Английская Википедия:Epichloë

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Redirect Шаблон:Automatic taxobox

Epichloë is a genus of ascomycete fungi forming an endophytic symbiosis with grasses. Grass choke disease is a symptom in grasses induced by some Epichloë species, which form spore-bearing mats (stromata) on tillers and suppress the development of their host plant's inflorescence. For most of their life cycle however, Epichloë grow in the intercellular space of stems, leaves, inflorescences, and seeds of the grass plant without incurring symptoms of disease. In fact, they provide several benefits to their host, including the production of different herbivore-deterring alkaloids, increased stress resistance, and growth promotion.

Within the family Clavicipitaceae, Epichloë is embedded in a group of endophytic and plant pathogenic fungi, whose common ancestor probably derived from an animal pathogen. The genus includes both species with a sexually reproducing (teleomorphic) stage and asexual, anamorphic species. The latter were previously placed in the form genus Neotyphodium but included in Epichloë after molecular phylogenetics had shown asexual and sexual species to be intermingled in a single clade. Hybrid speciation has played an important role in the evolution of the genus.

Epichloë species are ecologically significant through their effects on host plants. Their presence has been shown to alter the composition of plant communities and food webs. Grass varieties, especially of tall fescue and ryegrass, with symbiotic Epichloë endophyte strains, are commercialised and used for pasture and turf.

Taxonomy

Elias Fries, in 1849, first defined Epichloë as a subgenus of Cordyceps.[1] As type species, he designated Cordyceps typhina,[1] originally described by Christiaan Hendrik Persoon.[2] The brothers Charles and Louis René Tulasne then raised the subgenus to genus rank in 1865.[3] Epichloë typhina would remain the only species in the genus until the discovery of fungal grass endophytes causing livestock intoxications in the 1970s and 1980s, which stimulated the description of new species.[4] Several species from Africa and Asia that develop stromata on grasses were split off as a separate genus Parepichloë in 1998.[5]

Many Epichloë species have forms that reproduce sexually, and several purely asexual species are closely related to them. These anamorphs were long classified separately: Morgan-Jones and Gams (1982) collected them in a section (Albo-lanosa) of genus Acremonium.[6] In a molecular phylogenetic study in 1996, Glenn and colleagues found the genus to be polyphyletic and proposed a new genus Neotyphodium for the anamorphic species related to Epichloë.[7] A number of species continued to be described in both genera until Leuchtmann and colleagues (2014) included most of the form genus Neotyphodium in Epichloë.[4] Phylogenetic studies had shown both genera to be intermingled, and the nomenclatural code required since 2011 that one single name be used for all stages of development of a fungal species. Only Neotyphodium starrii, of unclear status, and N. chilense, which is unrelated, were excluded from Epichloë.[4]

<imagemap> File:Epichloë tubB phylogeny.jpg|center|750px|alt=Phylogeny of the fungal genus Epichloë from aligned tubB gene sequences.|Phylogeny of the genus *Epichloë*. Clicking on a species in the phylogeny will load the appropriate wikipedia article.

desc bottom-left

rect 844 337 1195 377 Epichloë amarillans rect 605 689 977 728 Epichloë aotearoae rect 931 534 1412 578 Epichloë baconii rect 606 636 1022 682 Epichloë brachyelytri rect 495 234 1206 277 Epichloë bromicola rect 496 282 796 332 Epichloë elymi rect 902 384 1454 475 Epichloë festucae rect 432 84 1105 180 Epichloë gansuensis rect 433 184 942 233 Epichloë glyceriae rect 902 485 1170 528 Epichloë mollis rect 433 32 985 75 Epichloë sibirica rect 932 586 1560 632 Epichloë stromatolonga rect 841 938 1581 1032 Epichloë sylvatica rect 771 736 1720 931 Epichloë typhina rect 924 1037 1716 1131 Epichloë typhina </imagemap>

Species

As of 2024, there are 44 accepted species in the genus, with 1 subspecies and 5 varieties described. 20 species, 1 subspecies and 4 varieties are haploid. 24 species and 1 variety are hybrids (allopolyploids). Several taxa are only known as anamorphic (asexual) forms, most of which have previously been classified in Neotyphodium.[4]

Haploid Taxa Known Distribution Sexual Reproduction Vertical Transmission Known Host Range Reference to Species Description
Epichloë amarillans

J.F. White

North America Observed Present Agrostis hyemalis, Agrostis perennans, Calamagrostis canadensis, Elymus virginicus, Sphenopholis nitida, Sphenopholis obtusata, Sphenopholis × pallens, Ammophila breviligulata Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë aotearoae

(C.D. Moon, C.O. Miles & Schardl) Leuchtm. & Schardl

New Zealand, Australia Not observed Present Echinopogon ovatus Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë baconii

J.F. White

Europe Observed Absent Agrostis capillaris, Agrostis stolonifera Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë brachyelytri

Schardl & Leuchtm.

North America Observed Present Brachyelytrum erectum Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë bromicola

Leuchtm. & Schardl

Europe, Asia Observed on Bromus erectus, Elymus repens and Elymus tsukushiensis Present in Bromus benekenii, Bromus ramosus and Hordelymus europaeus, Hordeum brevisubulatum, Leymus chinensis and Elymus tsukushiensis; absent in Bromus erectus and Elymus repens Europe: Bromus benekenii, Bromus erectus, Bromus ramosus, Elymus repens, Hordelymus europaeus, Hordeum brevisubulatum. Asia: Leymus chinensis, Elymus tsukushiensis Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë calamagrostidis

Leuchtm. & Schardl

Europe Observerd Absent Calamagrostis villosa, Calamagrostis varia, Calamagrostis purpurea Leuchtmann, Adrian; Schardl, Christopher L. (2022). "Genetic diversity of Epichloë endophytes associated with Brachypodium and Calamagrostis host grass genera including two new species". Journal of Fungi. 8 (10): 1886.

doi: 10.3390/jof8101086

Epichloë elymi

Schardl & Leuchtm.

North America Observed Present Bromus kalmii, Elymus spp. (including Elymus hystrix) Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë festucae

Leuchtm., Schardl & M.R. Siegel

Europe, Asia, North America Observed Present Festuca spp., Koeleria spp., Schedonorus spp. Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë festucae var. lolii

(Latch, M.J. Chr. & Samuels) C.W. Bacon & Schardl

Europe, Asia, North Africa, introduced in New Zealand, Australia and elsewhere Not observed Present Lolium perenne subsp. perenne Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë ftanensis Leuchtm. & A.D. Treindl Europe Observed Absent Calamagrostis arundinacea Leuchtmann, Adrian; Schardl, Christopher L. (2022). "Genetic diversity of Epichloë endophytes associated with Brachypodium and Calamagrostis host grass genera including two new species". Journal of Fungi. 8 (10): 1886.

doi: 10.3390/jof8101086

Epichloë gansuensis

(C.J. Li & Nan) Schardl

Asia Not observed Present Achnatherum inebrians, Achnatherum sibiricum, Achnatherum pekinense Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë inebrians

(C.D. Moon & Schardl) L. Chen & C.J. Li

Asia Not observed Present Achnatherum inebrians Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë glyceriae

Schardl & Leuchtm.

North America Observed Absent Glyceria spp. Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë mollis

(Morgan-Jones & W. Gams) Leuchtm. & Schardl

Europe Observed Present Holcus mollis Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë scottii

T. Thünen, Y. Becker, M.P. Cox & S. Ashrafi

Europe Observed Present Melica uniflora Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë sibirica

(X. Zhang & Y.B. Gao) Tadych

Asia Not observed Present Achnatherum sibiricum Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë stromatolonga

(Y.L. Ji, L.H. Zhan & Z.W. Wang) Leuchtm.

Asia Not observed Present Calamagrostis epigejos Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë sylvatica

Leuchtm. & Schardl

Europe, Asia Observed Present Brachypodium sylvaticum, Hordelymus europaeus Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë sylvatica subsp. pollinensis

Leuchtm. & M. Oberhofer

Europe Observed Present Hordelymus europaeus Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë typhina

(Pers.) Brockm.

Europe, introduced in North America and elsewhere Observed Present in Puccinellia distans; absent in other hosts Anthoxanthum odoratum, Brachypodium phoenicoides, Brachypodium pinnatum, Dactylis glomerata, Lolium perenne, Milium effusum, Phleum pratense, Poa trivialis, Poa silvicola, Puccinellia distans Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë clarkii

J.F. White

Europe Observed Absent Holcus lanatus

Holcus mollis

Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë poae

Tadych, K.V. Ambrose, F.C. Belanger & J.F. White

Europe, North America Observed on Poa nemoralis and Poa pratensis Present in Poa nemoralis, Poa secunda subsp. juncifolia; absent in Poa pratensis Europe: Poa nemoralis, Poa pratensis. North America: Poa secunda subsp. juncifolia, Poa sylvestris Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë poae var. aonikenkana

Iannone & Schardl

Argentina (Santa Cruz) Not observed Present Bromus setifolius Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë poae var. canariensis

(C.D. Moon, B. Scott, & M.J. Chr.) Leuchtm.

Canary Islands Not observed Present Lolium edwardii Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë poae var. huerfana

(J.F. White, G.T. Cole & Morgan-Jones) Tadych & Leuchtm.

North America Not observed Present Festuca arizonica Шаблон:Cite journal
Hybrid Taxa Progenitor Species Known Distribution Sexual Reproduction Vertical Transmission Known Host Range Reference to Species Description
Epichloë alsodes

T. Shymanovich, C.A. Young, N.D. Charlton & S.H. Faeth

Epichloë amarillans × Epichloë typhina subsp. poae North America Not observed Present Poa alsodes Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë australiensis

(C.D. Moon & Schardl) Leuchtm. & Schardl

Epichloë festucae × Epichloë typhina complex (from Poa pratensis) Australia Not observed Present Echinopogon ovatus Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë cabralii

Iannone, M.S. Rossi & Schardl

Epichloë amarillans × Epichloë typhina complex (from Poa nemoralis) Argentina (Santa Cruz, Tierra del Fuego) Not observed Present Phleum alpinum Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë canadensis

N.D. Charlton & C.A. Young

Epichloë amarillans × Epichloë elymi North America Not observed Present Elymus canadensis Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë chisosa

(J.F. White & Morgan-Jones) Schardl

Epichloë amarillans × Epichloë bromicola × Epichloë typhina complex (from Poa pratensis) North America Not observed Present Achnatherum eminens Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë coenophiala

(Morgan-Jones & W. Gams) C.W. Bacon & Schardl

Epichloë baconii (Lolium associated clade) × Epichloë festucae × Epichloë typhina complex (from Poa nemoralis) Europe, North Africa, introduced in North America and elsewhere Not observed Present Schedonorus arundinaceus [synonyms: Festuca arundinacea, Lolium arundinaceum] Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë danica

Leuchtm. & M. Oberhofer

Epichloë bromicola × Epichloë sylvatica Europe Not observed Present Hordelymus europaeus Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë disjuncta

Leuchtm. & M. Oberhofer

Epichloë scottii × Epichloë typhina complex Europe Not observed Present Hordelymus europaeus Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë funkii

(K.D. Craven & Schardl) J.F. White

Epichloë elymi × Epichloë festucae North America Not observed Present Achnatherum robustum Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë guerinii

(Guillaumin, Ravel & C.D. Moon) Leuchtm. & Schardl

Epichloë gansuensis × Epichloë typhina complex Europe Not observed Present Melica ciliata, Melica transsilvanica Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë hordelymi

Leuchtm. & M. Oberhofer

Epichloë bromicola × Epichloë typhina complex Europe Not observed Present Hordelymus europaeus Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë hybrida

M.P. Cox & M.A. Campbell

Epichloë festucae var. lolii × Epichloë typhina Europe Not observed Present Lolium perenne Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë liyangensis

Z.W. Wang, Y. Kang & H. Miao

Epichloë bromicola × Epichloë typhina complex (from Poa nemoralis) Asia Observed Present Poa pratensis subsp. pratensis Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë melicicola

(C.D. Moon & Schardl) Schardl

Epichloë aotearoae × Epichloë festucae South Africa Not observed Present Melica racemosa, Melica decumbens Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë novae-zelandiae

Leuchtm. & A.V. Stewart

Epichloë amarillans × Epichloë bromicola × Epichloë typhina subsp. poae New Zealand Not observed Present Poa matthewsii Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë occultans

(C.D. Moon, B. Scott & M.J. Chr.) Schardl

Epichloë baconii (Lolium associated clade) × Epichloë bromicola Europe, North Africa, introduced in New Zealand and elsewhere Not observed Present Lolium multiflorum, Lolium rigidum u.a. Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë pampeana

(Iannone & Cabral) Iannone & Schardl

Epichloë festucae × Epichloë typhina complex (from Poa nemoralis) South America Not observed Present Bromus auleticus Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë schardlii

(Ghimire, Rudgers & K.D. Craven) Leuchtm.

Epichloë typhina complex (subsp. poae × subsp. poae) North America Not observed Present Cinna arundinacea Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë schardlii var. pennsylvanica

T. Shymanovich, C.A. Young, N.D. Charlton & S.H. Faeth

Epichloë typhina complex (subsp. poae × subsp. poae) North America Not observed Present Poa alsodes Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë siegelii

(K.D. Craven, Leuchtm. & Schardl) Leuchtm. & Schardl

Epichloë bromicola × Epichloë festucae Europe Not observed Present Schedonorus pratensis (synonyms: Festuca pratensis, Lolium pratense) Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë sinensis

P. Tian, C.J. Li & Z.B. Nan

Epichloë sibirica × Epichloë typhina subsp. poae Asia (Northwest China) Not observed Present Festuca sinensis Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë sinica

(Z.W. Wang, Y.L. Ji & Y. Kang) Leuchtm.

Epichloë bromicola × Epichloë typhina complex Asia Not observed Present Roegneria spp. Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë sinofestucae

(Y.G. Chen, Y.L. Ji & Z.W. Wang) Leuchtm.

Epichloë bromicola × Epichloë typhina complex Asia Not observed Present Festuca parvigluma Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë tembladerae

(Cabral & J.F. White) Iannone & Schardl

Epichloë festucae × Epichloë typhina complex (from Poa nemoralis) North America Not observed Present North America: Festuca arizonica. South America: Bromus auleticus, Bromus setifolius, Festuca argentina, Festuca hieronymi, Festuca magellanica, Festuca superba, Melica stuckertii, Phleum alpinum, Phleum commutatum, Poa huecu, Poa rigidifolia Шаблон:Cite journal
Epichloë uncinata

(W. Gams, Petrini & D. Schmidt) Leuchtm. & Schardl

Epichloë bromicola × Epichloë typhina complex Europe Not observed Present Schedonorus pratensis (synonyms: Festuca pratensis, Lolium pratense) Шаблон:Cite journalA1:G25

Life cycle and growth

Blue-stained large plant cells with smaller hyphae visible between them
Epichloë coenophiala hyphae between tall fescue leaf cells

Epichloë species are specialized to form and maintain systemic, constitutive (long-term) symbioses with plants, often with limited or no disease incurred on the host.[8] The best-studied of these symbionts are associated with the grasses and sedges, in which they infect the leaves and other aerial tissues by growing between the plant cells (endophytic growth) or on the surface above or beneath the cuticle (epiphytic growth). An individual infected plant will generally bear only a single genetic individual clavicipitaceous symbiont, so the plant-fungus system constitutes a genetic unit called a symbiotum (pl. symbiota).

Symptoms and signs of the fungal infection, if manifested at all, only occur on a specific tissue or site of the host tiller, where the fungal stroma or sclerotium emerges. The stroma (pl. stromata) is a mycelial cushion that gives rise first to asexual spores (conidia), then to the sexual fruiting bodies (ascocarps; perithecia). Sclerotia are hard resting structures that later (after incubation on the ground) germinate to form stipate stromata. Depending on the fungus species, the host tissues on which stromata or sclerotia are produced may be young inflorescences and surrounding leaves, individual florets, nodes, or small segments of the leaves. Young stromata are hyaline (colorless), and as they mature they turn dark gray, black, or yellow-orange. Mature stromata eject meiotically derived spores (ascospores), which are ejected into the atmosphere and initiate new plant infections (horizontal transmission). In some cases no stroma or sclerotium is produced, but the fungus infects seeds produced by the infected plant, and is thereby transmitted vertically to the next host generation. Most Epichloë species, and all asexual species, can vertically transmit.

The taxonomic dichotomy is especially interesting in this group of symbionts, because vegetative propagation of fungal mycelium occurs by vertical transmission, i.e., fungal growth into newly developing host tillers (=individual grass plants). Importantly, many Epichloë species infect new grass plants solely by growing into the seeds of their grass hosts, and infecting the growing seedling.[9][10] Manifestation of the sexual state — which only occurs in Epichloë species — causes "choke disease", a condition in which grass inflorescences are engulfed by rapid fungal outgrowth forming a stroma. The fungal stroma suppresses host seed production and culminates in the ejection of meiospores (ascospores) that mediate horizontal (contagious) transmission of the fungus to new plants.[9] So, the two transmission modes exclude each other, although in many grass-Epichloë symbiota the fungus actually displays both transmission modes simultaneously, by choking some tillers and transmitting in seeds produced by unchoked tillers.

While being obligate symbionts in nature, most epichloae are readily culturable in the laboratory on culture media such as potato dextrose agar or a minimal salts broth supplemented with thiamine, sugars or sugar alcohols, and organic nitrogen or ammonium.[11]

Epichloë species are commonly spread by flies of the genus Botanophila. The flies lay their eggs in the growing fungal tissues and the larvae feed on them.[12]

Файл:Stromata Botanophila Flies.jpg
A stroma of Epichloë baconii formed on the grass Agrostis stolonifera, showing eggs, brood chambers and larval feeding tracks of Botanophila flies.

Evolution

The epichloae display a number of central features that suggest a very strong and ancient association with their grass hosts. The symbiosis appears to have existed already during the early grass evolution that has spawned today's pooid grasses. This is suggested by phylogenetic studies indicating a preponderance of codivergence of Epichloë species with the grass hosts they inhabit.[13] Growth of the fungal symbiont is very tightly regulated within its grass host, indicated by a largely unbranched mycelial morphology and remarkable synchrony of grass leaf and hyphal extension of the fungus;[14][15] the latter seems to occur via a mechanism that involves stretch-induced or intercalary elongation of the endophyte's hyphae, a process so far not found in any other fungal species, indicating specialized adaptation of the fungus to the dynamic growth environment inside its host.[16] A complex NADPH oxidase enzyme-based ROS-generating system in Epichloë species is indispensable for maintenance of this growth synchrony. Thus, it has been demonstrated that deletion of genes encoding these enzymes in Epichloë festucae causes severely disordered fungal growth in grass tissues and even death of the grass plant.[17][18]

Molecular phylogenetic evidence demonstrates that asexual Epichloë species are derived either from sexual Epichloë species, or more commonly, are hybrids of two or more progenitor Epichloë species.[19][20]

Bioactive compounds

Файл:N-formylloline.svg
N-formylloline, an insecticidal alkaloid produced in several Epichloë–grass symbiota.

Many Epichloë endophytes produce a diverse range of natural product compounds with biological activities against a broad range of herbivores.[21][22] The purpose of these compounds is as a toxicity or feeding deterrence against insect and mammalian herbivores.[23] Ergoline alkaloids (which are ergot alkaloids, named after the ergot fungus, Claviceps purpurea, a close relative of the epichloae) are characterized by a ring system derived from 4-prenyl tryptophan.[24] Among the most abundant ergot alkaloids in epichloë-symbiotic grasses is ergovaline, comprising an ergoline moiety attached to a bicyclic tripeptide containing the amino acids L-proline, L-alanine, and L-valine. Key genes and enzymes for ergot alkaloid biosynthesis have been identified in epichloae and include dmaW, encoding dimethylallyl-tryptophan synthase and lpsA, a non-ribosomal peptide synthetase.[24]

Another group of epichloë alkaloids are the indole-diterpenoids, such as lolitrem B, which are produced from the activity of several enzymes, including prenyltransferases and various monooxygenases.[25] Both the ergoline and indole-diterpenoid alkaloids have biological activity against mammalian herbivores, and also activity against some insects.[21] Шаблон:Visible anchor is a pyrrolopyrazine alkaloid thought to be biosynthesized from the guanidinium-group-containing amino acid L-arginine, and pyrrolidine-5-carboxylate, a precursor of L-proline,[26][27] and is an insect-feeding deterrent.[27] One gene required for peramine synthesis – Шаблон:Visible anchor – was found by Tanaka et al., 2005.[27] The loline alkaloids[28] are 1-aminopyrrolizidines with an oxygen atom linking bridgehead carbons 2 and 7, and are biosynthesized from the amino acids L-proline and L-homoserine.[29] The lolines have insecticidal and insect-deterrent activities comparable to nicotine.[28] Loline accumulation is strongly induced in young growing tissues[30] or by damage to the plant-fungus symbiotum.[31] Many, but not all, epichloae produce up to three classes of these alkaloids in various combinations and amounts.[21] Recently it has been shown that Epichloë uncinata infection and loline content afford × Festulolium grasses protection from black beetle (Heteronychus arator).[32]

Many species in Epichloë produce biologically active alkaloids, such as ergot alkaloids, indole-diterpenoids (e.g., lolitrem B), loline alkaloids, and the unusual guanidinium alkaloid, peramine.[21]

Ecology

Effects on the grass plant

It has been proposed that vertically transmitted symbionts should evolve to be mutualists since their reproductive fitness is intimately tied to that of their hosts.[33] In fact, some positive effects of epichloae on their host plants include increased growth, drought tolerance, and herbivore and pathogen resistance.[9][34] Resistance against herbivores has been attributed to alkaloids produced by the symbiotic epichloae.[21] Although grass-epichloë symbioses have been widely recognized to be mutualistic in many wild and cultivated grasses, the interactions can be highly variable and sometimes antagonistic, especially under nutrient-poor conditions in the soil.[35]

Ecosystem dynamics

Due to the relatively large number of grass species harboring epichloae and the variety of environments in which they occur, the mechanisms underlying beneficial or antagonistic outcomes of epichloë-grass symbioses are difficult to delineate in natural and also agricultural environments.[9][36] Some studies suggest a relationship between grazing by herbivores and increased epichloë infestation of the grasses on which they feed,[37][38] whereas others indicate a complex interplay between plant species and fungal symbionts in response to herbivory or environmental conditions.[39] The strong anti-herbivore activities of several bioactive compounds produced by the epichloae [21][26] and relatively modest direct effects of the epichloae on plant growth and physiology[40][41] suggest that these compounds play a major role in the persistence of the symbiosis.

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Шаблон:Taxonbar Шаблон:Authority control

  1. 1,0 1,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Fries1849 не указан текст
  2. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Persoon1798 не указан текст
  3. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Tulasne1865 не указан текст
  4. 4,0 4,1 4,2 4,3 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Leuchtmann2014 не указан текст
  5. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок WhiteReddy1998 не указан текст
  6. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Morgan-Jones1982 не указан текст
  7. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Glenn1996 не указан текст
  8. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Spatafora2007 не указан текст
  9. 9,0 9,1 9,2 9,3 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Schardl2004 не указан текст
  10. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Freeman1904 не указан текст
  11. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Blankenship2001 не указан текст
  12. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Goryzynska2010 не указан текст
  13. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Schardl2008 не указан текст
  14. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Tan2001 не указан текст
  15. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Christensen2002 не указан текст
  16. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Christensen2008 не указан текст
  17. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Tanaka2006 не указан текст
  18. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Takemoto2006 не указан текст
  19. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Tsai1994 не указан текст
  20. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Moon2004 не указан текст
  21. 21,0 21,1 21,2 21,3 21,4 21,5 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Bush1997 не указан текст
  22. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Scott2001 не указан текст
  23. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Roberts2005 не указан текст
  24. 24,0 24,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Schardl2006 не указан текст
  25. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Young2006 не указан текст
  26. 26,0 26,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Tanaka2005 не указан текст
  27. 27,0 27,1 27,2 Шаблон:Cite journal
  28. 28,0 28,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Schardl2007 не указан текст
  29. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Blankenship2005 не указан текст
  30. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Zhang2009 не указан текст
  31. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Gonthier2008 не указан текст
  32. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Barker2014 не указан текст
  33. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Ewald1987 не указан текст
  34. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок MalinowskiBelesky2000 не указан текст
  35. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Saikkonen2002 не указан текст
  36. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Saikkonen2006 не указан текст
  37. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Clay2005 не указан текст
  38. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Kohn2007 не указан текст
  39. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Granath2007 не указан текст
  40. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Hahn2008 не указан текст
  41. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Hunt2005 не указан текст