Английская Википедия:DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Infobox SCOTUS case

DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia, 577 U.S. ___ (2015), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States clarified when arbitration provisions in contracts are governed by the Federal Arbitration Act. In a 6–3 opinion written by Justice Stephen Breyer, the Court reversed a decision by the California Court of Appeal that refused to enforce an arbitration agreement between DIRECTV and its customers.[1] The California Court had ruled that the arbitration agreement was unenforceable because, under applicable California law, a class action arbitration waiver between DIRECTV and its customers was unenforceable.[2] However, the Supreme Court of the United States held that the California Court of Appeal's interpretation was preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act, and the California Court of Appeal was therefore required to enforce the arbitration agreement.[3]

Justice Clarence Thomas filed a dissent, restating his view that the Federal Arbitration Act does not apply to proceedings in state courts.[4] Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, also filed a dissent, writing that the majority's decision "again expanded the scope of the FAA, further degrading the rights of consumers and further insulating already powerful economic entities from liability for unlawful acts".[5]

See also

References

Шаблон:Bots Шаблон:Reflist

External links

Партнерские ресурсы
Криптовалюты
Магазины
Хостинг
Разное

  1. ↑ Шаблон:Ussc, slip op. at 1, 11 (2015).
  2. ↑ DIRECTV, slip op. at 3–4.
  3. ↑ DIRECTV, slip op. at 5, 11.
  4. ↑ DIRECTV, slip op. at 1 (Thomas, J., dissenting).
  5. ↑ DIRECTV, slip op. at 14 (Ginsburg, J., dissenting).
Источник — http://wikihandbk.com/ruwiki/index.php?title=Английская_Википедия:DIRECTV,_Inc._v._Imburgia&oldid=14150198