P152.44 million in tax payments with the BIR.[73]
  2. The Department of Labor and Employment cleared the media giant for its compliance with general labor standards, occupational safety and health, and security of tenure. Former ABS-CBN corporate services head Mark Nepomuceno said they also have contributed to mandatory employee benefits such as Social Security System, PhilHealth, and Pag-IBIG Fund. He also stated that ABS-CBN was no longer practicing end-of-contract scheme, as well as giving benefits to independent contributors varying per contract negotiation[73]
  3. Telecommunications Commissioner General Gamaliel Cordoba stated that franchise laws cover "commercial purposes", including pay-per-view service. Section 1 of Republic Act 7908, which allows ABS-CBN Covergence's broadcast operations, states that: "It is hereby granted a franchise to construct, operate, and maintain, for commercial purposes." Even though ABS-CBN introduced the service without NTC guidelines yet, the fine for such violation is a measly P200. Senate President Recto stated that the NTC can just impose a fine on ABS-CBN rather than shutdown.[73]
  4. Securities and Exchange Commission Commissioner Ephyro Amatong clarified that a legal interpretation from 1999 stated that Philippine Depository Receipts were not equivalent to certificates of ownership, which may have evolved in recent years. Senator Poe pointed out that companies should be notified of any changes in the legal interpretation of the investment instrument, as all media companies have to be 100% Filipino-owned. Issuing PDRs is a common practice among Philippine media outfits—including Rappler and GMA. The SEC has not yet conducted a review whether there are violations in ABS-CBN's PDRs, with Amatong saying he "would rather not make a categorical statement at this time" as to whether there are violations in ABS-CBN's PDRs, given the pending case at the Supreme Court, as of May 6, 2020.[73]

Quo warranto petition

On February 10, 2020, Solicitor General of the Philippines Jose Calida filed a quo warranto petition before the Supreme Court of the Philippines seeking to revoke ABS-CBN's franchise and that of its subsidiary ABS-CBN Convergence over alleged breaches of its franchise, including operating its pay-per-view service Kapamilya Box Office (KBO), constitutional restriction on foreign ownership of mass media, and resorted to an ingenious corporate layering scheme, to transfer its subsidiary's franchise without Congressional approval.[74] The network responded to disprove the allegations leveled against it.[75]

Within the same month, various congressmen urged the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) to grant a provisional authority to ABS-CBN to continue operations after the lapse of its current franchise until Congress should have decided on its franchise application.[76] Having consulted with the Department of Justice (DOJ), the NTC affirmed in March 2020 that it would "likely" issue a provisional authority to ABS-CBN and "let ABS-CBN continue operations based on equity".[77] However, the Federation of International Cable TV and Telecommunications Associations of the Philippines (FICTAP) questioned the provisional authority, stating that it would be unconstitutional.[78]

On June 23, 2020, the Supreme Court of the Philippines dismissed the quo warranto petition to revoke ABS-CBN Corporation's franchise, stating that the petition was moot and academic as the franchise had already expired, therefore the Court would not be changing anything by voiding the franchise ab initio.[79] However, the quo warranto petition filed against ABS-CBN Convergence Inc. for allegedly illegally operating Шаблон:Abbr[4] remains pending.[80]

Planned provisional authority cancellation

On March 5, 2020, lawyer Larry Gadon filed a petition for prohibition before the Supreme Court of the Philippines, seeking to stop Telecommunications Commissioner Gamaliel Cordoba, House Speaker Alan Peter Cayetano, and House Committee on Legislative Franchises Chairman Franz Alvarez from issuing ABS-CBN's provisional authority, saying the provisional authority to operate violates the doctrine of separation of powers.[81]

Sixteen days after the shutdown, Gadon announces that he is withdrawing the petition which he filed, seeking to stop Cordoba, Cayetano, and Alvarez from issuing provisional authority, stating that was rendered moot and the act sought to be prevented no longer exists.[82]

On June 2, 2020, the Supreme Court of the Philippines dismissed the petition for the prohibition against Telecommunications Commissioner Gamaliel Cordoba, House Speaker Alan Peter Cayetano, and House Committee on Legislative Franchises Chairman Franz Alvarez from issuing provisional authority, stating that the court does not deem it efficient.[83]

May 2020 broadcast stoppage

Файл:ABS-CBN broadcast sign-off on May 5, 2020.png
The sign-off message broadcast by DWWX-TV (ABS-CBN Manila) before stopping all broadcasts at Шаблон:Format time in compliance with the NTC order

Шаблон:External media

Файл:ABS-CBN logo during its 2020 shutdown.jpeg
The logo of ABS-CBN during its 2020 shutdown

On May 3, 2020, Calida warned the NTC against granting the provisional authority to ABS-CBN, citing a Supreme Court decision in 2014, stating that provisional authority can only be granted after the franchise is secured in Congress.[76][74] In the same statement, Calida cautioned that the agency would put itself at risk of prosecution under the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act should they issue the provisional authority without a legal franchise being held by ABS-CBN's operating companies and that a 1991 DOJ opinion stating the NTC may issue provisional authority without a legal franchise was overturned by the Supreme Court.[74]

On May 5, 2020, Philippine House Committee on Legislative Franchises chairperson Franz Alvarez warned the NTC from backtracking. If they did, the NTC could be held in contempt for refusal to issue a provisional authority to ABS-CBN.[84] Six days before, the House Committee on Legislative Franchises issued a show cause order against NTC Commissioner Gamaliel Cordoba, Deputy Commissioners Edgardo Cabarios, Delilah Deles, and Legal Branch Head Ella Blanca Lopez to explain why should not be cited in contempt for issuing the cease and desist order against ABS-CBN.[85] The NTC responded by stating that it was legally bound to order the shutdown of ABS-CBN and apologized to the House of Representatives for failing to notify it of the shutdown order.[86]

On the same day, NTC issued a cease and desist order to immediately close its free-to-air broadcasting operations, including its radio stations DZMM, S+A, and MOR Philippines, following the expiration of its broadcast franchise the day before.[87][88][89][90] The cease and desist order covers 42 free television stations operated by ABS-CBN across the country, including the main ABS-CBN Network, ten digital broadcast channels, 18 FM stations, and five AM stations. However, ABS-CBN News Channel (ANC), The Filipino Channel (TFC), DZMM TeleRadyo (renamed TeleRadyo due to the inclusion of DZMM in the order), and its sister cable channels (run by subsidiary Creative Programs including Metro Channel, which was named after Metro Magazines whose publisher is ABS-CBN Publishing), as well as its online properties, and production companies Star Music and Star Cinema, were allowed to continue as their operations are not contingent on the legislative franchise.[91]

Following the news program TV Patrol, the network signed off the air at 7:52 pm (PST). ABS-CBN executives Carlo Katigbak and Mark Lopez aired statements on the program appealing the NTC's cease and desist order.[92][93] The newscast was also simulcast on DZMM, S+A, and MOR stations.[94] DZMM radio and television counterpart signed off at 8:20 pm, following SRO: Suhestyon, Reaksyon at Opinyon and rebranded simply as TeleRadyo following the newscast and the digital television networks available on ABS-CBN TV Plus including Asianovela Channel, Movie Central, and the terrestrial operations of Jeepney TV, Myx, O Shopping, and Knowledge Channel also signed off. After the cease and desist order, Cine Mo!, Yey!, and the KBO remain unaffected (during the television premiere of The Mall, The Merrier on KBO channel from May 1–6, 2020).

Along with the order, NTC gave ABS-CBN 10 days to explain why its assigned frequencies should not be recalled.[95] In response on May 15, 2020, ABS-CBN reasoned that "it would be detrimental to the public interest as it would hamper the ability of ABS-CBN to immediately resume serving the public through its broadcasts, once the franchise is granted".[96] Additionally, House Bill 6732 was proposed by House Speaker Alan Peter Cayetano on May 13, 2020, which would have granted the network a provisional franchise to operate until October 31.[96][97] Subsequently, on May 27, 2020, NTC was told to refrain from carrying out the recall while the Congress deliberates on the measures to grant provisional franchise and a fresh franchise.[98]

Post-shutdown developments

Network programming and legal action

On May 7, 2020, TV Patrol resumed broadcast on ABS-CBN News Channel, as it simulcast the program from the leading network since March due to the COVID-19 pandemic programming changes.[99] It was also simulcast on its news website, its Facebook and YouTube pages, as well as on The Filipino Channel to viewers outside the country. On May 8, 2020, the following day, TV Patrol began airing on Cine Mo! and returned on TeleRadyo.[100]

ABS-CBN Corporation filed a petition for certiorari and prohibition as well as temporary restraining order (TRO) to the Supreme Court of the Philippines, seeking to nullify the NTC's cease and desist order on May 7, 2020.[101] (See Шаблон:Format link below.) The Senate and the House of the Representatives filed respective bills urging NTC to reconsider its order, as well as to abolish the agency itself.[102][103]

On May 8, 2020, DZMM TeleRadyo, now rebranded as simply TeleRadyo, resumed its regular programming airing the usual DZMM programming format.[104] TeleRadyo is carried through ABS-CBN TV Plus, making it one of three exclusive channels (the others being Cine Mo! and Yey!) that remain operational on digital free-to-air television after the NTC's order takes effect.[104] ABS-CBN later clarified in a statement that the three channels, along with Kapamilya Box Office channel, continued broadcasting and received in Metro Manila, Laguna province, Iloilo province, and selected areas of Baguio through a block time agreement with AMCARA Broadcasting Network (former owner of Studio 23 from its 1996 launch until ABS-CBN acquired a stake in AMCARA in 2010) owned by the Carandang family. On the same day, MOR Philippines also resumed its online and cable operations through a national programming service set up by the network's flagship station in Metro Manila.[105]

On May 11, 2020, House Representatives Paolo Duterte, Eric Go Yap, and Abraham Tolentino filed House Resolution No. 853, seeking to probe into the corporation's possible violation of its franchise.[106][107][108]

On June 1, 2020, Jeepney TV and Asianovela Channel resumed broadcasting on ABS-CBN TV Plus as temporary channel replacements for ABS-CBN and S+A, but both channels are still on free trial.[109]

On June 4, 2020, ABS-CBN announced on TV Patrol that a cable-and-satellite channel named Kapamilya Channel would launch on June 13, resuming the ABS-CBN productions and aired its entertainment, news and current affairs programming, along with movie blocks.[110] However, because of the network's temporary suspension of production of entertainment programs during the enhanced community quarantine in Luzon caused by the COVID-19 pandemic (and later free TV shutdown), the dramas Pamilya Ko and Make It With You confirmed their cancellations and failed to complete their respective stories.[111][112] Comedy gag show Banana Sundae also did not return to air.[113]

Alias cease-and-desist order

On June 30, 2020, the NTC issued an alias cease-and-desist order demanding ABS-CBN TV Plus to stop broadcasting all of its digital free-to-air channels on UHF Channel 43 in Metro Manila and some provinces, as well as Sky Direct to stop operating nationwide.[5]

Congressional hearings for a new franchise

On May 13, 2020, House Bill 6732, proposed by House Speaker Alan Peter Cayetano, which grants the network a provisional franchise to operate until October 31, 2020 "unless sooner revoked or canceled", was approved by the House of Representatives convening as a Committee of the Whole. The said bill was awaiting for third and final reading after which it would have been transmitted to the Senate;[97][114] but on May 19, 2020, the proposal was withdrawn with the chamber opting to go straight to hearing measures seeking to grant the media giant a fresh 25-year franchise.[115]

  • The first day of hearings was held on May 26, under the auspices of the Joint Committee for Legislative Franchises, Good Governance, and Public Accountability, where ABS-CBN President and CEO Carlo Katigbak and Deputy Speaker Rodante Marcoleta gave their respective side's opening statements.[116]
  • The second day, held on June 1, tackled the media conglomerate's ownership concerns.[117]
  • The third day was held on June 3, mainly focused on Eugenio Lopez III's citizenship.[118]
  • The fourth hearing was held on June 8, which also focused on Lopez III's citizenship.[119] These first days of the hearings focused on Eugenio Lopez III dual citizenship status being a Filipino and an American citizen at the same time.
  • The fifth hearing was held on June 11, which tackled the legalities of ABS-CBN's issuance of PDRs or Philippine Depositary Receipts.[120] During the course of the hearing, the PDRs were determined to be legal but these raised questions on the real motives of the financial instrument.
  • The sixth hearing was held on June 15, tackled the media conglomerate's closure during Marcos regime and return to the Lopez family after the People Power Revolution in 1986.[121] Questions on the return to the Lopez family were raised in particular to the arbitrary procedure and the settlement agreement that were agreed upon.
  • The seventh hearing was held on June 17, which was attended by former Senate president Juan Ponce Enrile, tackled the constitutional 50-year limit on congressional franchises and airing of a program on DXAS-TV (ABS-CBN Davao) hosted by Duterte called Gikan sa Masa, Para sa Masa.[122]
  • The eighth hearing was held on June 29, tackled the network's blocktime agreement with AMCARA Broadcasting Network for continuous airing of the network's programs on free-to-air digital television through DWBM-TV (UHF Channel 43) in ABS-CBN TV Plus set-top box in Metro Manila, Laguna, selected areas of Baguio, and Iloilo.[123] During the hearings, questions were raised both to AMCARA and ABS-CBN on the seemingly long term block time arrangements.
  • The ninth hearing was held on June 30, tackled the media conglomerate's labor issues.[124] Questions were raised on program-based contracts and independent contractors which are prevalent in most broadcasting companies.[125]
  • The tenth hearing was held on July 1, tackled the media conglomerate's tax delinquencies.Шаблон:Citation needed Questions were raised regarding the actual tax payments of ABS-CBN pointing out to government tax incentives that were availed.Шаблон:Citation needed
  • The eleventh hearing was held on July 2, continuing the issues on taxes and labor practices.Шаблон:Citation needed
  • The twelfth hearing was held on July 6, tackling allegations of biased reporting from the network and its coverage of the 2016 general election, and also tackled issues regarding bias and morality on some past ABS-CBN news and programs.Шаблон:Citation needed
  • The thirteenth hearing which was a summation of arguments was held on July 9, with Representatives Carlos Zarate and Rodante Marcoleta respectively delivering the closing arguments for, and against the renewal.Шаблон:Citation needed
  • On July 10, members of the House of Representatives, particularly the Committee on Legislative Franchises, voted 70–11 to deny the franchise application of ABS-CBN, citing several issues on the network's franchise.[126][127]

Supreme Court case

Шаблон:Infobox Philippines court case On May 7, 2020, ABS-CBN filed a petition for certiorari and prohibition asking the Court to issue a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the implementation of the National Telecommunications Commission's cease and desist order.[128][129] If granted, this TRO would allow them to operate until the case is decided.[130] However, some lawyers have questioned the legal merits of the petition,[129][131] as it was filed right to the Supreme Court, even before a motion for reconsideration before the Шаблон:Abbr or a case in the Court of Appeals.[129] In the petition, ABS-CBN argues that it is proper to have filed first in the Supreme Court, as the case in their view involves "genuine issues of constitutionality that must be addressed at the most immediate time"[128]Шаблон:Rp and that their petition is of "transcendental importance".[128]Шаблон:Rp On May 18, Larry Gadon filed a motion for consolidation against the ABS-CBN's temporary restraining order, stating that it violates the hiearchy of the courts and the case must be filed at the Шаблон:Abbr.[132] The following day, the Court accepted the case, ordered the Шаблон:Abbr to reply, and impleaded both the House and Senate and dismissing Gadon's plea for a consolidation.[133] The Шаблон:Abbr filed its required comment on May 26.[134]

The Supreme Court set a further hearing for July 13 on the merits of the petition, though there may not be a ruling on that date.[135] However, the hearing was rescheduled to August 4, 2020.[136]

The petition to issue a temporary restraining order was dismissed by the Supreme Court on August 25, 2020.[137][138] In its ruling, the Court invoked the principle of the separation of powers, leaving the matter to Congress.[139]

House of Representatives votes on the franchise renewal

The following is a list of how members of the House Committee on Legislative Franchises voted.[140][141]

NO to the resolution denying the renewal of the ABS-CBN franchise (11):[142]

Шаблон:Columns-list

YES to the resolution denying the ABS-CBN franchise (77 - Note: Unofficial list compiled from various news sources. Congressmen refuse to release official list. According to Prof. Jean Franco, associate professor for the University of the Philippines Political Science Department, this translates to lack of transparency and accountability. Franco also stated that the congressmen may be hiding their votes out of fear of vendetta.):[143] Шаблон:Columns-list

Recused from voting (2):

  • Alfred Vargas – Quezon City, 5th District, citing "conflict of interest."
  • Micaela Violago – Nueva Ecija, 2nd District

Abstained from voting (1):

Recall of frequencies and channels

On September 10, 2020, the NTC issued an order recalling all TV and radio frequencies and channels assigned to ABS-CBN and its related radio and local TV stations. The NTC cited the absence of a "valid legislative franchise" as justification for the order. In addition, the NTC also said that all provisional authorities and certificates of public convenience granted to ABS-CBN were also revoked and canceled.[144][145][146]

Blocktime deals and partnership agreements

ZOE Broadcasting Network

On October 6, 2020, ABS-CBN Corporation announced a deal with ZOE Broadcasting Network to air ABS-CBN shows from its owned television network on Channel 11's A2Z (formerly ZOE TV) on October 10, after almost three years of speculated rumors. Alongside, the network would also air Light TV-produced programs, ZOE's content partners including CBN Asia and Trinity Broadcasting Network, and others including its blocktimers, licensors, and providers, similar to what GMA News TV (formerly QTV/Q and later GTV) has done before.[147][148]

A month of launching of the said new channel, the NTC were reportedly to investigate ABS-CBN and ZOE Broadcasting Network if the said blocktime agreement of two stations are processed in legal ways.[149][150]

Brightlight Productions and TV5/Cignal

On January 18, 2021, the Philippine Star's entertainment columnist Ricky Lo reported that a possible partnership between ABS-CBN and its rival TV5 might happen very soon through its programming partner Cignal TV, which allowed ABS-CBN to air its programs on the rival network and its regional stations, aside from its existing agreement with ZOE Broadcasting Network (which only limited to Mega Manila area).[151] The partnership become evident when ABS-CBN's flagship Sunday variety show ASAP Natin 'To is reported to be carried on TV5 beginning January 24, replacing Sunday Noontime Live! (which was headlined by some ABS-CBN talents).[152] Both ABS-CBN and TV5 later confirmed this move in collaboration with Brightlight Productions and Cignal TV on January 21, with a movie block FPJ: Da King starring Fernando Poe Jr. also included in the Sunday's lineup.[153][154]

According to TV5 Network and Cignal TV chairman Manuel V. Pangilinan on the addition of more ABS-CBN shows on the network, he said that for now it is "too early" to consider for a said expansion,[155] that is until March 5 where ABS-CBN and TV5 confirmed that ABS-CBN's Primetime Bida shows carried on the said network on March 8.[156]

GMA Network

In December 2022, executives of both GMA Network and ABS-CBN discussed a collaboration of a television series, with both companies casting their respective artists and the latter's production unit Dreamscape Entertainment developing the romantic drama series Unbreak My Heart.[45]

On June 20, 2023, ABS-CBN Corporation and GMA Network extended their collaboration to broadcast noontime variety show It's Showtime on GTV starting July 1, 2023, as well as its temporary replacement It's Your Lucky Day from October 14 to 28, 2023 due to the former's suspension.[157][158][159]

2021 franchise approval initiatives

On December 8, 2020, Buhay Party-List Representative and Deputy Speaker Lito Atienza said that the approval of the ABS-CBN franchise might happen on 2021 under the House leadership of Lord Allan Velasco, as he assures the speaker to give some ample time to settle the franchise.[160] On January 4, 2021, Senate President Tito Sotto filed a Senate Bill No. 1967 that seeks to grant ABS-CBN's franchise for another 25 years,[161] with at least 16 senators backing its support for Sotto's bill.[162] Later that day, Batangas 6th District Representative and Deputy Speaker Vilma Santos-Recto, one of the 11 representatives who voted in favor of the franchise on July 10, 2020, said that she will refile her same franchise bill in the House,[163] which Santos-Recto filed a House Bill No. 8298 on January 18.[164] However, SAGIP Party-List Representative Rodante Marcoleta, one of the 70 representatives who voted against the franchise on July 10, 2020, and the host of Net 25's public affairs program, Sa Ganang Mamamayan (lit. For Citizens), reiterated that "major changes are needed" for the network to be able to regain its franchise.

On February 9, 2021, during his public address and an IATF meeting over government-owned People's Television Network, Duterte said that he will not allow ABS-CBN to operate, even if a franchise was given to them by Congress until they settle their taxes.[165][166] The following day, Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque, in his Malacañang virtual press briefing, said that Duterte would leave it to the Office of the Ombudsman to investigate ABS-CBN over alleged unpaid taxes and condonation of the network's soured loans.[167][168]

On February 11, 2021, House Speaker Lord Allan Velasco said that ABS-CBN's franchise renewal will have to wait until 2022.[169][170]

Frequency reassignment

Television

On July 26, 2021, during Duterte's State of the Nation Address, Duterte intended to reassign the former frequencies of ABS-CBN to different companies.[171]

On January 5, 2022, Advanced Media Broadcasting System (which airs its flagship TV station ALLTV), backed by the Villar Group through Planet Cable, was awarded a provisional authority license for the Channel 2 analog frequency and its digital counterpart Channel 16 frequency by the National Telecommunications Commission.[172][173] On January 26, Channel 23 was awarded to Aliw Broadcasting Corporation, and Channel 43 was awarded to Sonshine Media Network International.[174]

Radio

On March 29, 2023, 101.9 MHz in Metro Manila was awarded to Christian Bible Baptist Church as The Anchor 101.9 in San Pedro, Laguna.Шаблон:Citation needed

On May 23, 2023, 630 KHz was awarded to Baycomms Broadcasting Corporation as DWPM Radyo 630, however, its operations are controlled by MediaSerbisyo Corporation, a joint venture between Prime Media Holdings (through subsidiary Philippine Collective Media Corporation) and ABS-CBN Corporation under an airtime lease agreement.[175]

House of Representatives briefing on the ABS-CBN/TV5 deal and cancellation

On August 16, 2022, the House of Representatives has originally set a briefing on the investment of ABS-CBN in TV5 on August 18,[176] however the briefing silently announced its cancellation on the following day that was scheduled to happen on that day.[177] Rodante Marcoleta commented on the deal.[178]

Reactions and aftermath

Prior to shutdown

Before the expiration of the broadcast franchise, ABS-CBN talents and employees conducted weekly demonstrations in front of its headquarters in Quezon City as well as in its regional stations from January to February 2020.[179][180] During these demonstrations, presidential daughter and incumbent Davao City mayor Sara Duterte-Carpio expressed support for the franchise renewal.[181]

After broadcast stoppage

Файл:ABS-CBN franchise rally - night (Quezon City; 03-06-2020).jpg
Supporters of ABS-CBN staging a rally outside the ABS-CBN Broadcasting Center on the night of June 3, 2020.

The NTC's cease and desist order on ABS-CBN was met by widespread criticism by the Kapisanan ng mga Brodkaster ng Pilipinas (KBP) (in which the network is one of its members),[182] as well as various advocacy groups,[183][184] business organizations,[185][186] the local Catholic church,[187][188][189] and even some members of the Congress. Several journalists and celebrities from the network and its rival GMA Network expressed solidarity with ABS-CBN after it was ordered to cease its radio and TV broadcast.[190][191] In addition, former president Benigno Aquino III criticized the shutdown of ABS-CBN, stating that Duterte and his administration made their own "unnecessary problem".[192] The hashtag #NoToABSCBNShutDown topped the local and worldwide Twitter trending lists the same day.[193]

Within a day, numerous colleges and universities in the Philippines, including the UPLB College of Development Communication, Ateneo de Manila University and its Communication Department, the University of Santo Tomas, St. Scholastica's College and its Mass Communication Department, De La Salle University, and the UP Diliman College of Mass Communication released statements supporting the franchise renewal of ABS-CBN.[194]

The network's shutdown was noted to have placed the job security of 11,000 ABS-CBN employees in jeopardy during the COVID-19 pandemic, though the company assured them a stable salary, as well as a complete health and financial benefits for the next two months following the shutdown.[1][4] In response, the government may give a 2-month aid to the employees of ABS-CBN.[195]

GMA Network's shares increased by 24% as the Philippine Stock Exchange voluntarily suspended ABS-CBN's trading. However, investors remained cautious about GMA's stock rally due to the effects of the shutdown on business confidence.[196][197]

Duterte denied involvement with the network's shutdown,[198] despite earlier assertions that he would oppose its franchise renewal.[11] His spokesman, Harry Roque, also thanked the network for its assistance to the country during the COVID-19 pandemic.[44][199] According to Roque, Duterte could not mark the bill renewing ABS-CBN's franchise as urgent as it would involve private interest and that Duterte would be neutral to the renewal.[200]

On May 5, 2020, GMA Network's primetime news program 24 Oras, interviewed the Federation of International Cable TV and Telecommunications Association of the Philippines (FICTAP) President Estrellita Juliano Tamano, who claimed that ABS-CBN violated their 1995 legislative broadcast by airing six channels. She argued that ABS-CBN should be instead broadcasting in one channel only and instead file for a new franchise for each channel they broadcast.[201][202]

On May 7, 2020, Philippine Cable and Telecommunications Association Inc (PCTA) President Ronaldo Manlapig argued that there is no need to file for a separate franchise for each channel as ABS-CBN uses digital transmission their frequency, hence the multiple channels.[203][204]

Public criticism in the early days after the shutdown revolved around the NTC, for lack of fairness on the agency's cease and desist order on the network, and Congress – especially the lower house – for inaction to pass the franchise renewal bill.[205][206]

ABS-CBN's shutdown received international attention as news websites, magazines, newspapers, and broadcasters from around the world including, The New York Times,[4] The Washington Post,[1] Variety,[207] BBC News,[10] CBS News,[208] Time,[3] Al Jazeera,[90] The Guardian,[209] the Associated Press,[210] ABC News,[211] NHK,[212][213] KBS,[214] Yonhap News Agency,[215] the Financial Times,[216] and The Straits Times[217] published stories on the network's shutdown.[218]

The discontinuation of ABS-CBN's terrestrial broadcast operations created difficulties during the onslaught of Typhoon Vongfong (Ambo), when authorities and residents of some distant provinces, including Aurora, Quezon, and Sorsogon, reported being unable to get updated information about the typhoon from other sources because ABS-CBN was the only national television station whose signal could reach them, and internet data was hard to get in their area.[219][220]

On June 4, 2020, it was announced that Kapamilya Channel would air programs from ABS-CBN such as Ang Probinsyano and ASAP Natin 'To beginning June 13, 2020, on cable and satellite TV providers nationwide.[221]

After the committee vote

Some members of Congress expressed dismay over the decision, including Cagayan de Oro Rep. Rufus Rodriguez, who called the denial "defying evidence".[222] Progressive and sectoral groups in the Philippines such as Akbayan, Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas, and Pamalakaya also slammed the body for the vote.[223] However, on July 13, 2020, Speaker Alan Peter Cayetano stood by the decision to deny the network its franchise.

Файл:ABS-CBN franchise loss protest - Angel Locsin (Quezon City; 07-10-2020).jpg
Supporters conducting a nightly noise barrage in front of the ABS-CBN headquarters, with ABS-CBN artist Angel Locsin speaking in front

From July 11 until the end of the month, supporters organized a nightly noise barrage in front of the ABS-CBN studios in Quezon City in opposition to the verdict. Other similarly styled demonstrations were held in front of respective ABS-CBN stations in Davao City, Bacolod, and Naga, Camarines Sur.[224][225] On July 26, demonstrations in Cagayan de Oro were marred after three funeral wreaths containing ribbons glorifying unidentified individuals left the New People's Army in front of the ABS-CBN station in the city. National Union of Journalists of the Philippines Western Mindanao Safety Officer JB Deveza called such action "a form of death threat" aimed to intimidate the network employees, and the action appeared to be a part of a coordinated red-tagging operation.[226]

On July 16, a movement named People's Initiative for Reforms and Movement for Action (PIRMA), an independent and organic collective of concerned Filipinos moving to advance reforms via people's initiative and referendum launched a signature campaign called "PIRMA Kapamilya" that aims to grant ABS-CBN a people's franchise via democratic experiment of a people's initiative.[227] The signature campaign started on July 25 and aimed to gather 7 million signatures nationwide (3% of registered voters in each legislative district and at least 10% of total registered voters) as a requirement for the COMELEC to call for a referendum on the franchise.[228]

In a related manner, Kantar Media Philippines (ABS-CBN's main client and partner) originally announced the closure of its television ratings service by the end of 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the broadcast stoppage of ABS-CBN,[229] however, the decision was reversed following the block time deal between ABS-CBN and ZOE, as well as retaining the majority of its existing staff.[230]

In a related manner, boxing promotion company ALA Promotions (promoted the Pinoy Pride series of bouts aired on ABS-CBN and its sister network, S+A) announced its closure on August 18, 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the broadcast stoppage of ABS-CBN, while its gym division ALA Gym remained operational.[231][232][233][234][235][236]

Cessations and retrenchments

Шаблон:Excessive examples

On July 15, ABS-CBN released a statement that it would lay off a number of its workers and close down some of its business operations in light of the denial of the franchise effective August 31.[237]

According to a town-hall meeting called by management hours before the release of the statement, among the first entities bound to close were:

Other company divisions that announced their respective dissolution and reduction of workforces prior to or beyond the July 15 announcement and the August 31 take effect, unless otherwise noted were:

As of December 15, 2022, there were about 5,955 employees and workers that were displaced, retrenched, or laid off by the company itself, according to the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE).[255][256]

Long-term effects

Information barriers during various typhoons

The ABS-CBN shutdown was attributed to information gaps during the media coverage of typhoons that occurred since November 2020, particularly Super Typhoon Rolly,[257][258] Typhoon Ulysses,[259] Super Typhoon Odette,[260] Super Typhoon Karding and Typhoon Paeng with reports noting the void left by the closure of its provincial news bureaus and lack of a substantial signal reach in provinces far from Manila.

Presidential spokesperson Harry Roque, however, disagreed with netizens claiming that the shutdown of ABS-CBN exposed “information gaps” in calamities such as Super Typhoon Rolly. Responding to a question, Roque said both private and government media are doing their best in providing news updates to keep the public informed.[261] Roque also vehemently refuted the claim of Vice President Leni Robredo that the absence of ABS-CBN's regional unit left some residents in the dark. Roque said his team has been holding public briefings to update Filipinos about the national situation amid recent calamities.[262]

Chilling effect

Media experts noted that the shutdown of ABS-CBN has had a chilling effect on newsrooms in the country.[263][264] Journalism professor Rolando Tolentino defines "chilling effect" as the discouragement of free speech and other legal rights via legal sanction.[265] According to the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility, after the shutdown, fear had taken over some newsrooms resulting in reluctance to do investigative reports.[263] Journalism professor Danilo Arao said the chilling effect caused coverage by some media outlets to become skewed to favor the President Duterte administration and its supporters.[264]

See also

References

Шаблон:Reflist Шаблон:Commons category

Шаблон:Rodrigo Duterte Шаблон:ABS-CBN

Партнерские ресурсы
Криптовалюты
Магазины
Хостинг
Разное

  1. ↑ 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6 Шаблон:Cite news
  2. ↑ 2,0 2,1 2,2 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,6 Шаблон:Cite web
  3. ↑ 3,0 3,1 3,2 Шаблон:Cite magazine
  4. ↑ 4,0 4,1 4,2 4,3 4,4 Шаблон:Cite news
  5. ↑ 5,0 5,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  6. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  7. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  8. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  9. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  10. ↑ 10,0 10,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  11. ↑ 11,0 11,1 11,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  12. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  13. ↑ Шаблон:Cite court
  14. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  15. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  16. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  17. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  18. ↑ Coronel, S. S. (2010), 'Corruption and the watchdog role of the news media.' In P. Norris (ed.), Public Sentinel: News Media and Governance Reform, 111–36.Washington, DC: World Bank.
  19. ↑ Шаблон:Cite thesis
  20. ↑ Шаблон:Cite book
  21. ↑ 21,0 21,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  22. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  23. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  24. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  25. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  26. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  27. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  28. ↑ 28,0 28,1 28,2 28,3 28,4 Шаблон:Cite news
  29. ↑ 29,0 29,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  30. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  31. ↑ 31,0 31,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  32. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  33. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  34. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  35. ↑ 35,0 35,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  36. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  37. ↑ Шаблон:Cite book
  38. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  39. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  40. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  41. ↑ 41,0 41,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  42. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  43. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  44. ↑ 44,0 44,1 44,2 44,3 Шаблон:Cite news
  45. ↑ 45,0 45,1 45,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  46. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  47. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  48. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Du112018 не указан текст
  49. ↑ Шаблон:Cite newsШаблон:Dead link
  50. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  51. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  52. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  53. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  54. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок HB676 не указан текст
  55. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок HB3064 не указан текст
  56. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок HB3521 не указан текст
  57. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок HB3713 не указан текст
  58. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок HB3947 не указан текст
  59. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок SB981 не указан текст
  60. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок HB4305 не указан текст
  61. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок HB5608 не указан текст
  62. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок HB5705 не указан текст
  63. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок HB5753 не указан текст
  64. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок HB6052 не указан текст
  65. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок HB6138 не указан текст
  66. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок HB6293 не указан текст
  67. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок SB1403 не указан текст
  68. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  69. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок HR639 не указан текст
  70. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Mercado20200217 не указан текст
  71. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  72. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  73. ↑ 73,0 73,1 73,2 73,3 Шаблон:Cite news
  74. ↑ 74,0 74,1 74,2 Шаблон:Cite newsШаблон:Dead link
  75. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  76. ↑ 76,0 76,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  77. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  78. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  79. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  80. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  81. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  82. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  83. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  84. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  85. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  86. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  87. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  88. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  89. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  90. ↑ 90,0 90,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  91. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  92. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  93. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  94. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  95. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  96. ↑ 96,0 96,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  97. ↑ 97,0 97,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  98. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  99. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  100. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  101. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  102. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  103. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  104. ↑ 104,0 104,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  105. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  106. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  107. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  108. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  109. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  110. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  111. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  112. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  113. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  114. ↑ Шаблон:Cite newsШаблон:Dead link
  115. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  116. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  117. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  118. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  119. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  120. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  121. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  122. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  123. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  124. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  125. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  126. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок PNAGovPH-HouseDenies не указан текст
  127. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок PNAGovPH-SeveralIssues не указан текст
  128. ↑ 128,0 128,1 128,2 G.R. No. 252119, Шаблон:Lang. Petition for certiorari and prohibition (with urgent applications for the issuance of a temporary restraining order and/or a writ of preliminary injunction) Шаблон:Webarchive May 7, 2019. Retrieved June 25, 2020.
  129. ↑ 129,0 129,1 129,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  130. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  131. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  132. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  133. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  134. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  135. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  136. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  137. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  138. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  139. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок PhilippinesSC_GRNo252119 не указан текст
  140. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  141. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  142. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  143. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  144. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  145. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  146. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  147. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  148. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  149. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок BlocktimerInvestigation не указан текст
  150. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок BlocktimerInvestigationAsianAffairs не указан текст
  151. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  152. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  153. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  154. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  155. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  156. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  157. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  158. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  159. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  160. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  161. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  162. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  163. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  164. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  165. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  166. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  167. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  168. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  169. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  170. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  171. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  172. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок ABS-CBN News не указан текст
  173. ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Rappler не указан текст
  174. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  175. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  176. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  177. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  178. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  179. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  180. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  181. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  182. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  183. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  184. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  185. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  186. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  187. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  188. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  189. ↑ Шаблон:Cite newsШаблон:Dead link
  190. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  191. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  192. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  193. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  194. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  195. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  196. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  197. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  198. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  199. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  200. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  201. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  202. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  203. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  204. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  205. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  206. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  207. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  208. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  209. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  210. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  211. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  212. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  213. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  214. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  215. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  216. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  217. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  218. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  219. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  220. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  221. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  222. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  223. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  224. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  225. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  226. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  227. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  228. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  229. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  230. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  231. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  232. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  233. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  234. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  235. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  236. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  237. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  238. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  239. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  240. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  241. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  242. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  243. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  244. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  245. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  246. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  247. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  248. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  249. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  250. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  251. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  252. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  253. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  254. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  255. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  256. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  257. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  258. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  259. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  260. ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
  261. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  262. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
  263. ↑ 263,0 263,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  264. ↑ 264,0 264,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  265. ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
Источник — http://wikihandbk.com/ruwiki/index.php?title=Английская_Википедия:ABS-CBN_franchise_renewal_controversy&oldid=12878138