Английская Википедия:Cross-Strait relations

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:Pp-pc Шаблон:Infobox bilateral relations Шаблон:Infobox Chinese

Файл:China map.png
Territories currently administered by the two governments that formally use the name China: the PRC (in purple) and the ROC (in orange). The size of minor islands is exaggerated in this map for ease of identification.

Cross-Strait relations (sometimes called Mainland–Taiwan relations,[1] China–Taiwan relations or Taiwan–China relations[2]) are the relations between China (officially the People's Republic of China, PRC) and Taiwan (officially the Republic of China, ROC).

The relationship has been complex and controversial due to the dispute on the political status of Taiwan after the administration of Taiwan was transferred from Japan to the Republic of China at the end of World War II in 1945, and the subsequent split between the PRC and ROC as a result of the Chinese Civil War. The essential question is whether the two governments are still in a civil war over One China, each holding within one of two "regions" or parts of the same country (e.g. "1992 Consensus"), whether they can be unified under a "one country, two systems" framework, or whether they are now separate countries (either as "Taiwan" and "China" or Two Chinas). The English expression "cross-strait relations" is considered to be a neutral term that avoids reference to the political status of either side.

At the end of World War II in 1945, the administration of Taiwan was transferred to the Republic of China (ROC) from the Empire of Japan, though legal questions remain regarding the language in the Treaty of San Francisco. In 1949, with the Chinese Civil War turning decisively in favor of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the Republic of China government, led by the Kuomintang (KMT), retreated to Taiwan and established the provisional capital in Taipei, while the CCP proclaimed the People's Republic of China (PRC) government in Beijing. No armistice or peace treaty has ever been signed and debate continues as to whether the civil war has legally ended.[3]

Since then, the relations between the governments in Beijing and Taipei have been characterized by limited contact, tensions, and instability. In the early years, military conflicts continued, while diplomatically both governments competed to be the "legitimate government of China". Since the democratization of Taiwan, the question regarding the political and legal status of Taiwan has shifted focus to the choice between political unification with mainland China or de jure Taiwanese independence. The PRC remains hostile to any formal declaration of independence and maintains its claim over Taiwan.

At the same time, non-governmental and semi-governmental exchanges between the two sides have increased. In 2008, negotiations began to restore the Three Links (postal, transportation, trade) between the two sides, cut off since 1949. Diplomatic contact between the two sides has generally been limited to Kuomintang administrations on Taiwan. However, during Democratic Progressive Party administrations, negotiations continue to occur on practical matters through informal channels.[4]

History

Timeline

Шаблон:Simple Horizontal timeline

Leaders of the two governments <timeline> ImageSize = width:900 height:auto barincrement:70 PlotArea = left:150 right:100 bottom:80 top:0

DateFormat = dd/mm/yyyy Define $now = 31/12/2022 Period = from:01/01/1950 till:$now TimeAxis = orientation:horizontal ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:5 start:01/01/1950 ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:1 start:01/01/1950 Legend = orientation:horizontal position:bottom

Colors =

 id:ccp  value:coral  legend:Communist_Party_of_China
 id:kmt  value:powderblue  legend:Kuomintang
 id:dpp  value:drabgreen  legend:Democratic_Progressive_Party

BarData =

bar:cn text:People's Republic of China
bar:tw text:Republic of China

PlotData=

 align:center mark:(line,black)
 bar:cn
 from: 15/11/2012 till: $now  text:"Xi Jinping"  color:ccp
 from: 15/11/2002 till: 15/11/2012  text:"Hu Jintao"  color:ccp
 from: 09/11/1989 till: 15/11/2002  text:"Jiang Zemin"  color:ccp
 from: 22/12/1978 till: 09/11/1989  text:"Deng Xiaoping"  color:ccp
 from: 09/09/1976 till: 22/12/1978  text:"Hua G."  color:ccp
 from: 01/01/1950 till: 09/09/1976  text:"Mao Zedong"  color:ccp
 bar:tw
 from: 20/05/2016  till: $now  text:"Tsai Ing-wen"  color:dpp 
 from: 20/05/2008  till: 20/05/2016  text:"Ma Ying-jeou"  color:kmt
 from: 20/05/2000  till: 20/05/2008  text:"Chen Shui-bian"  color:dpp
 from: 13/01/1988  till: 20/05/2000  text:"Lee Teng-hui"  color:kmt
 from: 20/05/1978  till: 13/01/1988  text:"Chiang Ching-kuo"  color:kmt
 from: 05/04/1975  till: 20/05/1978  text:"Yen C.-K."  color:kmt
 from: 01/01/1950  till: 05/04/1975  text:"Chiang Kai-shek"  color:kmt

</timeline>

Before 1949

Файл:China LOC 2006458367.jpg
A 1885 map of China, showing Taiwan, which was part of Fujian province
Файл:"Japan" with inset map "Formosa and Riu-Kiu Islands" from A Literary and Historical Atlas of Asia, by J.G. Bartholomew. J.M. Dent and Sons, Ltd. 1912.jpg
A 1912 map of the Japanese Empire, showing Taiwan, which was under Japanese rule from 1895 to 1945

Шаблон:Main

The early history of cross-strait relations involved the exchange of cultures, people, and technology.[5][6][7] However, no Chinese dynasty formally incorporated Taiwan in ancient times.[8] In the 16th and 17th centuries, Taiwan first caught the attention of Portuguese, then Dutch and Spanish explorers. After establishing their first settlement in Taiwan in 1624, the Dutch were defeated in 1662 by Koxinga (Zheng Chenggong), a Ming dynasty loyalist, who took the island and established the first formally Han Chinese regime in Taiwan. Koxinga's heirs used Taiwan as a base for launching raids into mainland China against the Manchu Qing dynasty, before being defeated in 1683 by Qing forces. Taiwan was incorporated into Fujian province in 1684.

With other powers increasingly eyeing Taiwan for its strategic location and resources in the 19th century, the administration began to implement a modernization drive.[9] In 1887, Fujian-Taiwan Province was declared by Imperial decree. However, the fall of the Qing outpaced the development of Taiwan, and in 1895, following its defeat in the First Sino-Japanese War, the Imperial government ceded Taiwan to Japan in perpetuity. Qing loyalists briefly resisted the Japanese rule under the banner of the "Republic of Formosa", but were quickly put down by Japanese authorities.[10]

From 1928 to 1942, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) maintained that Taiwan was a separate nation.[11] In a 1937 interview with Edgar Snow, Mao Zedong stated "we will extend them (the Koreans) our enthusiastic help in their struggle for independence. The same thing applies for Taiwan."[12]

Japan ruled Taiwan until 1945. As part of the Japanese Empire, Taiwan was a foreign jurisdiction in relation to the Qing dynasty until 1912, and then to the Republic of China for the remainder of the Japanese rule. In 1945, Japan was defeated in World War II and surrendered its forces in Taiwan to the Allies; the ROC, then ruled by the Kuomintang (KMT), took custody of the island. The period of post-war KMT rule over China (1945–1949) was marked by conflict in Taiwan between local residents and the new KMT authority. The Taiwanese rebelled on 28 February 1947, but the uprising was violently suppressed by the KMT. The seeds for the Taiwan independence movement were sown during this period.

China was soon engulfed in full-scale civil war. In 1949, the conflict turned decisively against the KMT and in favor of the CCP. On 1 October 1949, CCP Chairman Mao Zedong proclaimed the founding of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in Beijing. The ROC government retreated to Taiwan, eventually declaring Taipei its temporary capital in December 1949.[13]

Military stalemate to diplomatic war (1949–1979)

Kuomintang's retreat

In June 1949, the ROC declared a "closure" of all Chinese ports and its navy attempted to intercept all foreign ships. The closure covered from a point north of the mouth of Min river in Fujian province to the mouth of the Liao River in Manchuria.[14] Since China's railroad network was underdeveloped, north–south trade depended heavily on sea lanes. ROC naval activity also caused severe hardship for Chinese fishermen.

The two governments continued in a state of war until 1979. In October 1949, the PRC's attempt to take the ROC-controlled island of Kinmen was thwarted in the Battle of Kuningtou, halting the advance of the PRC's People's Liberation Army (PLA) towards Taiwan.[15] In the Battle of Dengbu Island on 3 November 1949, the ROC forces repulsed their PRC counterparts, but were later forced to retreat after the PRC gained air superiority.[16] The ROC government also launched a number of air bombing raids into key coastal cities of China such as Shanghai.[17] The Communists' other amphibious operations of 1950 were more successful: they led to the Communist conquest of Hainan Island in April 1950, capture of Wanshan Islands off the Guangdong coast (May–August 1950) and of Zhoushan Island off Zhejiang (May 1950).[18] The same result happened in the Battle of Dongshan Island on 11 May 1950, as well as the Battle of Nanpeng Island in September and October of the same year. However, supported by the United States, the ROC won the Battle of Nanri Island in 1952. Later in the year, the communists won the Battle of Nanpeng Archipelago, as well as the Battle of Dalushan Islands and the Dongshan Island Campaign, both in 1953.

After losing mainland China, a group of approximately 12,000 KMT soldiers escaped to Burma and continued launching guerrilla attacks into southern China in the early 1950s.[19] Their leader, General Li Mi, was paid a salary by the ROC government and given the nominal title of Governor of Yunnan. Initially, the U.S. supported these remnants and the Central Intelligence Agency provided them with aid. After the Burmese government appealed to the United Nations in 1953, the U.S. began pressuring the ROC to withdraw its loyalists. By the end of 1954, nearly 6,000 soldiers had left Burma and Li Mi declared his army disbanded. However, thousands remained, and the ROC continued to supply and command them, even secretly supplying reinforcements at times. In northwestern China, the Kuomintang Islamic insurgency was fought by Muslim Kuomintang army officers who refused to surrender to the Communists throughout the 1950s and 1960s.

Korean War and Taiwan Strait Crises

Файл:Taiwan Strait.png
The Taiwan Strait

Most observers expected Chiang's government to eventually fall in response to a Communist invasion of Taiwan, and the U.S. initially showed no interest in supporting Chiang's government in its final stand. Things changed radically with the onset of the Korean War in June 1950. At this point, it became politically impossible in the U.S. to allow a total Communist victory over Chiang, so President Harry S. Truman ordered the U.S. Seventh Fleet into the Taiwan Strait to prevent the ROC and PRC from attacking each other.[20] The U.S. fleet hindered the Communist invasion of Taiwan, and the PRC decided to send troops to Korea in October 1950.[21] The ROC proposed to participate in the Korean War, but was rejected.[22] During the Korean War, some captured Communist Chinese soldiers, many of whom were originally KMT soldiers, were repatriated to Taiwan rather than China.[23][24][25]

Though viewed as a military liability by the United States, the ROC viewed its remaining islands in Fujian as vital for any future campaign to defeat the PRC and retake China. On 3 September 1954, the First Taiwan Strait Crisis began when the PLA started shelling Kinmen and threatened to take the Dachen Islands.[14] On 20 January 1955, the PLA took nearby Yijiangshan Island, with the entire ROC garrison of 720 troops killed or wounded defending the island. On 24 January, the U.S. Congress passed the Formosa Resolution authorizing the President to defend the ROC's offshore islands.[14] The First Taiwan Strait Crisis ended in March 1955 when the PLA ceased its bombardment. The crisis was brought to a close during the Bandung conference.[14] At the conference, China articulated its Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence and Premier Zhou Enlai publicly stated, "[T]he Chinese people do not want to have a war with the United States. The Chinese government is willing to sit down to discuss the question of relaxing tension in the Far East, and especially the question of relaxing tension in the Taiwan area."[26] Two years of negotiations with the U.S. followed, although no agreement was reached on the Taiwan issue.[26]

The Second Taiwan Strait Crisis began on 23 August 1958 with air and naval engagements between the PRC and the ROC military forces, leading to intense artillery bombardment of Kinmen (by the PRC) and Xiamen (by the ROC), and ended in November of the same year.[14] PLA patrol boats blockaded the islands from ROC supply ships. Though the U.S. rejected Chiang Kai-shek's proposal to bomb Chinese artillery batteries, it quickly moved to supply fighter jets and anti-aircraft missiles to the ROC. It also provided amphibious assault ships to land supply, as a sunken ROC naval vessel was blocking the harbor. On 7 September, the U.S. escorted a convoy of ROC supply ships and the PRC refrained from firing. On 25 October, the PRC announced an "even-day ceasefire" — the PLA would only shell Kinmen on odd-numbered days.

Файл:U.S. President Eisenhower visited TAIWAN 美國總統艾森豪於1960年6月訪問臺灣台北時與蔣中正總統-2.jpg
U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower, riding with President Chiang Kai-shek, waves to onlookers during his visit to Taipei, Taiwan in June 1960.
Файл:President Richard Nixon and Premier Chou En-Lai Shake Hands at the Nixons' Arrival in Peking, China.jpg
U.S. President Richard Nixon shakes hands with Premier Zhou Enlai during his visit to Beijing, China in February 1972.

After the 1950s, the "war" became more symbolic than real, represented by on again, off again artillery bombardment towards and from Kinmen. In later years, live shells were replaced with propaganda sheets.[27] The ROC once initiated Project National Glory, a plan to retake mainland China.[28] The project failed in the 1960s,[29] and the bombardment finally ceased after the establishment of diplomatic relations between the PRC and the United States.[27] The PRC and the ROC have never signed any agreement or treaty to officially end the war.[30] There were occasional defectors from both sides.[31][32]

Diplomatically during this period, until around 1971, the ROC government continued to be recognized as the legitimate government of China and Taiwan by most NATO governments. The PRC government was recognized by Soviet Bloc countries, members of the Non-Aligned Movement, and some Western nations such as the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Both governments claimed to be the legitimate government of China, and labeled the other as illegitimate. Civil war propaganda permeated the education curriculum. Each side portrayed the people of the other as living in hell-like misery. In official media, each side called the other "bandits". The ROC also suppressed expressions of support for Taiwanese identity or Taiwan independence.

Thawing of relations (1979–1998)

After the United States formally recognized the PRC and broke its official relations with the ROC in 1979, the PRC under the leadership of Deng Xiaoping shifted its strategy from liberating Taiwan to peaceful unification.[33][34] Deng proposed a model for the incorporation of Taiwan into the PRC which involved a high degree of autonomy within the Chinese state, similar to the model proposed to Hong Kong which would eventually become "one country, two systems." The ROC government under Chiang Ching-kuo maintained a "Three Noes" policy of no contact, no negotiation and no compromise to deal with the PRC government. However, Chiang was forced to break from this policy during the May 1986 hijacking of a China Airlines cargo plane, in which the Taiwanese pilot subdued other members of the crew and flew the plane to Guangzhou. In response, Chiang sent delegates to Hong Kong to discuss with PRC officials for the return of the plane and crew, which is seen as a turning point between cross-strait relations.[35][36]

In 1987, the ROC government began to allow visits to China. This benefited many, especially old KMT soldiers, who had been separated from their family in China for decades.[37][38] This also proved a catalyst for the thawing of relations between the two sides. Problems engendered by increased contact necessitated a mechanism for regular negotiations. In 1988, a guideline was approved by PRC to encourage ROC investments in the PRC.[39][40] It guaranteed ROC establishments would not be nationalized, and that exports were free from tariffs, ROC businessmen would be granted multiple visas for easy movement.

In 1990, under the presidency of Lee Teng-hui, the National Unification Council was established in Taiwan.[34] In the following year, the Guidelines for National Unification were adopted and the period of mobilization for the suppression of Communist rebellion was terminated. In order to negotiate with China on operational issues without compromising the government's position on denying the other side's legitimacy, the ROC government created the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF), a nominally non-governmental institution directly led by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC), an instrument of the Executive Yuan in 1991. The PRC responded to this initiative by setting up the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits (ARATS), directly led by the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council. This system, described as "white gloves", allowed the two governments to engage with each other on a semi-official basis without compromising their respective sovereignty policies.[41] Led by Koo Chen-fu and Wang Daohan, the two organizations began a series of talks that culminated in the 1993 Wang–Koo summit while both sides agreed to deliberate ambiguity on questions of sovereignty in order to engage on operational questions affecting both sides.[42]

Also during this time, however, the rhetoric of ROC President Lee Teng-hui began to turn further towards Taiwan independence.[43] Prior to the 1990s, the ROC had been a one-party authoritarian state committed to eventual unification with China. However, with democratic reforms the attitudes of the general public began to influence policy in Taiwan. As a result, the ROC government shifted away from its commitment to the One China and towards a separate political identity for Taiwan. In 1995, Lee visited the United States and delivered a speech to an invited audience at Cornell University.[44] In response to Taiwan's diplomatic moves, the PRC postponed the second Wang–Koo summit indefinitely.[45] The PLA attempted to influence the 1996 Taiwanese presidential election by conducting a missile exercise, leading to the Third Taiwan Strait Crisis.[46][47]

Hostile non-contact (1998–2008)

Файл:Taipei Station with UN-for-Taiwan banner 20080318.jpg
'UN for Taiwan' banner at Taipei Railway Station

In 1998, the ARATS and the SEF resumed contact and the second Wang–Koo summit was held in Shanghai, China.[48] The PRC leader Jiang Zemin also received the Taiwanese representatives in Beijing. While Wang Daohan's return visit to Taiwan was scheduled, Lee Teng-hui described cross-Strait relations as "state-to-state or at least special state-to-state relations" in July 1999.[49] Lee's "two-state" theory postponed Wang's visit indefinitely and the PRC issued a white paper entitled "The One-China Principle and the Taiwan Issue" in February 2000, before the 2000 Taiwanese presidential election.[50]

Chen Shui-bian of the pro-independence Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was elected President of the ROC in 2000. Before the KMT handed over power to the DPP, chairman of the Mainland Affairs Council Su Chi suggested a new term “1992 Consensus” as a common point that was acceptable to both sides so that Taiwan and China could keep up cross-strait exchanges.[51] Chen expressed some willingness to accept the 1992 Consensus, but backed down after backlash within his own party.[52] In his inaugural speech, Chen Shui-bian pledged to the Four Noes and One Without, in particular, promising to seek neither independence nor unification as well as rejecting the concept of special state-to-state relations expressed by his predecessor, Lee Teng-hui, as well as establishing the Three Mini-Links. Furthermore, he pursued a policy of normalizing economic relations with the PRC.[53] The PRC did not engage Chen's administration, but meanwhile in 2001 Chen lifted the 50-year ban on direct trade and investment with the PRC.[54][55] In November 2001, Chen repudiated "One China" and called for talks without preconditions.[56] On 3 August 2002, Chen defined the cross-Strait relations as One Country on Each Side (namely, that China and Taiwan are two different countries). The PRC subsequently cut off official contact with the ROC government.[57]

Hu Jintao became General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party in late 2002, succeeding Jiang Zemin as de facto top leader of China. Hu continued to insist that talks can only proceed under an agreement of the "One China" principle. At the same time, Hu and the PRC continued a military missile buildup across the strait from Taiwan while making threats of military action against Taiwan should it declare independence or if the PRC considers that all possibilities for a peaceful unification are completely exhausted. The PRC also continued applying diplomatic pressure to other nations to isolate the ROC diplomatically.[58] However, during the 2003 Iraq war, the PRC allowed Taiwanese airlines use of China's airspace.[59]

After the re-election of Chen Shui-bian in 2004, Hu's government changed the previous blanket no-contact policy, a holdover from the Jiang Zemin administration. Under the new policy, on the one hand, the PRC government continued a no-contact policy towards Chen Shui-bian. It maintained its military build-up against Taiwan, and pursued a vigorous policy of isolating Taiwan diplomatically. In March 2005, the Anti-Secession Law was passed by the National People's Congress, formalizing "non-peaceful means" as an option of response to a formal declaration of independence in Taiwan.Шаблон:Citation needed

Файл:Kuomintang nanjing.jpg
Lien Chan touring the Sun Yat-sen Mausoleum with the Kuomintang delegation to mainland China in 2005

On the other hand, the PRC administration pursued contact with apolitical, or politically non-independence leaning, groups in Taiwan. In his May 17 Statement in 2004, Hu Jintao made friendly overtures to Taiwan on resuming negotiations for the "Three Links", reducing misunderstandings, and increasing consultation.Шаблон:Citation needed However, the Anti-Secession Law was passed in 2005, which was not well received in Taiwan. The CCP increased contacts on a party-to-party basis with the KMT,[60]Шаблон:Rp then the opposition party in Taiwan, due to their support for the One China principle. The increased contacts culminated in the 2005 Pan-Blue visits to China, including a meeting between Hu and then-KMT chairman Lien Chan in April 2005.[61][62] It was the first meeting between the leaders of the two parties since the end of the Chinese Civil War in 1949.[63][64][65]

Resumption of high level contact (2008–2016)

Inauguration of Ma Ying-jeou

In 2008, the KMT won a large majority in the legislative election and its candidate Ma Ying-jeou won the following Taiwanese presidential election on 22 March.[66] Ma advocated that cross-strait relations should shift from "mutual non-recognition" to "mutual non-denial".[67] He stated that the relations are neither between two Chinas nor two states. It is a special relationship.[68] Cross-strait cooperation increased during Ma's tenure.[69]

Both Hu Jintao and his new counterpart, Ma Ying-jeou, considered the 1992 Consensus to be the basis for negotiations between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. On 26 March 2008, Hu Jintao held a telephone talk with the U.S. President George W. Bush, in which he explained that the "1992 Consensus" shows that "both sides recognize there is only one China, but agree to differ on its definition".[70][71][72] There followed a series of meetings between the two sides. On 12 April 2008, Hu Jintao held a meeting with ROC's then vice-president elect Vincent Siew as chairman of the Cross-Straits Common Market Foundation during the Boao Forum for Asia.[73] On 28 May 2008, Hu met with the KMT chairman Wu Po-hsiung, the first meeting between the heads of the CCP and the KMT as ruling parties.[74] During this meeting, Hu and Wu agreed that both sides should recommence semi-official dialogue under the 1992 Consensus.[75][76]

Файл:Voa chinese Chiang Pin-kung Kao-Koong-lian.jpg
Chiang Pin-kung (left) represented the SEF at the Chen–Chiang Summit in October 2011.

Cross-Strait high-level talks between the ARATS and the SEF reopened in June 2008, with the first meeting held in Beijing. On 13 June, President of the ARATS, Chen Yunlin, and President of the SEF, Chiang Pin-kung, signed files agreeing that direct flights between the two sides would begin on 4 July,[77] and that Taiwan would allow entrance of up to 3,000 visitors from China daily.[78] The first direct flights took off on 15 December 2008.[79]

The financial relationship between the two areas improved on 1 May 2009 in a move described as "a major milestone" by The Times.[80] The ROC's financial regulator, the Financial Supervisory Commission, announced that Chinese investors would be permitted to invest in Taiwan's money markets for the first time since 1949. Investors can apply to purchase Taiwan shares that do not exceed one tenth of the value of the firm's total shares. The move came as part of a "step by step" movement designed to relax restrictions on Chinese investment. Taipei economist Liang Chi-yuan commented: "Taiwan's risk factor as a flash point has dropped significantly with its improved ties with Chinese. The Chinese would be hesitant about launching a war as their investment increases here."

From military aspect, a report in 2010 from Taiwan's Ministry of National Defense said that China's charm offensive is only accommodating on issues that do not undermine China's claim to Taiwan and that the PRC would invade if Taiwan declared independence, developed weapons of mass destruction, or suffered from civil chaos.[81] President Ma has called repeatedly for the PRC to dismantle the missile batteries targeted on Taiwan's cities, without result.[82] Ma also called on the PRC to embrace Sun Yat-sen's call for freedom and democracy.[83]

In June 2013, China offered 31 new measures to improve Taiwan's economic integration with the mainland.[84]

Файл:2014 Wang-Zhang Meeting.png
2014 Wang-Zhang Meeting in Taiwan

In October 2013, in a hotel lobby on the sidelines of the APEC Indonesia 2013 meetings, Wang Yu-chi, Minister of the Mainland Affairs Council, spoke briefly with Zhang Zhijun, Minister of the Taiwan Affairs Office, each addressing the other by his official title. Both called for the establishment of a regular dialogue mechanism between their two agencies. Zhang also invited Wang to visit China.[85][86] The two ministers met in Nanjing on 11 February 2014, in the first official, high-level, government-to-government contact between the two sides since 1949.[87][88][89][90] During the meeting, Wang and Zhang agreed on establishing a direct and regular communication channel. They also agreed on finding a solution for health insurance coverage for Taiwanese students studying in mainland China, on pragmatically establishing SEF and ARATS offices in their respective territories, and on studying the feasibility of allowing visits to detained persons once these offices had been established. Zhang paid a retrospective visit to Taiwan between 25 and 28 June 2014, making him the highest CCP official to ever visit the country.[91]

Sunflower Student Movement

In 2014, the Sunflower Student Movement broke out. Citizens occupied the Taiwanese Legislative Yuan for 23 days, protesting against the government's forcing through the Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement. The protesters felt that the trade pact with China would leave Taiwan vulnerable to political pressure from Beijing.[92] The agreement ended up unratified in the legislature.[93] In September 2014, Xi Jinping adopted a more uncompromising stance than his predecessors as he called for the "one country, two systems" model to be applied to Taiwan.[94] It was noted that the model had not been mentioned by the PRC since 2005, when the Anti-Secession Law was passed.[95]

Файл:2015 Ma–Xi Meeting 08.jpg
2015 Ma–Xi meeting in Singapore

On 7 November 2015, Xi and Ma met and shook hands in Singapore, marking the first meeting between leaders of the two sides since the end of the Chinese Civil War in 1949.[96][97] They met within their capacity as "Leader of Mainland China" and "Leader of Taiwan" respectively. No major agreements were reached on the occasion, however, a hotline connecting the head of the Mainland Affairs Council and the head of the Taiwan Affairs Office was established at the end of 2015.[98][99]

In January 2016, the opposition DPP won the Taiwanese presidential election.[100] In the transition to a new administration, the ROC Justice Minister Luo Ying-shay embarked on a 5-day historic visit to mainland China in March, making her the first minister of the Government of the Republic of China to visit the mainland after the end of the Chinese Civil War in 1949.[101]

Deteriorating relations (2016–present)

Inauguration of Tsai Ing-wen

Файл:總統蔡英文與前總統馬英九步出總統府 (26851536660).jpg
Tsai Ing-wen succeeded Ma Ying-jeou as the ROC President in May 2016.

In the 2016 Taiwan general elections, Tsai Ing-wen and the DPP captured landslide victories.[102] Tsai initially pursued a similar strategy as Chen Shui-bian, but after winning the election she received a similarly frosty reception from the PRC.[103][104][105] In her inauguration speech, President Tsai acknowledged that the talks surrounding the 1992 Consensus took place without agreeing that a consensus was reached. She credited the talks with spurring 20 years of dialogue and exchange between the two sides. She hoped that exchanges would continue on the basis of these historical facts, as well as the existence of the Republic of China's constitutional system and the democratic will of the Taiwanese people.[106] In response, Beijing called Tsai's answer an "incomplete test paper" because Tsai did not agree to the content of the 1992 Consensus.[104] On 25 June 2016, Beijing suspended official cross-strait communications,[107] with any remaining cross-strait exchanges thereafter taking place through unofficial channels.[108]

The Tsai administration blocked former President Ma Ying-jeou from visiting Hong Kong,[109][110][111] but eight non-DPP magistrates and mayors from Taiwan visited Beijing in 2016.[112][113][114] Their visit was aimed to reset and restart cross-strait relations after Tsai took office. The eight local leaders reiterated their support of One China under the 1992 Consensus.

In October 2017, Tsai Ing-wen expressed hopes that both sides would restart their cross-strait relations after the 19th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party, and argued that new practices and guidelines governing mutual interaction should be examined.[115][116] However, Xi Jinping emphasized the PRC's sovereignty over Taiwan in his opening speech at the 19th National Congress.[117] At the same time, he offered the chance for open talks and "unobstructed exchanges" with Taiwan as long as the government moved to accept the 1992 Consensus.[117][118]

Beginning in the mid-to-late 2010s, Beijing has significantly restricted the number of Chinese tour groups allowed to visit Taiwan in order to place pressure upon President Tsai Ing-wen.[119] Apart from Taiwan, the Holy See and Palau have also been pressured to recognize the PRC over the ROC.[120] China was also accused of conducting hybrid warfare against Taiwan.[121][122] ROC political leaders, including President Tsai and Premier William Lai, as well as international media outlets, have repeatedly accused the PRC of spreading fake news via social media to create divisions in Taiwanese society and influence voters.[123][124][125][126]

In 2019, Tsai Ing-wen explained the government's position on a speech delivered by Xi Jinping, and emphasized that she has never accepted the 1992 Consensus.[127] Tsai made a shift from not publicly accepting the 1992 Consensus to directly rejecting it, stating that there's no need to talk about the 1992 Consensus anymore, because this term has already been defined by Beijing as "one country, two systems."[128] Tsai, who supported the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests, pledged that as long as she is Taiwan's president, she will never accept the "one country, two systems."[129] In January 2020, re-elected Tsai Ing-wen argued that Taiwan already was an independent country called the "Republic of China (Taiwan)", further arguing that the mainland Chinese authorities had to recognize that situation.[130]

The Taiwanese public turned further against mainland China, due to fallout from the Hong Kong protests and also due to the PRC's continued determination to keep the ROC out of the World Health Organization during the COVID-19 pandemic.[131] The opposition KMT also appeared to distance itself from the Chinese mainland in 2020, stating it would review its unpopular advocacy of closer ties with the PRC. In March 2021, KMT chairman Johnny Chiang rejected "one country, two systems" as a feasible model for Taiwan, citing Beijing's response to protests in Hong Kong as well as the value that Taiwanese place in political freedoms.[132]

The Hong Kong Economic, Trade and Cultural Office in Taiwan suspended its operation indefinitely in 2021, followed by the Macau Economic and Cultural Office.[133] In October 2021, Tsai stated in her National Day speech that Taiwanese people would not be forced to "bow" down to mainland Chinese pressure, and said that Taiwan would keep bolstering its defenses.[134] The PRC denounced Tsai's speech as "incited confrontation and distorted facts", and added that seeking Taiwanese independence was closing doors to dialogue.[135] Following a ban on the importation of pineapples from Taiwan and wax apples in 2021, the Chinese government banned the import of grouper fish in June 2022, claiming they had found banned chemicals and excessive levels of other substances.[136][137]

2022 and 2023 military exercises

Шаблон:Further

Файл:Tsai Presents Pelosi with Order of Propitious Clouds by Chien 01.jpg
ROC President Tsai Ing-wen with U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on 3 August 2022

On 2 August 2022, U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi visited Taiwan. China perceived her visit as a violation of its sovereign rights on Taiwan, and the PLA announced it would conduct live-fire exercises in six zones surrounding Taiwan from 4 to 7 August.[138][139] The live-fire drills were unprecedented in recent history[139] and took place in zones that surrounded the island's busiest territorial waters and airspace.[140][141] The military exercises involved the usage of live-fire ammunition, air assets, naval deployments, and ballistic missile launches by the PLA.[142] In response, Taiwan deployed ships and aircraft. No military conflict came of this, although it greatly increased tensions between the two countries. China announced an end to the exercises on 10 August, but also stated that regular "patrols" would be launched in the Taiwan Strait.[143][144]

On 10 August 2022, the PRC's Taiwan Affairs Office and the State Council Information Office jointly published the first white paper about Taiwan's status since 2000 called "The Taiwan Question and China's Reunification in the New Era". In it, the PRC urged again for Taiwan to unify under the "one country, two systems" formula. Notably, the white paper did not contain a previous line stating that no troops would be sent to Taiwan after unification. In response, Taiwan's Mainland Affairs Council said the white paper was "wishful thinking and disregarding facts".[145]

Another set of military exercises began on 8 April 2023, after president Tsai visited U.S. Speaker Kevin McCarthy in California.[146][147][148] Beijing called this operation the "Joint Sword". Taiwan reportedly spotted 70 aircraft and 11 ships from China. On the first day of the military exercises, one of the Chinese vessels discharged a shot while sailing near Pingtan Island – the nearest point between China and Taiwan.[149]

Taiwan's prosecutions of Chinese espionage cases spiked in 2023, reaching 16 throughout the year. From 2013 to 2019, the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau registered 44 espionage cases by China.[150]

Semi-official relations

Файл:Straits Exchange Foundation Dazhi Headquarters.JPG
Straits Exchange Foundation headquarter office in Taipei, Taiwan
Файл:Chiang Wan-an and Gong Zheng shaking hands.jpg
Shanghai Mayor Gong Zheng and Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an shaking hands at the 2023 Shanghai-Taipei City Forum

Semi-governmental contact is maintained through the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits (ARATS). Although formally privately constituted bodies, the SEF and the ARATS are both directly led by the Executive Government of each side: the SEF by the Mainland Affairs Council of the ROC's Executive Yuan, and the ARATS by the Taiwan Affairs Office of the PRC's State Council. The heads of the two bodies are both full-time appointees and do not hold other government positions.

Semi-official representative offices between the two sides are the PRC's Cross-Strait Tourism Exchange Association (CSTEA) in Taiwan, and ROC's Taiwan Strait Tourism Association (TSTA) in China.[151][152] Both were established in May 2010.[153] However, the duties of these offices are limited only to tourism-related affairs.

The Kuomintang and the Chinese Communist Party maintained regular dialogue via the KMT–CCP Forum from 2006 to 2016.[154][155] This was called a "second rail" in Taiwan and helped to maintain political understanding between the two parties.[156]

The Shanghai-Taipei City Forum is an annual forum between the cities of Shanghai and Taipei. Launched in 2010 by then-Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-pin to promote city-to-city exchanges, it led to Shanghai's participation in the Taipei International Flora Exposition end of that year.[157] Both Taipei and Shanghai are the first two cities across the Taiwan Strait that carries out exchanges. The forum proceeded even though Ko Wen-je was the non-KMT mayor of Taipei from 2014 to 2022.[158][159]

Another mode of contact is through private bodies accredited by the respective governments to negotiate technical and operational aspects of issues between the two sides. Called the "Macau mode", this avenue of contact was maintained even through the years of the Chen Shui-bian administration.[160]

Transportation

Файл:Air China Airbus A330-343X B-6530 Departing from Taipei Songshan Airport 20150103c.jpg
An Air China Airbus A330-300 at Taipei Songshan Airport

The PRC proposed Three Links to open up postal, transportation and trade links between Mainland China and Taiwan. Before 2003, travelers had to make a time-consuming stopover at a third destination, usually Hong Kong or Macau.[161] Cross-Strait charter flights during Chinese New Year took off in 2003. However, the charter flights still had to land in Hong Kong. The transportation model was improved in 2005 as the flights had to fly over Hong Kong's flight information region without landing. It was not until 2008 that direct flights and cargo shipments began.[79] As of 2015, 61 mainland Chinese cities are connected with eight airports in Taiwan. The flights operate every day, totaling 890 round-trip flights across the Taiwan Strait per week.[162]

Taiwan residents cannot use the Republic of China passport to travel to mainland China, and mainland China residents cannot use the People's Republic of China passport to travel to Taiwan, as neither the ROC nor the PRC considers this international travel. The PRC government requires Taiwan residents to hold a Mainland Travel Permit for Taiwan Residents when entering mainland China, whereas the ROC government requires mainland Chinese residents to hold the Exit and Entry Permit for the Taiwan Area of the Republic of China to enter the Taiwan Area.

Economy

China is Taiwan's most important target of outward foreign direct investment.[163] From 1991 to 2022, more than US$200 billion have been invested in China by Taiwanese companies.[164] Much of Taiwanese-owned manufacturing, particularly in the electronics sector and the apparel sector, occurs in the PRC.[165]Шаблон:Rp The investments helped the Taiwanese economy but also propelled China's economic rise.[166]

China is also Taiwan's largest trading partner, accounting for over 20 percent of total trade.[167] China and Hong Kong account for over 30 percent of Taiwan's exports. In 2022, Taiwan's trade surplus with mainland China and Hong Kong amounted to $100.4 billion.[168] Electronic components, including semiconductor chips, lead in Taiwan's total exports to China.[169]

Since the governments on both sides of the strait do not recognize the other side's legitimacy, there is a lack of legal protection for cross-strait economic exchanges. The Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) was viewed as providing legal protection for investments.[170] In 2014, the Sunflower Student Movement effectively halted the Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement (CSSTA).

Neither China nor Taiwan is comfortable with mutual economic dependence, and each government has been driven to seek alternatives.[171] Since 2016, Taiwan has tried to reduce its economic reliance on mainland China through its New Southbound Policy – in 2022 Taiwan's total investments in the countries targeted by the policy outstripped investments in China for the first time.[172] The number of Taiwanese working in China also fell. In 2015, 58 percent of Taiwanese working outside Taiwan worked in mainland China, with a total number of 420,000 people.[173] In 2021, the number fell to 163,000, accounting for 51.1 percent of the 319,000 Taiwanese who worked overseas.[174]

In 2021, China banned pineapple imports from Taiwan, citing the risk of “harmful creatures” that could affect its own crops. The Taiwanese government characterized the ban as a Chinese campaign to ramp up political pressure on Taiwan. Similar to the Australian barley and wine incident, China was accused of "using ambiguous and opaque trade policies to punish its rivals." As a reaction to the ban, Taiwanese politicians and allies promoted Taiwanese pineapples as freedom pineapples.[175]

Cultural exchanges

The National Palace Museum in Taipei and the Palace Museum in Beijing have collaborated on exhibitions.[176] Scholars and academics frequently visit institutions across the Taiwan Strait.[177] Books published on each side are regularly re-published in the other side. However, restrictions on direct imports, different writing systems, and censorship somewhat impede the exchange of books and ideas.[178][179] Some cultural exchanges are even accused of being associated with China's united front work.[180][181]

Taiwanese students can apply to universities in the mainland China without taking China's nationwide unified examination, called Gaokao.[182] There are regular programs for school students from each side to visit the other.[183][184] In 2019, there were 30,000 mainland Chinese and Hong Kong students studying in Taiwan.[185] There were also more than 7,000 Taiwanese students studying in Hong Kong that same year.[186]

Religious exchange has become frequent. Frequent interactions occur between worshipers of Matsu, and also between Buddhists.[187][188] Taiwan Buddhist organization Tzu Chi is the first overseas non-governmental organization allowed to operate in China.[189]

Humanitarian actions

Both sides have provided humanitarian aid to one another on several occasions.Шаблон:Citation needed Following the 2008 Sichuan earthquake, an expert search and rescue team was sent from Taiwan to help rescue survivors in Sichuan. Shipments of aid material were also provided under the coordination of the Red Cross Society of the Republic of China and charities such as Tzu Chi.[190]

Following the 2023 Jishishan earthquake, Taiwanese President Tsai expressed her condolences and offered humanitarian aid to the PRC.[191] Tsai expressed her condolences in official remarks, as well as in a simplified character post on X.[192]

Military

Шаблон:Merge from

China has embarked on a massive military build-up.[193] The U.S. has increased military exchanges with Taiwan,[194][195] and U.S. military vessels passed through the Taiwan Strait at a far greater rate.[196]

Speculation about the odds of war between China and Taiwan is rife. The Deputy Director-General of Taiwan's National Security Bureau, Chen Wen-fan, stated in 2020 that Xi Jinping intends to solve the "Taiwan Problem" by 2049.[197] In 2022, U.S. Pacific Command described the situation of Cross-Straits relations as being dire, as China was amassing the largest build-up of military personnel and assets seen since the World War II.[198][199] Admiral Mike Gilday, Chief of Naval Operations of the U.S. Navy, warned that the American military must be prepared for the possibility of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan before 2024.[200] A poll conducted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) summarized that China is determined to unify with Taiwan and the potential for a military crisis or conflict in the Taiwan Strait is very real.[201] The poll also showed that China is willing to wait to unify with Taiwan peacefully, but would immediately invade if Taiwan declared independence.

Public opinion

China

A survey conducted between 2020 and 2021 showed that 55 percent of the respondents accepted launching an unification war to take back Taiwan entirely while 33 percent of them opposed.[202] 22 percent of the respondents accepted the two sides of the Taiwan Strait keeping separate political systems, with unification not necessarily being the end game. Another survey conducted in 2022 showed Chinese respondents were split between those favoring tough policies on Taiwan and those favoring friendly ones.[203]

Young jingoistic Chinese nationalists on the internet, also called Little Pink, occasionally bypassed the Great Firewall to flood websites with messages and stickers in protest against Taiwan independence.[204][205][206][207]

Taiwan

Шаблон:Further

Файл:National Chengchi University identity survey.svg
Results from an identity survey conducted each year since 1992 by the Election Study Center, National Chengchi University.[208] Responses are Taiwanese (green), Chinese (red) or both Taiwanese and Chinese (hatched). Non-responses are shown as grey.

In 2023, a poll conducted by the Election Study Center of National Chengchi University (NCCU) showed that the Taiwanese public opted for maintaining some forms of the status quo, instead of choosing Taiwan independence or unification with China as soon as possible.[209][210] Other polls released by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC)[211] and the Focus Survey Research[212] showed similar responses. A poll conducted by the Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation (TPOF) showed the public preferred independence to unification with China.[213][214]

On people's national identity of being either "Taiwanese" or "Chinese," a majority of respondents identify as Taiwanese in either poll of the NCCU[208] or the TPOF.[215] MAC polls have consistently shown support for the future of Taiwan to be decided by the people in Taiwan.[216][217][218]

On President Tsai Ing-wen's cross-strait policy, the first poll conducted by the TPOF in August 2016 showed 51 percent of approval and 40 percent of disapproval.[219] The approval rating dropped below the disapproval rating three month later and hit the lowest of 25 percent in December 2018.[220] However, the approval rating bounced after 2019.[219] In 2020, an annual poll conducted by Academia Sinica showed 73 percent of respondents disagreed with the statement that "the Chinese government is a friend of Taiwan's," an increase of 15 percent from the previous year.[221][222]

See also

Шаблон:Portal

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Further reading

Шаблон:Library resources box

Books
  • Beckershoff, A. (2023). Social Forces in the Re-Making of Cross-Strait Relations: Hegemony and Social Movements in Taiwan. Routledge. Шаблон:ISBN
  • Bush, R. & O'Hanlon, M. (2007). A War Like No Other: The Truth About China's Challenge to America. Wiley. Шаблон:ISBN
  • Bush, R. (2006). Untying the Knot: Making Peace in the Taiwan Strait. Brookings Institution Press. Шаблон:ISBN
  • Шаблон:Cite book
  • Carpenter, T. (2006). America's Coming War with China: A Collision Course over Taiwan. Palgrave Macmillan. Шаблон:ISBN
  • Cole, B. (2006). Taiwan's Security: History and Prospects. Routledge. Шаблон:ISBN
  • Copper, J. (2006). Playing with Fire: The Looming War with China over Taiwan. Praeger Security International General Interest. Шаблон:ISBN
  • Gill, B. (2007). Rising Star: China's New Security Diplomacy. Brookings Institution Press. Шаблон:ISBN
  • Shirk, S. (2007). China: Fragile Superpower: How China's Internal Politics Could Derail Its Peaceful Rise. Oxford University Press. Шаблон:ISBN
  • Tsang, S. (2006). If China Attacks Taiwan: Military Strategy, Politics and Economics. Routledge. Шаблон:ISBN
  • Tucker, N.B. (2005). Dangerous Strait: the U.S.-Taiwan-China Crisis. Columbia University Press. Шаблон:ISBN
  • Wachman, Alan M. (2007 ) Why Taiwan? Geostrategic Rationales for China's Territorial Integrity. Stanford University Press. Шаблон:ISBN
Articles

External links

Шаблон:Commons category Шаблон:Wikiquote

Шаблон:Cross-Strait relations Шаблон:Foreign relations of China Шаблон:Foreign relations of Taiwan Шаблон:Chinese Civil War Шаблон:China topics Шаблон:Taiwan topics Шаблон:Authority control

  1. Шаблон:Cite journal
  2. Шаблон:Cite news
  3. Шаблон:Cite book
  4. Шаблон:Cite news
  5. Zhang, Qiyun. (1959) An outline history of Taiwan. Taipei: China Culture Publishing Foundation
  6. Sanchze-Mazas (ed.) (2008) Past human migrations in East Asia : matching archaeology, linguistics and genetics. New York: Routledge.
  7. Brown, Melissa J. (2004) Is Taiwan Chinese? : the impact of culture, power, and migration on changing identities. Berkeley: University of California Press
  8. Шаблон:Cite book
  9. Шаблон:Cite web
  10. Шаблон:Cite book
  11. Шаблон:Cite journal
  12. Шаблон:Cite web
  13. Шаблон:Cite news
  14. 14,0 14,1 14,2 14,3 14,4 Tsang, Steve Yui-Sang Tsang. The Cold War's Odd Couple: The Unintended Partnership Between the Republic of China and the UK, 1950–1958. [2006] (2006). I.B. Tauris. Шаблон:ISBN. p 155, p 115-120, p 139-145
  15. Qi, Bangyuan. Wang, Dewei. Wang, David Der-wei. [2003] (2003). The Last of the Whampoa Breed: Stories of the Chinese Diaspora. Columbia University Press. Шаблон:ISBN. pg 2
  16. Шаблон:Cite web
  17. Шаблон:Cite book
  18. MacFarquhar, Roderick. Fairbank, John K. Twitchett, Denis C. [1991] (1991). The Cambridge History of China. Cambridge University Press. Шаблон:ISBN. pg 820.
  19. Шаблон:Cite journal
  20. Bush, Richard C. [2005] (2005). Untying the Knot: Making Peace in the Taiwan Strait. Brookings Institution Press. Шаблон:ISBN.
  21. Шаблон:Cite journal
  22. Шаблон:Cite journal
  23. Шаблон:Cite web
  24. Шаблон:Cite thesis
  25. Шаблон:Cite news
  26. 26,0 26,1 Шаблон:Cite book
  27. 27,0 27,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  28. Шаблон:Cite web
  29. Шаблон:Cite news
  30. Шаблон:Cite news
  31. Шаблон:Cite web
  32. Шаблон:Cite news
  33. Шаблон:Cite journal
  34. 34,0 34,1 Шаблон:Cite book
  35. Шаблон:Cite news
  36. Шаблон:Cite news
  37. Шаблон:Cite journal
  38. Шаблон:Cite news
  39. Шаблон:Cite web
  40. Шаблон:Cite web
  41. Шаблон:Cite news
  42. Шаблон:Cite journal
  43. Шаблон:Cite journal
  44. Шаблон:Cite news
  45. Шаблон:Cite journal
  46. Шаблон:Cite journal
  47. Шаблон:Cite journal
  48. Шаблон:Cite journal
  49. Шаблон:Cite journal
  50. Шаблон:Cite journal
  51. Шаблон:Cite news
  52. Шаблон:Cite news
  53. Шаблон:Cite book
  54. Шаблон:Cite news
  55. Шаблон:Cite news
  56. Шаблон:Cite journal
  57. Шаблон:Cite journal
  58. Шаблон:Cite news
  59. Шаблон:Cite web
  60. Шаблон:Cite book
  61. Шаблон:Cite news
  62. Шаблон:Cite news
  63. Шаблон:Cite news
  64. Шаблон:Cite news
  65. Шаблон:Cite news
  66. Шаблон:Cite news
  67. Шаблон:Cite web
  68. Шаблон:Cite news
  69. Шаблон:Cite book
  70. Шаблон:Cite news
  71. Шаблон:Cite news
  72. Шаблон:Cite news
  73. Шаблон:Cite news
  74. Шаблон:Cite news
  75. Шаблон:Cite news
  76. Шаблон:Cite news
  77. Шаблон:Cite news
  78. Шаблон:Cite news
  79. 79,0 79,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  80. Шаблон:Cite news
  81. Шаблон:Cite web
  82. Шаблон:Cite web
  83. Шаблон:Cite web
  84. Шаблон:Cite web
  85. Шаблон:Cite web
  86. Шаблон:YouTube
  87. Шаблон:Cite web
  88. Шаблон:Cite web
  89. Шаблон:Cite news
  90. Шаблон:Cite web
  91. Шаблон:Cite news
  92. Шаблон:Cite web
  93. Шаблон:Cite news
  94. Шаблон:Cite news
  95. Шаблон:Cite book
  96. Шаблон:Cite news
  97. Шаблон:Cite news
  98. Шаблон:Cite news
  99. Шаблон:Cite web
  100. Шаблон:Cite news
  101. Шаблон:Cite web
  102. Шаблон:Cite news
  103. Шаблон:Cite web
  104. 104,0 104,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  105. Шаблон:Cite news
  106. Шаблон:Cite web
  107. Шаблон:Cite news
  108. Шаблон:Cite news
  109. Шаблон:Cite web
  110. Шаблон:Cite news
  111. Шаблон:Cite news
  112. Шаблон:Cite web
  113. Шаблон:Cite web
  114. Шаблон:Cite web
  115. Шаблон:Cite web
  116. Шаблон:Cite web
  117. 117,0 117,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  118. Шаблон:Cite web
  119. Шаблон:Cite news
  120. Шаблон:Cite web
  121. Шаблон:Cite news
  122. Шаблон:Cite news
  123. Шаблон:Cite news
  124. Шаблон:Cite news
  125. Шаблон:Cite news
  126. Шаблон:Cite news
  127. Шаблон:Cite web
  128. Шаблон:Cite news
  129. Шаблон:Cite news
  130. Шаблон:Cite web
  131. Шаблон:Cite news
  132. Шаблон:Cite news
  133. Шаблон:Cite news
  134. Шаблон:Cite news
  135. Шаблон:Cite news
  136. Шаблон:Cite news
  137. Шаблон:Cite news
  138. Шаблон:Cite web
  139. 139,0 139,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  140. Шаблон:Cite web
  141. Шаблон:Cite web
  142. Шаблон:Cite web
  143. Шаблон:Cite news
  144. Шаблон:Cite news
  145. Шаблон:Cite web
  146. Шаблон:Cite news
  147. Шаблон:Cite news
  148. Шаблон:Cite news
  149. Шаблон:Cite news
  150. Шаблон:Cite news
  151. Шаблон:Cite web
  152. Шаблон:Cite news
  153. Шаблон:Cite web
  154. Шаблон:Cite news
  155. Шаблон:Cite web
  156. Шаблон:Cite news
  157. Шаблон:Cite web
  158. Шаблон:Cite web
  159. Шаблон:Cite news
  160. Шаблон:Cite news
  161. Шаблон:Cite web
  162. Шаблон:Cite web
  163. Шаблон:Cite web
  164. Шаблон:Cite web
  165. Шаблон:Cite book
  166. Шаблон:Cite book
  167. Шаблон:Cite web
  168. Шаблон:Cite web
  169. Шаблон:Cite news
  170. Шаблон:Cite book
  171. Шаблон:Cite web
  172. Шаблон:Cite news
  173. Шаблон:Cite news
  174. Шаблон:Cite news
  175. Шаблон:Cite news
  176. Шаблон:Cite news
  177. Шаблон:Cite web
  178. Шаблон:Cite web
  179. Шаблон:Cite news
  180. Шаблон:Cite news
  181. Шаблон:Cite news
  182. Шаблон:Cite news
  183. Шаблон:Cite news
  184. Шаблон:Cite news
  185. Шаблон:Cite news
  186. Шаблон:Cite news
  187. Шаблон:Cite news
  188. Шаблон:Cite web
  189. Шаблон:Cite news
  190. Шаблон:Cite web
  191. Шаблон:Cite web
  192. Шаблон:Cite web
  193. Шаблон:Cite web
  194. Шаблон:Cite web
  195. Шаблон:Cite news
  196. Шаблон:Cite web
  197. Шаблон:Cite web
  198. Шаблон:Cite web
  199. Шаблон:Cite web
  200. Шаблон:Cite news
  201. Шаблон:Cite web
  202. Шаблон:Cite journal
  203. Шаблон:Cite web
  204. Шаблон:Cite web
  205. Шаблон:Cite web
  206. Шаблон:Cite web
  207. Шаблон:Cite news
  208. 208,0 208,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  209. Шаблон:Cite web
  210. Шаблон:Cite news
  211. Шаблон:Cite web
  212. Шаблон:Cite news
  213. Шаблон:Cite web
  214. Шаблон:Cite news
  215. Шаблон:Cite web
  216. Шаблон:Cite news
  217. Шаблон:Cite news
  218. Шаблон:Cite news
  219. 219,0 219,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  220. Шаблон:Cite news
  221. Шаблон:Cite web
  222. Шаблон:Cite news