Английская Википедия:Biodiversity loss

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:About Шаблон:Use mdy dates

Файл:Summary of major environmental-change categories expressed as a percentage change (red) relative to baseline - fcosc-01-615419-g001.jpg
Summary of major biodiversity-related environmental-change categories expressed as a percentage of human-driven change (in red) relative to baseline (blue). Red indicates the percentage of the category that is damaged, lost, or otherwise affected, whereas blue indicates the percentage that is intact, remaining, or otherwise unaffected.[1]

Biodiversity loss happens when various species disappear completely from Earth (extinction) or when there is a decrease or disappearance of species in a specific area. This in turn leads to a reduction in biological diversity in that area. The decrease can be temporary or permanent. It is temporary if the damage that has led to the loss is reversible in time, for example through ecological restoration. If this is not possible then the decrease is permanent. This ongoing global extinction (also called the holocene extinction or sixth mass extinction) is a biodiversity crisis. The cause for most of the biodiversity loss are those human activities that push the planetary boundaries too far.[1][2][3]

The causes for current biodiversity loss are habitat loss, fragmentation and degradation;[4] land use intensification (and ensuing land loss/habitat loss), often for commercial and agricultural uses (specifically monoculture farming).[5][6] Further causes include nutrient pollution and other forms of pollution (air and water pollution), over-exploitation and unsustainable use (related to human overpopulation), invasive species[7] and climate change.[4]

Many scientists, along with the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, say that the main reasons for biodiversity loss are the growing human population and excessive consumption.[8][9][10][11][12] However other scientists have criticized this, saying that loss of habitat is caused mainly by "the growth of commodities for export". They also state that population has very little to do with overall consumption due to country wealth disparities.[13]

Climate change is another threat to global biodiversity.[14][15] For example, coral reefs – which are biodiversity hotspots – will be lost within the century if global warming continues at the current rate.[16][17] However, habitat destruction (often for the expansion of agriculture), is currently the more significant driver of biodiversity loss, not climate change.[18][19] Invasive species and other disturbances have become more common in forests in the last several decades. These tend to be directly or indirectly connected to climate change and have negative consequences for forest ecosystems.[20][21]

Groups that care about the environment have been working for many years to stop the decrease in biodiversity. Now, preventing biodiversity loss is often included in global policies. It can be part of the response to the triple planetary crisis. For example, the UN Convention on Biological Diversity aims to prevent biodiversity loss and to conserve wilderness areas. However, a report of the United Nations Environment Programme in 2020 found that most of these efforts had failed to meet their international goals.[22] For example, of the 20 biodiversity goals laid out by the Aichi Biodiversity Targets in 2010, only six were "partially achieved" by the deadline of 2020.[23][24]

Global estimates across all species

Шаблон:See also

Файл:IUCN Kategorien Rote Liste.svg
Red list categories of the IUCN
Файл:Extinction Rebellion-2.jpg
Demonstrator against biodiversity loss, at Extinction Rebellion (2018).

The current rate of global biodiversity loss is estimated to be 100 to 1000 times higher than the (naturally occurring) background extinction rate, faster than at any other time in human history,[25][26] and expected to still grow in the upcoming years.[27][28][29] The fast-growing extinction trends of various animal groups like mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish have led scientists to declare a current biodiversity crisis in both land and ocean ecosystems.[30][31]

In 2006, many more species were formally classified as rare or endangered or threatened; moreover, scientists have estimated that millions more species are at risk which have not been formally recognized.[32]

In 2021, about 28 percent of the 134,400 species assessed using the IUCN Red List criteria are now listed as threatened with extinction—a total of 37,400 species compared to 16,119 threatened species in 2006.[33]

A 2022 study, which surveyed more than 3,000 experts, states that "global biodiversity loss and its impacts may be greater than previously thought", and estimates that roughly 30% of species "have been globally threatened or driven extinct since the year 1500."[34][35]

Research published in 2023 found that out of 70,000 species, about 48% are facing decreasing populations due to human activities, while only 3% are seeing an increase in populations.[36][37][38]

Methods to quantify loss

Шаблон:See also

Biologists define biodiversity as the "totality of genes, species and ecosystems of a region".[39][40] To measure biodiversity loss rates for a particular location, scientists record the species richness and its variation over time in that area. In ecology, local abundance is the relative representation of a species in a particular ecosystem.[41] It is usually measured as the number of individuals found per sample. The ratio of abundance of one species to one or multiple other species living in an ecosystem is referred to as relative species abundances.[41] Both indicators are relevant for computing biodiversity.

There are many different biodiversity indexes.[42] These investigate different scales and time spans.[43] Biodiversity has various scales and subcategories (e.g. phylogenetic diversity, species diversity, genetic diversity, nucleotide diversity).[43]

The question of net loss in confined regions is often a matter of debate.[44]

Observations by type of life

Wildlife in general

Файл:1970- Decline in species populations - Living Planet Index.svg
The World Wildlife Fund’s Living Planet Report 2022 found that wildlife populations declined by an average 69% since 1970.[45][46][47]

Шаблон:Main

An October 2020 analysis by Swiss Re found that one-fifth of all countries are at risk of ecosystem collapse as the result of anthropogenic habitat destruction and increased wildlife loss.[48] If these losses are not reversed, this could trigger a total ecosystem collapse.[49]

The World Wildlife Fund in 2022[50] reports an average population decline of 68% between 1970 and 2016 for 4,400 animal species around the world encompassing nearly 21,000 monitored populations.[51]

Terrestrial invertebrates

Insects

Шаблон:Main

Шаблон:Excerpt

Earthworms

Scientists have studied loss of earthworms from several long-term agronomic trials. They found that relative biomass losses of minus 50–100% (with a mean of minus 83 %) match or exceed those reported for other faunal groups.[52] Thus it is clear that earthworms are similarly depleted in the soils of fields used for intensive agriculture.[52] Earthworms play an important role in ecosystem function.[52] For example, they help with biological processing in soil, water, and even green house gas balancing.[53] The decline of earthworm diversity is due to five reasons: "(1) soil degradation and habitat loss, (2) climate change, (3) excessive nutrient and other forms of contamination load, (4) over-exploitation and unsustainable management of soil, and (5) invasive species".[54]Шаблон:Rp Factors like tillage practices and intensive land use decimate the soil and plant roots that earthworms use to create their biomass. This interferes with carbon and nitrogen cycles.

Knowledge of earthworm species diversity is quite limited as not even 50% of them have been described.[54] Sustainable agriculture methods could help prevent earthworm diversity decline, for example reduced tillage.[54]Шаблон:Rp The Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity is trying to take action and promote the restoration and maintenance of the many diverse species of earthworms.[54]

Amphibians

Шаблон:Excerpt

Wild mammals

Шаблон:Excerpt

Birds

Шаблон:Main Some pesticides, like insecticides, likely play a role in reducing the populations of specific bird species.[55] A study funded by BirdLife International confirms that 51 species of birds are critically endangered and eight could be classified as extinct or in danger of extinction. Nearly 30% of extinction is due to hunting and trapping for the exotic pet trade. Deforestation, caused by unsustainable logging and agriculture, could be the next extinction driver, because birds lose their habitat and their food.[56][57]

Plants

Шаблон:See also

Trees

While plants are essential for human survival, they have not received the same attention as the conservation of animals.[58] It is estimated that a third of all land plant species are at risk of extinction and 94% have yet to be evaluated in terms of their conservation status.[58] Plants existing at the lowest trophic level require increased conservation in order to reduce negative impacts at higher trophic levels.[59]

Scientists have warned in 2022 that a third of tree species are threatened with extinction. This will significantly alter the world's ecosystems because their carbon, water and nutrient cycles will be affected.[60][61] The GTA (global tree assessment) has determined that "17,510 (29.9%) tree species are considered threatened with extinction. In addition, there are 142 tree species recorded as Extinct or Extinct in the Wild."[61]

Possible solutions can be found in some silvicultural methods of forest management which promote tree biodiversity, such as selective logging, thinning or crop tree management, and clear cutting and coppicing.[62]

Flowering plants

Шаблон:Excerpt

Freshwater species

Шаблон:Main

Freshwater ecosystems ranging from swamps, deltas, to rivers make up to 1% of earths surface. Although making up such little proportion of the earth, freshwater ecosystems are important because these kind of habitats are home to approximately one third of vertebrate species.[63] Freshwater species are beginning to decline at twice the rate of other species such as those located on land or within the ocean. This rapid loss has already placed 27% of 29,500 species dependent on freshwater upon the IUCN Red List.[63]

Global populations of freshwater fish are collapsing due to water pollution and overfishing. Migratory fish populations have declined by 76% since 1970, and large "megafish" populations have fallen by 94% with 16 species declared extinct in 2020.[64]

Marine species

Шаблон:Main

Marine biodiversity encompasses any living organism which resides in the ocean or in estuaries.[65] By 2018, approximately 240,000 marine species had been documented.[66] But many marine species - estimates range between 178,000 and 10 million oceanic species - remain to be described.[65] It is therefore likely that a number of rare species (not seen for decades in the wild) have already disappeared or are on the brink of extinction, unnoticed.[67]

Human activities have a strong and detrimental influence on marine biodiversity. The main drivers of marine species extinction is habitat loss, pollution, invasive species, and overexploitation.[68][69] Greater pressure is placed on marine ecosystems near coastal areas because of the human settlements in those areas.[70]

Overexploitation has resulted in the extinction of over 25 marine species. This includes seabirds, marine mammals, algae, and fish.[65][71] Examples of extinct marine species include the Steller's sea cow (Hydrodamalis gigas) and the Caribbean monk seal (Monachus tropicalis). Not all extinctions are because of humans. For example, in the 1930s, the eelgrass limpet (Lottia alveus) became extinct in the NW Atlantic area once the Zostera marina seagrass population declined upon exposure to a disease.[72] The Lottia alveus were greatly impacted because the Zostera marina were their sole habitats.[65]

Causes

The main causes of current biodiversity loss are listed below:

  1. Habitat loss, fragmentation and degradation;[4] for example habitat fragmentation for commercial and agricultural uses (specifically monoculture farming).[5]
  2. Land use intensification (and ensuing land loss/habitat loss); a significant factor in loss of ecological services due to direct effects as well as biodiversity loss.[6]
  3. Nutrient pollution and other forms of pollution (air and water pollution)
  4. Overexploitation and unsustainable use (for example unsustainable fishing methods, overfishing, overconsumption and human overpopulation)
  5. Invasive species that effectively compete for a niche, replacing indigenous species[7]
  6. Climate change (e.g. extinction risk from climate change, effects of climate change on plant biodiversity)[4]

Jared Diamond describes an "Evil Quartet" of habitat destruction, overkill, introduced species and secondary extinctions.[73] Edward O. Wilson suggested the acronym HIPPO for the main causes of biodiversity loss. HIPPO stands for Habitat destruction, Invasive species, Pollution, human over-Population and Over-harvesting.[74][75]

Habitat destruction

Файл:Biodiversity Hotspots Map.jpg
Earth's 25 terrestrial hot spots of biodiversity. These regions contain a high number of plant and animal species and have been subjected to high levels of habitat destruction by human activity, leading to biodiversity loss.
Файл:Sugarcane Deforestation, Bolivia, 2016-06-15 by Planet Labs.jpg
Deforestation and increased road-building in the Amazon Rainforest in Bolivia cause significant concern because of increased human encroachment upon wild areas, increased resource extraction and further threats to biodiversity.

Шаблон:ExcerptFor example, habitat loss is one of the causes in the decline of insect populations (see the section below on insects).

Urban growth and habitat fragmentation

Шаблон:Further

The direct effects of urban growth on habitat loss are well understood: building construction often results in habitat destruction and fragmentation.[76] This leads to selection for species that are adapted to urban environments.[77] Small habitat patches are unable to support the same level of genetic or taxonomic diversity as they formerly could while some of the more sensitive species may become locally extinct.[78] Species abundance populations are reduced due to the reduced fragmented area of habitat. This causes an increase of species isolation and forces species towards edge habitats and adapt to foraging elsewhere.[76]

Infrastructure development in Key Biodiversity Areas (KBA) is a major driver of biodiversity loss, with infrastructure being present in roughly 80% of KBAs.[79] Infrastructure development leads to conversion and fragmentation of natural habitat, pollution and disturbance. There can also be direct harm of animals through collisions with vehicles and structures. This can have impacts beyond the infrastructure site.[79]

Land use intensification

Шаблон:See also

Humans are changing the uses of land in various ways, and each can lead to habitat destruction and biodiversity loss. The 2019 Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services found that industrial agriculture is the primary driver leading to a collapse in biodiversity.[80][8] The UN's Global Biodiversity Outlook 2014 estimated that 70 percent of the projected loss of terrestrial biodiversity are caused by agriculture use.Шаблон:Update inline A publication from 2005 said that "Cultivated systems [...] cover 24% of Earth’s surface".[81]Шаблон:Rp The same publication explained cultivated areas to be "areas in which at least 30% of the landscape is in croplands, shifting cultivation, confined livestock production, or freshwater aquaculture in any particular year".[81]Шаблон:Rp

More than 17,000 species are at risk of losing habitat by 2050 as agriculture continues to expand to meet future food needs (as of 2020).[82] A global shift towards largely plant-based diets would free up land to allow for the restoration of ecosystems and biodiversity.[83] In the 2010s over 80% of all global farmland was used to rear animals.[83]

As of 2022, 44% of Earth's land area required conservation attention, which may include declaring protected areas and following land-use policies.[84]

Nutrient pollution and other forms of pollution

Шаблон:Further

Air pollution

Файл:Air pollution3.jpg
Industrial processes contributing to air pollution through the emission of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrous oxide.

Air pollution adversely affects biodiversity.[85] Pollutants are emitted into the atmosphere for example by the burning of fossil fuels and biomass. Industrial and agricultural activity release the pollutants sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides.[86] Once sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide are introduced into the atmosphere, they can react with cloud droplets (cloud condensation nuclei), raindrops, or snowflakes, forming sulfuric acid and nitric acid. With the interaction between water droplets and sulfuric and nitric acids, wet deposition occurs and creates acid rain.[87][88]

A review from 2009 studied four air pollutants (sulfur, nitrogen, ozone, and mercury) and several types of ecosystems. [89] Air pollution affects the functioning and biodiversity of terrestrial as well as aquatic ecosystems.[89] For example, "air pollution causes or contributes to acidification of lakes, eutrophication of estuaries and coastal waters, and mercury bioaccumulation in aquatic food webs".[89]

Noise pollution

Шаблон:Further

Noise generated by traffic, ships, vehicles, and aircraft can affect the survivability of wildlife species and can reach undisturbed habitats.[90] Noise pollution is common in marine ecosystems, affecting at least 55 marine species.[91] One study discovered that as seismic noises and naval sonar increases in marine ecosystems, cetacean, such as whales and dolphins, diversity decreases.[92] Multiple studies have noticed that fewer fishes, such as cod, haddock, rockfish, herring, sand seal, and blue whiting, have been spotted in areas with seismic noises, with catch rates declining by 40–80%.[91][93][94][95]

Noise pollution has also altered avian communities and diversity. Noises can reduce reproductive success, minimize nesting areas, increase stress response, and reduce species abundances.[96][91] Noise pollution can alter the distribution and abundance of prey species, which can then impact predator populations.[97]

Pollution from fossil fuel extraction

Файл:Locations and proportions of oil and gas fields overlapping IUCN Protected Areas.png
Potential for biodiversity loss from future fossil fuel extraction: Proportions of oil and gas field area overlapping with Protected Areas (PAs) (gray polygons) of different IUCN Protected Area management categories by UN regions: North America (a), Europe (b), West Asia (c), LAC (d), Africa (e), and Asia Pacific (f). Absolute area of overlap across all IUCN management categories is shown above histograms. Location of fields overlapping with PAs are shown in (g). Shading is used so that points can be visualized even where their spatial locations coincide, so darker points indicate higher densities of fields overlapping PAs.[98]

Fossil fuel extraction and associated oil and gas pipelines have major impacts on the biodiversity of many biomes due to land conversion, habitat loss and degradation, and pollution. An example is the Western Amazon region.[99] Exploitation of fossil fuels there has had significant impacts on biodiversity.[98] Many of the protected areas with rich biodiversity are in fact located in areas containing unexploited fossil fuel reserves worth between 3 and 15 trillion USD (2018).[98] The protected areas may well be under threat in future.

Overexploitation

Шаблон:Further

Continued overexploitation can lead to the destruction of the resource, as it will be unable to replenish. The term applies to natural resources such as water aquifers, grazing pastures and forests, wild medicinal plants, fish stocks and other wildlife.

Overfishing

Шаблон:Main

Файл:Trawlers overfishing cod.jpg
Mass fishing of Pacific jack mackerel (with possible bycatch) with a Chilean purse seiner.
Файл:Surexploitation morue surpêcheEn.jpg
Atlantic cod stocks were severely overexploited in the 1970s and 1980s, leading to their abrupt collapse in 1992.[100]

A report in 2019 by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services report found that overfishing is the main driver of mass species extinction in the oceans.[101][102] Overfishing has reduced fish and marine mammal biomass by 60% since the 1800s.[103] It is currently pushing over one-third of sharks and rays towards extinction.[104]

Many commercial fishes have been overharvested: a 2020 report by FAO classified as overfished 34% of the fish stocks of the world's marine fisheries.[105] By the same period, global fish populations were reduced by 38% compared to 1970.[66]

Many regulatory measures are available for controlling overfishing. These measures include fishing quotas, bag limits, licensing, closed seasons, size limits and the creation of marine reserves and other marine protected areas.

Human overpopulation and overconsumption

Файл:Decline-of-the-worlds-wild-mammals.png
The changing distribution of the world's land mammals in tonnes of carbon. The biomass of wild land mammals has declined by 85% since the emergence of humans.[106]

The world's population numbered nearly 7.6 billion as of mid-2017 and is forecast to peak towards the end of the 21st century at between 10–12 billion people.[107] Scholars have argued that population size and growth, along with overconsumption, are significant factors in biodiversity loss and soil degradation.[108][109][1][11] Review articles, including the 2019 IPBES report, have also noted that human population growth and overconsumption are significant drivers of species decline.[8][9] A 2022 study warned that conservation efforts will continue to fail if the primary drivers of biodiversity loss continue to be ignored, including population size and growth.[10]

However, other scientists have criticized the assertion that population growth is a key driver for biodiversity loss.[13] They argue that the main driver is the loss of habitat which is caused by "the growth of commodities for export, particularly soybean and oil-palm, primarily for livestock feed or biofuel consumption in higher income economies."[13] Because of the wealth disparities between countries, there is a negative correlation between a country's total population and its per capita footprint. On the other hand, the correlation between a country's GDP and its footprint is strong.[13] The study argues that population as a metric is unhelpful and counterproductive for tackling environmental challenges.[13]

Invasive species

Шаблон:Main

The term invasive is poorly defined and often very subjective.[110] The European Union defines invasive alien species as those that are, firstly, outside their natural distribution area, and secondly, threaten biological diversity.[111][112] Biotic invasion is considered one of the five top drivers for global biodiversity loss and is increasing because of tourism and globalization.[113][114] This may be particularly true in poorly regulated fresh water systems, though quarantines and ballast water rules have improved the situation.[81]

Invasive species may drive local native species to extinction via competitive exclusion, niche displacement, or hybridisation with related native species. Therefore, alien invasions may result in extensive changes in the structure, composition and global distribution of the biota at sites of introduction. This leads ultimately to the homogenisation of the world's fauna and flora and the loss of biodiversity.[115][116]

Climate change

Файл:Song 2021 rate relationship.png
The relationship between the magnitude of climate variability and change (including both large increases and decreases in global temperature) and the extinction rate, over the past 450 million years.[117] This graph does not include the recent human made climate change.

Climate change is another threat to global biodiversity.[14][15] However, habitat destruction e.g. for the expansion of agriculture, is currently the more significant driver of contemporary biodiversity loss, not climate change.[18][19]

A 2021 collaborative report by scientists from the IPBES and the IPCC says that biodiversity loss and climate change must be addressed simultaneously, as they are inexorably linked and have similar effects on human well-being.[118] Frans Timmermans, Vice-President of the European Commission, stated in 2022 that people are less aware of the threat of biodiversity loss than they are of the threat of climate change.[119]

The interaction between climate change and invasive species is complex and not easy to assess. Climate change is likely to favour some invasive species and harm others,[120] but few authors have identified specific consequences of climate change for invasive species.[121]

Invasive species and other disturbances have become more common in forests in the last several decades. These tend to be directly or indirectly connected to climate change and have negative consequences for forest ecosystems.[20][21]

Шаблон:Excerpt

Extinction risks

Шаблон:Excerpt

Impacts

On ecosystems

Шаблон:See also Biodiversity loss has negative impacts on the functioning of ecosystems. This in turn has many impacts on humans.[42] The reason is that affected ecosystems can no longer provide the same quality of ecosystem services as they would otherwise. Examples for ecosystem services are crop pollination, cleaning air and water, decomposing waste, and providing forest products as well as areas for recreation and tourism.[81]

Two key statements of a comprehensive review in 2012 of the last twenty years of research include:[42]

  • "There is now unequivocal evidence that biodiversity loss reduces the efficiency by which ecological communities capture biologically essential resources, produce biomass, decompose and recycle biologically essential nutrients"; and 
  • "Impacts of diversity loss on ecological processes might be sufficiently large to rival the impacts of many other global drivers of environmental change"

Permanent global species loss (extinction) is a more dramatic and tragic phenomenon than regional changes in species composition. However, even minor changes from a healthy stable state can have a dramatic influence on the food web and the food chain. This is because reductions in only one species can adversely affect the entire chain (coextinction). This can lead to an overall reduction in biodiversity, unless alternative stable states of the ecosystem are possible.[122]

For example, a study on grasslands used manipulated grassland plant diversity and found that those ecosystems which have a higher biodiversity show more resistance of their productivity to climate extremes.[123]

On food and agriculture

Файл:Global state and trends figures for key elements of biodiversity important to food and agriculture.svg
An infographic describing the relationship between biodiversity and food.

In 2019, the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) produced its first report on The State of the World's Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture. It warned that "Many key components of biodiversity for food and agriculture at genetic, species and ecosystem levels are in decline."[124][125]

The report states that "Many of the drivers that have negative impacts on BFA (biodiversity for food and agriculture), including overexploitation, overharvesting, pollution, overuse of external inputs, and changes in land and water management, are at least partially caused by inappropriate agricultural practices."[126]Шаблон:Rp It further explains that "transition to intensive production of a reduced number of species, breeds and varieties, remain major drivers of loss of BFA and ecosystem services."[126]Шаблон:Rp

To reduce biodiversity loss related to agricultural practices, FAO encourages the use of "biodiversity-friendly management practices in crop and livestock production, forestry, fisheries and aquaculture".[126]Шаблон:Rp

On health and medicines

The WHO has analyzed how biodiversity and human health are connected: "Biodiversity and human health, and the respective policies and activities, are interlinked in various ways. First, biodiversity gives rise to health benefits. For example, the variety of species and genotypes provide nutrients and medicines."[127]

Medicinal and aromatic plants are widely used in traditional medicine as well as in cosmetic and food industries.[127]Шаблон:Rp The WHO estimated in 2015 that about "60,000 species are used for their medicinal, nutritional and aromatic properties".[127]Шаблон:Rp There is a global trade in plants for medicinal purposes.[127]Шаблон:Rp

Biodiversity contributes to the development of pharmaceuticals. A significant proportion of medicines are derived from natural products, either directly or indirectly. Many of these natural products come from marine ecosystems.[128] However, unregulated and inappropriate over-harvesting (bioprospecting) could potentially lead to overexploitation, ecosystem degradation and loss of biodiversity.[129][130] Users and traders harvest plants for traditional medicine either by planting them or by collecting them in the wild. In both cases, sustainable medicinal resource management is important.[127]Шаблон:Rp

Proposed solutions

Шаблон:Further

Файл:Red List Index, OWID.svg
Red List Index (2019): The Red List Index (RLI) defines the conservation status of major species groups, and measures trends in the proportion of species expected to remain extant in the near future without additional conservation action. An RLI value of 1.0 equates to all species being categorised as 'Least Concern', and hence that none are expected to go extinct in the near future. A value of 0 indicates that all species have gone extinct.[131]

Scientists are investigating what can be done to address the two global crises together: biodiversity loss and climate change. For both of these crises there is a need to "conserve enough nature and in the right places".[132] A study in 2020 found that "beyond the 15% land area currently protected, 35% of land area is needed to conserve additional sites of particular importance for biodiversity and stabilize the climate."[132]

Additional measures for protecting biodiversity, which go beyond just environmental protection, are important. Such measures include: addressing drivers of land use change, increasing efficiency in agriculture and reducing the need for animal agriculture. The latter could be achieved by increasing the shares of plant-based diets.[133][134]

Convention on Biological Diversity

Шаблон:See also Many governments have conserved portions of their territories under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), a multilateral treaty signed in 1992–3. The 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets are part of the CBD's Strategic Plan 2011–2020 and were published in 2010.[135] Aichi Target Number 11 aimed to protect 17 percent of terrestrial and inland water areas, and 10 percent of coastal and marine areas by 2020 .[136]

Of the 20 biodiversity goals laid out by the Aichi Biodiversity Targets in 2010, only six were partially achieved by the deadline of 2020.[23][24] The report by CBD in 2020 highlighted that if the status quo is not changed, biodiversity will continue to decline due to "currently unsustainable patterns of production and consumption, population growth and technological developments".[137][138] The report also singled out Australia, Brazil, Cameroon and the Galapagos Islands (Ecuador) for having had one of its animals lost to extinction in the past ten years.[139]

Following this, the leaders of 64 nations and the European Union pledged to halt environmental degradation and restore the natural world. The pledge was not signed by leaders from some of the world's biggest polluters, namely China, India, Russia, Brazil and the United States.[140] Some experts contend that the refusal of the United States to ratify the Convention on Biological Diversity is harming global efforts to halt the extinction crisis.[141]

Scientists say that even if the targets for 2020 had been met, it likely would not have resulted in any substantive reductions of current extinction rates.[109][1] Others have raised concerns that the Convention on Biological Diversity does not go far enough, and argue the goal should be zero extinctions by 2050, along with cutting the impact of unsustainable food production on nature by half. That the targets are not legally binding has also been subject to criticism.[142]

In December 2022, all countries on earth, except the United States and the Holy See,[143] signed onto the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework at the 2022 United Nations Biodiversity Conference. This framework calls for protecting 30% of land and oceans by 2030 (30 by 30). It also has 22 other targets intended to reduce biodiversity loss. At the time of signing the agreement, only 17% of land territory and 10% of ocean territory were protected. The agreement includes protecting the rights of Indigenous peoples and changing the current subsidy policy to one better for biodiversity protection. However, it makes a step backward in protecting species from extinction in comparison to the Aichi Targets.[144][145] Critics said the agreement does not go far enough to protect biodiversity, and that the process was rushed.[144]

Other international and national action

In 2019 the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) published the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. This report said that up to a million plant and animal species are facing extinction because of human activities.[8] The IPBES is an international organization since 2012 that serves a similar role to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC),[146] only that it focuses on biodiversity and ecosystem services, not on climate change.

The United Nation's Sustainable Development Goal 15 (SDG 15) "Life on Land" includes targets for biodiversity. The fifth target of SDG 15 is: "Take urgent and significant action to reduce the degradation of natural habitats, halt the loss of biodiversity and, by 2020, protect and prevent the extinction of threatened species."[147] This target has one indicator: the Red List Index.[148]

Nearly three-quarters of bird species, two thirds of mammals and more than half of hard corals have been recorded at World Heritage Sites, even though they cover less than 1% of the planet. Countries with World Heritage Sites can include them in their national biodiversity strategies and action plans.[149][150]

See also

References

Шаблон:Reflist

External links

Шаблон:Human impact on the environment Шаблон:Global catastrophic risks Шаблон:Portal bar

de:Verlust von Biodiversität

  1. 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 Шаблон:Cite journal
  2. Шаблон:Cite journal
  3. Шаблон:Cite journal
  4. 4,0 4,1 4,2 4,3 Шаблон:Cite web
  5. 5,0 5,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  6. 6,0 6,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  7. 7,0 7,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  8. 8,0 8,1 8,2 8,3 Шаблон:Cite journal
  9. 9,0 9,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  10. 10,0 10,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  11. 11,0 11,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  12. Шаблон:Cite journal
  13. 13,0 13,1 13,2 13,3 13,4 Шаблон:Cite journal
  14. 14,0 14,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  15. 15,0 15,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  16. Шаблон:Cite web
  17. Шаблон:Cite news
  18. 18,0 18,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  19. 19,0 19,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  20. 20,0 20,1 Шаблон:Cite book
  21. 21,0 21,1 Шаблон:Citation
  22. Шаблон:Cite book
  23. 23,0 23,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  24. 24,0 24,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  25. Шаблон:Cite news
  26. Шаблон:Cite web
  27. Шаблон:Cite journal
  28. Шаблон:Cite journal
  29. Шаблон:Cite journal
  30. Шаблон:Cite journal
  31. CIESM 2013. Marine extinctions - patterns and processes. CIESM Workshop Monograph n° 45 [F. Briand ed.], 188 p., CIESM Publisher, Monaco.
  32. Шаблон:Cite journal
  33. Шаблон:Cite web
  34. Шаблон:Cite news
  35. Шаблон:Cite journal
  36. Шаблон:Cite news
  37. Шаблон:Cite journal
  38. Шаблон:Cite news
  39. Шаблон:Cite book
  40. Шаблон:Cite book
  41. 41,0 41,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  42. 42,0 42,1 42,2 Шаблон:Cite journal
  43. 43,0 43,1 Шаблон:Cite book
  44. Шаблон:Cite journal
  45. Шаблон:Cite web
  46. Шаблон:Cite web
  47. Regional data from Шаблон:Cite web
  48. Шаблон:Cite news
  49. Шаблон:Cite news
  50. Шаблон:Cite web
  51. Шаблон:Cite web
  52. 52,0 52,1 52,2 Шаблон:Cite journal Файл:CC-BY icon.svg Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  53. Шаблон:Cite journal
  54. 54,0 54,1 54,2 54,3 Шаблон:Cite journal
  55. Шаблон:Cite web
  56. Шаблон:Cite web
  57. Шаблон:Cite journal
  58. 58,0 58,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  59. Шаблон:Cite journal
  60. Шаблон:Cite news
  61. 61,0 61,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  62. Шаблон:Cite journal
  63. 63,0 63,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  64. Шаблон:Cite news
  65. 65,0 65,1 65,2 65,3 Шаблон:Cite journal
  66. 66,0 66,1 Шаблон:Cite book
  67. Шаблон:Cite news
  68. Шаблон:Cite journal
  69. Шаблон:Cite journal
  70. Шаблон:Cite journal
  71. Шаблон:Cite journal
  72. Шаблон:Cite journal
  73. Шаблон:Cite book
  74. Шаблон:Cite book
  75. Шаблон:Cite book
  76. 76,0 76,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  77. Шаблон:Cite journal
  78. Шаблон:Cite journal
  79. 79,0 79,1 Шаблон:Cite journal Файл:CC-BY icon.svg Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  80. Шаблон:Cite news
  81. 81,0 81,1 81,2 81,3 Шаблон:Cite web
  82. Шаблон:Cite news
  83. 83,0 83,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  84. Шаблон:Cite journal
  85. Шаблон:Cite book
  86. Шаблон:Cite bookШаблон:Page needed
  87. Шаблон:Cite journal
  88. Шаблон:Cite journal
  89. 89,0 89,1 89,2 Шаблон:Cite journal
  90. Шаблон:Cite journal
  91. 91,0 91,1 91,2 Шаблон:Cite thesis
  92. Шаблон:Cite journal
  93. Шаблон:Cite journal
  94. Шаблон:Cite journal
  95. Шаблон:Cite journal
  96. Шаблон:Cite journal
  97. Шаблон:Cite journal
  98. 98,0 98,1 98,2 Шаблон:Cite journal Файл:CC-BY icon.svg Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  99. Шаблон:Cite journal
  100. Шаблон:Cite journal
  101. Шаблон:Cite journal
  102. Шаблон:Cite web
  103. Шаблон:Cite journal
  104. Шаблон:Cite journal
  105. Шаблон:Cite book
  106. Шаблон:Cite web
  107. Шаблон:Cite web
  108. Шаблон:Cite journal
  109. 109,0 109,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  110. Шаблон:Cite journal
  111. Шаблон:Cite web
  112. Шаблон:Cite journal
  113. Шаблон:Cite book
  114. Шаблон:Cite journal
  115. Шаблон:Cite journal
  116. Шаблон:Cite journal
  117. Шаблон:Cite journal
  118. Шаблон:Cite news
  119. Шаблон:Cite news
  120. Шаблон:Cite journal
  121. Шаблон:Cite journal
  122. Шаблон:Cite journal
  123. Шаблон:Cite journal
  124. Шаблон:Citation
  125. Шаблон:Citation
  126. 126,0 126,1 126,2 Шаблон:Cite book Alt URL, text has been copied from this publication and a Wikipedia-specific license statement is available.
  127. 127,0 127,1 127,2 127,3 127,4 Шаблон:Cite book
  128. Шаблон:Cite journal
  129. Шаблон:Cite journal
  130. Шаблон:Cite journal
  131. Шаблон:Cite web
  132. 132,0 132,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  133. Шаблон:Cite news
  134. Шаблон:Cite journal
  135. Шаблон:Cite web
  136. Шаблон:Cite web
  137. Шаблон:Cite news
  138. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2020) Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. Montreal.
  139. Шаблон:Cite web
  140. Шаблон:Cite news
  141. Шаблон:Cite news
  142. Шаблон:Cite news
  143. Шаблон:Cite news
  144. 144,0 144,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  145. Шаблон:Cite news
  146. Шаблон:Cite web
  147. Шаблон:Cite report
  148. Шаблон:Cite web Файл:CC-BY icon.svg Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  149. Шаблон:Cite news
  150. Шаблон:Cite web