Английская Википедия:Fifteenth Finance Commission

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use Indian EnglishШаблон:Use dmy dates

Шаблон:Infobox government agency

The FifteenthШаблон:NbspFinance Commission (XV-FC or 15-FC) is an Indian Finance Commission constituted in November 2017 and is to give recommendations for devolution of taxes and other fiscal matters for fiveШаблон:Nbspfiscal years, commencing 2020-04-01. The commission's chairman is Nand Kishore Singh, a senior member of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) since March 2014,[1] with its full-timeШаблон:Nbspmembers being Ajay Narayan Jha, Ashok Lahiri and Anoop Singh. In addition, the commission also has a part-timeШаблон:Nbspmember in Ramesh Chand.

Constitution

The FifteenthШаблон:NbspFinance Commission was constituted by the Government of India—after getting ceremonial approval from President of India—through a notification in The Gazette of India on 2017-11-27.[2][3] Nand Kishore Singh was appointed as the commission's chairman, with its full-time members being Shaktikanta Das and Anoop Singh and its part-time members being Ramesh Chand and Ashok Lahiri.[4][5][6]

The commission held its first meeting on 2017-12-04.[7][8][9][10] Lahiri was elevated to the status of a full-timeШаблон:Nbspmember in May 2018 and was accorded the status of a minister of state.[11][12] Das resigned as member on 11 December 2018,[13] to become the Governor of Reserve Bank of India.[14][15][16]

In July 2019, the commission's term was extended by a month to November 2019, and its terms of reference (ToR) were expanded by the Union Cabinet and asked it to consider whether "adequate, secure and non-lapsable" funds could be provided for funding defence and internal security, and how would a distinct system to fund defence and internal security be operationalised.[17][18]

Members

Profile of members of the FifteenthШаблон:NbspFinance Commission
Шаблон:Abbr Шаблон:Center Шаблон:Center Шаблон:Center Шаблон:Center
Шаблон:Center Шаблон:Center Файл:N. K. Singh - World Economic Forum on India 2012.jpg Шаблон:Center Retired Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officer. Served as Union Revenue Secretary, Union Economic Affairs Secretary and Union Expenditure Secretary. Also served as a member of the erstwhile Planning Commission. Post-retirement, served as a member of the Parliament in the Rajya Sabha (Council of the States) for the state of Bihar. He has been a senior member of the Bharatiya Janata Party since March 2014.[19]
Шаблон:Center Шаблон:Center Шаблон:Center An adjunct professor at Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. Also served as the International Monetary Fund's director of its Regional Office of Asia and the Pacific.
Шаблон:Center Шаблон:Center Former Chief Economic Adviser to the Government of India, director of the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, executive director at the Asian Development Bank, reader at the Delhi School of Economics at the University of Delhi, and the chairperson of Bandhan Bank.
Шаблон:Centre Шаблон:Centre Файл:Ajay Narayan Jha, IAS addressing an event.jpg Retired IAS. Served as the Union Finance Secretary and Union Expenditure Secretary. He was appointed member of the commission in lieu of Das.
Шаблон:Center Шаблон:Center Шаблон:Centre A member of the NITI Aayog, a fellow of National Academy of Agricultural Sciences and Indian Society of Agricultural Economics. Also served as the director of the National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research.
Notes

Extensions

The commission was to submit its Report on the basis of its Terms of Reference (ToR) by 30 October 2019 covering a period of five years commencing from 1 April 2020.[20]

In July 2019, The Union Cabinet chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi approved the extension of the term of Fifteenth Finance Commission up to 30 November 2019 to enable the commission to examine various comparable estimates for financial projections in view of reforms and the new realities to finalise its recommendations for the period 2020–2025, after taking into consideration, its constitution in the backdrop of various major fiscal/budgetary reforms introduced by the Union Government in the past four years like closure of the Planning Commission and its replacement by NITl Aayog, removal of distinction between Non-Plan and Plan expenditure, advancing the budget calendar by one month and passing of the full budget before commencement of the new financial year i.e. on 1 February, introduction of Goods and Services Tax (GST) from July 2017 and New FRBM architecture with debt and fiscal deficit path, and also the task of determining the expenditure and receipts of the Union and State governments based on which the Commission shall make its recommendations is time-consuming, as checks for data consistency across time and data sets become challenging.[21]

In November 2019, the Cabinet approved the 15th Finance Commission to submit first report for the first fiscal year viz. 2020-21 and to extend the tenure of 15th Finance Commission to provide for the presentation of the final report covering FYs 2021–22 to 2025-26 by October 30, 2020. The statement by the government cited reasons such as, due to restrictions imposed by the model code of conduct, the commission completed its visit to states only recently, which had a bearing on the detailed assessments of states requirements, comprehensively examining their implications and aligning them to the requirements of the states and the central government will require additional time, and making a five-year coverage available for the commission beyond 1 April 2021, will help both state and central governments design schemes with medium- to long-term financial perspective and provide adequate time for mid-course evaluation and correction.[22][23]

The first report, consisting of recommendations for the financial year 2020–21, was tabled in Parliament in February 2020.[24]

On 9 November 2020, the Fifteenth Finance Commission (XVFC) led by Chairman Sh N K Singh, submitted its report for the period 2021–22 to 2025–26 to the Hon'ble President of India.[25]

The final report with recommendations for the 2021-26 period was tabled in Parliament on February 1, 2021.[24]  

Aims

The commission was set up to give recommendations for devolution of taxes and other fiscal matters for fiveШаблон:Nbspfiscal years, commencing 1Шаблон:NbspAprilШаблон:Nbsp2020.[2][3] The main tasks of the commission were to "strengthen cooperative federalism, improve the quality of public spending and help protect fiscal stability".[26][27][28] Some newspapers like The Hindu and The Economic Times noted that commission's job was made harder because of the roll-out of goods and service tax (GST) regime in India, as, it had taken certain powers concerning taxation away from the union and the states, and, had given them to the newly formed GST Council.[29][30] The peer-reviewed journal, Economic and Political Weekly, further noted that even after the passage of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003, some states still incur revenue deficits, so, the commission would have to either recommend the disbandment of revenue deficit grants, or, would have to recommend ways for further fiscal consolidation.[31]

The commission's chairman, N. K. Singh, said that the commission would need to define populism, as, the commission's terms of reference (ToR) had a provision for rewarding states which were successful in eliminating or reducing expenditure incurred on populist schemes.[32][33][34][35] Singh added that the commission would need to reappraise the formula of devolution of revenue through the union's taxes, because of a provision in its ToR.[36][37][38] Singh further said, in a lecture to Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad students, that one of the commission's challenges was to find a balance between equity and efficiency,[39] adding that urban and rural local bodies—the constitutionally-mandated third-tier of government in India—needed to be further empowered to stimulate added economic growth.[40]

Chief Economic Adviser to the Government of India, Arvind Subramanian, said that the commission may need to function like the first finance commission because of an increased decentralisation and change in India;[41][42][43] further suggesting to divide the tax devolution system into fourШаблон:NbsppotsШаблон:Snd"return", "redistribution", "risk sharing" and "reward",[41][43] while also saying that tax devolution was no more a north–south issue.[42][43] However, Subramanian's ideas were opposed by Pinaki Chakraborty, a professor at the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, and a member of the FifteenthШаблон:NbspFinance Commission's advisory council, who said that having a division of tax devolution into fourШаблон:Nbsppots would violate "the objective of offsetting revenue disabilities."[44]

The commission's chairperson, N. K. Singh, said in April 2019 that there should be mechanisms through which the Finance Commissions and the GST Council could coordinate to "ensure there are multiplier benefits of a higher growth trajectory".[45]

Demands

At its first interaction with members of parliament (MPs),[46] the commission was asked by some MPs to recommend a plan on compensating states which suffered revenue losses after the roll-out of GST.[47] Some parliamentarians also asked the commission to reassess the criteria of classifying a state as 'backwards'.[48][49]

The president of Nationalist Congress Party, Sharad Pawar, suggested the commission to create a financial buffer against oil prices.[50] Whereas, the chief minister of Bihar and Janata Dal (United) president and convener, Nitish Kumar—in a letter to the commission's chairman, N. K. Singh—asked the commission to revisit the criterion of the target of a maximum 3%Шаблон:Nbspfiscal deficit under the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003, calling it "iniquitous".[50] Singh added, that the state was still waiting for special financial allocations promised to it under the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000.[50]

The commission, on its visit to the state, was asked by the Government of West Bengal to look into restructuring the state's debt, so that it does not become "a permanent drag on the economy of Bengal";[51][52] the state's chief minister and All India Trinamool Congress chairperson, convener and president, Mamata Banerjee, said in a press conference, that "we expect that Finance Commission will consider our demand for debt restructuring or waiver".[51][52] West Bengal government further suggested an alternative devolution formula based on factors like social backwardness, locational complexities and continuation of revenue deficits to the commission.[53]

The commission was asked by several state governments to increase states' share in union's tax devolution from the existing 42Шаблон:Nbsp perШаблон:Nbspcent to 50Шаблон:NbspperШаблон:Nbspcent.[52][54][55][56] Whereas, the Government of India asked the commission to review a 10Шаблон:NbspperШаблон:Nbspcent hike from 32Шаблон:Nbspper cent to 42Шаблон:NbspperШаблон:Nbspcent in tax devolution given to states by the FourteenthШаблон:NbspFinance Commission,[56][57][58] with Union Minister of Finance, Arun Jaitley, saying that "India is a Union of states, the Union also has to survive".[57][59]

Working

Файл:Fifteenth Finance Commission meeting.jpg
A meeting of the FifteenthШаблон:NbspFinance Commission, attended by its chairperson, members, secretary and other staffers; Шаблон:Circa

The commission visited several states, and held meetings with senior political and non-political state government officials of different states;[60][52][54][61] most states also generally submitted a memorandum to the commission outlining their needs and demands to the panel.[60][52][54][61] It also met with representatives of the industry and bankers.[62][63] Das acted as chairman of the commission in state visits without Singh.[60] The commission further met with the representatives of various federal government agencies, including the vice-chairman and chief executive officer of its quasi-autonomous policy think-tank, the NITI Aayog, Rajiv Kumar and Amitabh Kant respectively.[64]

The commission was headquartered in New Delhi at the Jawahar Vyapar Bhawan on Tolstoy Marg and its offices were provided security cover by the Central Industrial Security Force.[65][66]

In July 2019, the commission's term was extended by a month to November 2019, and its terms of reference (ToR) were expanded by the Union Cabinet and asked it to consider whether "adequate, secure and non-lapsable" funds could be provided for funding defence and internal security, and how would a distinct system to fund defence and internal security be operationalised.[17][18]

Advisory bodies

Advisory council

The commission constituted an advisory council "to advise it on matters related to its terms of reference".[67][68][69] The council consisted of president of Forum for Strategic Initiatives and former Chief Economic Adviser to the Government of India, Arvind Virmani; Oxus Research and Investments chairman and a part-time member of the Prime Minister's Economic Advisory Council, Surjit Bhattal; a former deputy director in the IMF, Sanjeev Gupta; a professor at the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, Pinaki Chakraborty; JP Morgan chief India economist, Sajjid Chinoy; and a managing director and India economist and strategist at Credit Suisse, Neelkanth Mishra.[67][68][69]

Chief Economic Adviser to the Government of India, Krishnamurthy Subramanian, was inducted as a member of the advisory council in May 2019.[70][71]

High-level group

Шаблон:Multiple image

Further, the commission also constituted a high-level group to inter alia advise it on "ways and means to" make effective use of the "existing financial resources and to" encourage "the state governments' effort on" fulfilling "well-defined health parameters in India".[72][73] The group comprised All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi director, Randeep Guleria as its convener and Narayana Health City chairman, Devi Shetty; Maharashtra University of Health Sciences vice-chancellor, Deelip Govind Mhaisekar; chairman, managing director and chief cardiac surgeon of Medanta Health City, Naresh Trehan; professor and head of department of cardiothoracic surgery at R. G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Bhabatosh Biswas; and president of Public Health Foundation of India, K. Srinath Reddy as its members.[72][73]

Criticism

South India penalised for population control

Файл:T. M. Thomas Isaac.jpg
Finance minister of Kerala, T. M. Thomas Isaac was a major opponent of the Fifteenth Finance Commission's terms of reference

Politicians—including chief ministers and finance ministers—; retired civil servants; judges; and economists from South Indian states opposed the commission's terms of reference,[74][75][76][77] as, it used the data of [[2011 Census of India|2011Шаблон:Nbspcensus]], instead of the data of 1971Шаблон:Nbspcensus, as previous commissions had.[78][79][80] South Indian states believes that this would dilute the share of South India in the pool of union's tax revenue, because of its progressive measure in population control vis-à-vis the north since 1971.[81][82][83][84][85] Kerala finance minister, T. M. Thomas Issac, proposed a meeting of finance ministers of the tenШаблон:Nbspstates and union territories to discuss the commission's ToR.[86][87][88][89] In response, Subhash Chandra Garg, Union Economic Affairs Secretary, said that the terms of reference were balanced and were "not oneШаблон:Nbspway or the other", adding that according to the second provision of the ToR, states with a good total fertility rate—especially, the ones which had reached the replacement rate (2.1Шаблон:Nbspchildren perШаблон:Nbspwoman)—would be incentivised.[90][91][92] Garg's views were reiterated by the nation's finance minister and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Rajya Sabha leader, Arun Jaitley, who—in a Facebook post—said that the row over the commission's terms of reference was "needless" and could not have been "further from the truth".[93][94] Prime minister and BJP Lok Sabha leader, Narendra Modi, said that vested interests were behind the allegations that the commission's terms of reference being biased against certain states and union territories and called such allegations "baseless".[95][96]

Finance ministers of the states of Karnataka, Kerala and Andhra Pradesh and the finance minister of the Union Territory of Puducherry met at a conclave in Kerala's capital, Thiruvananthapuram, in April 2018 and collectively denounced the commission's terms of reference, calling them to be in contradiction with the principles of federalism.[97][98] FiveШаблон:Nbspstate and twoШаблон:Nbspunion territory finance ministers met in Andhra Pradesh's capital, Amaravati, and drafted a memorandum to the president, Ram Nath Kovind, seeking changes in the commission's terms of reference.[99][100] The group of finance ministers eventually met the president on 2018-05-17.[101]

In July 2018, the vice president, Venkaiah Naidu—in his capacity as the chairman of Rajya Sabha—asked the commission's chairman, N. K. Singh, if certain states would be penalised with the use of 2011Шаблон:Nbspcensus and was ensured by Singh that performing and progressive states would not be penalised by the commission.[102]

Classification of Delhi

Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) convener and the chief minister of Delhi, Arvind Kejriwal, criticised the commission for treating the National Capital Territory of Delhi neither as a state nor as a union territory (UT), saying that the Delhi government deserved a Шаблон:INRConvert grant from the union government if it qualified as a UT in the commission's eyes,[103][104][105] else it deserved more devolution of union government's tax revenue as a state.[103][104][105] Kejriwal added that the Government of Delhi would move to the Supreme Court of India on the matter.[103][104][105] AAP national executive and political affairs committee member and Delhi deputy chief minister and finance minister, Manish Sisodia said that the terms of reference of the commission were "unfair";[106][107] Sisodia was a part of the group of state and union territory finance ministers who met with the president.[101] In addition, AAP national joint secretary, Akshay Marathe said—citing Central Board of Direct Taxes figures—that the National Capital Territory of Delhi contributed as much as Шаблон:INRConvert—or 13Шаблон:NbspperШаблон:Nbspcent—of the nation's direct tax revenue and got around Шаблон:INRConvert from the Government of India in return.[108]

Others

Jammu and Kashmir finance minister, economist and Jammu and Kashmir Peoples Democratic Party member, Haseeb Drabu, said, in an editorial in Livemint commented that the commission's ToR were outdated, and needed to be redrafted "to make the 15thШаблон:NbspFinance Commission a "secondШаблон:Nbspgeneration" commission".[109]

References

  1. Шаблон:Cite web
  2. 2,0 2,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  3. 3,0 3,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  4. Шаблон:Cite news
  5. Шаблон:Cite news
  6. Шаблон:Cite web
  7. Шаблон:Cite web
  8. Шаблон:Cite web
  9. Шаблон:Cite web
  10. Шаблон:Cite web
  11. Шаблон:Cite news
  12. Шаблон:Cite web
  13. Шаблон:Cite web
  14. Шаблон:Cite web
  15. Шаблон:Cite news
  16. Шаблон:Cite news
  17. 17,0 17,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  18. 18,0 18,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  19. Шаблон:Cite web
  20. Шаблон:Cite web
  21. Шаблон:Cite web
  22. Шаблон:Cite news
  23. Шаблон:Cite news
  24. 24,0 24,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  25. Шаблон:Cite web
  26. Шаблон:Cite news
  27. Шаблон:Cite web
  28. Шаблон:Cite news
  29. Шаблон:Cite news
  30. Шаблон:Cite news
  31. Шаблон:Cite journal
  32. Шаблон:Cite news
  33. Шаблон:Cite news
  34. Шаблон:Cite news
  35. Шаблон:Cite news
  36. Шаблон:Cite news
  37. Шаблон:Cite news
  38. Шаблон:Cite news
  39. Шаблон:Cite news
  40. Шаблон:Cite news
  41. 41,0 41,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  42. 42,0 42,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  43. 43,0 43,1 43,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  44. Шаблон:Cite news
  45. Шаблон:Cite web
  46. Шаблон:Cite news
  47. Шаблон:Cite news
  48. Шаблон:Cite web
  49. Шаблон:Cite web
  50. 50,0 50,1 50,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  51. 51,0 51,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  52. 52,0 52,1 52,2 52,3 52,4 Шаблон:Cite news
  53. Шаблон:Cite news
  54. 54,0 54,1 54,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  55. Шаблон:Cite news
  56. 56,0 56,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  57. 57,0 57,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  58. Шаблон:Cite news
  59. Шаблон:Cite news
  60. 60,0 60,1 60,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  61. 61,0 61,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  62. Шаблон:Cite news
  63. Шаблон:Cite web
  64. Шаблон:Cite web
  65. Шаблон:Cite news
  66. Шаблон:Cite web
  67. 67,0 67,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  68. 68,0 68,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  69. 69,0 69,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  70. Шаблон:Cite news
  71. Шаблон:Cite web
  72. 72,0 72,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  73. 73,0 73,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  74. Шаблон:Cite news
  75. Шаблон:Cite news
  76. Шаблон:Cite web
  77. Шаблон:Cite news
  78. Шаблон:Cite news
  79. Шаблон:Cite news
  80. Шаблон:Cite web
  81. Шаблон:Cite news
  82. Шаблон:Cite news
  83. Шаблон:Cite news
  84. Шаблон:Cite web
  85. Шаблон:Cite news
  86. Шаблон:Cite news
  87. Шаблон:Cite news
  88. Шаблон:Cite news
  89. Шаблон:Cite news
  90. Шаблон:Cite news
  91. Шаблон:Cite news
  92. Шаблон:Cite news
  93. Шаблон:Cite news
  94. Шаблон:Cite news
  95. Шаблон:Cite news
  96. Шаблон:Cite news
  97. Шаблон:Cite news
  98. Шаблон:Cite news
  99. Шаблон:Cite news
  100. Шаблон:Cite news
  101. 101,0 101,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  102. Шаблон:Cite news
  103. 103,0 103,1 103,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  104. 104,0 104,1 104,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  105. 105,0 105,1 105,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  106. Шаблон:Cite news
  107. Шаблон:Cite news
  108. Шаблон:Cite news
  109. Шаблон:Cite news

External links

Шаблон:Ministry of Finance (India) Шаблон:Finance Commission of India