Английская Википедия:Authoritative Discourse
Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Italic title Шаблон:Gnosticism Authoritative Discourse, also known as Authoritative Teaching or Authentikos LogosШаблон:Sfn (Sahidic Coptic: ⲁⲩⲑⲉⲛⲧⲓⲕⲟⲥ ⲗⲟⲅⲟⲥ)[1] is a text about the journey of the soul.[2] It is the third of eight treatises in Codex VI of the Nag Hammadi library texts, taking up pages 22–35 of the codex's 78 pages.Шаблон:Sfn The text uses metaphors extensively to describe the origin, condition, and ultimate destiny of the soul,Шаблон:Sfn calling the soul a prostitute, a seed of wheat, a contestant, an invalid, a fish, and a bride.Шаблон:Sfn Researchers have debated whether the text should be classified as Gnostic, Christian, or both.Шаблон:Sfn
History
The text was discovered in Nag Hammadi, Egypt in 1945Шаблон:Sfn as one of the 51 total treatises transcribed into the 13 codices that make up the Nag Hammadi library.[3] The codices had been buried around 400 AD.Шаблон:Sfn The writing is likely a Coptic translation of a Greek original,Шаблон:Sfn but there is no direct evidence in the Authoritative Discourse text because the Coptic is so fluent.Шаблон:Sfn Scholars disagree on the date of the original text, with a range of c. 180–400 AD.Шаблон:Sfn
Some of the papyrus on which the text is written has been damaged.Шаблон:Sfn The most significant damage is the loss of the opening lines on pages 22–28.Шаблон:Sfn There are gaps at the top of pages 29–30.Шаблон:Sfn The remaining pages are mostly intact, and the scribe's writing is easy to read.Шаблон:Sfn
The first scholarly translation of the text was a German translation by Martin Krause and Pahor Labib in 1971.Шаблон:Sfn Wolf-Peter Funk published a second German translation in 1973.Шаблон:Sfn Jacques Ménard published a French translation in 1977.Шаблон:Sfn Along with the rest of the works in the Nag Hammadi library, the text was translated into English and published in The Nag Hammadi Library in English in 1977.[4] The publication was part of the work of the Coptic Gnostic Library Project, which began in 1966 at Claremont Graduate University.Шаблон:Sfn George W. MacRae translated the text to English.[5] Marvin Meyer published a second English translation in 2007.Шаблон:Sfn
Summary
The invisible worlds appeared, and the righteous soul came from these worlds.[6] She could be found in either the descent or the Pleroma.[7] Her bridegroom secretly fed the soul and rubbed her eyes with the word (logos) to open her mind.[8] She could recognize her family and where she came from, letting go of worldly desires.[9] In the body, the soul joined with lust, hatred, envy, and materialism.[10] The soul chose indulgence, losing touch with her family.[11] Her ignorance led to animal-like behavior.[12]
Before anything came into being, the Father alone existed, preceding the heavenly and earthly worlds, principality, authority, and powers.[13] He desired to reveal his wealth and glory, creating a contest to make contestants appear and leave behind worldly things.[14] Those who oppose us are adversaries to be overcome through our knowledge of the Inscrutable One.[15] Despite hunger, thirst, illness, and pain, we hold onto the strength hidden within us.[16]
Our soul, living in a poor house, faces challenges from the material world that try to blind her.[17] To counter these challenges, she uses the word (logos) as a medicine to open her eyes and conceal her enemies.[18] She finds refuge in her secure treasure-house, unaffected by worldly matters.[19] Many adversaries born within her constantly fight her day and night.[20]
We must remain vigilant, aware of hidden nets waiting to catch us.[21] If caught, we would be submerged in water, unable to escape.[22] Those who prey on us rejoice, like a fisherman using bait.[23] In this world, we are like fish, watched by the adversary who desires to swallow us.[24] The devil presents worldly temptations to capture us,[25] starting with small pains and desires for material things,[26] leading to love of ignorance and ease.[27] The adversary entices the body with pleasures, aiming to deceive the soul and draw her into ignorance.[28]
However, the soul realizes the fleeting nature of these passions and rejects them.[29] The soul seeks a new way of life, despising the transitory world.[30] She embraces her true light, shedding worldly attachments, and adorning herself with a beautiful mind.[31] She learns about her inner depth and finds solace in her shepherd's presence.[32] Despite the scorn she faced, she receives abundant grace and glory.[33] Those who sought to exploit her body are ashamed, unaware of her invisible spiritual nature.[34] Her true shepherd has taught her hidden knowledge.[35]
The ignorant ones do not seek God nor inquire about their resting place.[36] They act in a cruel manner, worse than pagans.[37] Pagans know and worship their idols, but they have not heard God's word.[38] The senseless man is worse than a pagan since he has been told to seek and ask, but his hardness of heart and ignorance prevent him.[39] However, the rational soul perseveres and learns about God.[40] She finds what she sought and receives rest.[41] She enjoys eternal glory and power.[42]
Analysis
Researcher Ulla Tervahauta states that although Authoritative Discourse was found among the Nag Hammadi texts, which are closely connected with Gnosticism, the writing is not easily classified as Gnostic.Шаблон:Sfn The text does not present a lower Creator separate from the true divinity, nor is the soul presented as disconnected from the spiritual realm.Шаблон:Sfn Translator George W. MacRae agrees that the text lacks a typical Gnostic cosmogony.Шаблон:Sfn But MacRae believes that the text is Gnostic because of its emphasis on the evil of the material world, the divine origin of the soul, and the idea of salvation through revealed knowledge.Шаблон:Sfn MacRae concedes, however, that the text lacks the self-assurance of unquestionably Gnostic treatises.Шаблон:Sfn
Tervahauta believes that the text should be classified as Platonic Early Christianity.Шаблон:Sfn Her methodology compares Authoritative Discourse with a wide variety of ancient texts rather than limiting comparisons to other Nag Hammadi texts.Шаблон:Sfn This broader approach reveals that the author was familiar with both New Testament and Gnostic literature and chose to produce a Christian homily.Шаблон:Sfn
French translator Jacques Ménard considers the text Gnostic, but this view was criticized by Egyptology professor[43] Jan Zandee in 1978 and by religious scholar Roel van den Broek in 1979.Шаблон:Sfn Zandee provides counterexamples to argue that it is a work of Greek Christianity.Шаблон:Sfn Van den Broek argues that it is a work of Platonic Christianity from AlexandriaШаблон:Sfn by analyzing the Platonic terminology used to describe the soul.[44] In particular, van den Broek argues that the text closely parallels the teachings of Porphyry and was likely written contemporaneously in the mid-third century.[45] Tervahauta considers it Egyptian but not necessarily Alexandrian.Шаблон:Sfn
Historian of religion Madeleine Scopello argues in a 1988 book that the text is Gnostic.Шаблон:Sfn Her reasoning is that the soul, which is grammatically feminine in the text, represents the typical Gnostic thinking woman rather than a woman who is an object of desire.Шаблон:Sfn Tervahauta criticizes Scopello for ignoring stories of Christian women and Christian allusions in her analysis.Шаблон:Sfn
Professor[46] Richard Valantasis compares asceticism in Authoritative Discourse with Roman asceticism.[47] Valantasis concludes that monks preserved the text as secular literature that aligned with their ascetic lifestyle.Шаблон:Sfn Tervahauta counters that Valantasis ignores the Christian elements of the text to focus on Roman tradition.Шаблон:Sfn
MacRae notes the rarity of the title's lack of a grammatical article, meaning that it would be incorrect to call it The Authoritative Discourse.Шаблон:Sfn The untranslated title contains the word logos, which can be translated many ways depending on context, including word, discourse, teaching, reason, and account.[48] The translation to discourse or teaching is based on Hermetica and other writings that contain logos in the title.Шаблон:Sfn
References
External links
- Authoritative Teaching complete text at The Gnostic Society Library
Шаблон:The Nag Hammadi Codices
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite book
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite book
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite book
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite book
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite book
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 278. 22:11–15. "...the invisible, ineffable worlds appeared. From these the invisible soul of righteousness came"
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 278. 22:18–19. "Whether she is in the descent or is in the Pleroma"
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 278. 22:23–28. "Secretly her bridegroom fetched it. He presented it to her mouth to make her eat it like food, and he applied the word to her eyes as a medicine to make her see with her mind"
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 278. 22:29–34. "...and perceive her kinsmen and learn about her root ... in order that she might receive what is hers to renounce [matter]."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 279. 23:12–17. "...when the spiritual soul was cast into the body, it became a brother to lust, and hatred, and envy, and a material soul."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 279. 24:17–20. "Therefore she does not remember her brothers and her father, for pleasure and sweet profits deceive her."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 279. 24:20–22. "Having left knowledge behind, she fell into bestiality."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 279. 25:27–34. "And before anything came into being, it was the Father alone who existed, before the worlds that are in the heavens appeared, or the world that is on the earth, or principality, or authority, or the powers."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 280. 26:8–16. "He, then, the Father, wishing to reveal his [wealth] and his glory, brought about this great contest in this world, wishing to make the contestants appear, and make all those who contend leave behind the things that had come into being"
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 280. 26:20–25. "And (as for) those who contend with us, being adversaries who contend against us, we are to be victorious over their ignorance through our knowledge, since we have already known the Inscrutable One"
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 280. 27:14–25. "...we go about in hunger (and) in thirst ... we are ill (and) feeble (and) in pain. But there is a great strength hidden within us."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 280. 27:25–29. "Our soul indeed is ill, because she dwells in a house of poverty, while matter strikes blows at her eyes, wishing to make her blind."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 280. 28:11–14. "...apply it to her eyes as a medicine in order that she may see, and her light may conceal the hostile forces"
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 280. 28:23–25. "...she runs upward into her treasure-house—the one in which her mind is"
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 280–281. 28:31–33. "For many are her home-born ones who fight against her by day and by night"
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 281. 29:3–7. "...we do not sleep, nor do we forget [the] nets that are spread out in hiding, lying in wait for us to catch us."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 281. 29:7–10. "For if we are caught in a single net, it will suck us down into its mouth, while the water flows over us"
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 281. 29:18–21. "For man-eaters will seize us and swallow us, rejoicing like a fisherman casting a hook into the water."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 281. 30:4–10. "The adversary spies on us, lying in wait for us like a fisherman, wishing to seize us, rejoicing that he might swallow us."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 281. 30:26–27. "Now these are the foods with which the devil lies in wait for us."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 281. 30:28–33. "First he injects a pain into your heart until you have heartache on account of a small thing of this life, and he seizes (you) with his poisons."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 281. 31:6–7. "The greatest of all these are ignorance and ease."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 281. 31:15–17. "...drawing her by force in ignorance, deceiving her"
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 282. 31:24–27. "But the soul—she who has tasted these things—realized that sweet passions are transitory."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 282. 31:31–33. "Afterwards she despises this life, because it is transitory."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 282. 32:2–8. "And she learns about her light, as she goes about stripping off this world, while her true garment clothes her within, (and) her bridal clothing is placed upon her in beauty of mind"
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 282. 32:9–11. "And she learns about her depth and runs into her fold, while her shepherd stands at the door."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 282. 32:12–16. "In return for all the shame and scorn, then, that she received in this world, she receives ten thousand times the grace and glory."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 282. 32:28–32. "They were therefore ashamed of their work; they suffered the loss of the one for whom they had endured labors. They did not realize that she has an invisible spiritual body"
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 282. 33:1–3. "This her true shepherd taught her in knowledge."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 282. 33:4–8. "But these—the ones who are ignorant—do not seek after God. Nor do they inquire about their dwelling place, which exists in rest"
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 282. 33:9–11. "They are more wicked than the pagans"
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 282. 33:28–32; 34:1. "...they know that God who is in the heavens exists, the Father of the universe, exalted over their idols, which they worship. But they have not heard the word"
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 283. 34:24–28. "...the substance of hardness of heart strikes a blow upon his mind, along with the force of ignorance and the demon of error."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 283. 34:32; 35:1–2. "But the rational soul who (also) wearied herself in seeking—she learned about God."
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 283. 35:15–16. "She found what she had sought after. She received rest from her labors"
- ↑ MacRae 1981, p. 283. 35:19–22. "To it belongs the glory and the power and the revelation for ever and ever."
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite book
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite journal
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite book
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite book
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
