Английская Википедия:Archibald v. Braverman

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Infobox court case

Archibald v. Braverman, Шаблон:Law report (1969), was a case decided by the California Court of Appeals that first ruled that visual perception of an accident was not a necessary prerequisite to recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress under the criteria enunciated in Dillon v. Legg. The holding in Archibald was later overruled by the 1989 case Thing v. La Chusa.[1][2][3]

See also

Notes

Шаблон:Notelist

References

Шаблон:Reflist

External links

Шаблон:United States tort case law

  1. Thing v. La Chusa, 48 Cal. 3d 644, 668
  2. Шаблон:Cite web
  3. Шаблон:Cite web