Английская Википедия:Afanasievo culture

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Infobox archaeological culture The Afanasievo culture, or Afanasevo culture (Afanasevan culture) (Шаблон:Lang-ru Afanas'yevskaya kul'tura), is an early archaeological culture of south Siberia, occupying the Minusinsk Basin and the Altai Mountains during the eneolithic era, Шаблон:Circa 3300 to 2500 BCE. It is named after a nearby mountain, Gora Afanasieva (Шаблон:Lang-ru) in what is now Bogradsky District, Khakassia, Russia, first excavated by archaeologist Sergei Teploukhov in 1920-1929.[1] Afanasievo burials have been found as far as Shatar Chuluu in central Mongolia, confirming a further expansion about 1,500 km beyond the Altai mountains.[2] The Afanasievo culture is now considered as an integral part of the Prehistory of Western and Central Mongolia.[3]

According to David W. Anthony the Afanasevan population was descended from people who migrated c. 3700–3300 BCE across the Eurasian Steppe from the pre-Yamnaya Repin culture of the Don-Volga region.[4] It is considered as "intrusive from the west", in respect to previous local Siberian cultures.[5] According to Anthony, "The Afanasievo culture migration to the Altai was carried out by people with a Repin-type material culture, probably from the middle Volga-Ural region."[4]

A 2021 study by F. Zhang and others found that early Tarim mummies from the late 3rd and early 2nd millennia BCE were unrelated to the Afanasevians, and came from a genetically isolated population derived from Ancient North Eurasians, that had borrowed agricultural and pastoral practices from neighboring peoples.[6]

Because of its geographical location and dating, Anthony and earlier scholars such as Leo Klejn, J. P. Mallory and Victor H. Mair have linked the Afanasevans to the Proto-Tocharian language.[7][8][9][10] Afanasievan ancestry persisted in Dzungaria at least until the second half of the 1st millennium BCE.[6] The Shirenzigou culture (410–190 BC), just northeast of the Tarim Basin, also appears to have been derived from the Afanasievans, which, in addition to linguistics, further reinforces an Afanasievo hypothesis for the Tocharians.[11]

Dating

Шаблон:Multiple image Conventional archaeological understanding tended to date the Afanasievo culture at around 2500–2000 BC. However radiocarbon gave dates as early as 3705 BC on wooden tools and 2874 BC on human remains.[12] The earliest of these dates have now been rejected, giving a date of around 3300 BC for the start of the culture, and 2500 BC for its termination.[13]

Culture

Файл:Afanasievo display translation.jpg
Afanasievo culture display in the National Museum of the Altai Republic (translated)

Mass graves were not usual for this culture.[14] Afanasievo cemeteries include both single and small collective burials with the deceased usually flexed on their back in a pit. The burial pits are arranged in rectangular, sometimes circular, enclosures marked by stone walls. It has been argued that the burials represent family burial plots with four or five enclosures constituting the local social group.

The Afanasievo economy included cattle, sheep, and goat. Horse remains, either wild or domestic, have also been found. The Afanasievo people became the first food-producers in the area. Tools were manufactured from stone (axes, arrowheads), bone (fish-hooks, points) and antler. Among the antler pieces are objects that have been identified as possible cheek-pieces for horses. Artistic representations of wheeled vehicles found in the area has been attributed to the Afanasievo culture. Ornaments of copper, silver and gold have also been found.[7]

The Afanasievans are now considered as the earliest herders of East Asia, who were instrumental in the establishment of the long tradition of pastorialism in Mongolia.[15] Their rise also corresponds with the appareance of domesticated sheep, goats, and cattle, which marks the earliest spread of Near Eastern domesticated animals and pastoralism to Inner Asia.[16]

They also introduced the initial practice of copper and bronze metallurgy.[15] Afanasievo burials include metal artifacts in copper, bronze (awls, knives), gold and silver, as well the remains of disassembled carts.[17][18][19] The Afanasievos may have used cattle-drawn wagons, as did Yamanaya communities.[20][21]

Genetics

Шаблон:See Шаблон:Annotated image The analysis of the full genome of Afanasievo individuals has shown that they were genetically very close to the Yamnaya population of the Pontic–Caspian steppe.[24][25][26] The Afanasievo and Yamnaya populations were much more similar to each other than to groups geographically located between the two (which unlike Afanasievo samples carried a large amount of ancestry from eastern Siberian hunter-gatherers). This indicates that the Afanasievo culture was brought to the Altai region via migration from the western Eurasian steppe, which occurred with little admixture from local populations.[26][27]

From the Altai mountains, steppe-derived Afanasievo ancestry spread to the east into Mongolia and to the south into Xinjiang. The Yamnaya-related lineages and ancestry in Afanasievo disappeared in the course of the Bronze Age in the Altai region and Mongolia, being replaced by the migrating populations from the Sintashta culture arriving from the west. In Dzungaria, Afanasievo-related ancestry persisted at least into the late first millennium BCE.[28][29]

The Afanasievo people, accompanied by their pastoralist technologies, are one of the major foreign contributors to the genetic profile of the modern northwestern Chinese.[30]

Paternal haplogroups

The genetic closeness of the Yamnaya and Afanasievo populations is also mirrored in the uniparental haplogroups, especially in the predominance of the Y-chromosome haplogroup R1b.[26]Шаблон:Efn

Maternal haplogroups

Файл:Bertek-33, an Afanasyevo Cemetery.jpg
Bertek-33, an Afanasyevo Cemetery on the Ukok Plateau, Altai Mountains.[31]

A 2018 study analyzed the maternal haplogroups of 7 Afanasievo specimens. 71% belonged to West Eurasian maternal haplogroups U, H and R, while 29% belonged to the East Eurasian maternal haplogroup C.[32]

Populations east of the Afanasievans

Afanasievo burials are recorded as far as central Mongolia, at the sites of Altan Sandal and Shatar Chuluu.[2][33] To their east, in the modern area of eastern Mongolia and beyond, resided Neolithic cultures of Prehistoric Mongolia, probably derived from the Ancient Northeast Asians, who were the predecessors of the Slab Grave culture of eastern Mongolia.[34][35]

Paleoepidemiology

At Afanasevo Gora, two strains of Yersinia pestis have been extracted from human teeth. One is dated 2909–2679 BCE; the other, 2887–2677 BCE. Both are from the same (mass) grave of seven people, and are presumed near-contemporary.[14] This strain's genes express flagellin, which triggers the human immune response; so it was not a bubonic plague.[36]

Possible links to other cultures

Файл:PC Analysis Afanasievo.png
Genetic proximity of the Afanasievo culture (Шаблон:Colorsample) with ancient (color) and modern (grey) populations. Primary Component Analysis (detail).[6]
Файл:Admixture proportions of Afanasievo populations.png
Admixture proportions of Afanasievo populations. They combined Eastern Hunter Gatherer (Шаблон:Colorsample EHG), Caucasian Hunter-Gatherer (Шаблон:Colorsample CHG) and Anatolian Neolithic (Шаблон:Colorsample) ancestry, and were almost indentical with Yamnaya people.[37]

Because of its numerous traits attributed to the early Indo-Europeans, like metal-use, horses and wheeled vehicles, and cultural relations with Kurgan steppe cultures, the Afanasevans are believed to have been Indo-European-speaking.[7] They were genetically similar to the Yamnaya populations of Western Steppe Herders.Шаблон:Sfn Genetic studies have demonstrated a discontinuity between Afanasievo and the succeeding Siberian-originating Okunevo culture, as well as genetic differences between Afanasievo and the Tarim mummies.[38] A genomic study published in 2021 found that the population of earliest Tarim Basin cultures (the Tarim mummies, dated to Шаблон:C.) had high levels of Ancient North Eurasian ancestry and no connection with Afanasievo populations.Шаблон:Sfn

Numerous scholars have suggested that the Afanasevo culture may be responsible for the introduction of metallurgy to China.[39][40][41] In particular, contacts between the Afanasievo culture and the Majiayao culture and the Qijia culture are considered for the transmission of bronze technology.[42][43]

The Afanasievo culture may also display cultural borrowings from the earlier Banpo culture (c. 4000 BCE), particularly in the area of painted pottery, suggesting influence from the Far East, specifically from Neolithic China, on the Afanasievo culture and other cultural complexes in the Middle Yenisei region.[44][45]

Successors

In the Altai Mountains and to the southeast, Afanasievans seem to have coexisted with the early period of the Chemurchek culture for some time, as some of their burials are contemporary and some of the artifacts of the burials coincide.[46]

To the north, the Afanasievo culture was succeeded by the Okunev culture, which is considered as an extension of the Paleosiberian local non-Indo-European forest culture into the region.[7] The Okunev culture nevertheless displays influences from the earlier Afanasievo culture.[24] The region was subsequently occupied by the Andronovo, Karasuk, Tagar and Tashtyk cultures, respectively.[47][48]

Allentoft et al. (2015) confirmed that the Afanasevo culture was replaced by the second wave of Indo-European migrations from the Andronovo culture during late Bronze Age and early Iron Age.[24]Шаблон:Refn The Andronovo population was found to be genetically related, but clearly distinct from the Afanasievo population.[24]

Several scholars propose the Afanasievo culture as the ancestors of the Tocharians, who lived on the northern edge of the Tarim Basin (in present-day Xinjiang, China) in the first millennium AD.[24] The Tocharian languages are believed to have become extinct during the 9th century AD. The Indo-European speaking Tocharian peoples of the Tarim city-states then intermixed with the Uyghurs, whose Old Uyghur language spread through the region.

Shirenzigou culture (410-190 BCE)

Файл:Shirenzigou panorama.png
Surroundings of the Shirenzigou archaeological site in Barkol County

Шаблон:Main Genetic studies on Iron Age individuals of the Shirenzigou site dated to circa 200 BCE have shown a fairly balanced admixture between the West Eurasian and East Eurasian genetic pools.[11] The West Eurasian component was Yamnaya-related, while the East Eurasian component was Northeast Asian-related. The Yamanaya component suggest a strong probability that the Shirenzigou populations were derived from the Afanasievo culture to the north, and spoke an Indo-European language.[11] This reinforces an Afanasievo hypothesis for the Tocharians, often called the "Steppe hypotheses", rather than an hypotheses favouring BMAC and Andronovo Culture origins, the "Bactrian Oasis hypotheses".[11]

Notes

Файл:Timeline Afanasievo.png
Timeline of Afanasievo and later cultures in western Mongolia

Шаблон:Indo-European topics Шаблон:Reflist

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Further reading

Шаблон:Central Asian history Шаблон:Rulers of Ancient Central Asia

  1. Шаблон:Cite book
  2. 2,0 2,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  3. Шаблон:Cite journal
  4. 4,0 4,1 Шаблон:Cite book
  5. Шаблон:Cite book
  6. 6,0 6,1 6,2 Шаблон:Cite journal
  7. 7,0 7,1 7,2 7,3 Шаблон:Cite book
  8. Шаблон:Cite book
  9. Шаблон:Cite book
  10. Клейн Л. С. Миграция тохаров в свете археологии // Stratum plus. Т. 2. С. 178—187.
  11. 11,0 11,1 11,2 11,3 Шаблон:Cite journal
  12. Шаблон:Cite journal
  13. Шаблон:Cite journal
  14. 14,0 14,1 Rasmussen, S15-16. These samples are marked "RISE509" and "RISE511".
  15. 15,0 15,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  16. Шаблон:Cite journal
  17. Шаблон:Cite journal
  18. Kovalev, A. A., and Erdenebaatar, D. (2009). Discovery of new cultures of the Bronze Age in Mongolia according to the data obtained by the international Central Asian archaeological expedition. In Bemmann, J., Parzinger, H., Pohl, E., and Tseveendorzh, D. (eds.), Current Archaeological Research in Mongolia, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn, pp. 149–170.
  19. Шаблон:Cite journal
  20. Шаблон:Cite journal
  21. Шаблон:Cite journal
  22. Coordinates: Шаблон:Coord
  23. Шаблон:Cite web
  24. 24,0 24,1 24,2 24,3 24,4 Шаблон:Cite journal
  25. Шаблон:Cite journal
  26. 26,0 26,1 26,2 Шаблон:Cite journal
  27. Narasimhan2019, Supplementary Information, p. 235: "Based on the PCA and ADMIXTURE plots, we observe that the individuals from Kanai_MBA, Okunevo_BA.AG, and Central_Steppe_EMBA.SG are genetically homogenous, and as expected based on the geography, more closely related to ESHGs than to WSHGs. In contrast to these individuals, individuals from the Afanasievo culture appear to be genetically similar to those from the western Steppe, consistent with the hypothesis of population movement from the west to the east that leapfrogged the intervening groups with primarily ancestry related to Central_Steppe_EMBA."
  28. Шаблон:Harvnb
  29. Шаблон:Cite journal "Beginning in the Middle Bronze Age, there is no compelling evidence in the Mongolian time transect data for a persistence of the Yamnaya-derived lineages that spread with Afanasievo. Instead the Yamnaya-related ancestry can only be modelled as deriving from a later spread related to people of the Middle to Late Bronze Age Sintashta and Andronovo horizons who were themselves a mixture of ~2/3 Yamnaya-related and 1/3 European farmer-related ancestry4,5,6. The Sintashta-related ancestry is detected in proportions of 0–57% in groups from this time onward, with substantial proportions of Sintashta-related ancestry only in western Mongolia (Figure 3, Online Table 25). For all these groups, qpAdm ancestry models pass with Afanasievo in the outgroups while models with Afanasievo as the source and Sintashta in the outgroups are all rejected (Figure 3, Online Table 25)."
  30. Шаблон:Cite journal
  31. Шаблон:Cite journal
  32. Шаблон:Cite journal See also Supporting Information document 1 for uniparental haplogroup details.
  33. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок WHRL не указан текст
  34. Шаблон:Cite journal
  35. Шаблон:Cite journal
  36. Rasmussen, 575.
  37. Шаблон:Cite journal
  38. Шаблон:Cite journal
  39. Шаблон:Cite journal
  40. Шаблон:Cite book
  41. Шаблон:Cite book
  42. Шаблон:Cite journal
  43. Шаблон:Cite journal
  44. Шаблон:Cite book
  45. Шаблон:Cite journal
  46. Kovalev, A. A., and Erdenebaatar, D. (2009). Discovery of new cultures of the Bronze Age in Mongolia according to the data obtained by the international Central Asian archaeological expedition. In Bemmann, J., Parzinger, H., Pohl, E., and Tseveendorzh, D. (eds.), Current Archaeological Research in Mongolia, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn, p.158: "Two 14C-dates that have come from the charcoal found in the earliest (ritual) pit of Chemurchek barrow No. 2 appeared to be in the same period as the four radiocarbon dates from the charcoal in the fi lling of the burial pit of barrow No. 1 that belongs to the Afanasievo culture. It may indicate that during the earliest period of existence of the Chemurchek culture, its population in the Altai region maybe coexisted with population of the Afanasievo culture. A pillar, erected at the eastern side of an Afanasievo culture barrow (Fig. 1.1), as well as the finding of a bone arrowhead (Fig. 1.4), which is similar to arrowheads from Kulala Ula 1 and Kara Tumsik barrows (Fig. 2.10,12), also confirm this proposition."
  47. Шаблон:Cite web
  48. Шаблон:Cite web