Английская Википедия:Chizuko Ueno

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Infobox person

Шаблон:Nihongo[1] is a Japanese sociologist and Japan's "best-known feminist".[2][3] Her work covers sociological issues including semiotics, capitalism, and feminism in Japan.[1][4] Ueno is known for the quality, polarizing nature, and accessibility of her work.[5] She was married to historian Daikichi Irokawa.[6][7][8][9]

Early life and education

Ueno was raised as a Christian, which she notes as being "very unusual" because only 1% of the Japanese population is Christian.[10] Her father was a physician.[11] In an interview with The Japan Times, she describes her father as "a complete sexist" who had extremely high expectations of her two brothers but only considered his daughter as a "pet girl", which allowed her the "freedom to do whatever I wanted to do".[10] The marriage between Ueno's parents was unhappy, and her mother repeatedly fretted the difficulty that divorce would bring should she pursue it. Ueno would later describe monogamous marriage institutions as "the root of all evil".[12] Ueno studied sociology at Kyoto University,[1] where she participated in the Zengakuren student protests of the 1960s.[10] Ueno has stated that during her time as a student, she faced sexual discrimination.[13]

Academic career

Chizuko Ueno has spent her entire career advocating for equality of gender in the Japanese society by means of researching diverse issues of gender and contributing to the establishment of gender studies as an acknowledged field of research in Japan.

In 1982, Ueno authored The Study of the 'Sexy Girl' (セクシィ・ギャルの大研究) and Reading the Housewife Debates (主婦論争を読む), texts that would be referred to as "The Flagbearers of 1980's Feminism".[1] Her work investigated the relationship between the "Women's Lib" (ウーマン・リブ) movement of the 1960s and Women's Liberation Movement (女性解放運動) of the 1970s.[1] The primary perspective of these works was the application of structuralist and semiotic theory to sociology in order to investigate gender-centric mechanisms in society. This public debate coincided with the prominence of other scholars such as Asada Akira, Nakazawa Shin'ichi, and Yomota Inuhiko, a period known as the New Academicism Boom (ニュー・アカデミズム・ブーム).[1]

After dropping out of her doctoral courses, Ueno worked in a marketing systems think tank and produced many works on the debates of consumption and society.[14]

From 1979 to 1989, she was a Lecturer and later Associate Professor at the Heian Women's College. She was an Associate Professor and Professor at the Kyoto Seika University at the Department of Humanities from 1989 to 1994.[1] In 1993, after being rejected from many other universities as a strident feminist scholar, she received an invitation from the University of Tokyo.[10]

She is a special guest professor at the Graduate School of Core Ethics and Frontier Sciences at Ritsumeikan University and a professor emeritus at the University of Tokyo.[15] She retired from this position in order to take the role of Chief Director of the Women's Action Network (WAN),[16][17] an organization designed to connect and introduce feminists from different backgrounds.[18] The Women's Action Network website hosts news, essays, popular media reviews, and promotes certain merchandise.[16]

In 1994, Ueno received the Suntory Arts and Sciences award for her work, The Rise and Fall of the Modern Family.[1]

Scholarship and views

Ueno's research field includes feminist theory, family sociology, and women's history. She is best known for her contribution to gender studies in Japan. As a public intellectual, she played a central role in creating the field of gender studies in Japanese academia.[10]

Ueno is a trenchant critic of postwar revisionism and criticizes the whitewashing of Japanese history, which she claims attempts to justify its colonialism, wartime atrocities, and racism both before and after World War II. In particular, she has defended the compensation of Korean comfort women who were forced into prostitution by the Empire of Japan.[10] She is also a staunch advocate of global women's reproductive rights,[19] and a critic of monogamous marriage institutions.[12]

Ueno often discusses the semiotics and accessibility of feminism, claiming that feminist discussion in Japanese can frequently lack the language needed to make its concepts readily understandable and approachable.[3] Moreover, Ueno has engaged in publicly provocative expressions and publications in order to invite dialogue on otherwise less-discussed feminist issues in the Japanese media, for which she has received both praise and criticism from other feminists.[5] In the mid-1980s, Ueno was also involved in a public debate with Japanese eco-feminist Aoki Yayoi.[5]

Her work has argued that a key component of Marxist-Feminist thought is the recognition that sexism is an inherent, inseparable aspect of capitalist economies, and that sexism in the modern family does not owe its origins to pre-modern traditions, but rather is an acute product of post-industrial economic structure.[1]

Ueno has stressed the need for an accessible legacy of feminist thought.[20]

Controversy in South Korea

Ueno is classified as an postcolonial feminist in Japan, but many South Korean scholars don't think so, they often criticize her for not completely abandoning her 'colonialist' perception because of the limitations of Japanese feminism. She opposed the criminal punishment of Park Yu-ha, who openly instigated historical revisionism on the issue of Comfort Women in South Korea, citing freedom of expression. She was accused of being a 'colonialist' by many South Korean feminists and Korean nationalists.[21] Park Yu-ha's view of the comfort women is considered morally identical to that of 'Japanese far-right' or 'Holocaust Negationism' by many South Korean scholars.[22][23]

On the afternoon of March 28, 2016, Chizuko Ueno said at a debate at the University of Tokyo in Japan, "it was the judiciary of Korea that filed a criminal complaint against [Park Yoo-ha]", causing controversy in South Korea. Yang Jing-ja (양징자), a Zainichi scholar who participated in the forum, said, "The charges against [Park Yoo-ha were] made by the victims, and the prosecution tried to reconcile with the victims through mediation. It was Professor Park Yoo-ha who rejected the prosecution's mediation plan," he countered, after which Ueno suddenly handed over the microphone and stepped down from the podium, saying, "[I'm] busy".[24]

Selected publications

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Шаблон:Authority control