Английская Википедия:Content farm

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Update

A content farm or content mill is a company that employs large numbers of freelance writers or uses automated tools to generate a large amount of textual web content which is specifically designed to satisfy algorithms for maximal retrieval by search engines, known as SEO (search engine optimization). Their main goal is to generate advertising revenue through attracting reader page views,[1] as first exposed in the context of social spam.[2]

Articles in content farms have been found to contain identical passages across several media sources, leading to questions about the site's placing SEO goals over factual relevance.[3] Proponents of the content farms claim that from a business perspective, traditional journalism is inefficient.[1] Content farms often commission their writers' work based on analysis of search engine queries that proponents represent as "true market demand", a feature that traditional journalism purportedly lacks.[1]

Characteristics

Some sites labeled as content farms may contain many articles and have been valued in the millions of dollars. In 2009, Wired magazine wrote that, according to founder and CEO Richard Rosenblatt of Demand Media (which includes eHow), that "by next summer, Demand will be publishing one million items a month, the equivalent of four English-language Wikipedias a year".[4] Another site, Associated Content, was purchased in May 2010 by Yahoo! for $90 million.[5] However, this new website, which was renamed Yahoo! Voices, was shut down in 2014.[6]

Pay scales for content are low compared to traditional salaries received by writers.Шаблон:Cn One company compensated writers at a rate of $3.50 per article.Шаблон:Cn Such rates are substantially lower than a typical writer might receive working for mainstream online publications; however, some content farm contributors produce many articles per day and may earn enough for a living. It has been observed that content writers are mostly women with children, English majors, or journalism students seeking supplemental income while working at home.[7]

Since the emergence and popularity of large language models, content farms have started using the tools to automatically generate content without any need for human authors.[8]

Criticisms

Critics allege that content farms provide relatively low-quality content,[9] and that they maximize profit by producing "just good enough" material rather than high-quality articles.[10] Articles that are written by human authors (rather than by automated techniques) are often not be written by a specialist in the subjects reported. Some authors working for sites identified as content farms have admitted knowing little about the fields on which they report.[11]

Search engines see content farms as a problem, as they tend to bring the user to less relevant and lower quality results of the search.[12] The reduced quality and rapid creation of articles on such sites has drawn comparisons to the fast food industry[13] and to pollution: Шаблон:Cquote

Content farms are also criticised for being the source of fake ad impressions,[14] a form of ad fraud, which takes an unfair share of available advertising spend away from legitimate publishers.[15]

Reception

In one of Google's promotional videos for search published in the summer of 2010, the majority of the links available were reported to be produced at content farms.[16] In late February 2011, Google announced it was adjusting search algorithms significantly to "provide better rankings for high-quality sites—sites with original content and information such as research, in-depth reports, thoughtful analysis and so on."[17] This was reported to be a reaction to content farms and an attempt to reduce their effectiveness in manipulating search result rankings.[18]

Gabriel Weinberg, creator of privacy-focused search engine DuckDuckGo has reported that his search engine makes efforts to block content from content farms.[19]

Research

Because of their recent (as of 2011) appearance on the web, content farms have not yet received much explicit attention from the research community. The model of hiring inexpensive freelancers to produce content of marginal or questionable quality was first discussed as an alternative strategy to generating fake content automatically; this was discussed together with an example of the infrastructure necessary to make content-farm-based sites profitable through online ads, along with techniques to detect social spam that promotes such content.[2]

While not explicitly motivated by content farms, there has been recent interest in the automatic categorisation of websites according to the quality of their content.[20][21] A detailed study on the application of these methods to the identification of content farm pages is yet to be done.Шаблон:Cn

See also

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Шаблон:SearchEngineOptimization