Английская Википедия:Bruce Gilley

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Infobox academic Bruce Gilley (born July 21, 1966) is a Canadian–American professor of political science and director of the PhD program in Public Affairs and Policy at the Mark O. Hatfield School of Government at Portland State University. He is the founder and President of the Oregon Association of Scholars,[1][2] member of the Heterodox Academy and founding signatory of the Oregon Academic Faculty Pledge on Freedom.[3] Gilley gained international acclaim but also a storm of criticism for his highly controversial peer-reviewed article The Case for Colonialism, published in an advance online edition of the scientific journal Third World Quarterly in 2017. Fifteen members of the journal's board resigned over Gilley's article.

Scholarship

Файл:Appearance of Correspondent Bruce Gilley on September 23, 2002, testifying before a congressional committee on the current and future leadership of the Communist Party in China, future succession issues, and the Chinese political system.ogg
Appearance of Correspondent Bruce Gilley on September 23, 2002, testifying before a congressional committee on the current and future leadership of the Chinese Communist Party, future succession issues, and the Chinese political system.

Prof. Dr. Bruce Gilley a Canadian born American of Scottish descent[4] received his Bachelor of Arts in economics and international relations from the University of Toronto in 1988. As a Commonwealth Scholar he did his Master of Economics at the University of Oxford from 1989 to 1991, and went to China to spend a year teaching English.[4] From 1992 to 2002, he worked as a journalist in Hong Kong writing for the Eastern Express newspaper and then the Far Eastern Economic Review magazine where his biggest scoop was exposing an illicit technology transfer by a Stanford professor to China's military. Gilley was a Woodrow Wilson Scholar at Princeton University from 2004 to 2006 from where he received his PhD in politics in 2007.[3][5] He became an associate professor in 2008 at the Department of Political Science of the Mark O. Hatfield School of Government at Portland State University. He was granted academic tenure in 2011 and promoted to full professor in 2016.[6] Gilley's research centers on comparative and international politics and public policy. His work covers issues as diverse as democracy, climate change, political legitimacy, and international conflict. He is a specialist on the politics of China and Asia.[2] His 2006 article "The meaning and measure of state legitimacy: results for 72 countries" introduced a novel multidimensional, quantitative measure of the qualitative concept of political legitimacy.Шаблон:RШаблон:RШаблон:R His work has since been extended by other scholars, and customized to specific geographical regions such as Latin AmericaШаблон:R and Europe.Шаблон:R Gilley himself has since updated his work on quantification of legitimacy with additional empirical data.Шаблон:RШаблон:R

The Case for Colonialism

Gilley's article "The case for colonialism" was published in an advance online version of the Third World Quarterly in 2017.[7] According to Gilley, colonialism was both objectively beneficial (the benefits outweighed the harms) and subjectively legitimate (it was accepted by large portions of the local population). Consequently, the author calls for a revival of colonialism.[8] The article was controversial both for its argument and for its subsequent withdrawal, and resulted in a debate about academic standards and peer review. Fifteen members of the journal's board resigned over the issue.Шаблон:RШаблон:RШаблон:RШаблон:RШаблон:RШаблон:R Critics described the article as low-quality and said that it was published, over the objections of reviewers, as a form of academic clickbait, while board member Noam Chomsky defended the publication of the article, saying that it's “pretty clear that proper procedures were not followed in publishing the article, but I think retraction is a mistake – and also opens very dangerous doors...Rebuttal offers a great opportunity for education, not only in this case.”[7][9] The article was ultimately withdrawn with Gilley's assent after the editor had received threats of violence and it was re-published in the National Association of Scholars' journal Academic Questions in April 2018.[10][9] When asked if it would be ethical to publish a paper making a case for genocide, Gilley said, "I think everyone would agree, [genocide] is a moral wrong" but that he did not believe colonialism was a moral wrong. In the spring of 2022, Gilley responded to many of his critics in a second article entitled 'The Case for Colonialism: A Response to My Critics'.[11]

The Last Imperialist

Gilley's biography of Sir Alan Burns, entitled The Last Imperialist: Sir Alan Burns's Epic Defense of the British Empire, was withdrawn from publishing by Rowman & Littlefield after J. Moufawad-Paul started a petition, which gained over 1000 signatories, saying the author espoused a "pro-colonial" and "white nationalist" perspective.[12] Gilley defended the book by saying it had passed a peer-review procedure and was endorsed by historians Tirthankar Roy and Jeremy Black; Roy confirmed that it had been peer-reviewed and that he had endorsed it and stated that "[t]hat it could be an apology for empires ... never crossed my mind, I do not think this book is one".[12] The book was published by conservative publishing house Regnery Gateway in September 2021.[13]

Hong Kong independence

Gilley's views about colonialism were strongly influenced by his years as a journalist when he worked in Hong Kong. During his stay the British transferred their crown colony Hong Kong to China on the first of July 1997. The tremendous fear among the population of Hong Kong prior to the transfer of power to China in 1997 made a big impression on him.[4]

Political views

Gilley describes himself as a "classical liberal" and "an independent voter".[4] In 2017, Gilley withdrew from the American Political Science Association, stating that he considered it to lack intellectual diversity and to possess an anti-conservative bias.Шаблон:R As a member of the Heterodox Academy, he has been critical of tenure evaluations which require a pledge to uphold collegiate diversity.Шаблон:R Gilley has been critical of educational initiatives designed to enhance diversity, equity, and inclusion.[14][15]

Memberships and awards

Gilley is a member of the editorial boards of the Journal of Democracy and the Journal of Contemporary China.Шаблон:R furthermore Gilley is the chapter president of the Oregon Association of Scholars, the state chapter of the National Association of Scholars, member of the Heterodox Academy and founding signatory of the Oregon Academic Faculty Pledge on Freedom.[3] He is the recipient of the following awards and nominations for scholarly achievement and articles:Шаблон:Efn-ua

  • Commonwealth Scholarship, University of Oxford (1989–1991)
  • East Asian Studies Prize, Princeton University (2002)
  • Woodrow Wilson Scholars Fellowship, Princeton University (2004–2006)
  • Marcel Cadieux Award, Best Article on Foreign Policy, Canadian Institute of International Affairs
  • Nominated for Gabriel A. Almond Best Dissertation Award, American Political Science Association (2006, 2012)
  • Best Dissertation in Comparative Politics, Department of Politics, Princeton University (2007)
  • Frank Cass Prize, Best Article in Democratization (2010)
  • Dean's Award for Scholarly Achievement – Senior Faculty, College of Urban and Public Affairs (2016)

Selected publications

Authored

Edited

  • Middle Powers and the Rise of China. Georgetown University Press, Washington DC, 2014. (With Andrew O'Neil)
  • Political Change in China: Comparisons With Taiwan. Lynne Rienner, Boulder, 2008. (With Larry Diamond)
  • Asia's Giants: Comparing China and India. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2005. (With Edward Friedman)

Articles

See also

References

Notes

Шаблон:Reflist

Citations

Шаблон:Reflist

External links

Шаблон:Wikiquote Шаблон:Commons category

Шаблон:Portal bar Шаблон:Political ideologies Шаблон:Empires Шаблон:International relations Шаблон:Authority control

  1. The Oregon Chapter of the National Association of Scholars
  2. 2,0 2,1 Author: Bruce Gilley – mindingthecampus.org Retrieved January 30, 2023
  3. 3,0 3,1 3,2 Bruce Gilley's Academic page and Bio at Portland state University
  4. 4,0 4,1 4,2 4,3 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок E interview не указан текст
  5. Illicit technology transfer by a Stanford professor to China's military.
  6. Bruce Gilley, Portland state University Official CURRICULUM VITAE, October 11, 2022
  7. 7,0 7,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Flaherty-2017-09-26 не указан текст
  8. Шаблон:Cite journal
  9. 9,0 9,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  10. "The Case for Colonialism", Bruce Gilley, Academic Questions, June 2018, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 167–185.
  11. Gilley, Bruce, The Case for Colonialism: A Response to My Critics, Academic Questions, 2022
  12. 12,0 12,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  13. Шаблон:Cite book
  14. Шаблон:Cite web
  15. Шаблон:Cite web
  16. Reviews of Tiger on the Brink:
  17. Reviews of Model Rebels:
    • Tony Saich (November–December 2001), China Perspectives 38: 77–78, Шаблон:JSTOR; translated into French by Mathilde Lelièvre (September–October 2001), Perspectives Chinoises 67: 83–85, Шаблон:JSTOR
    • John L. Rawlinson (2001), History: Reviews of New Books 29 (3): 130–131, Шаблон:Doi
    • Flemming Christiansen (July 2002), The China Journal 48: 211–212, Шаблон:Doi
    • Michelle Mood (Winter 2001–2002), Pacific Affairs 74 (4): 592–593, Шаблон:Doi
    • Parks M. Coble (Winter 2002), Agricultural History 76 (1): 116–118, Шаблон:JSTOR
    • Jonathan Unger (Spring 2002), China Review International 9 (1): 109–112, Шаблон:JSTOR
    • Robert G. Ferguson (June 2002), Enterprise & Society 3 (2): 371–372, Шаблон:Doi
    • Ma. Teresa Rodríguez y Rodríguez (September–December 2004), Estudios de Asia y Africa 39 (3): 790–794, Шаблон:JSTOR
  18. Reviews of China's New Rulers:
    • Michael Sheridan (January 2003), The Sunday Times, [4]
    • Lucian W. Pye (January–February 2003), Foreign Affairs 82 (1): 176, Шаблон:Doi
    • Alissa Black (July 2003), International Affairs 79 (4): 932–933, Шаблон:JSTOR
    • Alfred L. Chan (July 2003), The China Journal 50: 107–119, Шаблон:Doi
    • Richard B. Khoe (Summer–Fall 2003), SAIS Review 23 (2): 239–243, Шаблон:Doi
    • Michael Schoenhals (September 2004), The China Quarterly 179: 811–812, Шаблон:JSTOR
    • John Sweda (Winter 2004), Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 28 (1)
  19. Reviews of China's Democratic Future:
    • Peg Christoff (March 2004), Library Journal 129 (4)
    • Stephen Green (October 2004), International Affairs 80 (5): 1022–1023, Шаблон:JSTOR
    • Scott Kennedy (Winter 2004–2005), World Policy Journal 21 (4): 77–85, Шаблон:JSTOR
    • Barrett L. McCormick (January 2005), The China Journal 53: 192–194, Шаблон:Doi
    • Patricia M. Thornton (Summer 2005), Political Science Quarterly 120 (2): 338–339, Шаблон:JSTOR
    • Andrew Mertha (September 2006), Perspectives on Politics 4 (3): 613–614, Шаблон:JSTOR
    • Alan P. L. Liu (2008), China Review International 15 (1): 94–96, Шаблон:JSTOR
    • Jagannath P. Panda (2008), Strategic Analysis 33 (1): 127–132, Шаблон:Doi
  20. Reviews for The Right to Rule:
    • Pierre Hassner (February 2010), Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 52 (1): 204–206, Шаблон:Doi
    • Mitchell A. Seligson (March 2010), Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 378–379, Шаблон:JSTOR
    • Vsevolod Gunitskiy (Spring 2010), Political Science Quarterly 125 (1): 163–165, Шаблон:JSTOR
    • Stefano Burzo (November 2016), Journal of East Asian Studies 16 (3): 420–421, Шаблон:Doi
  21. Reviews of The Nature of Asian Politics:
    • Benjamin Reilly (February 2015), Australian Outlook, [5]; Journal of Democracy 26 (3): 171–175, Шаблон:Doi
    • Duncan McCargo (May–June 2015), Foreign Affairs, [6]
    • Takashi Inoguchi (March 2016), Pacific Affairs 89 (1): 115–116, [7]
    • Sungmoon Kim (September 2016), Perspectives on Politics 14 (3): 900–902, Шаблон:Doi
    • Osman Hulusi Takçı (2016), Review of International Law & Politics 12 (2): 190–194, [8]
  22. Шаблон:Cite book
  23. Шаблон:Cite book