Английская Википедия:Drogo (mayor of the palace)
Drogo (born Шаблон:Circa) was a Frankish nobleman of the Pippinid family and the eldest son of Carloman, mayor of the palace of Austrasia under the Merovingian king Childeric III. He succeeded to his father's office in 747 but was soon squeezed out of power by his uncle, Pippin III, the mayor in Neustria. He resisted his uncle's takeover, but in 753 was captured and forced to become a monk.
Mayor in Austrasia, 747 – c. 751
Carloman seems to have named his son after his own uncle, Duke Drogo of Champagne, the eldest son of Pippin II.Шаблон:Sfn The name of Drogo's mother is not known.Шаблон:Sfn He was of majority age when he witnessed a charter issued by his father in August 747.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn At the time Drogo was the heir of both his father and his uncle. Around October that year,Шаблон:Sfn his father abdicated his mayoralty, went on a pilgrimage to Rome and entered the monastery of Monte Cassino.Шаблон:EfnШаблон:Sfn
Drogo succeeded his father in Austrasia and in rule over Alemannia and Thuringia.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn This fact was obscured by later chroniclers, like Einhard and the anonymous compiler of the Annals of Metz, neither of whom mention Drogo. They sought to create a simplified Pippinid family tree so as to make the position of Pippin III, founder of the Carolingian dynasty, appear stronger than it was.Шаблон:Sfn At the time Carloman left on his pilgrimage, Drogo's position must have been strong.Шаблон:Sfn The Chronicle of Fredegar claims, misleadingly, that Carloman entrusted both Austrasia and Drogo to Pippin's care.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn
The main piece of evidence that Drogo actually succeeded to his father's office is a short anonymous letter preserved in the collection of Saint Boniface's letters.Шаблон:Sfn The letter writer asks a certain Andhemus "whether he [Boniface] has gone to the synod of the duke of the western provinces [Pippin] or to the son of Carloman [Drogo]."Шаблон:Sfn[1] No answer to the letter is known, but it is known that Boniface sided with Pippin. Historian Roger Collins notes that "given a choice in 747 between Pippin and his nephew, for Boniface to favour the already proven western ruler over the young and inexperienced eastern one [made] pragmatic sense."Шаблон:Sfn
It is not known for how long Drogo exercised mayoral authority in Austrasia.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn The birth of a son, Charles, to his uncle on 2 April 748 seems to have fundamentally altered the relationship between Drogo and Pippin. Soon after Pippin released his younger brother Grifo, who had been imprisoned for rebelling against Carloman. This was likely done with an eye to destabilizing Drogo's government.Шаблон:Sfn
In opposition to Pippin III, 751–753
By 751 Pippin's position was strong enough to gain papal support for a takeover of the kingdom. Childeric III was deposed and Pippin crowned in his place.Шаблон:Sfn Drogo kept up a "spirited resistance" against his uncle until 753.Шаблон:Sfn In that year, Pope Stephen II wrote to the Frankish nobles ordering them to support Pippin. He even came to Francia to lend his support. Carloman followed, although for what purpose is not clear.Шаблон:Efn Historian Matthias Becher argues that Carloman was trying to save Drogo's position. He was detained on Pippin's orders, fell ill and died in France in 755.Шаблон:Sfn
Drogo was captured along with his unnamed younger brother later in 753. The two were tonsured and put in a monastery.Шаблон:Sfn Drogo's capture was sufficiently important to be mentioned in three Carolingian annals: the Petavian Annals, Annals of Lorsch and Moselle Annals.Шаблон:Sfn In 754, Stephen II anointed Pippin, his wife Bertrada and their sons, Charles and Carloman, declaring that thenceforth none but Pippin's descendants should reign over the Franks. This was made possibly only by the elimination of Pippin's nephews as rivals.Шаблон:Sfn
It is possible that Drogo later made peace with his uncle and was released. A Drogo is named as a follower (fidelis) of Pippin in a document of 753 and as a count in another of 762.Шаблон:Sfn As Collins notes, "later [Carolingian] historiography attempted with considerable success to obscure" Drogo.Шаблон:Sfn Modern reconstructions of his career must "rely on a great deal of conjecture."Шаблон:Sfn
Notes
Explanatory footnotes Шаблон:Notelist Citations Шаблон:Reflist
Sources
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
- ↑ Translated in Emerton 1940, p. 142 (no. 79).
