Английская Википедия:G 1/13

Содержание

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

G 1/13
Файл:Scale of justice.png Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office
Issued 25 November 2014
Board composition
Chairman: Wim Van der Eijk Members: K. Garnett, A. Klein, R. Moufang, R. Murphy, U. Oswald, G. Weiss
Headword
Fischer-Tropsch Catalysts/SASOL TECHNOLOGY II

G 1/13 is a decision issued on 25 November 2014 by the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO), holding that in opposition proceedings a retroactive effect of a restoration of a company must be recognised by the EPO. In other words, a restoration of a company has retroactive effect before the EPO when it has such retroactive effect under national law.

Questions referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal

The referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal lies from an interlocutory decision T 22/09 from Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.07. The referred questions were:

Answers to the referred questions

The Enlarged Board of Appeal answered these questions as follows:

Further reading

• Шаблон:EPO Case law book 2022: "Opposition procedure - entitlement to file an opposition - general"
• Шаблон:EPO Case law book 2022: "Opposition procedure - entitlement to file an opposition - examination at any state in the proceedings of entitlement to oppose"
• Шаблон:EPO Case law book 2022: "Procedural status of the parties - parties to appeal proceedings"
• Шаблон:EPO Case law book 2022: "Procedural status of the parties - existence of a company"
• Шаблон:EPO Case law book 2022: "Referral by a board of appeal - general"
• Шаблон:EPO Case law book 2022: "Referral by a board of appeal - point of law of fundamental importance"

External links

• G 0001/13 () of 25.11.2014
• Decision G 1/13, Official Journal EPO 4/2015, A42 (Шаблон:ECLI)
• Decision T 22/09 (Party status/Fischer-Tropsch Catalysts/SASOL TECHNOLOGY) of 21 June 2013 (referring decision)