Английская Википедия:Darby v. Cisneros
Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску
Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Infobox SCOTUS case
Darby v. Cisneros, 509 U.S. 137 (1993), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that federal courts cannot require that a plaintiff exhaust his administrative remedies before seeking judicial review when exhaustion of remedies is not required by either administrative rules or statute.
Facts of the case
R. Gordon Darby, a real estate developer in South Carolina, was banned from participating in Department of Housing and Urban Development programs for 18 months. He and others filed in federal court even though they had not exhausted the internal HUD review process. Henry Cisneros, as HUD Secretary, was the respondent.
See also
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 509
- List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court
Further reading
External links
Категории:
- Английская Википедия
- United States Supreme Court cases
- United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
- United States administrative case law
- 1993 in United States case law
- United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
- Страницы, где используется шаблон "Навигационная таблица/Телепорт"
- Страницы с телепортом
- Википедия
- Статья из Википедии
- Статья из Английской Википедии