Английская Википедия:Civic nationalism

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Distinguish Шаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:Nationalism sidebar Шаблон:Liberalism sidebar

Civic nationalism, otherwise known as democratic nationalism and liberal nationalism, is a form of nationalism that adheres to traditional liberal values of freedom, tolerance, equality, and individual rights, and is not based on ethnocentrism.[1][2] Civic nationalists often defend the value of national identity by saying that individuals need it as a partial shared aspect of their identity (an upper identity) in order to lead meaningful, autonomous lives[3] and that democratic polities need a national identity to function properly.[4]

Civic nationalism is frequently contrasted with ethnic nationalism. According to the American professor Donald Ipperciel, Chief Information Officer at York University, civic nationalism historically was a determining factor in the development of modern constitutional and democratic forms of government, whereas ethnic nationalism has been more associated with authoritarian rule and even dictatorship.[5] The 20th-century revival of civic nationalism played a key role in the ideological war against racism.[6] However, as the Turkish political scientist Umut Özkirimli states, "civic" nations can be as intolerant and cruel as the so-called "ethnic" nations, citing French Jacobin techniques of persecution that were utilized by 20th-century fascists.[7]

Civic nationhood is a political identity built around shared citizenship within the state. Thus, a "civic nation" defines itself not by culture but by political institutions and liberal principles, which its citizens pledge to uphold. Membership in the civic nation is open to every person by citizenship, regardless of culture or ethnicity; those who share these values are considered members of the nation.[8] For example, according to Article 66 of the Turkish Constitution, those who acquire Turkish citizenship are considered "Turks" even if their ethnicity is not Turkish.[9]

In theory, a civic nation or state does not aim to promote one culture over another.[8] German philosopher Jürgen Habermas has argued that immigrants to a liberal-democratic state need not assimilate into the host culture but only accept the principles of the country's constitution (constitutional patriotism).[8]

History

Шаблон:Or-section Civic nationalism lies within the traditions of rationalism and liberalism, but as a form of nationalism it is contrasted with ethnic nationalism. Ernest Renan is often thought to be an early civic nationalist.[10] Philosopher Hans Kohn was one of the first to differentiate civic nationalism from ethnic nationalism in his 1944 publication The Idea of Nationalism: A Study in Its Origins and Background.[11] Membership of the civic nation is considered voluntary, as in Renan's classical definition in "Qu'est-ce qu'une nation?" of the nation as a "daily referendum" characterized by the "will to live together".[12] Civic-national ideals influenced the development of representative democracy in countries such as the United States and France (see the United States Declaration of Independence of 1776, and the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of 1789).[13]

The Corsican nationalist movement organized around the FLNC is giving a civic definition of the Corsican nation ("destiny community") in the continuity of Pasquale Paoli and the ideas of the Lumières.

The Scottish National Party[14][15][16] and Plaid Cymru,[16] which advocate independence of their respective nations from the United Kingdom, proclaim themselves to be civic nationalist parties, in which they advocate the independence and popular sovereignty of the people living in their nation's society, not individual ethnic groups.

The Republican Left of Catalonia supports a civic Catalan independentism and defends a Catalan Republic based on republicanism and civic values within a diverse society.[17]

The Union of Cypriots define its ideology as Cypriot nationalism,[18] a civic nationalism that focuses on the shared identity of Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots. It highlights both communities' common culture, heritage and traditions as well as economic, political, and social rights. It also supports the reunification of Cyprus and the end of foreign interference by Greece, Turkey, and the United Kingdom.[19]

Outside Europe, it has also been used to describe the Republican Party in the United States during the Civil War Era.[20]

Civic nationalism shares elements of the Swiss concept of Шаблон:Interlanguage link, which is German for "nation by will", coined by Carl Hilty, understood as shared experience and dedication by citizens.Шаблон:Citation needed

Criticism

Yael Tamir has argued that the differences between ethnic and civic nationalism are blurred. She posits: "By waving the civic flag, Western democracies pretend to be more peaceful and inclusive than they really are, fostering a self-image that allows them to exonerate themselves, leaving them unprepared to deal with internal conflicts".[21]

The distinction between ethnic and civic nationalism has also been criticized by scholars like Bernard Yack[22] and Umut Özkırımlı.[23] Yack rejects Renan's notion of "voluntary" civic nationality as an illusion, arguing this "misrepresents political reality as surely as the ethnonationalist myths it is designed to combat", going on to state how cultural memories form an inseparable part of every national political identity.[22]

Quoting Rogers Brubaker, Özkırımlı argues: Шаблон:Blockquote

See also

Citations

Шаблон:Reflist

Sources

External links

Шаблон:Nationalism Шаблон:Liberalism

de:Willensnation

  1. Шаблон:Cite book
  2. Tamir, Yael. 1993. Liberal Nationalism. Princeton University Press. Шаблон:ISBNШаблон:Page needed; Will Kymlicka. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford University Press. Шаблон:ISBNШаблон:Page needed; David Miller. 1995. On Nationality. Шаблон:Webarchive Oxford University Press. Шаблон:ISBN.
  3. Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford University Press. Шаблон:ISBN. For criticism, see: Patten, Alan. 1999. "The Autonomy Argument for Liberal Nationalism." Nations and Nationalism. 5(1): 1-17.
  4. Miller, David. 1995. On Nationality. Oxford University Press. Шаблон:ISBN. For criticism, see: Abizadeh, Arash. 2002. "Does Liberal Democracy Presuppose a Cultural Nation? Four Arguments." American Political Science Review 96 (3): 495-509; Abizadeh, Arash. 2004. "Liberal Nationalist versus Postnational Social Integration." Nations and Nationalism 10(3): 231-250.
  5. Шаблон:Cite journal
  6. Шаблон:Cite book
  7. Шаблон:Cite book
  8. 8,0 8,1 8,2 Шаблон:Cite journal
  9. https://www.refworld.org/legal/legislation/natlegbod/1982/en/17317
  10. Ernest Renan. "What is a Nation?", 1882; cf. Chaim Gans, The Limits of Nationalism, Cambridge University Press, 2003, p. 11.
  11. Шаблон:Cite journal
  12. Шаблон:Cite web
  13. Шаблон:Cite book
  14. Шаблон:Cite book
  15. Шаблон:Cite book
  16. 16,0 16,1 Шаблон:Cite book
  17. Шаблон:Cite news
  18. Шаблон:Cite magazine
  19. Шаблон:Cite book
  20. Шаблон:Cite book
  21. Шаблон:Cite journal
  22. 22,0 22,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  23. Özkırımlı, Umut. (2005). Contemporary Debates on Nationalism: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.