Английская Википедия:Deepwater Horizon

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:About Шаблон:Pp-move-indef Шаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:Use British English

Шаблон:Infobox ship imageШаблон:Infobox ship careerШаблон:Infobox ship characteristics

Deepwater Horizon was an ultra-deepwater, dynamically positioned, semi-submersible offshore drilling rig[1] owned by Transocean and operated by BP. On 20 April 2010, while drilling at the Macondo Prospect, a blowout caused an explosion on the rig that killed 11 crewmen and ignited a fireball visible from Шаблон:Convert away.[2] The fire was inextinguishable and, two days later, on 22 April, the Horizon sank, leaving the well gushing at the seabed and causing the largest marine oil spill in history.[3][4]

Built in 2001 in South Korea by Hyundai Heavy Industries,[5] the rig was commissioned by R&B Falcon (a later asset of Transocean),[6] registered in Majuro, and leased to BP from 2001 until September 2013.[7] In September 2009, the rig drilled the deepest oil well in history at a vertical depth of Шаблон:Convert and measured depth of Шаблон:Convert[8] in the Tiber Oil Field at Keathley Canyon block 102, approximately Шаблон:Convert southeast of Houston, in Шаблон:Convert of water.[9]

Design

Файл:Deepwater Nautilus.jpg
The Deepwater Nautilus, sister rig to the Deepwater Horizon, being transported aboard a heavy-lift ship

Шаблон:Deepwater Horizon oil spill series Deepwater Horizon was a fifth-generation, RBS-8D design (i.e. model type), deepwater, dynamically positioned, column-stabilized,[10] semi-submersible mobile offshore drilling unit, designed to drill subsea wells for oil exploration and production using an Шаблон:Convert, Шаблон:Convert blowout preventer, and a Шаблон:Convert outside diameter marine riser.[11]

Deepwater Horizon was the second semi-submersible rig constructed of a class of two, although Deepwater Nautilus, its predecessor, is not dynamically positioned. The rig was Шаблон:Convert and capable of operating in waters up to Шаблон:Convert deep, to a maximum drill depth of Шаблон:Convert.[11] In 2010 it was one of approximately 200 deepwater offshore rigs capable of drilling in waters deeper than Шаблон:Convert.[12] Its American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) class notations were "A1, Column Stabilized Drilling Unit, AMS, ACCU, DPS-3".[10]

In 2002, the rig was upgraded with "e-drill", a drill monitoring system whereby technical personnel based in Houston, Texas, received real-time drilling data from the rig and transmitted maintenance and troubleshooting information.[13]

Advanced systems played a key role in the rig's operation, from pressure and drill monitoring technology, to automated shutoff systems[14] and modelling systems for cementing. The OptiCem cement modelling system, used by Halliburton in April 2010, played a crucial part in cement slurry mix and support decisions. These decisions became a focus for investigations into the explosion on the rig that month.[15]

History

Construction and ownership

Deepwater Horizon was built for R&B Falcon (which later became part of Transocean)[16] by Hyundai Heavy Industries in Ulsan, South Korea.[10] Construction started in December 1998, the keel was laid on 21 March 2000,[17] and the rig was delivered on 23 February 2001,[17] after the acquisition of R&B Falcon by Transocean.[18] Until 29 December 2004 the rig was registered in the Republic of Panama.[4]

Transocean, through its Steinhausen, Switzerland[19] subsidiary[20] Triton Asset Leasing GmbH,[21][17] operated the rig under the Marshallese flag of convenience.[22] The rig was leased to BP on a three-year contract for deployment in the Gulf of Mexico following construction.[23] The lease was renewed in 2004 for a year,[24] 2005 for five years,[25] and 2009 for three years covering 2010 to 2013.[22][26] The last contract was worth $544 million, or $496,800 a day,[27] for a "bare rig",[28] with crew, gear and support vessels estimated to cost the same.[28]

According to R&B Falcon's filings to SEC in 2001, the transfer document between R&B Falcon and Transocean was dated 17 August 2001,[29] and the rig was specified as "official registration number of 29273-PEXT-1, IMO number of 8764597, with gross tonnage of 32,588 and net tonnage of 9,778"[29] and the transfer value as Шаблон:Nowrap.[29] Шаблон:As of, the rig was insured for Шаблон:Nowrap covering the replacement cost and wreckage removal.[18]

Drilling operations

Deepwater Horizon worked on wells in the Atlantis (BP 56%, BHP 44%) and Thunder Horse (BP 75%, ExxonMobil 25%)[30] oil fields. It was described at times as a "lucky" and "celebrated" rig,[31] and in 2007 was still described as "one of the most powerful rigs in the world".[32] In 2006, it discovered oil in the Kaskida oil field and, in 2009, the "giant" Tiber oil field.[33][34] The well in the Tiber field had a true vertical depth of Шаблон:Convert and a measured depth of Шаблон:Convert, below Шаблон:Convert of water.[35] The well was the deepest oil well in the world[34][35][36][37] and more than Шаблон:Convert farther below the seabed than the rig's official drilling specification stated on the company's fleet list.[38]

In February 2010, Deepwater Horizon commenced drilling an exploratory well at the Macondo Prospect (Mississippi Canyon Block 252), about Шаблон:Convert off the southeast coast of Louisiana, at a water depth of approximately Шаблон:Convert.[39] The Macondo prospect exploration rights had been acquired by BP in 2009,[40] with the prospect jointly owned by BP (65%), Anadarko Petroleum (25%) and MOEX Offshore 2007 (10%).[41] Deepwater Horizon was still working on the Macondo site on 20 April 2010, when a violent explosion occurred leading to destruction of the rig and the subsequent oil spill.[42][43][44][45] This oil spill has been recorded as the largest offshore spill to occur to date,[46] resulting in Шаблон:Convert of coastal pollution.[47] The well was in the final stages of completion after cement had been emplaced for its last casing string. The exploratory work had been described as "concluded" with permission already having been requested from MMS to terminate operations at the Macondo site.[48] The rig was scheduled to move to its next roles as semi-permanent production platforms, initially at the Tiber site followed by a return to the Kaskida field, an oil dome 50 miles off the coast of Louisiana.[31]

During its operational lifetime, the rig was actively in operation for 93% of its working life (2,896 of 3,131 days). The remainder partly was time spent moving between sites.[49]

Regulation, safety, and inspection

The Minerals Management Service (renamed on 18 June 2010 to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, or Bureau of Ocean Energy (BOE))[50] is the regulatory and inspecting body for offshore oil drilling and rigs in the United States of America.[50] According to an Associated Press investigation, certain safety documentation and emergency procedure information, including documentation for the exact incident that later occurred, was absent.[49] The exact number of required monthly inspections performed varied over time; the inspections were carried out as required for the first 40 months, but after that around 25% of inspections were omitted,[49] although the investigation notes this is partly expected, since there are circumstances such as weather and movement which preclude an inspection.[49] Reports of the last three inspections for 2010 were provided under Freedom of Information legislation. Each of these inspections had taken two hours or less.[49]

During its lifetime the rig received 5 citations for non-compliance, 4 of which were in 2002 (safety, including the blowout preventer) and the other in 2003 (pollution).[49] A sixth citation in 2007 related to non-grounded electrical equipment was later withdrawn when the equipment was determined to be compliant with regulations.[49] Overall the Deepwater HorizonШаблон:'s safety record was "strong" according to a drilling consultant reviewing the information.[49] In 2009 the Minerals Management Service "herald[ed] the Deepwater Horizon as an industry model for safety".[49] According to AP's investigation "its record was so exemplary, according to MMS officials, that the rig was never on inspectors' informal 'watch list' for problem rigs".[49]

Explosion and oil spill

Шаблон:Main

Файл:Deepwater Horizon offshore drilling unit on fire 2010.jpg
Deepwater Horizon in flames after the explosion

Шаблон:Location map At Шаблон:Nowrap CDT on 20 April 2010, during the final phases of drilling the exploratory well off the gulf of Mexico, a geyser of seawater erupted from the marine riser onto the rig, shooting 70 m into the air. This was soon followed by the eruption of a slushy combination of drilling mud, methane gas, and water. The gas component of the slushy material quickly transitioned into a fully gaseous state and then ignited into a series of explosions and then a firestorm. An attempt was made to activate the blowout preventer, but it failed.[51] The final defense to prevent an oil spill, a device known as a blind shear ram, was activated but failed to plug the well.[52]

Ten workers were presumed killed in the initial explosion:

Jason Anderson, 35, of Midfield, Texas;

Donald Clark, 49, of Newellton, Louisiana;

Stephen Ray Curtis, 40, of Georgetown, Louisiana;

Gordon Jones, 28, of Baton Rouge, Louisiana;

Roy Wyatt Kemp, 27, Jonesville, Louisiana;

Karl Kleppinger Jr., 38, Natchez, Mississippi;

Keith Blair Manuel, 56, of Gonzales, Louisiana;

Dewey Revette, 48, of State Line, Mississippi;

Shane Roshto, 22, Liberty, Mississippi;

Adam Weise, 24, Yorktown, Texas.

An eleventh was crane operator Aaron Dale Burkeen, 37, Philadelphia, Mississippi, who died in the subsequent fire.

The rig was evacuated, with injured workers airlifted to medical facilities. After approximately 36 hours, Deepwater Horizon sank on 22 April 2010. The remains of the rig were located resting on the seafloor approximately 1,500 m deep at that location, and about 400 m northwest of the well.[43][53][54]

The resultant oil spill continued until 15 July when it was closed by a cap.[55] Relief wells were used to permanently seal the well, which was declared "effectively dead" on 19 September 2010.[56] NOAA established the Gulf Spill Restoration project, under the Deep Water Horizon National Resource Damage Assessment Trustees, to help to restore much of the coastline.[57]

Aftermath

Шаблон:Further

Transocean received an early partial insurance settlement for total loss of the Deepwater Horizon of Шаблон:Nowrap around 5 May 2010.[58] Financial analysts noted that the insurance recovery was likely to outweigh the value of the rig (although not necessarily its replacement value) and any liabilities Шаблон:Ndash the latter estimated at up to Шаблон:US$.[59]

Litigation, ultimate roll call of damage, and the scope of final insurance recovery were all unknown Шаблон:As of, with analysts reporting that the aftermath was of unprecedented scale and complexity compared to previous disasters which themselves took many years to unfold and resolve.[60][61] A July 2010 analysis by the Financial Times on the aftermath cited legal sources as saying that "at some point the scale of the litigation becomes so large that it really is novel", that "the situation is likely to be complicated further because the variety of probable cases means it will be hard to aggregate them into so-called class actions" and that there was "no way to put this in historical context because we have never faced anything like this before".[62] As with the Exxon Valdez disaster, litigation was being discussed in terms of a 20-year timescale.[60]

In January 2013, Transocean agreed to pay US$1.4 billion for violations of the US Clean Water Act. BP had earlier agreed to pay $2.4 billion but faced additional penalties that could range from $5 billion to $20 billion.[63] In September 2014, Halliburton agreed to settle a large percentage of legal claims against them by paying $1.1 billion into a trust by way of three installments over two years.[64] On 4 September 2014, U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier ruled BP was guilty of gross negligence and willful misconduct under the Clean Water Act (CWA). He described BP's actions as "reckless", while he said Transocean's and Halliburton's actions were "negligent". He apportioned 67% of the blame for the spill to BP, 30% to Transocean, and 3% to Halliburton. BP issued a statement strongly disagreeing with the finding, and saying the court's decision would be appealed.[65]

On 8 December 2014, The US Supreme Court rejected BP's legal challenge to a compensation deal over the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill. The settlement agreement had no cap, but BP initially estimated that it would pay roughly $7.8bn (£6.1bn) to compensate victims.[66]

The Deepwater Horizon oil spill is cited by lawyers, academics and journalists as an example of ecocide.[67][68][69][70]

Film

The biographical disaster movie Deepwater Horizon, released in 2016, depicts the events of the 2010 Deepwater Horizon explosion and subsequent oil spill. The film is based on "Deepwater Horizon's Final Hours", an article appearing in The New York Times.[71]

See also

Шаблон:Portal

References

Шаблон:Reflist

External links

Шаблон:Spoken Wikipedia Шаблон:Wikinews category

Шаблон:Transocean ultra-deepwater drilling rigs Шаблон:Deepwater Шаблон:BP Шаблон:2010 shipwrecks Шаблон:Authority control Шаблон:Good article

  1. Шаблон:Cite web
  2. Шаблон:Cite web
  3. Шаблон:Cite news
  4. 4,0 4,1 Шаблон:Cite report
  5. Шаблон:Cite web
  6. Шаблон:Cite news
  7. Шаблон:Cite news
  8. Шаблон:Cite press release
  9. Шаблон:Cite news
  10. 10,0 10,1 10,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  11. 11,0 11,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  12. Шаблон:Cite web
  13. Шаблон:Cite news
  14. Шаблон:Cite news
  15. Шаблон:Cite news
  16. Шаблон:Cite news – date of publication verifiable on [1]
  17. 17,0 17,1 17,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  18. 18,0 18,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  19. Шаблон:Cite web
  20. Шаблон:Cite web
  21. Шаблон:Cite web
  22. 22,0 22,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  23. Шаблон:Cite web
  24. Шаблон:Cite web
  25. Шаблон:Cite web
  26. Шаблон:Cite news
  27. Шаблон:Cite news
  28. 28,0 28,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  29. 29,0 29,1 29,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  30. Шаблон:Cite news
  31. 31,0 31,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  32. Шаблон:Cite web Alternate link Шаблон:Webarchive
  33. Шаблон:Cite press release
  34. 34,0 34,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  35. 35,0 35,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  36. Шаблон:Cite news
  37. Шаблон:Cite web
  38. Шаблон:Cite web
  39. Шаблон:Cite web
  40. Шаблон:Cite web
  41. Шаблон:Cite web
  42. Шаблон:Cite news
  43. 43,0 43,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  44. Шаблон:Cite press release
  45. Шаблон:Cite web
  46. Шаблон:Cite journal
  47. Шаблон:Cite journal
  48. Шаблон:Cite web
  49. 49,0 49,1 49,2 49,3 49,4 49,5 49,6 49,7 49,8 49,9 Шаблон:Cite news
  50. 50,0 50,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  51. Шаблон:Cite news
  52. Шаблон:Cite web
  53. Шаблон:Cite news
  54. Шаблон:Cite web
  55. Шаблон:Cite news
  56. Шаблон:Cite web
  57. Шаблон:Cite web
  58. Шаблон:Cite web
  59. Шаблон:Cite news
  60. 60,0 60,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  61. Шаблон:Cite news
  62. Шаблон:Cite news
  63. Шаблон:Cite journal
  64. Шаблон:Cite web
  65. Шаблон:Cite news
  66. Шаблон:Cite news
  67. Шаблон:Cite web
  68. Шаблон:Cite web
  69. Шаблон:Cite web
  70. Шаблон:Citation
  71. Шаблон:Cite web