Английская Википедия:Armenia–Azerbaijan border crisis

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description

Шаблон:Lead rewrite Шаблон:Update Шаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:Infobox military conflict

Файл:Armenia-Azerbaijan Border Crisis.svg
Map showing the territories of Armenia occupied by Azerbaijan (2023)

The military forces of Armenia and Azerbaijan have been engaged in a border conflict since 12 May 2021, when Azerbaijani soldiers crossed several kilometers (miles) into Armenia in the provinces of Syunik and Gegharkunik. Azerbaijan is currently occupying at least Шаблон:Convert of Armenian territory.[1][2][3][4][5][6] Azerbaijan has not withdrawn its troops from internationally recognised Armenian territory despite calls to do so by the European Parliament, United States and France – two of three co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group.[7][8] Since the end of the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War, Azerbaijan has made numerous incursions into Armenian territory.[9]

Since the end of the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh War, Azerbaijan has regularly violated the November ceasefire agreement, provoking cross-border fights with Armenia.[10][11][12][13]

It is an established pattern that Azerbaijan instigates cross-border incursions or ceasefire violations when its government is unhappy with the pace of negotiations with Armenia.[14][15]

The crisis escalated in July 2021, with clashes taking place on the Armenia–Nakhchivan border, and in November 2021 in the GegharkunikKalbajar area.[11]

In August 2021, Azerbaijani forces blockaded southern Armenia (Syunik) by closing the main north–south highway which interrupted all international transit with Iran and forced Armenia to develop alternative roads.[16][17][18][19]

The largest escalation occurred in September 2022, when Azerbaijan launched the largest attack on the Republic of Armenia in the history of the conflict between the two countries.[20][21][22][23] Casualties were reported on both sides.[24]

Armenia has unsuccessfully requested that the Collective Security Treaty Organisation and Russia independently intervene due to Azerbaijan's military incursions in May 2021 and September 2022. The CSTO and Russia declined to provide assistance both times.[25][26]

Officials from the European Union and Russia have explicitly condemned Azerbaijan's military operations, considering them to be violations of the ceasefire agreement.[11][13][27][28][29][12] Prior to August 2021, the Russian peacekeepers had made neutral statements calling for "both sides" to de-escalate rather than explicitly blame Azerbaijan for the fighting.[28][29][12] In order to strengthen the border against Azerbaijan's military incursions, Armenia allocated additional defense areas to border guards of the Russian Federal Security Service.[30][31]

Although the mission has been condemned by Azerbaijan and Russia, the EU has sent a CSDP civilian monitoring mission to Armenia to contribute to stability along the border and deter offensives by Azerbaijan.[32][33][34][2] The president of Azerbaijan, Ilham Aliyev, has made numerous threats to Armenia, making statements such as "Armenia must accept our conditions" if Armenians wish to "live comfortably on an area of 29,000 square kilometers," (11,000 sq. mi.) and "they must not forget that Armenian villages are visible from here."[35][36][37][38][39]

Since Azerbaijan's offensives, Armenia's borders with Azerbaijan have become militarized which has disrupted the livelihoods of residents in border communities: residents have been targeted and can no longer access farmlands, schools, water resources, relatives, or religious sites.[40][41][42][43] Fearing for their safety, many Armenian villagers have moved away permanently.[44][45][46]

Background

Шаблон:Main

Armenia and Azerbaijan have not officially demarcated their mutual borders since becoming independent states following collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.[47][48]

The issue of border demarcation between Armenia and Azerbaijan arose immediately after the defeat of Armenia in the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War, and Azerbaijan regaining control over its occupied territories. Before the 2020 war, there was no mutually agreed upon border between Armenia and Azerbaijan, with certain Armenian villages and agricultural workers crossing over into Azerbaijan.[49] During Soviet times, cross-border interactions and movements were common.[45][50][51]

The issue of exclaves/enclaves is another border-related issue; there is an exclave called Artsvashen which is formally part of Soviet-era Armenia but controlled by and situated entirely within the current Republic of Azerbaijan; likewise, the exclaves of Tigranashen, Voskepar, and Barkhudarly are formally part of Soviet-era Azerbaijan but controlled by and situated entirely within the current Republic of Armenia.[47]

Following the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War, physical demarcation of the borders commenced in certain areas using excavators.[48] Azerbaijan used Armenia's main north–south highway and Google Maps to unofficially demarcate the border between the southern regions of the two countries;[45][48][52] Armenian residents who lived on the east side of the highway were given three days to leave.[45][53] Azerbaijan built many new border posts often using Armenian roads under the escort of Russian military.[45] Intimidated by the presence of Azerbaijani military, certain Armenians living in border regions limited the number of trips to the region using the main highway; others moved away permanently.[45] Both Armenia and Azerbaijan agree that Soviet maps will form the basis of border delineation.[45][54]

Since the end of the war, Azerbaijan has increasingly promoted expansionist claims to Armenian territory which it describes as "Western Azerbaijan"[55][56][57][58] which have been perceived as a bargaining strategy to force Armenians to relinquish control of Artsakh[59] and concede the "Zangezur corridor."[60] The Azerbaijani government has also successfully petitioned Google to remove historical Armenian place names from maps of Artsakh.[61][62]

In April 2021, Azerbaijan's president Ilham Aliyev made irredentist claims over Armenia's capital Yerevan, Zangezur (Syunik), and Sevan (Gegharkunik), declaring that they are "historical lands" of Azerbaijan.[63][64] He said that if Armenia would not agree to provide a corridor from Nakhchivan to western Azerbaijan through Armenia's Syunik Province, then Azerbaijan would establish it through the use of force, claiming that Azerbaijani people would return to what he described as "West Zangazur".[65][66][67][68] Turkey supports Azerbaijan and also seeks territorial control over Armenia's Syunik province.[69]

A joint statement by the European Parliament Chair of the Delegation for relations with the South Caucasus, Marina Kaljurand, and Standing Rapporteurs on Armenia and Azerbaijan, Andrey Kovatchev and Željana Zovko condemned the statements made by the Azerbaijani side: "To de-escalate the situation...we condemn in particular recent statements by Azerbaijani representatives regarding so-called 'West Zangezur' and referring to the territory of the Republic of Armenia as Azerbaijani 'ancestral land'. Such statements are highly irresponsible and threaten to undermine regional security further."[70]

The day of Azerbaijan's first military incursion on 12 May 2021, it announced it was holding a four-day exercise involving 15,000 soldiers, involving tanks, missile systems, and aviation units, among other military resources.[71][72]

Armenian territory occupied by Azerbaijan

Azerbaijani soldiers are occupying internationally recognized Armenian territory and conducting engineering and fortification works.[73][74][4][75][76][77][78][79][80][81] Estimates of the amount of territory occupied vary between 50 and 215 square kilometers (20 and 83 sq. mi.) with some local Armenian officials and farmers claiming that the Azerbaijani military has made bigger territorial gains than is admitted by officials in Yerevan.[82][73][78][83][84][85][86][87][88]

European PACE monitors have "…observed the presence of Azerbaijani military positions within Armenian sovereign territory sometimes well beyond any disputed border line… [including]… strategic high ground… overlooking the main road linking the capital Yerevan to the Iranian border.[89] These strategic heights are in the regions of Gegharkunik, Kapan, and near the village of Nerkin Khand further south.[86] According to International Crisis Group, these new positions clearly give Azerbaijan an advantage if fighting resumes since they encircle several Armenian villages and overlook the main road to Syunik which is considered "a lifeline for the country's communication's routes" to both Iran and Nagorno-Karabakh.[90][82]

Locals fear Azerbaijan will threaten to cut off southern Armenia from the rest of the country unless Armenia surrenders concessions such as the Zangezur corridor.[90] Southern Armenia (Syunik) is often referred to as "the backbone of Armenia" given that it connects Armenia both to Artsakh as well as to Iran.[91] With 80% of Armenia's borders being closed since Turkey and Azerbaijan's 30 year-long blockade,[92] the border with Iran comprises one of only two open international borders to Armenia.[91]

Since Azerbaijan's military incursions, Armenia's eastern border has become militarized; it has been common for Armenian farmers in border areas to be shot at and for their livestock to be robbed.[41][42] An article published in Jacobin summarizes the situation as "Azerbaijan… kidnaps, tortures, rapes, and executes Armenians in the border regions."[93] Fearing for their safety, many Armenian villagers have stopped using land previously used for agricultural purposes and others have moved away permanently.[44][45][42]

Azerbaijan has not withdrawn its troops from internationally recognised Armenian territory despite calls to do so by the European Parliament, United States and France – the latter two which comprise two of three co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group.

Azerbaijan argues that it cannot be accused of occupying Armenian lands without official border demarcation.[90][94] Azerbaijani media outlets and notable politicians within the country have called for the occupation of more Armenian land.[95][96]

Timeline

May 2021

On 12 May, hundreds of Azerbaijani soldiers crossed several kilometres (miles) into Armenian territory and occupied territory within the provinces of Gegharkunik and Syunik.[97][49][98] The same day, Azerbaijan announced it was holding a four-day exercise involving 15,000 soldiers, tanks, missile systems, and aviation units.[71][72]

In Syunik, Azerbaijani soldiers attempted to surround Lake Sev.[4][49] The soldiers advanced towards civilian settlements, scaring local agricultural workers.[44] Incursions by Azerbaijani soldiers were also observed in Verishen and Sisian within Syunik[99][100][101]

In Gegharkunik, Azerbaijani incursions were also observed, including in Vardenis,[102][97][99][100][101] with certain media outlets reporting that Azerbaijani forces had captured areas there.[103] The Armenian National Security Service warned of the legal consequences of reporting misinformation that "cause[s] panic."[103]

Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan said negotiations were ongoing for an Azerbaijani withdrawal, and that Armenian forces had stopped the advance without any skirmishes having taken place.Шаблон:Citation needed

Файл:Lake Sev 02 (cropped).jpg
Lake Sev as seen from the peak of Mets Ishkhanasar mountain in Armenia

Azerbaijan claims that its forces did not cross into Armenia and merely took up positions that were inaccessible in winter months, adding that the border between the two countries was never formally demarcated following the collapse of the Soviet Union.[104]

However, Soviet maps from 1975 show that over 90% of Sev Lake is in Armenian territory, with only a small section of the northern shore situated within Azerbaijan SSR[4][105][106] The map also shows the adjacent smaller Lake Janlich (Jinli) as entirely in Armenian territory.[105][107][106] The Azerbaijani side, showed a map with the entire Sev lake belonging to Azerbaijan, and refused to leave the territory.[49][44]

On 13 May, the Armenian Defense Ministry reported that Azerbaijani forces crossed the Armenian border in two other sections.[101] The same day, Nikol Pashinyan said that 250 Azerbaijani soldiers remained within Armenia's internationally recognized borders.[101]

On 14 May, the Prime Minister of Armenia, Nikol Pashinyan, formally appealed to the Russian-led Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) to hold consultations regarding the Azerbaijani incursion into Armenia.[108][109][110][111] Armenian and Azerbaijani military officials convened at the border together with representatives of the Russian military deployed in the Syunik Province for several hours of negotiations, without any immediate resulting agreement being announced afterwards.[108] Pashinyan also said in a speech on 14 May that French President Emmanuel Macron said that France was ready to provide military assistance if necessary.[72]

On 15 May, Armenia's Defense Ministry stated that the situation regarding the Azerbaijani incursion on 12–13 May remained unresolved, with some Azerbaijani soldiers still on Armenian territory, and that negotiations in order to bring about a peaceful settlement were ongoing.[112]

On 15 May, the press service of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan responded by saying that it was enforcing the borders of Azerbaijan on the basis of "maps available to both sides", criticizing the Armenian statements as "provocative" and "inadequate". The Ministry also accused the Armenian authorities of using the situation for pre-election domestic political purposes,[113][114] a claim which is considered unlikely.[115]

During a call with Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, Azerbaijani President Aliyev described Armenia's decision to appeal to the CSTO as an attempt to "internationalize the issue".[116]

On 19 May, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said that Russia came up with an initiative to create a joint Armenia-Azerbaijan commission on demarcation and delimitation of the borders, in which Russia could play the role of a consultant or mediator.[117] On 20 May, acting prime minister Nikol Pashinyan confirmed that Armenia and Azerbaijan were close to an agreement on the creation of a joint commission to demarcate the border between the two countries, with Russia acting as a mediator, and each country appointing delegates to the commission by 31 May.[118]

In the morning of 20 May, a group of Azerbaijani servicemen crossed the border near the village of Khoznavar in the Goris region, walking 1.5 km (1 mile) into Armenian territory. They were forced back to their original positions by Armenian forces, but they then made a second attempt to cross the border in the evening, resulting in a fight between Armenian and Azerbaijani servicemen. The General Prosecutor's Office of Armenia reported that eleven Armenian soldiers were injured and hospitalized, and that there were injuries from the Azerbaijani side, too. The videos of the incident were leaked on social media, initially a video of Azerbaijani military men attacking and beating Armenian soldiers, and, on the next day, another video showing the Armenian Armed Forces expelling Azerbaijani servicemen from their territory appeared.[119]

On 25 May, an Armenian soldier was killed 7 kilometers (5 miles) within Armenian territory which Azerbaijan denied.[115] The same day, all male staff working for the administration of the Sisian community were mobilized into volunteer defense units.[115]

On 27 May, after the tensions rose further after the capture of six Armenian soldiers by Azerbaijani forces early in the morning, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan called for the deployment of international observers along portions of Armenia's border with Azerbaijan. "If the situation is not resolved this provocation could inevitably lead to a large-scale clash," Pashinyan said at an emergency meeting of Armenia's Security Council held in the evening, suggesting Armenia and Azerbaijan to pull back their troops from the border areas and let Russia and/or the United States and France, the two other co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group, deploy their observers there. The disengagement of troops and the launch of the monitoring mission, should be followed by a process of "ascertaining border points" supervised by the international community, the Prime Minister said.[120]

On 28 May, the EU spokesperson Peter Stano called for immediate de-escalation and urged both sides to pull back their forces to positions held before 12 May and engage in negotiations on border delimitation and demarcation, welcoming proposals for a possible international observation mission and expressing readiness to provide expertise and help on border delimitation and demarcation. The EU continues to call on Azerbaijan to release all prisoners of war and detainees without delay and welcomes all efforts aimed at decreasing tensions.[121]

July 2021

Файл:Armenian positions in the northeastern direction of Armenia on 28 July 2021.jpg
Military positions of the Armenian forces in the northeastern direction of Armenia, which were attacked by Azerbaijani forces on 28 July 2021, according to the Armenian MoD

After an incident on 6 July in the Agdam District, Armenian and Azerbaijani forces clashed again in the directions of Azerbaijan's Tovuz, Gadabay, Nakhchivan and Shusha districts from 7 to 20 July.[122][123][124] On 14 July, the Armenian defence ministry stated that the Azerbaijani engineers tried to advance their military positions near Yeraskh in the Nakhchivan section of the Armenia–Azerbaijan border, and clashes erupted. The ministry added that the Azerbaijani side had started shelling Yeraskh, using mortars and grenade launchers, with an Armenian soldier getting killed[125][126] and the community leader of Yeraskh getting wounded.[127] The Azerbaijani Defense Ministry stated that an Azerbaijani soldier stationed near Heydarabad was wounded during the clashes,[128] and added that the "responsibility for the creation of tension along the state border of the two countries lies entirely with Armenia."[129] The Azerbaijani Defense Ministry later on the same day stated that the Armenian forces had fired at the Azerbaijani positions near Istisu in Kalbajar and Aghdam in Tovuz.[130] On 19 July, further clashes erupted near Yeraskh on Armenia's eastern border with Azerbaijan's Nakhchivan.[14][131]

On 22 July 2021, President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev made another irredentist claim over Armenia's province of Syunik (also known as Zangezur), saying that it is "our own territory":

Шаблон:Blockquote

On 23 July 2021, the Azerbaijani Ministry of Defence stated that one of its soldiers was killed by Armenian sniper fire in Kalbajar District near the Armenia–Azerbaijan border.[132] Meanwhile, the Armenian MoD stated that three Armenian servicemen were wounded as Azerbaijani forces opened fire on Armenian positions located in the Gegharkunik section.[133]

On 28 July 2021, the Human Rights Defender of Armenia reported about intensive firing from the Azerbaijani side between 03:30 and 03:40 targeting civilian buildings in the villages of Verin Shorzha and Saradeghy in the Gegharkunik Province.[134] On the same day, three Armenian soldiers were killed in renewed clashes with Azerbaijani forces in the Kalbajar District and Gegharkunik Province, with four others wounded. Armenia accused Azerbaijan of "occupying Armenia's sovereign territory" as the Azerbaijani side blamed the incident on Armenian forces, stating that they opened fire first. Azerbaijan also reported 2 soldiers wounded during the skirmish.[135][136][137][138]

On 29 July, the Azerbaijani Ministry of Defence stated that Armenian forces broke the ceasefire in the morning, using automatic rifles and grenade launchers.[139] Armenian authorities then stated that the Azerbaijani side had violated the ceasefire,[140] but Azerbaijan denied that it broke the ceasefire.[141] An Armenian soldier was wounded in the shootout.[142]

On 31 July, Armenian authorities stated that Azerbaijani forces fired upon a logistic support vehicle delivering food to Armenian military positions in Yeraskh. As a result, the vehicle was "seriously damaged".[143]

August 2021

On 13 August 2021, Armenia and Azerbaijan reported about shelling on the border. The Armenian MoD stated that the Azerbaijani units opened fire from various calibre firearms at the Armenian positions in the Gegarkunik section, meanwhile Azerbaijan said that the Armenian forces had opened fire in the direction of the Kalbajar and Gadabay Districts.[144]

On 16 August 2021, two further Armenian soldiers were killed by Azerbaijani forces.[145] Vahan Tatosyan died from sniper fire at 09:50hrs in Yeraskh, while Arman Hakobyan was killed in Gegharkunik at 18:10hrs.[146][147]

On 17 August 2021, Armenian Ministry of Defence reported that another Armenian soldier was wounded as a result of a shelling attack from Azerbaijan.[148]

On 25 August, Azerbaijani forces blockaded southern Armenia (Syunik) by closing the main north–south (Goris – Kapan) highway in Armenia in two sections near the villages of Karmrakar and Shurnukh, interrupting all international transit with Iran.[16][17] The following day Azerbaijani forces blocked another section of the road further north, near the village of Vorotan.[16][17] The blockade stranded hundreds of Iranian trucks and resulted in the isolation of three villages located in between the closed sections of the road.[17] The blockade was alleviated partly under the escorts of Russian border guards which patrol the Armenian side of the border.[17][149][150][151]

Armenian Prime Minister Pashinyan announced that the issue would be solved with the construction of a new north–south transport corridor, which was completed in November 2021.[16][152]

On 27 August 2021, the Armenian Human Rights Defender reported that Azerbaijani troops had targeted Kut village: "Elderly people and children were in the yard at the time of the shooting. There were also children in the house at that time. On August 27, at around 10 pm, Azerbaijani armed forces fired intensively at civilian houses in the village of Kut, Gegharkunik region, directly targeting the civilian population," reported Arman Tatoyan.[153][154]

September 2021

On 1 September 2021, the Armenian soldier Gegham Sahakyan was killed by Azerbaijani sniper fire in Yeraskh.[155][156] Following increased tension with Iran, Azerbaijan began charging taxes on Iranian truck drivers who deliver supplies to Armenia through the main north-south highway, which Azerbaijan had previously blockaded.[157]

October 2021

On 9 October 2021, the Armenian MoD reported that an Armenian serviceman, Misak Khachatryan, was injured by a shot from border with Azerbaijan in Ararat Province.[158]

On 15 October 2021, Azerbaijani MoD reported that an Azerbaijani soldier was killed by Armenian sniper fire.[159]

On 15 and 16 October 2021, Armenian media reported that Azerbaijani forces shelled the village of Yeraskh, causing fires which damaged crops.[160][161]

November 2021

Between 12 and 15 November 2021, Azerbaijan extended its blockade of southern Armenia by installing additional border checkpoints on the roads between and leading to the cities of Goris and Kapan.[18]

On 16 November 2021, clashes between Azerbaijan and Armenia took place at the Syunik–Gegharkunik/Kalbajar–Lachin regions. At least seven Azerbaijani and 15 Armenian soldiers were killed,[162][163] with 32 Armenian soldiers captured.[164]

It appeared that Azerbaijan was using force to coerce Armenia into signing an agreement with various objectives: to demarcate their shared border, to establish an extraterritorial corridor through Armenia to Nakhchivan, and for Armenia to reaffirm that Artsakh is part of Azerbaijan.[163][18][165][3] Haqqin, a pro-government Azerbaijani news agency, wrote "Azerbaijan has demonstrated that it is prepared to inflict the final blow against Armenia. For good. After this, Yerevan will have no alternative to return to the negotiating table."[163] Although Azerbaijan claimed that Armenia provoked the fighting, geolocation footage indicated the Azerbaijani forces had made incursions clearly inside Armenia proper.[166]

The clashes ended at 18:30 local time after a Russian-mediated ceasefire.[167] On November 16, Pashinyan said that Azerbaijani forces occupied about Шаблон:Convert of Armenia. The figure of 41 square kilometers (15 sq. mi.) has been used since May, which would suggest that no new land was occupied in this newest round of fighting, but this contradicted with the Armenian MOD report, according to which Armenia has lost two military positions on 16 November.[168]

On November 17, a joint statement was issued by various EU officials: Marina Kaljurand (the European Union's chair of the delegation for relations with the South Caucasus), Andrey Kovatchev (the European Parliament's standing rapporteur on Armenia), and Željana Zovko (the European Parliament's standing rapporteur on Azerbaijan). These EU officials called the military operation launched by Azerbaijan on 16 November 2021 "the worst violation to date of the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh ceasefire agreement" and "condemn[ed] any attempts at "borderisation", as observed since the incursion of Azerbaijani troops into Armenian territory.[11]

On 22 November 2021, an Armenian soldier was killed by Azerbaijani forces near the village of Norabak in Gegharkunik province.[169]

December 2021

On December 3, a 65-year-old civilian, Seyran Sargsyan, from the Chartar village of Martuni district was captured and killed by the Azerbaijani military. The Russian peacekeepers have started and investigation on the case involving both sides.[170][171]

On 4 December, Azerbaijan freed 10 captured Armenian soldiers captured from the 16 November clashes in exchange of maps detailing the location of landmines in Nagorno Karabakh, the agreement was achieved with Russian mediation.[172]

On 9 December, the Azerbaijani Ministry of Defence announced that an Azerbaijani soldier was killed in a skirmish with Armenian forces on the Azeri-Armenian border.[173]

On 10 December, the Armenian Ministry of Defence announced that an Armenian soldier was killed after clashes with Azerbaijani forces on the Gegharkunik area of the Armenian-Azerbijani border.[174]

On 18 December, two Azerbaijani servicemen were captured by Armenian forces near Lachin, the soldiers were later released.[175]

January 2022

On 11 January, one Azerbaijani soldier and three Armenian soldiers were killed in a shootout in the Verin Shorzha area of Armenia's Gegharkunik province.[176][177][178]

April 2022

On 6 April, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and President İlham Aliyev met in Brussels for peace talks mediated by the European Council President Charles Michel.[179][180]

On 6 April, the government of Azerbaijan said that Armenian forces shelled Azerbaijani military positions deployed in the Republic of Armenia's north-eastern borderline. However, Armenia's Defense Ministry refuted this.[181]

September 2022

Шаблон:Main article

Файл:Map of Azerbaijani strikes on the territory of Armenia between 12-13 September 2022.png
Azerbaijani strikes on Armenian territory between September 12 and 14, 2022

On the morning of 12 September 2022, Azerbaijan initiated an unprovoked invasion of Armenia, striking positions along a 200 km (100 mile) stretch of their shared border.[182][183][184][185] Azerbaijan offensives hit 23 locations as far as 40 km (25 miles) within Armenia in the Syunik, Gegharkunik, and Vayots Dzor provinces.[186][187][188][189][190] Azerbaijani forces attacked military and civilian positions in Vardenis, Goris, Sotk, Jermuk, and other cities[191] with artillery, drones, and heavy weapons.[21][192][193][194] At least 105 Armenian soldiers and 71 Azerbaijani military personnel were killed.[195][196]

Azerbaijan claimed that Armenian forces had staged "large-scale subversive acts" using "saboteurs" who planted landmines,[190][197][198][196] an allegation the government spread during the days following the invasion[199] and also echoed by Azerbaijan's ally Turkey.[199] Various journalists, politicians, and political analysts have scrutinized these allegations and consider them unfounded or unverifiable.[182][183][184][185][200][201][202] Arkady Dubnov, a political scientist and expert on the Southern Caucasus said "This doesn't look convincing, and everyone understands that this was a contrived excuse. No Azeri officials have provided any evidence to substantiate the incursion."[203]

According to Thomas de Waal, political analyst and author of several books on the Caucasus, some media outlets misleadingly described the fighting as "border clashes" and made reference to the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh despite the fact "no fighting took place in Karabakh...or indeed in Azerbaijani territory; it was all inside the territory of Armenia."[204] Around 30 or 40 towns and villages located in sovereign Armenian territory were attacked, resulting in 7,600 people being displaced.[205] According to certain media reports Azerbaijan used large-calibre weapons such as Grad missiles to target civilian settlements.[190] Azerbaijani President Aliyev later directly referred to the invasion in a speech, making irredentist statements about Armenian territory and confirming that Azerbaijan forces now control strategic highground in the area:[206] "As a result of this [September 2022] military operation, our historical cities are now in front of our eyes through visual observation."[207] Following Azerbaijan's attacks, pro-government media outlets and notable politicians within the country called for occupation of more Armenian land, claiming that a "buffer zone" was needed to deter "Armenian provocations.".[95][96]

On 15 September 2022 at 12:20 a.m., Secretary of the Security Council of Armenia Armen Grigoryan announced that a ceasefire agreement had been reached between Armenia and Azerbaijan;[208] however, Azerbaijan did not confirm the ceasefire in any public statement.[208][185] The fighting ended with Azerbaijani troops taking control of new positions deep inside Armenia, with at least 7600 civilians displaced from Armenian provinces.[209][210]

Due to Azerbaijan's September attacks of Armenia, various foreign embassies including those of France, Britain, and the United States, have issued travel advisories against visiting southern Armenia and areas which share a border with Azerbaijan, including the provinces of Syunik, Vayots Dzor, as well as southern Gegharkunik, and parts of Tavush.[211]

October 2022

Шаблон:Main article On 6 October 2022, Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan and President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev met at the first European Political Community summit in Prague in an attempt to resolve the long running Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and the recent Armenia–Azerbaijan border crisis. Following the meeting, it was stated that the two parties agreed to the deployment of a European Union led mission, which would be deployed on the Armenian side of their shared border for a period of two months, starting in October 2022.[212][213] The stated aim of the mission is to "build confidence and, through its reports, to contribute to the border commissions" work towards delimitation of the border between the two parties. On October 12, nearly a month after Azerbaijan's attack, the Security Council of Armenia said there would be a peace deal between the two countries by the end of the year.[214]

The OSCE also sent a Needs Assessment Team to Armenia between 21 and 27 October 2022, following a request made by the government of Armenia. The OSCE sent a group of international experts and representatives of the OSCE Secretariat to assess the situation in certain border areas along the Armenia–Azerbaijan border.[215]

January 2023

On 23 January, the European Union Mission in Armenia (EUMA) launched its operations. The objective of the CSDP mission is to contribute to stability in the border areas of Armenia, build confidence on the ground, conduct active patrolling and reporting, and to support normalization efforts between Armenia and Azerbaijan led by the President of the European Council, Charles Michel.[216] EUMA will have an initial mandate of 2 years with the possibility of extension.

April 2023

A skirmish resulting in 7 people dying occurred near the village of Tegh which is the last village on the Lachin Corridor in Armenia before it enters Azerbaijani territory.[217][218] Video footage released by the Armenian Ministry of Defence showed Azerbaijani troops firing after approaching Armenian soldiers who were digging trenches along the border.[219] The French Foreign Ministry issued a statement: "Armenia's territorial integrity must be respected and Azerbaijani forces occupying positions on the Armenian side of the line of contact must withdraw in order to prevent future incidents and preserve the foundations of a lasting peace in the region."[220]

May 2023

On 5 May, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated, "a peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan is within reach," following the conclusion of four days of extensive negotiations held in Washington, D.C. Blinken confirmed that progress had been made and was hopeful that President Aliyev and Prime Minister Pashinyan would likely come up with a framework agreement on the sidelines of the 2nd European Political Community Summit to be held in Moldova in June 2023.[221]

Following the negotiations held in the US, it was announced that Armenia and Azerbaijan would resume peace talks in Brussels. According to officials, Western allies are encouraging mediation efforts between the two sides. President Aliyev and Prime Minister Pashinyan are set to meet with European Council president Charles Michel, followed by another meeting with German chancellor Olaf Scholz and French president Emmanuel Macron.[222]

Azerbaijani and Armenian forces exchanged artillery fire on 11 May along the border, near the town of Sotk in the Gegharkunik Province, leaving at least one soldier dead with several others wounded.[223] Both sides traded blame.[224][225] Tensions escalated after Azerbaijan installed a checkpoint to the Lachin corridor in 2022.[224]

July 2023

Nikol Pashinyan issued a warning that there is a likely chance of a third war unless both sides can reach a permanent peace.[226]

September 2023

On 3 September 2023, during an interview, Armenian prime minister Nikol Pashinyan stated that it was a strategic mistake for Armenia to solely rely on Russia to guarantee its security. Pashinyan stated, "Moscow has been unable to deliver and is in the process of winding down its role in the wider South Caucasus region" and "the Russian Federation cannot meet Armenia's security needs. This example should demonstrate to us that dependence on just one partner in security matters is a strategic mistake." Pashinyan accused Russian peacekeepers deployed to uphold the ceasefire deal of failing to do their job. Pashinyan confirmed that Armenia is trying to diversify its security arrangements, most notably with the European Union and the United States.[227]

On 7 September, speaking at a meeting of senior government officials, Armenian prime minister Nikol Pashinyan accused Azerbaijan of building up an army on the Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenian borders.[228][229]

On 14 September, the Azerbaijani military violated the ceasefire in Nagorno-Karabakh in the early hours of Thursday. Azerbaijani forces used small arms in the shooting in the region.[230]

On 19 September, Azerbaijan launched a military offensive in Nagorno-Karabakh.

Territorial incursions into the Republic of Artsakh

Current situation

Since March 26, 2023, the Azerbaijani government has formalized its blockade of the Republic of Artsakh by seizing strategic ground around the Lachin corridor both within Artsakh and Armenia, installing a military outpost that blocks a bypass dirt road that provided relief, blocking the old section of the Lachin corridor, and installing a checkpoint at the new section.[231][232][233][234][235][236][237] Azerbaijan has ignored calls from the Russian peacekeepers to observe the 2020 ceasefire conditions and return to their initial territorial positions behind the Line of Contact.[231][238][233][234][239] Azerbaijan has also ignored calls from the International Court of Justice, the European Court of Human Rights, and other international entities to restore freedom of movement across the Lachin corridor.[240]

Timeline

On 11 October 2021, an Armenian civilian named Aram Tepnants was shot dead by Azerbaijani snipers in the town of Martakert. Russia's Ministry of Defense confirmed the incident and stated that Russian peacekeepers launched an investigation involving both sides.[241]

On 8 November 2021, one Armenian civilian was killed and three wounded as Azerbaijani troops opened fire at Armenians repairing a water supply pipe near Shushi. Russia's Ministry of Defense confirmed the incident and stated that Russian peacekeepers launched an investigation involving both sides.[242] The U.S. Department of State Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs condemned the killing of the Armenian civilian.[243][244] On 8 March, it was reported that the only gas pipeline leading from Armenia to the Armenian-inhabited enclave of Artsakh was damaged, as tension spiked in the region following the launch of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The energy supply was reportedly disrupted again on the evening of March 21. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Artsakh authorities have accused the Azerbaijan government of deliberately creating additional humanitarian problems for the population of Artsakh.[245][246]

On 24 March, Azerbaijani soldiers crossed the Line of Contact and took control of the village of Farukh, using firearms and drones,[247] with women and children being evacuated from the nearby village of Khramort. Russian peacekeepers were reported to be negotiating with Azerbaijan.[248] On 27 March 2022, the Russian Defense Ministry reported that Azerbaijani forces had withdrawn from the village.[249][250] This statement was refuted by the Azerbaijani Ministry of Defense.[251] On 30 March 2022, Artsakh authorities stated that Azerbaijani forces were still occupying the strategically important Karaglukh heights.[252] On 15 April 2022 Azerbaijani forces crossed the Line of Contact near the village of Seysulan. Later that day, they reportedly agreed to pull back.[253]

Clashes broke out again in late July and early August 2022. On August 1, the Artsakh Defence Army reported that Azerbaijan attempted to breach the line of contact in northern Nagorno-Karabakh, wounding one soldier. Azerbaijan Defence Ministry denied these claims, and the Russian Defence Ministry reported no ceasefire violations that day.[254]

Over the next two days, clashes erupted again, killing one Azerbaijani soldier, two Artsakh Defence Army soldiers, and wounding 14 others. The international community reacted quickly, with Russia accusing Azerbaijan of breaking the fragile ceasefire and the European Union urging an immediate cessation of hostilities.[255]

According to the Azerbaijani Defence Ministry, Artsakhi soldiers had attacked Azerbaijan army posts in the area of Lachin, killing a conscript. In response, the Azerbaijani army stated it conducted an operation called "Revenge" and took control of several strategic heights in Karabakh. The Artsakh Defence Army accused Azerbaijan of violating the ceasefire and declared a partial mobilization. Following the flare-up, Armenia urged the international community to assist in putting an end to Azerbaijan's "aggressive actions".[255]

On 26 August, the Azerbaijani armed forces took full control of the Lachin Corridor area including Lachin and the villages of Zabukh and Sus as part of the 2020 cease-fire agreement.

Reactions

Файл:Armenia-Azerbaijan border crisis.png
Following the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh War, the Russian military increased its presence within Armenia. Meanwhile, the European Union initiated a civilian monitoring mission in Armenia to ensure stability in the border areas with Azerbaijan. Blue points correspond to locations of increased Russian military presence. Red points correspond to current or future field offices of the European Union Mission in Armenia (EUMA).

Various countries, supranational organizations, and human rights organizations have called for an end to the hostilities and supporting bilateral border demarcation, respecting the terms of the 2020 ceasefire agreement, and for Azerbaijan to pull back its forces from Armenian territory.

Following the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh War, both Russia and the European Union have increased their presence in Armenia along the border with Azerbaijan in order to improve stability of the border and deter offensives from Azerbaijan.[256][257] Upon Armenia's request, Russia's Federal Security Service expanded its patrols within Armenia and the EU contributed a civilian monitoring mission to Armenia. However, while both entities have deterred the possibility of full-scale warfare, they have been unable to fully prevent Azerbaijan's goals.[258]

Russia and the European Union have criticized each other's presence within Armenia. The European Union encouraged Armenia to seek alternative security alliances given "Russia's alleged readiness to guarantee the security of Armenia has proven to be non-existent."[259] Russia, in turn, criticized the EU and claims it is an effort by the West to diminish Russia's power in the region.[260] In January 2023, an EU official said that there were cases where EUMCAP monitors were turned back by Russian border guards within Armenia, even though they were accompanied by Armenian Defense officials.[257]

Supranational organizations

  • Шаблон:Flagicon European Union – The European Parliament declared that the entry of troops from Azerbaijan into the territory of Armenia amount to a violation of the territorial integrity of Armenia and of international law; whereas this violation of Armenian sovereign territory follows worrying statements by Azerbaijani representatives, including the president, which appeared to raise territorial claims and threaten the use of force and thereby undermine the efforts towards security and stability in the region.[5] The European Parliament also issued a report in March 2023, condemning Azerbaijan's attack of Armenia in 2022 and—considering CSTO's inaction during the invasion—encouraged Armenia to seek alternative security alliances.[259][261] Following the November 2021 escalation, the EU Delegation for relations with the South Caucasus released a statement expressing serious concern over the "military operation launched by Azerbaijan in response to alleged provocations" and condemned "any attempts at "borderisation", as observed since the incursion of Azerbaijani troops into Armenian territory on 12 May".[13] MEPs also condemned "Türkiye's expansionist and destabilizing role in the South Caucasus" given that it is Azerbaijan's traditional ally in the conflict.[262]
  • Шаблон:Flagicon Council of Europe – The organization issued a report stating "While it is difficult to negotiate with a party [Azerbaijan] keen to employ hate rhetoric and even denying Armenia's territorial integrity, it is crucial for Armenia to continue to do its utmost to contribute to the de-escalation of the tensions on the ground."[263] Secretary General Marija Pejčinović Burić stated, "Reports of escalating armed hostilities around the Armenian-Azerbaijani border are very alarming. Disagreements between Council of Europe member States must be resolved peacefully through negotiations. Recent direct contacts between the highest authorities of both countries were promising and should be continued. When entering the Council of Europe, Armenia and Azerbaijan committed to resolve the conflict peacefully. That commitment must be respected. The Council of Europe is ready to assist in reconciliation efforts which contribute to achieving a peaceful settlement".[264]
  • Шаблон:Flagicon OSCE – The U.S. representative stated, "We expect Azerbaijan to pull back all forces and call on both sides to begin immediately negotiations to demarcate their shared international borders."[115] The Co-Chairs of the Minsk Group took note of the reported detention of six Armenian soldiers on 27 May and called for the release of all prisoners of war and other detainees on an all for all basis.[265] Together, the Council of Europe, the OSCE also offered diplomatic services to resolve the conflict which privately "outraged" Baku.[14]
  • Шаблон:Flagicon Collective Security Treaty Organization – a military alliance in Eurasia consisting of several post-Soviet states, declared that it is closely monitoring the situation evolving in Syunik and if necessary, measures will be taken according to CSTO policy.[266] The CSTO declined to provide assistance to Armenia in both May 2021 and September 2022. Former Secretary General Nikolay Bordyuzha said that only in the most extreme case would the organization use force against a former Soviet Republic.[49]
  • Шаблон:Flagicon NATO – Javier Colomina, special Representative for the Caucasus & Central Asia, called for 'an immediate cessation of hostilities and urgent de-escalation'.[27]

Countries

Файл:Minister of Defense of Armenia Arshak Karapetyan and US Ambassador Lynne Tracy.jpg
Arshak Karapetyan and Lynne Tracy discussed the situation on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border on 30 August 2020.
  • Шаблон:Flagicon Canada – Commenting on Azerbaijan's September 2022 attacks, Foreign Minister Mélanie Joly tweeted that "Canada is very concerned by the rise in hostilities between Armenia and Azerbaijan, including strikes against settlements and civilian infrastructure inside Armenia. We urge for de-escalation, full respect of the ceasefire, and return to meaningful dialogue via the OSCE."[267][268]
  • Шаблон:Flagicon Estonia – Marina Kaljurand, foreign minister, MEP, and chair of the Delegation for Relations with the South Caucasus, condemned Azerbaijan's "large-scale military attack", adding that Azerbaijan is "taking advantage of the global and regional situation created by the aggression of Russia against Ukraine".[27]
  • Шаблон:Flagicon France – Following Azerbaijan's incursions in May 2021, President Emmanuel Macron wrote "Azerbaijan's armed forces have invaded Armenian territory. They must be immediately withdrawn."[99]
  • Шаблон:Flagicon India – Commenting on Azerbaijan's September 2022 attacks, the spokesperson of the Foreign Ministry called on the "aggressor side to immediately cease hostilities" adding that they "have seen reports of attacks along the Armenia-Azerbaijan border, including targeting of civilian settlements and infrastructure."[269]
  • Шаблон:Flagicon Iran – Mojtaba Zolnouri, the head of the Islamic Consultative Assembly's National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, declared that Tehran will categorically not accept any change in international borders in the region and that the territorial integrity of the countries in the region must be preserved. "Therefore, if part of the territory of Armenia is to be taken and our border conditions change, that is, to have a new neighbor, it is not acceptable for us," Zolnouri said.[270] Later, in a meeting with the acting Armenian Foreign Minister, the Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif confirmed that any redrawing of the borders is a red line for Iran.[271] Analysts consider Iran's decision to open a consulate in Syunik in August 2022 to be an expression of diplmatic support for Armenia's territorial integrity.[272][273] Iran has also offered diplomatic mediation assistance in July 2021 after fighting along the border.[274]
  • Шаблон:Flagicon Pakistan – The Ministry of Foreign Affairs reaffirmed the support from people and government of Pakistan for Azerbaijan on Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Pakistan is the only country in the world that does not recognize Armenia as a country since the creation of new states of Azerbaijan and Armenia after collapse of Soviet union to show a solidarity and support with Azerbaijani people on Nagorno-Karabkh conflict.
  • Шаблон:Flagicon Russia – President Vladimir Putin urged both countries to respect the ceasefire agreement, and that Russia will continue mediating efforts. Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov stated that "The Armenian side expressed extreme concern over the situation at the border", and that "President Putin shared this concern".[109] Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stated that Russia sees no reason to escalate emotions with regard to the situation at the border: "Not a single shot was fired, no skirmishes took place there. They sat down, calmly began to discuss how to defuse this situation, and asked us for assistance. Our military provided such assistance, an agreement was reached. I do not see any reason to escalate emotions in connection with this quite non-routine, but in any case calmly settled issue."[275]
  • Шаблон:Flagicon Turkey – The AKP's spokesperson, Ömer Çelik, condemned Armenia's "aggressive policies"; and also said, "We condemn this attack in the strongest manner." Çelik added that Turkey would oppose Armenian efforts to "endanger" the region.[276] He also criticized France's pro-Armenia response;[277] urging other countries to condemn "Armenian attacks". Celik clarified that "Turkey will support Azerbaijan in whatever they want" and accused Armenia of violating Azerbaijan's territorial integrity.[278]
  • Шаблон:Flagicon United States – The State Department initially voiced concerns regarding "increased tensions along a non-demarcated portion of the Armenia-Azerbaijan border", urging "restraint in de-escalating the situation peacefully".[4] Later on, U.S. State Department spokeswoman Jalina Porter stated that the United States were monitoring the situation closely, and that it expected Azerbaijan to "immediately pull back its forces" and "cease further provocation":[279]

Шаблон:Blockquote

In his 27 May 2021 press statement, U.S. State Department spokesperson Ned Price stated that the U.S. considers any movements along the non-demarcated areas of the international border between Armenia and Azerbaijan to be provocative and unnecessary and rejects the use of force to demarcate the border, calling on both sides to return to their previous positions and to cease military fortification of the non-demarcated border and the emplacement of landmines. Specifically, the U.S. called on Azerbaijan and Armenia to relocate their forces to the positions they held on 11 May, to de-escalate tensions, and create space for a peaceful negotiation process to demarcate the border on an urgent basis.[280] During his visit to Foreign Ministry of Armenia on 10 June 2021, the Acting U.S. Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs Philip Reeker reaffirmed the U.S. position on the necessity to withdraw Azerbaijani forces from Armenian border.[281] Senator Bob Menendez, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, wrote a letter in February 2023 criticizing the US Commerce Department for exporting weapons to Azerbaijan, highlighting "well-documented and credible allegations of Azerbaijan's atrocities against Armenians – including the deaths and displacement of thousands of Armenians in the wake of the 2020 Nagorno Karabakh War, the 2022 invasion of Armenia, in addition to Baku's ongoing blockade of the Lachin Corridor."[282]

Other organizations

  • Reporters Without Borders – reported on 23 June 2021 that a group of Spanish journalists have been threatened with death by Azerbaijani forces while reporting on their position in the Gegharkunik province. RWB condemned "this unacceptable act toward journalists".[283]
  • Freedom House – condemned Azerbaijan's attacks on Armenia, stating "military attacks on sovereign nations have no place in the rules-based international order".[194] The organization also said "With its dependence on authoritarian Russia for military protection against Azerbaijan, its openly hostile and equally authoritarian neighbor, Armenia's democratic project faces uniquely powerful headwinds," adding that "there are abundant indications that an expansion of Baku's control over...parts of Armenia would eliminate the freedoms and security of local people in much the same way [as Moscow's seizure of Ukrainian territory]".[284]
  • Human Rights Watch – analyzed several videos of inhumane killings of Armenian prisoners-of-war by Azerbaijani forces,[285] describing them as war crimes: Hugh Williamson, Europe and Central Asia director at Human Rights Watch said "These soldiers had been captured and laid down their arms. Their captors had an obligation to treat them humanely, and instead it appears that Azerbaijani forces shot them in cold blood. Now they need to be held accountable."[286]
  • Armenian National Committee of America – Its program director, Alex Galitsky, wrote "by violating Armenia's sovereignty, Baku has demonstrated that this conflict was never truly about the principle of territorial integrity for Azerbaijan. After all, if Azerbaijan's objectives were limited to territorial control, there would not have been systematic destruction of Armenian cultural heritage sites, the deliberate targeting of civilians, and exceedingly inflammatory rhetoric from the regime in Baku seeking to erase the very existence of the Armenian people."[287]
  • Helsinki Citizens' Assembly of Vanadzor – Artur Sakunts, a human rights activist and chair of the organization wrote "If Armenia does not show determination now and does not get out of the deadlock of the CSTO-Eurasian Union-trilateral statement of November 9, 2020 and does not take a step toward becoming part of the United States-France-European Union civilized system, then Putin, Erdogan and Aliyev will devour Armenia."[288]
  • Fund for Peace – The institute wrote, "The most recent attacks [by Azerbaijan in September 2022] are, in part, responsible for Armenia's rise from 97th to 93rd most fragile state this year, and even more significantly, the rise from 108th most fragile in 2019," adding that "As peace talks between Armenia and Azerbaijan continue, the international community has the opportunity to support genocide prevention in Armenia and Azerbaijan."
  • World Federalist Movement – Following Azerbaijan's September 2022 attacks, the organization said "This aggression was predictable in light of the international community's failure to condemn Azerbaijan and Turkey's war crimes during the 44-day war and the community's mute response to post 2020 developments, lacking any condemnation of actions by Baku." The organization also called for the international community to act, stating that "the sanctions that should be applied against Azerbaijan should be similar to those applied against Russia by the western powers as both are threat to democracies."[289]

Analysis

Azerbaijani narrative

Azerbaijan has defended its military activities within sovereign Armenian territory using various narratives: claiming that, without formal border demarcation its soldiers cannot be accused of occupation,[90][94] its soldiers were merely accessing Azerbaijani territory inaccessible due to poor weather conditions,[104][290] it is responding to Armenian "provocations",[190][197][291][196] and that it is defending Azerbaijan's "territorial integrity".[292] Azerbaijan has also frequently given "Revenge" titles to its military operations against Armenia and Artsakh, claiming that it is exacting retribution for alleged deaths of its soldiers.[293][294][295][296] Azerbaijani media outlets and notable politicians within the country called for occupation of more Armenian land after Azerbaijan's September 2022 attacks, claiming that a "buffer zone" was needed to deter "Armenian provocations."[95][96]

Various journalists, politicians, and political analysts have scrutinized several of these allegations and consider them unfounded or unverifiable.[182][183][184][185][200][202] Political analysts and genocide scholars say that Azerbaijan employs a "mirroring" tactic which is common among genocidal regimes and here "involves accusing Armenia and Armenians of committing the crimes that it itself has committed or is planning to commit."[297][298][299] Commenting on Azerbaijan's May 2021 incursion, Eurasianet noted "while those [Soviet-era] maps were not meant to strictly delineate an international border, they do all appear to show that most of Sev Lake is in Armenian territory, which would mean an [Azerbaijani] attempt to surround it would be an infiltration."[290]

Critics have argued that Azerbaijan's September 2022 attacks on Armenia undermined the government's official narrative of "territorial integrity", noting that for the last 10 years Azerbaijan has increasingly promoted expansionist territorial claims against sovereign Armenian territory (distinct from Nagorno-Karabakh).[300][301]

"Borderization" of Armenia

Borderization refers to the physical demarcation of a border which prevents the free movement of people and goods.[82]

Laurence Broers, South Caucasus programme director at London-based peacebuilding organization Conciliation Resources, wrote "Azerbaijan's attack demonstrated the potential for Armenia to be cut in two, given it is a mere 40 kilometres (25 miles) across at its narrowest point."[302] Laurence Broers also says that Azerbaijan's motivations are to have Armenia formally relinquish any claim to Artsakh: "Baku is seeking to avoid a repeat of the 1990s – where the militarily victorious side, then Armenia, was not able to consolidate its victory into a favorable peace from a position of strength."[14]

The analyst argues that Azerbaijan is using "coercive bargaining strategy" in order to extract concessions from Armenia on various issues, including minefield maps, the Syunik corridor, and that never-demarcated borders allow conversion of dated or ambiguous cartographies into better positions for Azerbaijan. This "borderization", according to Broers, also pressures Russia by showing that Russian security guarantees to Armenia are tractable relative to other issues; testing CSTO collective security guarantees and testing Russia's capacity to broker.[303] Broers further expanded on the theme of "borderization" of Armenia by Azerbaijan in his review published by Chatham House.[304] The tactics applied by Azerbaijan towards Armenia after the 2020 war were described as "borderization" tactics in an article published in the Georgetown Journal of International Affairs on June 16, 2021.[305] Joint statement on 17 November 2021 by the Chair of the Delegation for relations with the South Caucasus, Marina Kaljurand, the European Parliament's Standing Rapporteur on Armenia Andrey Kovatchev and the European Parliament's Standing Rapporteur on Azerbaijan, Željana Zovko called the military operation launched by Azerbaijan on 16 November 2021 the worst violation to-date since ceasefire agreement, condemning any attempts at "borderisation", as observed since the incursion of Azerbaijani troops into Armenian territory on 12 May 2021.[11]

According to the geopolitical intelligence firm Stratfor, "Azerbaijan remains unlikely to launch a large-scale military operation to seize large swaths of new territory in Nagorno-Karabakh or Armenia, as less costly methods can enable Baku to maintain progress toward its goals. Each time Azerbaijani forces gain ground, it improves their tactical position — even if those territorial gains only move the de facto line of contact by a matter of meters."[306]

Inaction of Russia and the Collective Security Treaty Organization

Russia is ostensibly Armenia's security guarantor due to the countries sharing a bilateral security alliance[307] and their joint membership in the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) which stipulates that members assist each other in order to protect territorial integrity: Шаблон:Blockquote However, neither Russia nor other members of the military alliance are providing military assistance against Azerbaijan's offensive. Various political analysts and politicians have said that Azerbaijan's attacks were emboldened by Russia's preoccupation with its invasion of Ukraine, Azerbaijan's military ties with Russia,[308] Azerbaijan's economic ties with Russia other European powers, and Russia's own interest in creating the "Zangezur corridor."[309][310][311][312][313]

Armenia requested CSTO's assistance two times, following various territorial incursions by Azerbaijan: in March 2021.[108][109][110][111] and in September 2022. The CSTO declined Armenia's request both times.[288] Instead of providing immediate assistance following Azerbaijan's September 2022 attack, the CSTO opted to send a "fact-finding mission" one week later and stated that it did not anticipate sending military aid even before the mission arrived.[288]

The CSTO's inaction in helping Armenia prompted the European Parliament to encourage Armenia to seek alternative security alliances.[259][261] Nerses Kopalyan, a political scientist, wrote that "The Russian peacekeepers function more like an impotent observation mission than an armed contingent."[314]

Nikolay Bordyuzha, the former longtime secretary general of the CSTO said "the issue is Armenian territory, the ownership of which is not under question," adding that "the entire international community sees this territory as the sovereign territory of Armenia. According to its own documents, the CSTO is obliged to react in the case of an incursion by the armed forces of another state."[315][115] Neil Hauer, a journalist specializing in the Caucasus points out that Azerbaijan's September 2022 invasion of Armenia occurred only a few days after Russia's forces experienced military setbacks in Ukraine's Kharkiv region and the "CSTO was exposed as a paper tiger."[199]

Inaction of the European Union

Various critics argue that the conflict is not being presented in the West in the same light as the Russian invasion of Ukraine despite the fact that Armenia is making democratic reforms against Azerbaijan's increasingly authoritarian state.[316][317][318][319]

Azerbaijan is a major exporter of oil and gas to Europe[320] and, with the aim to reduce its dependence on Russian imports, the European Union signed a gas-supply agreement with Azerbaijan in July 2022, which has been perceived as emboldening Azerbaijan's actions.[302][199]

However, political scientist, Suren Surenyants, considers it positive that European MEPs have "declared the September military actions [by Azerbaijan] an occupation and did not link this aggression with the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict." But Surenyants does not expect Azerbaijan's occupation of Armenia to end without concrete action from the international community: "Azerbaijanis are carrying out engineering work on the sovereign Armenian territory, equipping positions. Not a single international structure, not a single geopolitical center created a situation for Aliyev in which he would be forced to leave these territories."[80]

The EU has attempted to mediate a "peace agreement" between Armenia and Azerbaijan that includes a Joint Border Commission to delimit the countries' mutual boundary line. Commenting on this, Tigran Grigoryan, a political analyst said "What I'm seeing now is an attempt by the European Union [...] to establish a victor's peace at the expense of Armenia where Armenian interests are not taken into consideration at all."[321] The EU has treated both Armenia and Azerbaijan as equal parties despite the asymmetry in military and political power between the countries. The EU's response to the ethnic cleansing of Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh has been limited to vague statements that are bothsidist in nature, without naming the aggressor.[322] Since the 2020 war, every military escalation has resulted Azerbaijani forces gaining ground, which political scientist Karena Avedissian, describes as the "creeping annexation" of Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia.[322]

See also

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Шаблон:Armenia–Azerbaijan relations Шаблон:Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Шаблон:Post-Cold War Asian conflicts

  1. Шаблон:Cite web
  2. 2,0 2,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  3. 3,0 3,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  4. 4,0 4,1 4,2 4,3 4,4 Шаблон:Cite web
  5. 5,0 5,1 Шаблон:Cite press release
  6. Шаблон:Cite news
  7. Шаблон:Cite news
  8. Шаблон:Cite news
  9. Шаблон:Cite news
  10. Шаблон:Cite web
  11. 11,0 11,1 11,2 11,3 11,4 Шаблон:Cite web
  12. 12,0 12,1 12,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  13. 13,0 13,1 13,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  14. 14,0 14,1 14,2 14,3 Шаблон:Cite news
  15. Шаблон:Cite web
  16. 16,0 16,1 16,2 16,3 Шаблон:Cite news
  17. 17,0 17,1 17,2 17,3 17,4 Шаблон:Cite news
  18. 18,0 18,1 18,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  19. Шаблон:Cite web
  20. Шаблон:Cite web
  21. 21,0 21,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  22. Шаблон:Cite news
  23. Шаблон:Cite news
  24. Шаблон:Cite web
  25. Шаблон:Cite journal
  26. Шаблон:Cite web
  27. 27,0 27,1 27,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  28. 28,0 28,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  29. 29,0 29,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  30. Шаблон:Cite web
  31. Шаблон:Cite web
  32. Шаблон:Cite web
  33. Шаблон:Cite web
  34. Шаблон:Cite news
  35. Шаблон:Cite web
  36. Шаблон:Cite news
  37. Шаблон:Cite web
  38. Шаблон:Cite web
  39. Шаблон:Cite web
  40. Шаблон:Cite web
  41. 41,0 41,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  42. 42,0 42,1 42,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  43. Шаблон:Cite web
  44. 44,0 44,1 44,2 44,3 Шаблон:Cite web
  45. 45,0 45,1 45,2 45,3 45,4 45,5 45,6 45,7 Шаблон:Cite news
  46. Шаблон:Cite web
  47. 47,0 47,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  48. 48,0 48,1 48,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  49. 49,0 49,1 49,2 49,3 49,4 Шаблон:Cite news
  50. Шаблон:Cite news
  51. Шаблон:Cite news
  52. Шаблон:Cite news
  53. Шаблон:Cite web
  54. Шаблон:Cite web
  55. Шаблон:Cite news
  56. Шаблон:Cite news
  57. Шаблон:Cite web
  58. Шаблон:Cite news
  59. Шаблон:Cite web
  60. Шаблон:Cite web
  61. Шаблон:Cite web
  62. Шаблон:Citation
  63. Шаблон:Cite news
  64. Шаблон:Cite web
  65. Шаблон:Cite web
  66. Шаблон:Cite news
  67. Шаблон:Cite news
  68. Шаблон:Cite web
  69. Шаблон:Cite web
  70. Шаблон:Cite web
  71. 71,0 71,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  72. 72,0 72,1 72,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  73. 73,0 73,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  74. Шаблон:Cite web
  75. Шаблон:Cite press release
  76. Шаблон:Cite web
  77. Шаблон:Cite web
  78. 78,0 78,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  79. Шаблон:Cite news
  80. 80,0 80,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  81. Шаблон:Cite web
  82. 82,0 82,1 82,2 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Toal-2022 не указан текст
  83. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Bulghadarian не указан текст
  84. Шаблон:Cite web
  85. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок freiheit.org не указан текст
  86. 86,0 86,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Martirosyan-2022 не указан текст
  87. Шаблон:Cite web
  88. Шаблон:Cite news
  89. Шаблон:Cite web
  90. 90,0 90,1 90,2 90,3 Шаблон:Cite web
  91. 91,0 91,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  92. Шаблон:Cite news
  93. Шаблон:Cite web
  94. 94,0 94,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  95. 95,0 95,1 95,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  96. 96,0 96,1 96,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  97. 97,0 97,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  98. Шаблон:Cite web
  99. 99,0 99,1 99,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  100. 100,0 100,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  101. 101,0 101,1 101,2 101,3 Шаблон:Cite news
  102. Шаблон:Cite web
  103. 103,0 103,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  104. 104,0 104,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  105. 105,0 105,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  106. 106,0 106,1 Шаблон:Cite news
    Map online: Шаблон:Cite encyclopedia
  107. Шаблон:Cite encyclopedia
  108. 108,0 108,1 108,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  109. 109,0 109,1 109,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  110. 110,0 110,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  111. 111,0 111,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  112. Шаблон:Cite web
  113. Шаблон:Cite web
  114. Шаблон:Cite web
  115. 115,0 115,1 115,2 115,3 115,4 Шаблон:Cite news
  116. Шаблон:Cite web
  117. Шаблон:Cite news
  118. Шаблон:Cite news
  119. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок eng.kavkaz-uzel.eu не указан текст
  120. Шаблон:Cite news
  121. Шаблон:Cite web
  122. Шаблон:Cite web
  123. Шаблон:Cite web
  124. Шаблон:Cite web
  125. Шаблон:Cite web
  126. Шаблон:Cite web
  127. Шаблон:Cite web
  128. Шаблон:Cite web
  129. Шаблон:Cite web
  130. Шаблон:Cite web
  131. Шаблон:Cite web
  132. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок azc1 не указан текст
  133. Шаблон:Cite web
  134. Шаблон:Cite web
  135. Шаблон:Cite news
  136. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок 28 july не указан текст
  137. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок 2wounded не указан текст
  138. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок 4more не указан текст
  139. Шаблон:Cite news
  140. Шаблон:Cite web
  141. Шаблон:Cite web
  142. Шаблон:Cite web
  143. Шаблон:Cite web
  144. Шаблон:Cite web
  145. Шаблон:Cite news
  146. Шаблон:Cite web
  147. Шаблон:Cite web
  148. Шаблон:Cite web
  149. Шаблон:Cite web
  150. Шаблон:Cite news
  151. Шаблон:Cite news
  152. Шаблон:Cite web
  153. Шаблон:Cite web
  154. Шаблон:Cite web
  155. Шаблон:Cite web
  156. Шаблон:Cite web
  157. Шаблон:Cite news
  158. Шаблон:Cite web
  159. Шаблон:Cite web
  160. Шаблон:Cite web
  161. Шаблон:Cite web
  162. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок 19novcas не указан текст
  163. 163,0 163,1 163,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  164. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок 32Armenianpows не указан текст
  165. Шаблон:Cite web
  166. Шаблон:Cite web
  167. Шаблон:Cite news
  168. Шаблон:Cite web
  169. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок cas22novarm не указан текст
  170. Шаблон:Cite web
  171. Шаблон:Cite web
  172. Шаблон:Cite web
  173. Шаблон:Cite web
  174. Шаблон:Cite web
  175. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок 2Azerbaijanipows не указан текст
  176. Шаблон:Cite web
  177. Шаблон:Cite news
  178. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Public Radio of Armenia не указан текст
  179. Шаблон:Cite web
  180. Шаблон:Cite web
  181. Шаблон:Cite web
  182. 182,0 182,1 182,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  183. 183,0 183,1 183,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  184. 184,0 184,1 184,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  185. 185,0 185,1 185,2 185,3 Шаблон:Cite web
  186. Шаблон:Cite news
  187. Шаблон:Cite web
  188. Шаблон:Cite web
  189. Шаблон:Cite web
  190. 190,0 190,1 190,2 190,3 Шаблон:Cite web
  191. Шаблон:Cite news
  192. Шаблон:Cite web
  193. Шаблон:Cite web
  194. 194,0 194,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  195. Шаблон:Cite news
  196. 196,0 196,1 196,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  197. 197,0 197,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  198. Шаблон:Cite web
  199. 199,0 199,1 199,2 199,3 Шаблон:Cite web
  200. 200,0 200,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  201. Шаблон:Cite web
  202. 202,0 202,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  203. Шаблон:Cite web
  204. Шаблон:Cite news
  205. Шаблон:Cite web
  206. Шаблон:Cite web
  207. Шаблон:Cite web
  208. 208,0 208,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  209. Шаблон:Cite web
  210. Шаблон:Cite web
  211. Шаблон:Cite news
  212. Шаблон:Cite web
  213. Шаблон:Cite news
  214. Шаблон:Cite web
  215. Шаблон:Cite web
  216. Шаблон:Cite web
  217. Шаблон:Cite news
  218. Шаблон:Cite web
  219. Шаблон:Cite web
  220. Шаблон:Cite web
  221. Шаблон:Cite web
  222. Шаблон:Cite news
  223. Шаблон:Cite web
  224. 224,0 224,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  225. Шаблон:Cite web
  226. Шаблон:Cite news
  227. Шаблон:Cite web
  228. Шаблон:Cite news
  229. Шаблон:Cite news
  230. Шаблон:Cite web
  231. 231,0 231,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  232. Шаблон:Cite web
  233. 233,0 233,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  234. 234,0 234,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  235. Шаблон:Cite news
  236. Шаблон:Cite web
  237. Шаблон:Cite web
  238. Шаблон:Cite web
  239. Шаблон:Cite web
  240. Шаблон:Cite web
  241. Шаблон:Cite web
  242. Шаблон:Cite webШаблон:Dead link
  243. Шаблон:Cite web
  244. Шаблон:Cite web
  245. Шаблон:Cite news
  246. Шаблон:Cite web
  247. Шаблон:Cite web
  248. Шаблон:Cite web
  249. Шаблон:Cite web
  250. Шаблон:Cite web
  251. Шаблон:Cite web
  252. Шаблон:Cite web
  253. Шаблон:Cite web
  254. Шаблон:Cite web
  255. 255,0 255,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  256. Шаблон:Cite web
  257. 257,0 257,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  258. Шаблон:Cite web
  259. 259,0 259,1 259,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  260. Шаблон:Cite news
  261. 261,0 261,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  262. Шаблон:Cite web
  263. Шаблон:Cite web
  264. Шаблон:Cite web
  265. Шаблон:Cite news
  266. Шаблон:Cite news
  267. Шаблон:Cite web
  268. Шаблон:Cite web
  269. Шаблон:Cite web
  270. Шаблон:Cite news
  271. Шаблон:Cite news
  272. Шаблон:Cite web
  273. Шаблон:Cite news
  274. Шаблон:Cite news
  275. Шаблон:Cite news
  276. Шаблон:Cite web
  277. Шаблон:Cite web
  278. Шаблон:Cite web
  279. Шаблон:Cite news
  280. Шаблон:Cite web
  281. Шаблон:Cite web
  282. Шаблон:Cite web
  283. Шаблон:Cite web
  284. Шаблон:Cite web
  285. Шаблон:Cite news
  286. Шаблон:Cite web
  287. Шаблон:Cite web
  288. 288,0 288,1 288,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  289. Шаблон:Cite web
  290. 290,0 290,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  291. Шаблон:Cite web
  292. Шаблон:Cite web
  293. Шаблон:Cite web
  294. Шаблон:Cite news
  295. Шаблон:Cite web
  296. Шаблон:Cite web
  297. Шаблон:Cite web
  298. Шаблон:Cite web
  299. Шаблон:Cite web
  300. Шаблон:Cite web
  301. Шаблон:Cite web
  302. 302,0 302,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  303. Шаблон:Cite news
  304. Шаблон:Cite web
  305. Шаблон:Cite web
  306. Шаблон:Cite web
  307. Шаблон:Cite web
  308. Шаблон:Cite web
  309. Шаблон:Cite web
  310. Шаблон:Cite web
  311. Шаблон:Cite web
  312. Шаблон:Cite web
  313. Шаблон:Cite news
  314. Шаблон:Cite web
  315. Шаблон:Cite web
  316. Шаблон:Cite web
  317. Шаблон:Cite news
  318. Шаблон:Cite web
  319. Шаблон:Cite magazine
  320. Шаблон:Cite news
  321. Шаблон:Cite news
  322. 322,0 322,1 Шаблон:Cite journal