Английская Википедия:Boletaceae

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Automatic taxobox

The Boletaceae are a family of mushroom-forming fungi, primarily characterised by small pores on the spore-bearing hymenial surface (at the underside of the mushroom), instead of gills as are found in most agarics. Nearly as widely distributed as the agarics, the family is renowned for hosting some prime edible species highly sought after by mushroom hunters worldwide, such as the cep or king bolete (Boletus edulis). A number of rare or threatened species are also present in the family, that have become the focus of increasing conservation concerns. As a whole, the typical members of the family are commonly known as boletes.

Boletes are a group of mushrooms reasonably safe for human consumption, as none of them are known to be deadly to adults. Edible bolete species are especially suitable for novice collectors, since they pose little danger of being confused with deadly poisonous mushrooms, such as deadly Amanita species which bear gills instead of pores in their hymenial surface. Some boletes are toxic and may cause gastrointestinal poisoning if consumed, but these are unlikely to be confused with popular edible species in the family.

The family has been the subject of extensive systematic revisions in recent years, as some of the early established genera (particularly Boletus, Leccinum and Xerocomus), have revealed to be highly polyphyletic, and the original number of genera within the family had been underestimated. As a result, several new species and genera have been described from Asia, Europe and North America, while many existing species have been transferred to different genera, in concordance with phylogenetic results.

Description

Most species of Boletaceae produce large, fleshy mushrooms, with a more or less central stipe. The fruit bodies typically have tubular hymenophores, although a small number of species (e.g. Phylloporus) are lamellate. The spore deposit colours are commonly olivaceous (yellowish-green), yellowish, brownish, or vinaceous (red-wine coloured), and when viewed under the microscope spores are usually fusiform or subfusiform. In many species, parts of the fruit body will turn blue, red, or black when bruised or exposed to the air, as a result of the oxidation of pulvinic acid derivatives, like variegatic, xerocomic, and atrotomentinic acids.[1]

Taxonomy

Boletaceae were first described by the French botanist François Fulgis Chevallier in 1826, as a family distinct from Agaricaceae. Five genera were initially included in Chevallier's circumscription: Boletus (which is the type genus of the family), Cladoporus (now synonymous with Laetiporus[2]), Physisporus (now Perenniporia[3]), Polyporus, and Fistulina.[4] However, all of the original genera except Boletus have since been transferred to different families,[5][6] and several new Boletaceae genera have been described.

Genera

Rolf Singer, in the 4th edition (1986) of his Agaricales in Modern Taxonomy, included 26 genera and 415 species in Boletaceae.[6] In the Dictionary of the Fungi (10th edition, 2008), 35 Boletaceae genera were recognised, which collectively contained 787 species.[7] Molecular phylogenetic studies in the 2000s have revised the concept of the family; in a highly cited 2006 publication, Manfred Binder and David Hibbett recognised 38 genera within the family, many of which had remained at the time undescribed.[8] The number of Boletaceae genera increased significantly in the following years, as some of the early-established genera (Boletus, Leccinum, Xerocomus), further revealed to be highly polyphyletic.[9] In the comprehensive work of Wu and colleagues (2014),[10] seven major clades at subfamily level and 59 generic lineages were uncovered, including four new subfamilies (Austroboletoideae, Chalciporoideae, Leccinoideae, and Zangioideae) and 22 potential new genera. To formally name the generic lineages unravelled by molecular phylogenies, several new genera have since been described from Asia, Europe and North America including, among others, Baorangia,[11] Butyriboletus,[12] Cacaoporus,[13] Caloboletus,[14] Exsudoporus,[15] Imperator[16] and Rubroboletus.[17]

Some characters traditionally emphasised in morphology-based taxonomy, such as basidiospore ornamentation and "stuffed" pore morphology, revealed to be incongruent with molecular taxonomy, suggesting that certain traits evolved more than once within the family.[10][18]

Genus Authority  Year No. of species Distribution
Afroboletus Pegler & T.W.K.Young 1981 7 tropical Africa
Alessioporus[19] Gelardi, Vizzini & Simonini 2014 1 southern Europe
Aureoboletus Pouzar 1957 17[20] widespread
Australopilus[21] Halling & Fechner 2012 1 Australia
Austroboletus Wolfe 1980 Шаблон:Sort America, Australasia
Baorangia[11] G. Wu & Zhu L. Yang 2015 Шаблон:Sort East Asia, North America
Boletellus Murrill 1909 Шаблон:Sort widespread
Boletochaete Singer 1944 3 Africa, Southeast Asia
Boletus Fr. 1821 Шаблон:Sort widespread
Borofutus[22] Hosen & Zhu L.Yang 2012 1 Bangladesh
Bothia Halling, T.J.Baroni, & Binder 2007 1 North America
Buchwaldoboletus Pilát 1962 3 Europe, Australia
Butyriboletus[12] D.Arora & J.L.Frank 2014 18 widespread
Cacaoporus[13] Raspé & Vadthanarat 2019 2 Thailand
Caloboletus[14] Vizzini 2014 13 widespread
Chalciporus Bataille 1908 25 widespread
Chamonixia Rolland 1899 8 widespread
Corneroboletus[23] N.K.Zeng & Zhu L.Yang 2012 1 Singapore, Malaysia, tropical China
Crocinoboletus[24] N.K. Zeng, Zhu L. Yang & G. Wu 2015 2 East Asia, South Asia
Cyanoboletus[25] Gelardi, Vizzini & Simonini 2014 3 widespread
Durianella[26] A.W.Wilson & Manfr.Binder 2008 1 Malaysia, Borneo
Erythrophylloporus[27] Raspé, Vadthanarat & Lumyong 2019 3 China, Thailand
Exsudoporus[15] Vizzini, Simonini & Gelardi 2014 3 North America, Europe
Fistulinella Henn. 1901 15 pantropical
Gastroboletus Lohwag 1962 13 widespread
Gastroleccinum Thiers 1989 1 North America
Harrya[21] Halling, Nuhn & Osmundson 2012 2 Asia, North America, Central America
Heimioporus E.Horak 2004 Шаблон:Sort widespread
Heliogaster[28] (Kobayasi) Orihara & Iwase 2010 1 Japan
Hemileccinum[29] Šutara 2008 3[20] Europe, North America[20]
Hortiboletus[30] Simonini, Vizzini & Gelardi 2015 4 Europe, North America
Imleria[31] Vizzini 2014 4[32] Europe, Asia, North America[32]
Imperator Assyov et al. 2015 3 Europe, West Asia
Kaziboletus[33] Iqbal Hosen, Zhu L.Yang 2021 1 South Asia
Lanmaoa[11] G. Wu, Zhu L. Yang, Halling 2015 >5 East Asia, North America
Leccinellum Bresinsky & Manfr. Binder 2003 10 widespread
Leccinum Gray 1821 Шаблон:Sort widespread
Mucilopilus[10] Wolfe 1979 4[34] North America, New Zealand[34]
Mycoamaranthus Castellano, Trappe & Malajczuk 1992 3 Australasia, Africa, Southeast Asia
Neoboletus Gelardi et al. 2014 9 Europe, Asia
Nigroboletus[35] Gelardi, Vizzini, E. Horak, T.H. Li & Ming Zhang 2015 1 China
Octaviania Vittad. 1831 15 widespread
Parvixerocomus[11] G. Wu & Zhu L. Yang, 2015 2 East Asia
Paxillogaster E.Horak 1966 1 South America
Phylloboletellus Singer 1952 1 Central and South America
Phyllobolites Singer 1942 1 South America
Phylloporus Quel. 1888 Шаблон:Sort cosmopolitan
Pseudoaustroboletus[36] Yan C. Li & Zhu L. Yang 2014 1 East Asia, South Asia
Pseudoboletus Šutara 1991 2 north temperate regions
Pulchroboletus[19] Vizzini, Simonini & Gelardi 2014 1 southern Europe
Pulveroboletus Murrill 1909 25 cosmopolitan
Retiboletus Manfr. Binder & Bresinsky 2002 5 north temperate regions
Rheubarbariboletus[30] Vizzini, Simonini & Gelardi 2015 2 Europe
Rhodactina Pegler & T.W.K.Young 1989 2 India, Thailand
Rossbeevera[37] T.Lebel & Orihara 2011 9 Asia, Australia
Royoungia Castellano, Trappe & Malajczuk 1992 1 Australia
Rubroboletus[17] Kuan Zhao & Zhu L.Yang 2014 8 Widespread
Rugiboletus[11] G. Wu & Zhu L. Yang 2015 2 East Asia
Setogyroporus Heinem. & Rammeloo 1999 1 tropical Africa
Singerocomus[38] T.W.Henkel & M.E.Sm. 2016 3 ??
Singeromyces M.M.Moser 1966 1 Argentina
Sinoboletus M.Zang 1992 10 China
Solioccasus[39] Trappe, Osmundson, Manfr.Binder, Castellano & Halling 2013 1 Australasia
Spongiforma[40] Desjardin, Manf. Binder, Roekring & Flegel 2009 2 Thailand, Malaysia
Strobilomyces Berk. 1851 Шаблон:Sort cosmopolitan
Suillellus Murrill 1909 11 North America, Europe
Sutorius[41] Halling, Nuhn & Fechner 2012 3 North America, Costa Rica, Africa, S.E. Asia, Australia
Tubosaeta E.Horak 1967 5 Africa, Asia
Tylopilus P.Karst 1881 Шаблон:Sort widespread
Veloporphyrellus L.D.Gómez & Singer 1984 1 Central America
Wakefieldia Corner & Hawker 1952 2 Asia, Europe
Xanthoconium Singer 1944 7 cosmopolitan
Xerocomellus[29] Šutara 2008 24 North and South America, Europe
Xerocomus[29] Quel 1887 >20 widespread
Zangia[42] Yan C.Li & Zhu L.Yang 2011 6 China

(*) Note that the phylogenetic and taxonomic position of many taxa currently remaining in genus Boletus has not yet been clarified. The number of species in this genus will therefore significantly reduce in the following years, as more taxa will be transferred to different genera, or found to be synonyms.

Many other genera formerly part of this family have been moved into other, smaller families, as work with molecular phylogeny shows that they are more distantly related, even if morphologically similar. Representative of this adjustment, is the move of the slimy-capped genus Suillus to the family Suillaceae.

Distribution

Файл:Weilangta Phylloporus sp.jpg
Phylloporus sp. Wielangta Forest, Tasmania

Boletes are found worldwide, on every continent except Antarctica. Well-known and well-described in the temperate latitudes in the northern hemisphere, newer research has shown significant diversity in tropical and southern hemisphere regions as well. E. J. H. Corner found evidence of at least 60 species on the island of Singapore alone. In 1972 he described 140 species from the Malay Peninsula and Borneo and estimated there were at least as many yet to be documented.[43] Over 100 species belonging to 52 genera have been reported from China, which has emerged as one of the worldwide hotspots of Boletaceae diversity.[18] The family is also reasonably well-represented in the Mediterranean region, where many rare or range-restricted species can be found.[44]

Ecology

As heterotrophic organisms, the majority Boletaceae species are symbiotic, and form mutually beneficial ectomycorrhizal associations with various trees and shrubs.[45][46][47] However, a number of ancestral species in genera Buchwaldoboletus and Pseudoboletus, are saprotrophic or parasitic.[48][8][46] Evidence suggests that some, if not all, species of Chalciporus might also have a mycoparasitic interaction with other fungi.[46][9] The exact trophic status of some South American and African boletes, such as species of Phylloboletellus, is nonetheless not yet fully clarified, as fruit bodies are often found without the presence of ectomycorrhizal vegetation.[6][46]

Most frequently associated tree-hosts are members of the Fagaceae, particularly oak (Quercus), beech (Fagus) and chestnut (Castanea).[49][50][51] Fewer species are associated with conifers, mostly spruce (Picea) and fir (Abies). In the Mediterranean region, most boletes are strongly associated with evergreen oaks, particularly members of the "Ilex" group, such as the holm oak (Quercus ilex), the kermes oak (Q. coccifera), or the golden oak (Q. alnifolia).[44] Some boletes are also known to grow in association with Cistaceae shrubs, mainly Cistus[52] and Helianthemum,[53] and at least one species (Leccinellum corsicum) is exclusively associated with rockrose.[50][54]

Most boletes are sensitive to cold and fruit during warm spells in the summer and early months of the autumn, while some have very specific preferences with regards to substrate. For instance, the highly sought after Boletus aereus is mostly found on acidic soils,[55][50] whereas the poisonous Rubroboletus satanas is predominantly calciphilous and mostly occurs on chalk.[56][57] Other species, such as Hemileccinum impolitum or Leccinellum lepidum, are indifferent to the substrate and frequently occur on both calcareous and acidic soil.[44]

Conservation

A number of Boletaceae species are considered rare, vulnerable or endangered, and some have been included in regional or national Red Lists. Rubroboletus dupainii is listed among the 33 threatened fungi of Europe, as part of Appendix I of the Bern Convention.[58] Rubroboletus rhodoxanthus is considered extinct in England[59] and critically endangered in the Czech Republic.[60] Also critically endangered in the Czech Republic are Aureoboletus moravicus, Buchwaldoboletus sphaerocephalus, Butyriboletus fuscoroseus, Imperator rhodopurpureus, Leccinum roseotinctum and Rubroboletus rubrosanguineus.[60] Eleven species of Boletaceae, Boletus aereus, Boletus pinophilus, Butyriboletus regius, Hemileccinum impolitum, Imperator luteocupreus, I. rhodopurpureus, I. torosus, Rubroboletus dupainii, R. lupinus, R. pulchrotinctus and R. satanas, are considered vulnerable or endangered in North Macedonia and have been included in the national Red List of fungi.[61] Similarly, twenty species of Boletaceae are included in the Red List of fungi in Bulgaria.[62]

Research from the Mediterranean region suggests that many boletes might be under threat from accelerated climate changes and long-term drought. In a ten-year study from the island of Cyprus, most bolete species were found to be rare, highly restricted by low soil moisture and exhibited very erratic fruiting patterns strongly correlating to annual, late summer and early autumn precipitation.[44]

Edibility

A large number of boletes are edible, few are delicious and some are considered to be true culinary delicacies. The much sought after king bolete (Boletus edulis), in particular, is a species of high commercial value and has been described as "the wild mushroom par excellence".[63] In the Province of Parma in northern Italy, the four most sought after boletes, Boletus edulis, B. aereus, B. reticulatus and B. pinophilus, have been collected and commercially exploited for centuries.[64] Boletes are widely collected and sold in markets throughout Spain, particularly the province of Aragon.[65] Scandinavian cuisine praises boletes. Шаблон:Citation needed They are a regular feature of Finnish cuisine and, especially the king bolete, is considered an unsurpassed culinary mushroom, widely used in various soups, sauces, casseroles and hotpots.Шаблон:Citation needed Bolete mushrooms are sometimes also used as pizza topping, not unlike champignons, shiitake, or portobellos.

Two species of Butyriboletus, the royal bolete (B. regius) and the butter bolete (B. appendiculatus) are also culinary valued, though much less common than the ceps. In northern Europe, two of the commonest and most frequently collected edible boletes are the bay bolete (Imleria badia), whose pores bruise blue-green, and the orange birch bolete, which is a Leccinum with an orange cap and which bruises a bluish grey.Шаблон:Citation needed

Several guidebooks recommend avoiding all red-pored boletes, but both Neoboletus luridiformis (= Neoboletus erythropus) and Suillellus luridus are edible when well-cooked and widely consumed in certain parts of Europe.

Lookalikes

Poisonous or otherwise inedible species are also present in the family, however, such as the unpalatable bitter species Caloboletus calopus and the aptly named bitter bolete (Tylopilus felleus), with a taste compared to bile, as well as some orange-capped species of Leccinum. As the bitter bolete resembles somewhat the king bolete, it can produce literally a bitter disappointment to the mushroom hunter. The rule of thumb is that the bitter bolete has pink pores, and a brownish stipe with a dark brown (sometimes approaching black) reticulum, while the cep has whitish pores, which in maturity become yellowish or sometimes with a faint olivaceous tint, a light-colored (white and/or similar in color to the rest of the stipe) reticulum and white hyphae tufts at the base of the stipe. The bitter bolete also lacks the stuffed or plugged pore appearance (caused by a hyphal mat of cheilocystidia) that is common in the cep and its allies. If uncertain, tasting a small piece of cap context should clinch the identification, since Tylopilus felleus has a strong, foul bitter taste.

Toxicity

Файл:Boletus satanas.JPG
Devil's bolete (Rubroboletus satanas)

Rubroboletus satanas has long been considered to be poisonous, though it is not known to have been responsible for any fatalities and the symptoms are predominantly gastrointestinal in nature. A glycoprotein, bolesatine, is thought to be responsible for the poisonings.[66] When given to mice, Bolesatine causes massive thrombosis,[67] while at lower concentrations it is a mitogen, inducing cell division to human T lymphocytes.[68] A similar compound, bolevenine, has been isolated from the poisonous Neoboletus venenatus in Japan.[69]

More recent studies have associated the poisoning caused by R. satanas with hyperprocalcitonemia,[70] and classified it as a distinct syndrome among fungal poisonings.[71] Several other boletes are known to cause varying degrees of gastrointestinal symptoms, especially if eaten raw or insufficiently cooked.

One incident of death associated with Rubroboletus pulcherrimus was reported in 1994; a couple developed gastrointestinal symptoms after eating this fungus, with the husband finally succumbing. An autopsy revealed infarction of the midgut.[72]

See also

Шаблон:Portal

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Cited texts

External links

Шаблон:Commons category Шаблон:Wikispecies

Шаблон:Taxonbar Шаблон:Authority control

  1. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Nelson2010 не указан текст
  2. Kirk et al., (2008), p. 146.
  3. Kirk et al., (2008), p. 535.
  4. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Chevallier1828 не указан текст
  5. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Donk 1964 не указан текст
  6. 6,0 6,1 6,2 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Singer1986 не указан текст
  7. Kirk et al. (2008), p. 96.
  8. 8,0 8,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Binder2006 не указан текст
  9. 9,0 9,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Nuhn 2013 не указан текст
  10. 10,0 10,1 10,2 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Wu 2014 не указан текст
  11. 11,0 11,1 11,2 11,3 11,4 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Wu 2015 не указан текст
  12. 12,0 12,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Arora 2014 не указан текст
  13. 13,0 13,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Vadthanarat 2019 не указан текст
  14. 14,0 14,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Vizzini 2014a не указан текст
  15. 15,0 15,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Vizzini 2014c не указан текст
  16. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Assyov 2015 не указан текст
  17. 17,0 17,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Zhao 2014 не указан текст
  18. 18,0 18,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Wu et al. 2016 не указан текст
  19. 19,0 19,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Gelardi 2014 не указан текст
  20. 20,0 20,1 20,2 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Halling 2015 не указан текст
  21. 21,0 21,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Halling 2012b не указан текст
  22. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Hosen 2013 не указан текст
  23. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Zeng 2012 не указан текст
  24. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Zeng 2014 не указан текст
  25. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Vizzini 2014d не указан текст
  26. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Desjardin 2010 не указан текст
  27. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Vadthanarat 2019b не указан текст
  28. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Orihara2010 не указан текст
  29. 29,0 29,1 29,2 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Šutara 2008 не указан текст
  30. 30,0 30,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Vizzini 2015 не указан текст
  31. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Vizzini 2014b не указан текст
  32. 32,0 32,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Zhu2014 не указан текст
  33. Шаблон:Cite journal
  34. 34,0 34,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Wolfe1979 не указан текст
  35. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Gelardi 2015 не указан текст
  36. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Li2014 не указан текст
  37. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Lebel 2012 не указан текст
  38. Шаблон:Cite web
  39. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Trappe 2013 не указан текст
  40. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Desjardin2009 не указан текст
  41. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Halling2012 не указан текст
  42. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Li 2011 не указан текст
  43. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Corner1972 не указан текст
  44. 44,0 44,1 44,2 44,3 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Loizides 2019 не указан текст
  45. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Aeger 2006 не указан текст
  46. 46,0 46,1 46,2 46,3 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Tedersoo et al. 2010 не указан текст
  47. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Tedersoo et al. 2013 не указан текст
  48. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Pilat 1969 не указан текст
  49. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Alessio 1985 не указан текст
  50. 50,0 50,1 50,2 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Munoz 2005 не указан текст
  51. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Galli 2007 не указан текст
  52. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Coma06 не указан текст
  53. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Barden 2007 не указан текст
  54. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Loizides 2016 не указан текст
  55. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Courtecuisse 1995 не указан текст
  56. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Nilper не указан текст
  57. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Lannoy & Estadès 2001 не указан текст
  58. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Dahlberg 2006 не указан текст
  59. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Kibby 2016 не указан текст
  60. 60,0 60,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Mikšik 2012 не указан текст
  61. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Karadelev & Rusevska 2013 не указан текст
  62. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Gyosheva et al. 2006 не указан текст
  63. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Carluccio2003 не указан текст
  64. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Sitta 2008 не указан текст
  65. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок De Roman 2004 не указан текст
  66. Шаблон:Cite journal
  67. Шаблон:Cite journal
  68. Licastro F, Morini MC, Kretz O, Dirheimer G, Creppy EE; Stirpe F. (1993). "Mitogenic activity and immunological properties of bolesatine, a lectin isolated from the mushroom Boletus satanas Lenz". International Journal of Biochemistry. 25 (5): 789–792.
  69. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Matsuura2007 не указан текст
  70. Merlet A, Dauchy FA, Dupon M. (2012). Hyperprocalcitonemia due to mushroom poisoning. Clin Infect Dis. 54: 307–308.
  71. Шаблон:Cite journal
  72. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Benjamin1995 не указан текст