Английская Википедия:Damnatio memoriae

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Italic title Шаблон:Use mdy dates

Файл:Portrait of family of Septimius Severus - Altes Museum - Berlin - Germany 2017.jpg
The Severan Tondo, Шаблон:Circa tondo of the Severan family, with portraits of Septimius Severus, Julia Domna, and their sons Caracalla and Geta. The face of one of Severus' and Julia's sons has been erased; it may be Geta's, as a result of the Шаблон:Lang ordered by his brother Caracalla after Geta's death.

Шаблон:Lang (Шаблон:IPA) is a modern Latin phrase meaning "condemnation of memory", indicating that a person is to be excluded from official accounts. Depending on the extent, it can be a case of historical negationism. There are and have been many routes to Шаблон:Lang, including the destruction of depictions, the removal of names from inscriptions and documents, and even large-scale rewritings of history. The term can be applied to other instances of official scrubbing. The practice has been seen as early as the Egyptian New Kingdom period, where the Pharaohs Hatshepsut and Akhenaten were subject to it.

After Herostratus set fire to the Temple of Artemis, one of the Seven Wonders of antiquity, the people of Ephesus banned the mention of his name. His name has since become an eponym for people who commit crimes for the purpose of gaining notoriety.

Etymology

Although the term Шаблон:Lang is Latin, the phrase was not used by the ancient Romans, and first appeared in a thesis written in Germany in 1689.[1]

Ancient world

Файл:Römermuseum Osterburken (DerHexer) 2012-09-30 008.jpg
Шаблон:Lang of Commodus on an inscription in the Museum of Roman History Osterburken. The abbreviation "CO" was later restored with paint.

Today's best known examples of damnatio memoriae from antiquity concern chiselling stone inscriptions or deliberately omitting certain information from them.

Ancient Mesopotamia

According to Stefan Zawadzki, the oldest known examples of such practices come from around 2000–3000 BC. He cites the example of Lagash (an ancient city-state founded by the Sumerians in southern Mesopotamia), where preserved inscriptions concerning a conflict with another city-state, Umma, do not mention the ruler of Umma, but describe him as "the man of Umma", which Zawadzki sees as an example of deliberate degradation of the ruler of Umma to the role of an unworthy person whose name and position in history the rulers of Lagash did not want to record for posterity.[2]

Ancient Egypt

Файл:KV55 sarcophagus (Cairo Museum).jpg
Coffin believed to belong to Akhenaten found in Tomb KV55. Note the typical obliteration of the face.

Egyptians also practiced this,[3] as seen in relics from pharaoh Akhenaten's tomb and elsewhere. Akhenaten's sole worship of the god Aten, instead of the traditional pantheon, was considered heretical. During his reign, Akhenaten endeavoured to have all references to the god Amun chipped away and removed.[4] After his reign, temples to Aten were dismantled and the stones reused to create other temples. Images of Akhenaten had their faces chipped away, and images and references to Amun reappeared. The people blamed their misfortunes on Akhenaten's shift of worship to Atenism, away from the gods they served before him.[5] Other Egyptian victims of this practice include the pharaohs that immediately succeeded Akhenaten, including Smenkhkare, Neferneferuaten, and Ay.[3] The campaign of damnatio memoriae against Akhenaten and his successors was initiated by the latter's successor, Horemheb, who decided to erase from history all pharaohs associated with the unpopular Amarna Period; this process was continued by Horemheb's successors.[6] Tutankhamun was also erased from history in this way even though he had restored Egypt to the Amun god because he was simply one the kings who succeeded Akhenaten and he was likely Akhenaten's own son.

Ancient Hittites

Файл:Sirkeli entferntes Relief2.jpg
The erased rock relief at Sirkeli Höyük that is believed to be of Mursili III.[7]

One case of damnatio memoriae is known for the ancient Hittite empire. Mursili III was a king of the Hittites for about seven years in 1282–1275 BC. But then he was overthrown by his uncle Hattusili III, who then assumed the throne.

Located near the village of Sirkeli Höyük in Turkey, there's a well known relief of Mursili's father Muwatalli II, as well as a second, very similar relief that is believed to be that of his son Mursili. But then it was largely destroyed in antiquity, most likely by his spiteful uncle. The relief of the father was left untouched.

Ancient Greece

Файл:Honours for Phaedrus of Sphettus (IG II3 1 985 = IG II2 681) part 2.jpg
Part of an honorific decree for Phaedrus of Sphettus, passed in 259/8 BC. The lines mentioning Phaedrus' interactions with the Antigonids were chiselled out as part of the damnatio memoriae of 200 BC.

The practice was known in Ancient Greece.[8] The Athenians frequently destroyed inscriptions which referred to individuals or events that they no longer wished to commemorate.Шаблон:Sfn After Timotheus was convicted of treason and removed from his post as general in 373 BC, all references to him as a general were deleted from the previous year's naval catalogue.Шаблон:Sfn The most complete example is their systematic removal of all references to the Antigonids from inscriptions in their city, in 200 BC when they were besieged by the Antigonid king Philip V of Macedon during the Second Macedonian War.[9] One decree praising Demetrius Poliorcetes (Philip V's great-grandfather) was smashed and thrown down a well.Шаблон:Sfn

At Delphi, an honorific inscription erected between 337 and 327 BC for Aristotle and his nephew Callisthenes, two philosophers who were closely associated with the Macedonians, were smashed and thrown in a well after the death of Alexander of Macedon in 323 BC.Шаблон:Sfn

Ancient Rome

Файл:1366 - Inscription for Geta (198-209 AD) - Museo Archeologico, Cagliari - Photo by Giovanni Dall'Orto, November 11 2016.jpg
Erased mention of Geta in an inscription after his Шаблон:Lang (Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Cagliari)
Файл:Sejanus Damnatio Memoriae.jpg
Lucius Aelius Sejanus suffered Шаблон:Lang following a failed conspiracy to overthrow emperor Tiberius in AD 31. His statues were destroyed and his name obliterated from all public records. The above coin from Augusta Bilbilis, originally struck to mark the consulship of Sejanus, has the words L. Aelio Seiano obliterated.

In ancient Rome, the practice of Шаблон:Lang was the condemnation of emperors after their deaths. If the Senate or a later emperor did not like the acts of an emperor, they could have his property seized, his name erased and his statues reworked (normally defaced). Because there was an economic incentive to seize property and rework statues, historians and archaeologists have had difficulty determining when official Шаблон:Lang actually took place, although it seems to have been quite rare.

Compounding this difficulty is the fact that a completely successful Шаблон:Lang results—by definition—in the full and total erasure of the subject from the historical record. In the case of figures such as emperors or consuls it is unlikely that complete success was possible, as even comprehensive obliteration of the person's existence and actions in records and the like would continue to be historically visible without extensive reworking. The impracticality of such a cover-up could be vast—in the case of Emperor Geta, for example, coins bearing his effigy proved difficult to entirely remove from circulation for several years, even though the mere mention of his name was punishable by death.[10]

Difficulties in implementation also arose if there was not full and enduring agreement with the punishment, such as when the Senate's condemnation of Nero was implemented—leading to attacks on many of his statues[11]—but subsequently evaded with the enormous funeral he was given by Vitellius. Similarly, it was often difficult to prevent later historians from "resurrecting" the memory of the sanctioned person.

The impossibility of actually erasing memory of an emperor have led scholars to conclude that this was not actually the goal of damnatio. Instead, they understand damnatio: Шаблон:BlockquoteШаблон:AnchorThese emperors are known to have been erased from monuments:[12]

Emperor Reign Notes
Caligula 37–41 Disputed whether per senate decree[13][14]
Nero 54–68 hostis iudicatio (posthumous trial for treason)[13]
Domitian 81–96 per senate decree (96)[13]
Commodus 177–192 per senate decree (192)[13]
Clodius Albinus Usurper
Geta 209–211 per his brother Caracalla
Macrinus 217–218 Usurper
Diadumenian 217–218 Usurper
Elagabalus 218–222
Severus Alexander 222–235 Only during the reign of Maximinus Thrax
Maximinus Thrax 235–238 per senate decree (238)[13]
Maximus I Caesar only
Philip the Arab 244–249
Philip II 247–249 Philip the Arab's son
Decius 249–251
Herennius Etruscus 251 Decius' son
Hostilian 251 Decius' son
Aemilianus 253
Gallienus 253–268
Aurelian 270–275
Probus 276–282
Carus 282–283
Carinus 284–285
Numerian 283–284
Diocletian 284–305
Maximian 286–305 per senate decree (310)[13]
Galerius 305–311
Valerius Severus 306–307
Maximinus II 308–313 per senate decree (313)[13]
Maxentius 306–312
Licinius 308–324
Constantine II 337–340
Constans 337–350
Magnentius Usurper
Magnus Maximus 383–388

Middle Ages

Файл:Local do retrato de Marino Faliero na Galeria dos Doges de Veneza.jpg
The Doge of Venice Marino Faliero's portrait was removed and painted over with a black shroud as Шаблон:Lang for his attempted coup. The shroud bears the Latin phrase, "This is the space for Marino Faliero, beheaded for crimes."

In the Middle Ages, heresiarchs could have their memory condemned. The Council of Constance decreed the Шаблон:Lang of John Wycliffe.[15]

The practice of replacing pagan beliefs and motifs with Christian, and purposefully not recording the pagan history, has been compared to Шаблон:Lang as well.[16]

In her book Medici Women - Portraits of Power, Love and Betrayal, Gabrielle Langdon also presents compelling evidence concerning a probable damnatio memoriae issued against Isabella de' Medici, a prominent female figure of the 16th century Renaissance Medici court.[17]

Similar practices in modern times

Шаблон:Multiple image

Шаблон:Multiple image

Шаблон:Main article

While complete Шаблон:Lang has not been attempted in modern times—naming or writing about a person fallen from favour has never been made subject to formal punishment—less total instances of Шаблон:Lang in modern times include numerous examples from the Soviet Union, retouching photos to remove individuals such as Leon Trotsky,[18] Nikolay Yezhov,[19] and even Stalin.[20] After Stalin ordered the murder of Grigory Kulik's wife Kira Kulik-Simonich, all photographic records of her were destroyed; although she was described as very pretty, no photographs or other images of her survive.[21] Following their fall from favour, Lavrentiy Beria and others were removed from articles in the Great Soviet Encyclopedia.[22] Following the fall of communism in Eastern Europe, many communist statues, particularly of Lenin and Stalin, were removed from former Soviet satellite states.[23] Following a 2015 decision, a process of decommunization in Ukraine successfully dismantled all 1,320 statues of Lenin after its independence, as well as renaming roads and structures named under Soviet authority.[24]

The graphic designer David King had a strong interest in Soviet art and design, and amassed a collection of over 250,000 images. His most striking examples of before-and-after alterations were published as The Commissar Vanishes.

Poland

19th century Polish writers often omitted mentioning two kings from the list of Polish monarchs, Bezprym and Wenceslaus III of Bohemia, which has resulted in their being omitted from many later works as well.[25]

China

The treatment of Chinese politician Zhao Ziyang following his fall from grace inside the Chinese Communist Party is regarded as another modern case of Шаблон:Lang.[26]

Germany

The destruction of all copies of The Victory of Faith in order to erase Ernst Röhm is considered an act of Nazi damnatio memoriae.[27] In the end, two copies survived: one preserved in London and one preserved by the Communist government of East Germany.[28]

North Korea

In December 2013, Jang Song-thaek was abruptly accused of being a counter-revolutionary and was stripped of all his posts, expelled from the Workers' Party of Korea (WPK), arrested and executed. His photos were removed from official media and his image digitally removed from photos with other North Korean leaders.[29]

Analysis

The term is used in modern scholarship to cover a wide array of official and unofficial sanctions through which the physical remnants and memories of a deceased individual are destroyed.[30][31]

Looking at cases of Шаблон:Lang in modern Irish history, Guy Beiner has argued that iconoclastic vandalism only makes martyrs of the "dishonored", thus ensuring that they will be remembered for all time.[32] Nonetheless, Beiner goes on to argue that the purpose of Шаблон:Lang—rather than being to erase people from history—was to guarantee only negative memories of those who were so dishonored.[32][33] Pointing out that Шаблон:Lang did not erase people from history but in effect kept their memory alive,[33] Beiner concluded that those who partake in the destruction of a monument should be considered agents of memory.[34]

Author Charles Hedrick proposes that a distinction be made between Шаблон:Lang (the condemnation of a deceased person) and Шаблон:Lang (the actual erasure of another from historical texts).[35]

In case of removal of Soviet monuments in Eastern Europe, the primary reason was that they were established as a symbol of occupation, domination or cult of personality, rather than simple historic mark. It has been pointed out that all Nazi-established monuments and street names have been removed after World War II which has been perceived as natural reaction after liberation at that time.[36][37]

See also

Шаблон:Div col

Шаблон:Div col end

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Bibliography

External links

Шаблон:Spoken Wikipedia

Шаблон:Conformity Шаблон:CensorshipШаблон:Falsification of history