Английская Википедия:Eternal security

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Eternal security, also known as "once saved, always saved", is the belief that from the moment anyone becomes a Christian, they will be saved from hell, and will not lose salvation. Once a person is truly "born of God" or "regenerated" by the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, nothing in heaven or earth "shall be able to separate (them) from the love of God" (Romans 8:39) and thus nothing can reverse the condition of having become a Christian.

Eternal security is a characteristic doctrine of the Southern Baptists, Old Regular Baptists, United Baptists, Landmark Baptists, Missionary Baptists and other historic Baptist traditions. It is also held by various Calvinist groups such as Reformed Christians (Continental Reformed, Congregationalists, Presbyterians, Reformed Anglicans, and Reformed Baptists) due to the doctrine of Perseverance of the saints. It is also affirmed by the Plymouth Brethren, by the "Hyper-Grace" movement in Charismaticism as well as in Free Grace Theology, which is held by many independent fundamental Baptists and by a minority in many other denominations[1][2] (though the Reformed, Plymouth Brethren, Hyper-Grace and Free Grace traditions teach different versions of eternal security). In contrast, conditional security is taught in Catholicism, Lutheranism, Orthodoxy, Pentecostalism and Methodism, as well as some Baptist groups such as the Freewill Baptists, General Baptists and Campbellites. The doctrine of the Anabaptists at the commencement of the Protestant Reformation was eternal security (as witnessed by the Lutheran diet of Augsburg in 1530), though most of the groups currently identified as Anabaptists, such as the Mennonites and Hutterites, embrace the conditional security doctrine.

History

Шаблон:See also

The Reformed view of the perseverance of the saints has been foreshadowed by Augustine, Jovinian and Gottschalk, although not necessarily formulating their views identically.[3][4][5][6] Augustine accepted the doctrine that the Holy Spirit is received at water baptism producing regeneration (salvation), he tried to explain why some regenerated babies continued in the faith while other baptized infants would fall away from the faith and even live immoral lives in debauchery. Both groups possessed the Holy Spirit, so how can one account for the difference? Augustine concluded that God must give a second gift of grace called perseverance. The gift of perseverance is only given to some baptized infants, although it cannot be lost once received.[7][3] Augustine did not believe that his doctrine of perseverance was a new invention, thus Augustine also claimed that Cyprian taught a similar doctrine concerning perseverance.[8][9]

Jovinian (died: 405 AD) was an early church theologian often seen as a proto-Reformer in the 4th century, he believed that a person who was once regenerate could never be subverted by the devil. Thus his teaching has similarities to what Augustine and John Calvin taught, as he limits the impossibility of relapse to the truly regenerate.[5][6][10][11][12]

According to Ken Wilson, a view more similar to Free Grace theology was also in existence during the early church period. Augustine mentioned a group of Christians who held that salvation was achieved without any good deeds done by the individual, excluding repentance and perseverance in good works. These Christians believed that although Christians can experience God's temporal judgement, they would enter heaven regardless of their future actions. Augustine was heavily critical of their views.[13]

Views

Theology affirming the doctrine of eternal security

The traditional Calvinist doctrine teaches that a person is secure in salvation because he or she was predestined by God and therefore guaranteed to persevere, whereas in the Free Grace or non-traditional Calvinist views, a person is secure because at some point in time he or she has believed the Gospel message (Dave Hunt, What Love is This, p. 481).

Reformed Christianity

Файл:John Calvin 2.jpg
John Calvin

Шаблон:See also

In Reformed Christianity, eternal security is a logical consequence of the doctrine of perseverance of the saints, according to which true Christians will persevere in good works and faith. Because faith is God's perfect gift it will inevitably produce perseverance in faith and good works. Thus condemnation to hell because of sin, unbelief, or apostasy is not possible for true Christians.[14] Reformed theology holds that one's continued belief in Christ and good works are evidence of one's saving faith and that if one does not bear this fruit, he/she was never truly regenerated.

Plymouth Brethren

The Plymouth Brethren affirm eternal security as long as a Christian believer continues to have faith in Jesus.[15] In the Plymouth Brethren view "a true believer in Christ will continue in his faith."[15] Those who do not bear good works, as with Judas, never experienced the New Birth.[16] However, a few among the Plymouth Brethren have taught views more similar to Free Grace theology.[17][18]

Free grace theology

Free grace theology says that anyone who believes in Jesus Christ will go to heaven regardless of any future actions—including future sin, unbelief, or apostasy—though Christians who sin or abandon the faith will face God's discipline.[19]

Файл:ZaneHodges.JPG
Zane Hodges was an advocate of Free Grace theology

Free Grace doctrine views the person's character and life after receiving the gift of salvation as independent from the gift itself, or in other words, it asserts that justification (that is, being declared righteous before God on account of Christ) does not necessarily result in sanctification (that is, a progressively more righteous life). Charles Stanley, pastor of Atlanta's megachurch First Baptist and a television evangelist, has written that the doctrine of eternal security of the believer persuaded him years ago to leave his familial Pentecostalism and become a Southern Baptist. He sums up his conviction that salvation is by faith alone in Christ alone when he claims, "Even if a believer for all practical purposes becomes an unbeliever, his salvation is not in jeopardy… believers who lose or abandon their faith will retain their salvation."[20] For example, Stanley writes:

Шаблон:Blockquote

In a chapter entitled "For Those Who Stop Believing", he says, "The Bible clearly teaches that God's love for His people is of such magnitude that even those who walk away from the faith have not the slightest chance of slipping from His hand (p. 74)." Later, Stanley also writes: "You and I are not saved because we have an enduring faith. We are saved because at a moment in time we expressed faith in our enduring Lord" (p. 80).

The doctrine sees the work of salvation as wholly monergistic, which is to say that God alone performs it and man has no part in the process beyond receiving it, and therefore, proponents argue that man cannot undo what they believe God has done. By comparison, in traditional Calvinism, people, who are otherwise unable to follow God, are enabled by regeneration to cooperate with him, and so the Reformed tradition sees itself as mediating between the total monergism of the non-traditional Calvinist view and the synergism of the Wesleyan, Arminian, and Roman Catholic views in which even unregenerate man can choose to cooperate with God in salvation.

Molinism

One of the points of Molinism as taught by Evangelicals is "eternal life", these Molinists believe that the only basis for assurance is the work of Christ and that saving faith always perseveres to the end, however persevarance is a promise instead of a requirement.[21]

Hyper-Grace

The term "Hyper-Grace" has been applied to a doctrine taught by some Charismatic Christians today, such as Joseph Prince. Hyper-Grace teaches a strong form of eternal security, views fellowship with God as unconditional and denies that Christians in eternity will have different degrees of rewards. The view is similar to Free Grace theology, although Free Grace theology is distinguished by allowing the Christian to experience major temporal judgements for their sins.[22][23][24][25][26]

Theology rejecting the doctrine of Eternal Security

Шаблон:Further Catholic, Methodist, Anabaptist, Oriental Orthodox and Eastern Orthodox theology hold to synergism with respect to salvation and view the doctrine of eternal security as heretical, instead teaching that one's one's salvation is conditional on one's continued faith, good works, sanctification, and avoidance of sin.[27]

Catholicism

In Catholicism, Christians do not have eternal security because they can commit a mortal sin.[28] The Church teaches that Christians are subject to the cleansing torment of purgatory before entrance into heaven.

Orthodoxy

The Eastern Orthodox Churches and the Oriental Orthodox Churches teach "the conditional security of the believer".[29] "According to ... all of the Church’s spiritual writers, a man must be humble in order to stay on the right path and attain that for which he seeks."[29]

Lutheranism

The Lutheran Churches teach that true Christian believers can fall away from the faith into apostasy.[30]

Anabaptism

Anabaptists, such as Conservative Mennonites, teach that "Each member of the church has free will and can separate themselves from the body of Christ and live a sinful life, even if they once were bound to Christ."[31]

Classical Arminianism and Wesleyan Arminianism

Шаблон:Main The Arminian view, inclusive of the Classical Arminian position and Wesleyan-Arminian (Methodist) position, opposes any concept of eternal security, holding that a true Christian can fall from grace and be condemned to hell.[32]

See also

Шаблон:Portal

References

Шаблон:Reflist