Английская Википедия:Galileo project
Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:About Шаблон:Good article
| Manager | Date |
|---|---|
| John R. Casani | October 1977 – February 1988 |
| Dick Spehalski | February 1988 – March 1990 |
| Bill O'Neil | March 1990 – December 1997 |
| Bob Mitchell | December 1997 – June 1998 |
| Jim Erickson | June 1998 – January 2001 |
| Eilene Theilig | January 2001 – August 2003 |
| Claudia Alexander | August 2003 – September 2003 |
Galileo was an American robotic space program that studied the planet Jupiter and its moons, as well as several other Solar System bodies. Named after the Italian astronomer Galileo Galilei, the Galileo spacecraft consisted of an orbiter and an entry probe. It was delivered into Earth orbit on October 18, 1989 by Шаблон:OV on the STS-34 mission, and arrived at Jupiter on December 7, 1995, after gravitational assist flybys of Venus and Earth, and became the first spacecraft to orbit Jupiter. It launched the first probe into Jupiter, directly measuring its atmosphere. Despite suffering major antenna problems, Galileo achieved the first asteroid flyby, of 951 Gaspra, and discovered the first asteroid moon, Dactyl, around 243 Ida. In 1994, Galileo observed Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9's collision with Jupiter.
Jupiter's atmospheric composition and ammonia clouds were recorded. Io's volcanism and plasma interactions with Jupiter's atmosphere were also recorded. The data Galileo collected supported the theory of a liquid ocean under the icy surface of Europa, and there were indications of similar liquid-saltwater layers under the surfaces of Ganymede and Callisto. Ganymede was shown to possess a magnetic field and the spacecraft found new evidence for exospheres around Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto. Galileo also discovered that Jupiter's faint ring system consists of dust from impacts on the four small inner moons. The extent and structure of Jupiter's magnetosphere was also mapped.
On September 20, 2003, after 14 years in space and 8 years in the Jovian system, GalileoШаблон:'s mission was terminated by sending it into Jupiter's atmosphere at a speed of over Шаблон:Convert, completely eliminating the possibility of contaminating local moons with terrestrial bacteria.
Background
Jupiter is the largest planet in the Solar System, with more than twice the mass of all the other planets combined.[1] Consideration of sending a probe to Jupiter began as early as 1959, when the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) developed four mission concepts:
- Deep space flights would fly through interplanetary space;
- Flyby missions would fly past planets, and could visit multiple planets on a single mission;
- Orbiter missions would place a probe in orbit around a planet for detailed study;
- Planetary entry and lander missions, which would explore the atmosphere and surface.Шаблон:Sfn
Two missions to Jupiter, Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11, were approved in 1969, with NASA's Ames Research Center given responsibility for planning the missions.Шаблон:Sfn Pioneer 10 was launched in March 1972 and passed within Шаблон:Convert of Jupiter in December 1973. It was followed by Pioneer 11, which was launched in April 1973, and passed within Шаблон:Convert of Jupiter in December 1974, before heading on to an encounter with Saturn.Шаблон:Sfn They were followed by the more advanced Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 spacecraft, which were launched on 5 September and 20 August 1977 respectively, and reached Jupiter in March and July 1979.[2]
Planning
Initiation
Following the approval of the Voyager missions, NASA's Scientific Advisory Group (SAG) for Outer Solar System Missions considered the requirements for Jupiter orbiters and atmospheric probes. It noted that the technology to build a heat shield for an atmospheric probe did not yet exist, and indeed facilities to test one under the conditions found on Jupiter would not be available until 1980. There was also concern about the effects of radiation on spacecraft components, which would be better understood after Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11 had conducted their flybys. These indicated that the effects were less severe than feared.Шаблон:Sfn NASA management designated the JPL as the lead center for the Jupiter Orbiter Probe (JOP) Project.Шаблон:Sfn John R. Casani, who had headed the Mariner and Voyager projects, became the first project manager.[3] The JOP would be the fifth spacecraft to visit Jupiter, but the first to orbit it, and the probe would be the first to enter its atmosphere.Шаблон:Sfn
An important decision made at this time by Ames and the JPL was to use a Mariner program spacecraft like that used for Voyager for the Jupiter orbiter, rather than a Pioneer. Pioneer was stabilized by spinning the spacecraft at 60 rpm, which gave a 360-degree view of the surroundings, and did not require an attitude control system. By contrast, Mariner had an attitude control system with three gyroscopes and two sets of six nitrogen jet thrusters. Attitude was determined with reference to the Sun and Canopus, which were monitored with two primary and four secondary sensors. There was also an inertial reference unit and an accelerometer. This allowed it to take high resolution images, but the functionality came at a cost of increased weight. A Mariner weighed Шаблон:Convert compared to just Шаблон:Convert for a Pioneer.Шаблон:Sfn
The Voyager spacecraft had been launched by Titan IIIE rockets with a Centaur upper stage, but Titan was retired afterwards. In the late 1970s, NASA was focused on the development of the reusable Space Shuttle, which was expected to make expendable rockets obsolete.[4] In late 1975, NASA decreed that all future planetary missions would be launched by the Space Shuttle. The JOP would be the first to do so.Шаблон:Sfn The Space Shuttle was supposed to have the services of a space tug to launch payloads requiring something more than a low Earth orbit, but this was never approved. The United States Air Force then developed the solid-fueled Interim Upper Stage (IUS), later renamed the Inertial Upper Stage (with the same acronym), for the purpose.Шаблон:Sfn
The IUS was not powerful enough to launch a payload to Jupiter without resorting to using a series of gravitational slingshot maneuvers around planets to garner additional speed, something most engineers regarded as inelegant, and which planetary scientists at JPL disliked because it meant that the mission would take months or years longer to reach Jupiter.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn Longer travel times meant that components would age and the onboard power supply and propellant would be depleted. Some of the gravity assist options also meant flying closer to the Sun, which would induce thermal stresses.Шаблон:Sfn However, the IUS was constructed in a modular fashion, with two stages, a large one with Шаблон:Convert of propellant, and a smaller one with Шаблон:Convert. This was sufficient for most satellites. It could also be configured with two large stages to launch multiple satellites.Шаблон:Sfn A configuration with three stages, two large and one small, would be enough for a planetary mission, so NASA contracted with Boeing for the development of a three-stage IUS.Шаблон:Sfn
It was estimated that the JOP would cost $634 million (equivalent to $Шаблон:Inflation million in Шаблон:Inflation/year),Шаблон:Inflation/fn and it had to compete for fiscal year 1978 funding with the Space Shuttle and the Hubble Space Telescope. A successful lobbying campaign secured funding for both JOP and Hubble over the objections of Senator William Proxmire, the chairman of the Independent Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee. The United States Congress approved funding for the Jupiter Orbiter Probe on July 12, 1977, and JOP officially commenced on October 1, 1977, the start of the fiscal year.Шаблон:Sfn Casani solicited suggestions for a more inspirational name for the project, and the most votes went to "Galileo" after Galileo Galilei, the first person to view Jupiter through a telescope, and the discoverer of what is now known as the Galilean moons in 1610. It was noted that the name was also that of a spacecraft in the Star Trek television show. The new name was adopted in February 1978.Шаблон:Sfn
Preparation
Early plans called for a launch on Шаблон:OV on STS-23 sometime between 2 and 12 January 1982,[5] this being the launch window when Earth, Jupiter and Mars were aligned in such a way as to permit Mars to be used for a gravitational slingshot maneuver. To enhance reliability and reduce costs, the Galileo project's engineers decided to switch from a pressurized atmospheric entry probe to a vented one. This added Шаблон:Convert to its weight. Another Шаблон:Convert was added in structural changes to improve reliability. This would require additional fuel in the IUS.Шаблон:Sfn But the three-stage IUS was itself overweight, by about Шаблон:Convert.[6]
Lifting Galileo and the IUS would require the use of the special lightweight version of the Space Shuttle external tank, the Space Shuttle orbiter stripped of all non-essential equipment, and the Space Shuttle main engines (SSME) running at full power—109 percent of their rated power level.Шаблон:Sfn Running at this power level necessitated the development of a more elaborate engine cooling system.Шаблон:Sfn By 1980, delays in the Space Shuttle program pushed the launch date for Galileo back to 1984.[7] While a Mars slingshot was still possible in 1984, it would no longer be sufficient.Шаблон:Sfn
NASA decided to split Galileo into two separate spacecraft, an atmospheric probe and a Jupiter orbiter, with the orbiter launched in February 1984 and the probe following a month later. The orbiter would be in orbit around Jupiter when the probe arrived, allowing it to perform its role as a relay. Separating the two spacecraft required a second mission and a second carrier to be built for the probe, and was estimated to cost an additional $50 million (equivalent to $Шаблон:Inflation million in Шаблон:Inflation/year), but NASA hoped to be able to recoup some of this through separate completive bidding on the two. The problem was that while the atmospheric probe was light enough to launch with the two-stage IUS, the Jupiter orbiter was too heavy to do so, even with a gravity assist from Mars, so the three-stage IUS was still required.[8]Шаблон:Sfn
By late 1980, the price tag for the IUS had risen to $506 million (equivalent to $Шаблон:Inflation million in Шаблон:Inflation/year).Шаблон:Sfn The USAF could absorb this cost overrun (and indeed had anticipated that it might cost far more), but NASA was faced with a quote of $179 million (equivalent to $Шаблон:Inflation million in Шаблон:Inflation/year) for the development of the three-stage version,Шаблон:Sfn which was $100 million (equivalent to $Шаблон:Inflation million in Шаблон:Inflation/year) more than it had budgeted for.Шаблон:Sfn At a press conference on January 15, 1981, NASA Administrator Robert A. Frosch announced that NASA was withdrawing support for the three-stage IUS, and going with a Centaur G Prime upper stage because "no other alternative upper stage is available on a reasonable schedule or with comparable costs."Шаблон:Sfn
Centaur provided many advantages over the IUS. The main one was that it was far more powerful. The probe and orbiter could be recombined, and the probe could be delivered directly to Jupiter in two years' flight time.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn The second was that despite this, it was also more gentle than the IUS, as it had lower thrust, thereby minimizing the chance of damage to the payload. Thirdly, unlike solid-fuel rockets which burned to completion once ignited, Centaur could be switched off and on again. This gave it flexibility, which increased the chances of a successful mission, and permitted options like asteroid flybys. Centaur was proven and reliable, whereas the IUS had not yet flown. The only concern was about safety; solid-fuel rockets were considered safer than liquid-fuel ones, especially ones containing liquid hydrogen.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn NASA engineers estimated that additional safety features might take up to five years to develop and cost up to $100 million (equivalent to $Шаблон:Inflation million in Шаблон:Inflation/year.Шаблон:Sfn[8]
In February 1981, the JPL learned that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) was planning major cuts to NASA's budget, and was considering cancelling Galileo. What saved it from cancellation was the intervention of the USAF. The JPL had considerable experience with autonomous spacecraft.Шаблон:Sfn This was a necessity for deep space probes, since a signal from Earth takes anything from 35 to 52 minutes to reach Jupiter.[9] The USAF was interested in providing this capability for its satellites so that they would be able to determine their attitude using onboard systems rather than relying on ground stations, which were not "hardened" against nuclear attacks,Шаблон:Sfn and could take evasive action in the face of anti-satellite weapons.Шаблон:Sfn It was also interested in the manner in which the JPL was designing Galileo to withstand the intense radiation of the magnetosphere of Jupiter. On February 6, 1981 Strom Thurmond, the President pro tempore of the Senate, wrote directly to David Stockman, the Director of the OMB, arguing that Galileo was vital to the nation's defense.Шаблон:Sfn
In December 1984 Casani proposed adding a flyby of asteroid 29 Amphitrite to the Galileo mission. In plotting a course to Jupiter, the engineers were concerned to avoid asteroids. Little was known about them at the time, and it was suspected that they could be surrounded by dust particles. Flying through a dust cloud could damage the spacecraft's optics and possibly the spacecraft itself. To be safe, the JPL wanted to avoid asteroids by at least Шаблон:Convert. Most of the asteroids in the vicinity of the flight path like 1219 Britta and 1972 Yi Xing were only a few kilometers in diameter and posed little value when observed from a safe distance, but 29 Amphitrite was one of the largest of the asteroids, and a flyby at even Шаблон:Convert could have great scientific value. The flyby would delay the spacecraft's arrival in Jupiter orbit from August 29 to December 10, 1988, and the expenditure of propellant would reduce the number of orbits of Jupiter from eleven to ten. This was expected to add $20 to $25 million (equivalent to $Шаблон:Inflation to $Шаблон:Inflation million in Шаблон:Inflation/year) to the cost of the Galileo project. The 29 Amphitrite flyby was approved by NASA Administrator James M. Beggs on December 6, 1984.[10]Шаблон:Sfn
During testing, contamination was discovered in the system of metal slip rings and brushes used to transmit electrical signals around the spacecraft, and they were returned to be refabricated. The problem was traced back to a chlorofluorocarbon used to clean parts after soldering. It had been absorbed, and was then released in a vacuum environment. It mixed with debris generated as the brushes wore down, and caused intermittent problems with electrical signal transmission. Problems were also detected in the performance of memory devices in an electromagnetic radiation environment. The components were replaced, but then a read disturb problem arose, in which reads from one memory location disturbed those in adjacent locations. This was found to have been caused by the changes made to make the components less sensitive to electromagnetic radiation. Each component had to be removed, retested, and replaced. All of the spacecraft components and spare parts received a minimum of 2,000 hours of testing. The spacecraft was expected to last for at least five years—long enough to reach Jupiter and perform its mission. On December 19, 1985, it departed the JPL in Pasadena, California, on the first leg of its journey, a road trip to the Kennedy Space Center in Florida.Шаблон:Sfn The Galileo mission was scheduled for STS-61-G on May 20, 1986, using Шаблон:OV.Шаблон:Sfn[11]
Reconsideration
On January 28, 1986, Шаблон:OV lifted off on the STS-51-L mission. A failure of the solid rocket booster 73 seconds into flight tore the spacecraft apart, resulting in the deaths of all seven crew members.Шаблон:Sfn The Space Shuttle Challenger disaster was America's worst space disaster up to that time.Шаблон:Sfn The immediate impact on the Galileo project was that the May launch date could not be met because the Space Shuttles were grounded while the cause of the disaster was investigated. When they did fly again, Galileo would have to compete with high priority Department of Defense launches, the tracking and data relay satellite system, and the Hubble Space Telescope. By April 1986, it was expected that the Space Shuttles would not fly again before July 1987 at the earliest, and Galileo could not be launched before December 1987.Шаблон:Sfn
Шаблон:Legend2Шаблон:·Шаблон:Legend2Шаблон:·Шаблон:Legend2Шаблон:·Шаблон:Legend2Шаблон:·Шаблон:Legend2Шаблон:·Шаблон:Legend2
The Rogers Commission handed down its report on June 6, 1986.Шаблон:Sfn It was critical of NASA's safety protocols and risk management.Шаблон:Sfn In particular, it noted the hazards of Centaur-G stage.Шаблон:Sfn On June 19, 1986, NASA Administrator James C. Fletcher canceled the Shuttle-Centaur project.Шаблон:Sfn This was only partly due to the NASA management's increased aversion to risk in the wake of the Challenger disaster; NASA management also considered the money and manpower required to get the Space Shuttle flying again, and decided that there was insufficient resources to resolve lingering issues with Shuttle-Centaur as well.Шаблон:Sfn The changes to the Space Shuttle proved more extensive than anticipated, and in April 1987 the JPL was informed that Galileo could not be launched before October 1989.Шаблон:Sfn The Galileo spacecraft was shipped back to the JPL.Шаблон:Sfn
Without Centaur, it looked like there would not be any means of getting the spacecraft to Jupiter, and it looked for a time like its next trip would be to the Smithsonian Institution.[12] The cost of keeping it ready to fly in space was reckoned at $40 to $50 million per year (equivalent to $Шаблон:Inflation to $Шаблон:Inflation million in Шаблон:Inflation/year), and the estimated cost of the whole project had blown out to $1.4 billion (equivalent to $Шаблон:Inflation billion in Шаблон:Inflation/year).[13]
At the JPL, the Galileo Mission Design Manager and Navigation Team Chief, Robert Mitchell, assembled a team that consisted of Dennis Byrnes, Louis D'Amario, Roger Diehl and himself, to see if they could find a trajectory that would get Galileo to Jupiter using only a two-stage IUS. Roger Diehl came up with the idea of using a series of gravitational slingshots to provide the additional velocity required to reach Jupiter. This would require Galileo to fly past Venus, and then past Earth twice. This was referred to as the Venus-Earth-Earth Gravity Assist (VEEGA) trajectory.Шаблон:Sfn
The reason no one had thought of it before was that the second encounter with Earth would not give the spacecraft any extra energy. Diehl realised that this was not necessary; the second encounter with Earth would merely change its direction to put it on a course for Jupiter.Шаблон:Sfn In addition to increasing the flight time to six years, the VEEGA trajectory had an additional drawback from the point of view of NASA Deep Space Network (DSN): Galileo would arrive at Jupiter when it was at the maximum range from Earth, and maximum range meant minimum signal strength. Furthermore, it would have a southerly declination of −23 degrees instead of a northerly one of +18 degrees, so the main tracking station would be the Canberra Deep Space Communication Complex in Australia,Шаблон:Sfn with its two 34-meter and one 70-meter antennae. This was supplemented the 64-meter antenna at the Parkes Observatory.Шаблон:Sfn
Initially it was thought that the VEEGA trajectory demanded a November launch, but D'Amario and Byrnes calculated that a mid-course correction between Venus and Earth would permit an October launch as well.Шаблон:Sfn Taking such a roundabout route meant that Galileo would require sixty months to reach Jupiter instead of just thirty, but it would get there.[12] Consideration was given to using the USAF's Titan IV launch system with its Centaur G Prime upper stage.Шаблон:Sfn This was retained as a backup for a time, but in November 1988 the USAF informed NASA that it could not provide a Titan IV in time for the May 1991 launch opportunity, owing to the backlog of high priority Department of Defense missions.Шаблон:Sfn However, the USAF supplied IUS-19, which had originally been earmarked for a Department of Defense mission, for use by the Galileo mission.Шаблон:Sfn
As the launch date of Galileo neared, anti-nuclear groups, concerned over what they perceived as an unacceptable risk to the public's safety from the plutonium in the GalileoШаблон:'s radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) and General Purpose Heat Source (GPHS) modules, sought a court injunction prohibiting GalileoШаблон:'s launch.[14] RTGs were necessary for deep space probes because they had to fly distances from the Sun that made the use of solar energy impractical.[15] They had been used for years in planetary exploration without mishap: the Department of Defense's Lincoln Experimental Satellites 8/9 had 7 percent more plutonium on board than Galileo, and the two Voyager spacecraft each carried 80 percent of plutonium.[16] By 1989, plutonium had been used in 22 spacecraft.[17]
Activists remembered the crash of the Soviet Union's nuclear-powered Kosmos 954 satellite in Canada in 1978, and the Challenger disaster, while it did not involve nuclear fuel raised public awareness about spacecraft failures. No RTGs had ever done a non-orbital swing past the Earth at close range and high speed, as GalileoШаблон:'s VEEGA trajectory required it to do. This created a novel mission failure modality that might plausibly have entailed dispersal of GalileoШаблон:'s plutonium in the Earth's atmosphere. Scientist Carl Sagan, a strong supporter of the Galileo mission, wrote that "there is nothing absurd about either side of this argument."[15]
Before the Challenger disaster, the JPL had conducted shock tests on the RTGs that indicated that they could withstand a pressure of Шаблон:Convert without a failure, which would have been sufficient to withstand an explosion on the launch pad. The possibility of adding additional shielding was considered but rejected, mainly because it would add an unacceptable amount of extra weight.Шаблон:Sfn After the Challenger disaster, NASA commissioned a study on the possible effects if such an event occurred with Galileo on board. Angus McRonald, a JPL engineer, concluded that what would happen would depend on the altitude at which the Space Shuttle broke up. If the Galileo/IUS combination fell free of the orbiter at Шаблон:Convert, the RTGs would fall to Earth without melting, and drop into the Atlantic Ocean about Шаблон:Convert from the Florida coast. On the other hand, if the orbiter broke up at an altitude of Шаблон:Convert it would be traveling at Шаблон:Convert and the RTG cases and GPHS modules would melt before falling into the Atlantic Шаблон:Convert off the Florida coast.[18][19] NASA concluded that the chance of such a disaster was 1 in 2,500, although anti-nuclear groups thought it might be as high as 1 in 430.[14]Шаблон:Sfn The risk to an individual would be 1 in 100 million, about two orders of magnitude less than the danger of being killed by lightning.Шаблон:Sfn The prospect of an inadvertent re-entry into the atmosphere during the VEEGA maneuvers was reckoned at less than one in two million,[16] but an accident might have released up to Шаблон:Convert.Шаблон:Sfn
Launch
STS-34 was the mission designated to launch Galileo, scheduled for October 12, 1989, in the Space Shuttle Atlantis.[20] The spacecraft was delivered to the Kennedy Space Center by a high-speed truck convoy that departed the JPL in the middle of the night. There were fears that the spacecraft might be hijacked by anti-nuclear activists or terrorists, so the route was kept secret from the drivers, who drove through the night and the following day and only stopped for food and fuel.Шаблон:Sfn
Last minute efforts by three environmental groups to halt the launch were rejected by the District of Columbia Circuit. In a concurring opinion, Chief Justice Patricia Wald wrote that while the legal challenge was not frivolous, there was no evidence that NASA had acted improperly in compiling the mission's environmental assessment, and the appeal was therefore denied on technical grounds. On October 16, eight protesters were arrested for trespassing at the Kennedy Space Center; three were jailed and the remaining five released.[21]
The launch was twice delayed; first by a faulty main engine controller that forced a postponement to October 17, and then by inclement weather, which necessitated a postponement to the following day,[22] but this was not a concern since the launch window extended until November 21.[21] Atlantis finally lifted off at 16:53:40 UTC on October 18, and went into a Шаблон:Convert orbit.[22] Galileo was successfully deployed at 00:15 UTC on October 19.Шаблон:Sfn Following the IUS burn, the Galileo spacecraft adopted its configuration for solo flight, and separated from the IUS at 01:06:53 UTC on October 19.[23] The launch was perfect, and Galileo was soon headed towards Venus at over Шаблон:Convert.[24] Atlantis returned to Earth safely on October 23.[22]
Venus encounter
The encounter with Venus on February 9 was in view of the DSN's Canberra and Madrid Deep Space Communications Complexes.Шаблон:Sfn Galileo flew by at 05:58:48 UTC on February 10, 1990, at a range of Шаблон:Convert.[23] Doppler data collected by the DSN allowed the JPL to verify that the gravitational assist maneuver had been successful, and the spacecraft had obtained the expected Шаблон:Convert increase in speed. Unfortunately, three hours into the flyby, the tracking station at Goldstone had to be shut down due to high winds, and Doppler data was lost.Шаблон:Sfn
Because Venus was much closer to the Sun than the spacecraft had been designed to operate, great care was taken to avoid thermal damage. In particular, the X-band high gain antenna (HGA) was not deployed, but was kept folded up like an umbrella and pointed away from the Sun to keep it shaded and cool. This meant that the two small S-band low gain antennae (LGA) had to be used instead.Шаблон:Sfn They had a maximum bandwidth of 1,200 bits per second compared to the 134,000 bit/s expected from the HGA. As the spacecraft moved further from Earth, it also necessitated the use of the DSN's Шаблон:Convert dishes, to the detriment of other users, who had lower priority than Galileo. Even so, the downlink telemetry rate fell to 40 bit/s within a few days of the Venus flyby, and by March it was down to just 10 bit/s.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn
Venus had been the focus of many automated flybys, probes, balloons and landers, most recently the Magellan spacecraft, and Galileo had not been designed with Venus in mind. Nonetheless, there were useful observations that it could make, as it carried some instruments that had never flown on spacecraft to Venus, such as the near-infrared mapping spectrometer (NIMS).Шаблон:Sfn Telescopic observations of Venus had revealed that there were certain parts of the infrared spectrum that the greenhouse gases in the Venusian atmosphere did not block, making them transparent on these wavelengths. This permitted the NIMS to both view the clouds and obtain maps of the equatorial and mid-latitudes of the night side of Venus with three to six times the resolution of Earth-based telescopes.Шаблон:Sfn The ultraviolet spectrometer (UVS) was also deployed to observe the Venusian clouds and their motions.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn
Another set of observations was conducted using Galileo's energetic particles detector (EPD) when Galileo moved through the bow shock caused by Venus's interaction with the solar wind. Earth's strong magnetic field causes this to occur at around Шаблон:Convert from its center, but Venus's weak magnetic field causes the bow wave to occur nearly on the surface, so the solar wind interacts with the atmosphere.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn A search for lightning on Venus was conducted using the plasma wave detector, which noted nine bursts which were likely caused by lightning, but efforts to capture an image of lightning with the solid-state imaging system (SSI) were unsuccessful.Шаблон:Sfn Шаблон:-
Earth encounters
Flybys
Galileo made two small course corrections on 9 to 12 April and 11 to 12 May 1990.Шаблон:Sfn The spacecraft flew by Earth twice; the first time at a range of Шаблон:Convert at 20:34:34 UTC on December 8, 1990.[23] This was only Шаблон:Convert higher than predicted, and the time of the closest approach was only a second off. It was the first time that a deep space probe had returned to Earth from interplanetary space.Шаблон:Sfn A second flyby of Earth was at Шаблон:Convert at 15:09:25 UTC on December 8, 1992.[23] This time the spacecraft passed within a kilometer of its aiming point over the South Atlantic. This was so accurate that a scheduled course correction was cancelled, thereby saving Шаблон:Convert of propellant.Шаблон:Sfn
Earth's bow shock and the solar wind
The opportunity was taken to conduct a series of experiments. A study of Earth's bow shock was conducted as Galileo passed by Earth's day side. The solar wind travels at Шаблон:Convert and is deflected by Earth's magnetic field, creating a magnetic tail on Earth's dark side over a thousand times the radius of the planet. Observations were made by Galileo when it passed through the magnetic tail on Earth's dark side at a distance of Шаблон:Convert from the planet. The magnetosphere was quite active at the time, and Galileo detected magnetic storms and whistlers caused by lightning strikes. The NIMS was employed to look for mesospheric clouds, which are believed to be caused by methane released by industrial processes. Normally they are only seen in September or October, but Galileo was able to detect them in December, an indication of damage to Earth's ozone layer.[25]Шаблон:Sfn
Remote detection of life on Earth
The astronomer Carl Sagan, pondering the question of whether life on Earth could be easily detected from space, devised a set of experiments in the late 1980s using GalileoШаблон:'s remote sensing instruments during the mission's first Earth flyby in December 1990. After data acquisition and processing, Sagan published a paper in Nature in 1993 detailing the results of the experiment. Galileo had indeed found what are now referred to as the "Sagan criteria for life". These included strong absorption of light at the red end of the visible spectrum (especially over continents) which was caused by absorption by chlorophyll in photosynthesizing plants, absorption bands of molecular oxygen which is also a result of plant activity, infrared absorption bands caused by the ~1 micromole per mole (μmol/mol) of methane in Earth's atmosphere (a gas which must be replenished by either volcanic or biological activity), and modulated narrowband radio wave transmissions uncharacteristic of any known natural source. GalileoШаблон:'s experiments were thus the first ever controls in the newborn science of astrobiological remote sensing.Шаблон:Sfn
Galileo Optical Experiment
In December 1992, during GalileoШаблон:'s second gravity-assist planetary flyby of Earth, another groundbreaking experiment was performed. Optical communications in space were assessed by detecting light pulses from powerful lasers with GalileoШаблон:'s CCD. The experiment, dubbed Galileo Optical Experiment or GOPEX,[26] used two separate sites to beam laser pulses to the spacecraft, one at Table Mountain Observatory in California and the other at the Starfire Optical Range in New Mexico. The Table Mountain site used a frequency doubled Nd:YAG laser operating at a wavelength of 532 nm, with a repetition rate of ~15 to 30 Hz and a pulse power full width at half maximum (FWHM) in the tens of megawatts range, which was coupled to a Шаблон:Convert Cassegrain telescope for transmission to Galileo. The Starfire range site used a similar setup with a larger, Шаблон:Convert, transmitting telescope. Long exposure (~0.1 to 0.8 s) images using GalileoШаблон:'s 560 nm centered green filter produced images of Earth clearly showing the laser pulses even at distances of up to Шаблон:Convert.[27]
Adverse weather conditions, restrictions placed on laser transmissions by the U.S. Space Defense Operations Center (SPADOC) and a pointing error caused by the scan platform acceleration on the spacecraft being slower than expected (which prevented laser detection on all frames with less than 400 ms exposure times) all contributed to the reduction of the number of successful detections of the laser transmission to 48 of the total 159 frames taken. Nonetheless, the experiment was considered a resounding success and the data acquired will likely be used in the future to design laser downlinks that will send large volumes of data very quickly from spacecraft to Earth. The scheme was studied in 2004 for a data link to a future Mars orbiting spacecraft.[27]
Lunar observations
-
Showing Mare Orientale
-
Galileo shot of the north pole of Earth's Moon
-
False color mosaic by Galileo showing compositional variations of the Moon's surface
High gain antenna problem
Once Galileo headed beyond Earth, it was no longer risky to employ the HGA, so on April 11, 1991, Galileo was ordered to unfurl it. This was done using two small dual drive actuator (DDA) motors, and was expected to take 165 seconds, or 330 seconds if one failed. They would drive a worm gear. The antenna had 18 graphite-epoxy ribs, and when the driver motor started and put pressure on the ribs, they were supposed to pop out of the cup their tips were held in, and the antenna would unfold like an umbrella. When it reached the fully deployed configuration, redundant microswitches would shut down the motors. Otherwise they would run for eight minutes before being automatically shut down to prevent them from overheating.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn
Through telemetry from Galileo, investigators determined that the electric motors had stalled at 56 seconds, the spacecraft's spin rate had decreased and its wobble had increased. Only 15 ribs had popped out, leaving the antenna looking like a lop-sided, half-open umbrella. The first suggestion was to re-fold the antenna and try the opening sequence again. This was not possible; although the motors were capable of running in reverse, the antenna was not designed for this, and human assistance was required when it was done on Earth to ensure that the wire mesh did not snag. It was later discovered that less torque was available from the DDA each time, so after five deploy and stow operations, the DDA torque was half its original value.Шаблон:Sfn
The first thing the Galileo team tried was to rotate the spacecraft away from the Sun and back again on the assumption that the problem was with friction holding the pins in their sockets. If so, then heating and cooling the ribs might cause them to pop out of their sockets. This was done seven times, but with no result. They then tried swinging LGA-2 (which faced in the opposite direction to the HGA and LGA-1) 145 degrees to a hard stop, thereby shaking the spacecraft. This was done six times with no effect. Finally, they tried shaking the antenna by pulsing the DDA motors at 1.25 and 1.875 Hertz. This increased the torque by up to 40 percent. The motors were pulsed 13,000 times over a three-week period in December 1992 and January 1993, but only managed to move the ballscrew by one and a half revolutions beyond the stall point.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn
Investigators concluded that during the 4.5 years that Galileo spent in storage after the Challenger disaster, the lubricants between the tips of the ribs and the cup were eroded and worn by vibration during the three cross-country journeys by truck between California and Florida for the spacecraft.[28] The failed ribs were those closest to the flat-bed trailers carrying Galileo on these trips.Шаблон:Sfn The use of land transport was partly to save costs—air transport would have cost an additional $65,000 (Шаблон:Inflation) or so per trip—but also to reduce the amount of handling required in loading and unloading the aircraft, which was considered a major risk of damage.Шаблон:Sfn The spacecraft was also subjected to severe vibration in a vacuum environment by the IUS. Experiments on Earth with the test HGA showed that having a set of stuck ribs all on one side reduced the DDA torque produced by up to 40 percent.Шаблон:Sfn
The antenna lubricants were applied only once, nearly a decade before launch. Furthermore, the HGA was not subjected to the usual rigorous testing, because there was no backup unit that could be installed in Galileo in case of damage. The flight-ready HGA was never given a thermal evaluation test, and was unfurled only a half dozen or so times before the mission. But testing might not have revealed the problem; the Lewis Research Center was never able to replicate the problem on Earth, and it was assumed to be the combination of loss of lubricant during transportation, vibration during launch by the IUS, and a prolonged period of time in the vacuum of space where bare metal touching could undergo cold welding.Шаблон:Sfn
Fortunately, LGA-1 was capable of transmitting information back to Earth, although since it transmitted a signal isotropically, its bandwidth was significantly less than what the high-gain antenna's would have been; the high-gain antenna was to have transmitted at 134 kilobits per second, whereas LGA-1 was only intended to transmit at about 8 to 16 bits per second. LGA-1 transmitted with a power of about 15 to 20 watts, which by the time it reached Earth and had been collected by one of the large aperture 70-meter DSN antennas, had a total power of about 10 zeptowatts.[29] Through the implementation of sophisticated technologies, the arraying of several Deep Space Network antennas and sensitivity upgrades to the receivers used to listen to GalileoШаблон:'s signal, data throughput was increased to a maximum of 160 bits per second.[30][31] By further using data compression, the effective bandwidth could be raised to 1,000 bits per second.[31][32]
The data collected on Jupiter and its moons was stored in the spacecraft's onboard tape recorder, and transmitted back to Earth during the long apoapsis portion of the probe's orbit using the low-gain antenna. At the same time, measurements were made of Jupiter's magnetosphere and transmitted back to Earth. The reduction in available bandwidth reduced the total amount of data transmitted throughout the mission,[30] but William J. O'Neil, GalileoШаблон:'s project manager from 1992 to 1997,Шаблон:Sfn expressed confidence that 70 percent of GalileoШаблон:'s science goals could still be met.Шаблон:Sfn[33] The decision to use magnetic tape for storage was a conservative one, taken in the late 1970s when the use of tape was common. But conservatism was not restricted to engineers; a 1980 suggestion that the results of Galileo could be distributed electronically instead of on paper was regarded as ridiculous by geologists, on the grounds that storage would be prohibitively expensive; some of them thought that taking measurements on a computer involved putting a wooden ruler up to the screen.Шаблон:Sfn
Asteroid encounters
951 Gaspra
Two months after entering the asteroid belt, Galileo performed the first asteroid encounter by a spacecraft,Шаблон:Sfn passing the S-type asteroid 951 Gaspra to a distance of Шаблон:Convert at 22:37 UTC on October 29, 1991 at a relative speed of about Шаблон:Convert.[23] In all, 57 images of Gaspra were taken with the SSI, covering about 80% of the asteroid.Шаблон:Sfn Without the HGA, the bit rate was only about 40 bit/s, so an image took up to 60 hours to transmit back to Earth. The Galileo project was able to secure 80 hours of the Canberra's 70-meter dish time between 7 and 14 November 1991,Шаблон:Sfn but most of images taken, including low-resolution images of more of the surface, were not transmitted to Earth until November 1992.Шаблон:Sfn
The imagery revealed a cratered and irregular body, measuring about Шаблон:Convert.Шаблон:Sfn Its shape was not remarkable for an asteroid of its size.Шаблон:Sfn Measurements were taken using the NIMS to indicate the asteroid's composition and physical properties.Шаблон:Sfn While Gaspra has plenty of small craters—over 600 of them ranging in size from Шаблон:Convert—it lacks large ones, hinting at a relatively recent origin.Шаблон:Sfn However, it is possible that some of the depressions were eroded craters. Perhaps the most surprising feature was several relatively flat planar areas.Шаблон:Sfn Measurements of the solar wind in the vicinity of the asteroid showed it changing direction a few hundred kilometers from Gaspra, which hinted that it might have a magnetic field, but this was not certain.Шаблон:Sfn
243 Ida and Dactyl
Following the second Earth encounter, Galileo performed close observations of another asteroid, 243 Ida, at 16:52:04 UTC on August 28, 1993, at a range of Шаблон:Convert. Measurements were taken from Galileo using SSI and NIMS. The images revealed that Ida had a small moon measuring around Шаблон:Convert in diameter, which appeared in 46 images.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn
A competition was held to select a name for the moon, which was ultimately dubbed Dactyl after the legendary Dactyloi; craters on Dactyl were named after individual dactyloi. Regions on 243 Ida were named after cities where Johann Palisa, the discover of 243 Ida, made his observations, while ridges on 243 Ida were named in honor of deceased Galileo team members.Шаблон:Sfn Dactyl was the first asteroid moon discovered. Previously moons of asteroids had been assumed to be rare. The discovery of Dactyl hinted that they might in fact be quite common. From subsequent analysis of this data, Dactyl appeared to be an S-type asteroid, and spectrally different from 243 Ida. It was hypothesized that both may have been produced by the breakup of a Koronis parent body.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn
The requirement to use the LGA resulted in a bit rate of 40 bit/s, and that only from August 28 to September 29, 1993 and from February to June 1994. GalileoШаблон:'s tape recorder was used to store images, but tape space was also required for the primary Jupiter mission. A technique was developed whereby only image fragments of two or three lines out of every 330 were initially sent. A determination could then be made as to whether the image was of 243 Ida or empty space. Ultimately, only about 16 percent of the SSI data recorded could be sent back to Earth.Шаблон:Sfn Шаблон:-
Voyage to Jupiter
Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9
GalileoШаблон:'s prime mission was a two-year study of the Jovian system, but while it was en route, an unusual opportunity arose. On 26 March 1993, comet-seeking astronomers Carolyn S. Shoemaker, Eugene M. Shoemaker and David H. Levy discovered fragments of a comet orbiting Jupiter. They were the remains of a comet that had passed within the Roche limit of Jupiter, and had been torn apart by tidal forces. It was named Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9. Calculations indicated that it would crash into the planet sometime between 16 and 24 July 1994. While Galileo was still a long way from Jupiter, it was perfectly positioned to observe this event, whereas terrestrial telescopes had to wait to see the impact sites as they rotated into view because it would occur on Jupiter's night side.Шаблон:Sfn
Instead of burning up in Jupiter's atmosphere as expected, the first of the 21 comet fragments struck the planet at around Шаблон:Convert and exploded with a fireball Шаблон:Convert high, easily discernible to Earth-based telescopes even though it was on the night side of the planet. The impact left a series of dark scars on the planet, some two or three times as large as the Earth, that persisted for weeks. When Galileo observed an impact in ultraviolet light, it lasted for about ten seconds, but in the infrared it persisted for 90 seconds or more. When a fragment hit the planet, it increased Jupiter's overall brightness by about 20 percent. The NIMS observed one fragment create a fireball Шаблон:Convert in diameter that burned with a temperature of Шаблон:Convert, which was hotter than the surface of the Sun.Шаблон:Sfn
Probe deployment
The Galileo probe separated from the orbiter at 03:07 UTC on July 13, 1995,[34] five months before its rendezvous with the planet on December 7.Шаблон:Sfn At this point, the spacecraft was still Шаблон:Convert from Jupiter, but Шаблон:Convert from Earth, and telemetry from the spacecraft, travelling at the speed of light, took 37 minutes to reach the JPL. A tiny Doppler shift in the signal of the order of a few centimeters per second indicated that the separation had been accomplished. The Galileo orbiter was still on a collision course with Jupiter. Previously, course corrections had been made using the twelve Шаблон:Convert thrusters, but with the probe on its way, the Galileo orbiter could now fire its Шаблон:Convert Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm main engine which had been covered by the probe until then. At 07:38 UTC on July 27, it was fired for the first time to place the Galileo orbiter on course to enter orbit around Jupiter, whence it would perform as a communications relay for the Galileo probe. The Galileo probe's project manager, Marcie Smith at the Ames Research Center, was confident that this role could be performed by LGA-1. The burn lasted for five minutes and eight seconds, and changed the velocity of the Galileo orbiter by Шаблон:Convert.[35]Шаблон:Sfn
Dust storms
In August 1995, the Galileo orbiter encountered a severe dust storm Шаблон:Convert from Jupiter that took several months to traverse. Normally the spacecraft's dust detector picked up a dust particle every three days; now it detected up to 20,000 particles a day. Interplanetary dust storms had previously been encountered by the Ulysses space probe, which had passed by Jupiter three years before on its mission to study the Sun's polar regions, but those encountered by Galileo were more intense. The dust particles were about the same size as those in cigarette smoke, and had speeds ranging from Шаблон:Convert depending on their size. The existence of the dust storms had come as a complete surprise to scientists. While data from both Ulysses and Galileo hinted that they originated somewhere in the Jovian system, it was a mystery how they had been created, and how they had escaped from Jupiter's strong gravitational and electromagnetic fields.[36]Шаблон:Sfn
Tape recorder anomaly
The failure of GalileoШаблон:'s high-gain antenna meant that data storage to the tape recorder for later compression and playback was absolutely crucial in order to obtain any substantial information from the flybys of Jupiter and its moons. This was a four-track, 114-megabyte digital tape recorder, manufactured by Odetics Corporation.[37] On October 11, it was stuck in rewind mode for 15 hours before engineers learned what had happened and were able to send commands to shut it off. Although the recorder itself was still in working order, the malfunction had possibly damaged a length of tape at the end of the reel. This section of tape was declared "off limits" to any future data recording, and was covered with 25 more turns of tape to secure the section and reduce any further stresses, which could tear it. Because it happened only weeks before Galileo entered orbit around Jupiter, the anomaly prompted engineers to sacrifice data acquisition of almost all of the Io and Europa observations during the orbit insertion phase, in order to focus on recording data sent from the Jupiter probe descent.[38]
Jupiter
Шаблон:See also Шаблон:Multiple image
Arrival
The Galileo orbiter's magnetometers reported that the spacecraft had encountered the bow wave of Jupiter's magnetosphere on November 16, 1995, when it was still Шаблон:Convert from Jupiter. The bow wave was not stationary, but moved to and fro in responses to solar wind gusts, and was therefore crossed multiple times between 16 and 26 November, by which time it was Шаблон:Convert from Jupiter.Шаблон:Sfn
On December 7, 1995, the orbiter arrived in the Jovian system. That day it made a Шаблон:Convert flyby of Europa at 11:09 UTC, and then an Шаблон:Convert flyby of Io at 15:46 UTC, using Io's gravity to reduce its speed, and thereby conserve propellant for use later in the mission. At 19:54 it made its closest approach to Jupiter. The orbiter's electronics had been heavily shielded against radiation, but the radiation exceeded expectations, and nearly the spacecraft's design limits. One of the navigational systems failed, but the backup took over. Most robotic spacecraft respond to failures by entering safe mode and awaiting further instructions from Earth, but with a minimum of a two-hour signalling delay, this was not possible for Galileo.Шаблон:Sfn
Atmospheric probe
The descent probe awoke in response to an alarm at 16:00 UTC and began powering up its instruments. It passed through the rings of Jupiter and encountered a previously undiscovered belt of radiation ten times as strong as Earth's Van Allen radiation belt.Шаблон:Sfn Before the atmospheric entry, the probe detected a previously unknown radiation belt Шаблон:Convert above Jupiter's cloud tops.Шаблон:Sfn
It had been predicted that the probe would pass through three layers of clouds; an upper one consisting of ammonia ice-particles at a pressure of Шаблон:Convert; a middle one of ammonium hydrosulphide ice particles at a pressure of Шаблон:Convert; and one of water vapor at Шаблон:Convert.Шаблон:Sfn The atmosphere through which the probe descended was much denser and hotter than expected. Jupiter was also found to have only half the amount of helium expected and the data did not support the three-layered cloud structure theory: only one significant cloud layer was measured by the probe, at a pressure of around Шаблон:Convert but with many indications of smaller areas of increased particle densities along the whole length of its trajectory.Шаблон:Sfn
The descent probe entered Jupiter's atmosphere, defined for the purpose as being Шаблон:Convert above the Шаблон:Convert pressure level,Шаблон:Sfn without any braking at 22:04 UTC on December 7, 1995. At this point it was moving at Шаблон:Convert relative to Jupiter.[39]
The probe slowed to subsonic speed within two minutes of entry. The rapid flight through the atmosphere produced a plasma with a temperature of about Шаблон:Convert, and the probe's carbon phenolic heat shield lost more than half of its mass, Шаблон:Convert, during the descent.Шаблон:Sfn[40][41] At the time, this was by far the most difficult atmospheric entry yet attempted; the probe entered at Mach 50 and had to withstand a peak deceleration of Шаблон:Convert.Шаблон:Sfn[42] As it passed through Jupiter's cloud tops, it started transmitting data to the orbiter, Шаблон:Convert above.Шаблон:Sfn The data was not immediately relayed to Earth, but a single bit was transmitted from the orbiter as a notification that the signal from the probe was being received and recorded, which would then take days to arrive using the LGA.Шаблон:Sfn
The atmospheric probe deployed its Шаблон:Convert parachute fifty-three seconds later than anticipated, resulting in a small loss of upper atmospheric readings. This was attributed to wiring problems with an accelerometer that determined when to begin the parachute deployment sequence. It then dropped its heat shield, which fell into Jupiter's interior.Шаблон:Sfn[43][44][45] The parachute reduced the probe's speed to Шаблон:Convert. The signal from the probe was no longer detected by the orbiter after 61.4 minutes, at an elevation of Шаблон:Convert below the cloud tops and a pressure of Шаблон:Convert.[46] It was believed that the probe continued to fall at terminal velocity, as the temperature increased to Шаблон:Convert and the pressure to Шаблон:Convert, completely destroying it.Шаблон:Sfn
The probe's seven scientific instruments yielded a wealth of information. The probe detected very strong winds. Scientists had expected to find wind speeds of up to Шаблон:Convert, but winds of up to Шаблон:Convert were detected. The implication was that the winds are not produced by heat generated by sunlight or the condensation of water vapor (the main causes on Earth), but are due to an internal heat source. It was already well known that the atmosphere of Jupiter was mainly composed of hydrogen, but the clouds of ammonia and ammonium sulfide were much thinner than expected, and clouds of water vapor were not detected. This was the first observation of ammonia clouds in another planet's atmosphere. The atmosphere creates ammonia ice particles from material coming up from lower depths.[47] The probe detected less lightning, less water, but more winds than expected. The atmosphere was more turbulent and the winds a lot stronger than expected. Wind speeds in the outermost layers were Шаблон:Convert, in agreement with previous measurements from afar, but that winds increased dramatically at pressure levels of 1–4 bars, then remaining consistently high at around Шаблон:Convert.Шаблон:Sfn No solid surface was detected (or expected) during the Шаблон:Convert downward journey.[43]
The abundance of nitrogen, carbon and sulfur was three times that of the Sun, raising the possibility that they had been acquired from other bodies in the Solar system,[48][43] but the low abundance of water cast doubt on theories that Earth's water had been acquired from comets.[49] There was far less lightning activity than expected, only about a tenth of the level of activity on Earth, but this was consistent with the lack of water vapor. More surprising was the high abundance of noble gases, argon, krypton and xenon, with abundances up to three times that found in the Sun. For Jupiter to trap these gases, it would have had to be much colder than today, around Шаблон:Convert, which suggested that either Jupiter had once been much further from the Sun, or that the interstellar debris that the Solar system had formed from was much colder than had been thought.[50]
-
Artist's impression of the probe's entry into Jupiter's atmosphere
-
Timeline of the probe's atmospheric entry.
-
Jupiter's clouds - expected and actual results of GalileoШаблон:'s atmospheric probe mission
Orbiter
Шаблон:Legend2Шаблон:·Шаблон:Legend2Шаблон:·Шаблон:Legend2Шаблон:·Шаблон:Legend2Шаблон:·Шаблон:Legend2Шаблон:·Шаблон:Legend2
With the probe data collected, the Galileo orbiter's next task was to slow down in order to avoid heading off into the outer solar system. A burn sequence commencing at 00:27 UTC on December 8 and lasting 49 minutes reduced the spacecraft's speed by Шаблон:Convert and enter a 198-day parking orbit. The Galileo orbiter then became the first artificial satellite of Jupiter.Шаблон:Sfn[51] Most of its initial 7-month long orbit was occupied transmitting the data from the probe back to Earth. When the orbiter reached its apojove on March 26, 1996, the main engine was fired again to increase the orbit from four times the radius of Jupiter to ten times. By this time the orbiter had received half the radiation allowed for in the mission plan, and the higher orbit was to conserve the instruments for as long as possible by limiting the radiation exposure.Шаблон:Sfn
The spacecraft traveled around Jupiter in elongated ellipses, each orbit lasting about two months. The differing distances from Jupiter afforded by these orbits allowed Galileo to sample different parts of the planet's extensive magnetosphere. The orbits were designed for close-up flybys of Jupiter's largest moons. A naming scheme was devised for the orbits: a code with the first letter of the moon being encountered on that orbit (or "J" if none was encountered) plus the orbit number.Шаблон:Sfn
Io
The innermost of the four Galilean moons, Io is roughly the same size as Earth's moon, with a radius of Шаблон:Convert. It is in orbital resonance with Ganymede and Europa, and tidally locked with Jupiter, so just as the Earth's Moon always has the same side facing Earth, Io always has the same side facing Jupiter. It orbits faster though, with a rotation period of 1.769 days. As a result, rotational and tidal forces are 220 times as great as those on Earth's moon.Шаблон:Sfn These frictional forces are sufficient to melt rock and create volcanoes and lava flows. Although only a third of the size of Earth, Io generates twice as much heat. While geological events occur on Earth over periods of thousands or even millions of years, cataclysmic events are common on Io. Visible changes occurred between orbits of Galileo. The colorful surface is a mixture of red, white and yellow sulphur compounds.Шаблон:Sfn
Galileo flew past Io on arrival day, but in the interest of protecting the tape recorder, O'Neil decided to forego collecting images. Only the fields and particles instruments were allowed to collect data, as these required the tape recorder to run at slow speeds, and it was believed that it could handle this, whereas the SSI camera required it to operate a high speed, with abrupt stops and starts. It was a crushing blow to scientists, some of whom had waited years for the opportunity.Шаблон:Sfn No other Io encounters were scheduled during the prime mission because it was feared that the high radiation levels close to Jupiter would damage the spacecraft.Шаблон:Sfn However, valuable information was still obtained; Doppler data used to measure Io's gravitational field revealed that Io had a core of molten iron and iron sulfide.Шаблон:Sfn[52]
Another opportunity to observe Io arose during the GEM, when Galileo flew past Io on orbits I24 and I25, and it would revisit Io during the GMM, on orbits I27, I31, I32 and I33.Шаблон:Sfn As Galileo approached Io on I24 at 11:09 UTC on October 11, 1999, it entered safe mode. Apparently, high energy electrons had altered a bit on a memory chip. When it entered safe mode, the spacecraft turned off all non-essential functions. Normally it took seven to ten days to diagnose and recover from a safe mode incident; this time the Galileo Project team at the JPL had nineteen hours before the encounter with Io. After a frantic effort, they managed to diagnose a problem that had never been seen before, and restore the spacecraft systems with just two hours to spare. Not all of the planned activities could be carried out, but Galileo obtained a series of high-resolution color images of the Pillan Patera, and Zamama, Prometheus, and Pele volcanic eruption centers.Шаблон:Sfn
When Galileo next approached Io on I25 at 20:40 Pacific Time on November 25, 1999, the JPL were eating their Thanksgiving dinner at the Galileo Mission Control Center when, with the encounter with Io just four hours away, the spacecraft again entered safe mode. This time the problem was traced to a software patch implemented to bring Galileo out of safe mode during I24. Fortunately, the spacecraft had not shut down as much as it had on I24, and the team at JPL were able to bring it back online. During I24 they had done so with two hours to spare; this time, they had just three minutes. Nonetheless, the flyby was very successful, with GalileoШаблон:'s NIMS and SSI camera capturing an erupting volcano that generated a Шаблон:Convert long plume of lava that was sufficiently large and hot to have also been detected by the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility atop Mauna Kea in Hawaii. While such events were more common and spectacular on Io than on Earth, it was extremely fortuitous to have captured it.[53]
The safe mode incidents on I24 and I25 left some gaps in the data, which I27 targeted. This time Galileo passed just Шаблон:Convert over the surface of Io. At this time, the spacecraft was nearly at the maximum distance from Earth, and there was a solar conjunction, a period when the Sun blocked the line of sight between Earth and Jupiter. As a consequence, three quarters of the observations were taken over a period of just three hours. NIMS images revealed fourteen active volcanoes in a region thought to contain just four. Images of Loki Patera showed that in the four and half months between I24 and I27, some Шаблон:Convert had been covered in fresh lava. Unfortunately, a series of observations of extreme ultraviolet (EUV) had to be cancelled due to yet another safe mode event. Radiation exposure caused a transient bus reset, a computer hardware error resulting in a safe mode event. A software patch implemented after the Europa encounter on orbit E19 guarded against this when the spacecraft was within 15 Jupiter radii of the planet, but this time it occurred at 29 Jupiter radii. The safe mode event also caused a loss of tape playback time, but the project managers decide to carry over some Io data into orbit G28, and play it back then. This limited the amount of tape space available for that Ganymede encounter, but the Io data was considered to be more valuable.Шаблон:Sfn
The discovery of Io's iron core raised the possibility that it had a magnetic field. The I24, I25 and I27 encounters had been on equatorial orbits, which made it difficult to determine whether Io had its own magnetic field, or one induced by Jupiter. Accordingly, on orbit I31, Galileo passed within Шаблон:Convert of the surface of the north pole of Io, and on orbit I32 it flew Шаблон:Convert over the south pole.Шаблон:Sfn After examining the magnetometer results, planetary scientist Margaret G. Kivelson, announced that Io had no intrinsic magnetic field, which meant that its molten iron core did not have the same convective properties as that of Earth.[54] On I31 Galileo sped through an area that had been in the plume of the Tvashtar Paterae volcano, and it was hoped that the plume could be sampled. This time, Tvashtar was quiet, but the spacecraft flew through the plume of another, previously unknown, volcano Шаблон:Convert away. What had been assumed to be hot ash from the volcanic eruption turned out to be sulphur dioxide snowflakes, each consisting of 15 to 20 molecules clustered together.Шаблон:Sfn[55] GalileoШаблон:'s final return to Io on orbit I33 was marred by another safe mode incident. Although the project team worked hard to restore the spacecraft to working order, much of the hoped-for data was lost.[56]
Europa
Although the smallest of the four Galilean moons, with a radius of Шаблон:Convert, Europa is still the sixth largest moon in the solar system.[57] Observations from Earth indicated that it was covered in ice.Шаблон:Sfn Like Io, Europa is tidally locked with Jupiter. It is in orbital resonance with Io and Ganymede, with its 85-hour orbit being twice that of Io, but half that of Ganymede. Conjunctions with Io always occur on the opposite side of Jupiter to those with Ganymede.Шаблон:Sfn Europa is therefore subject to tidal effects.Шаблон:Sfn There is no evidence of volcanism like on Io, but Galileo revealed that the surface ice was covered in cracks.Шаблон:Sfn
Some observations of Europa were made during orbits G1 and G2. On C3, Galileo conducted a Шаблон:Convert "nontargeted" encounter of Europa on 6 November 1996. A "nontargeted" encounter is defined as a secondary flyby up to a distance of Шаблон:Convert. During E4 from 15 to 22 December 1996, Galileo flew within Шаблон:Convert of Europa, but data transmission was hindered by a Solar occultation that blocked transmission for ten days.Шаблон:Sfn
Galileo returned to Europa on E6 in January 1997, this time at a height of Шаблон:Convert to analyze oval-shaped features in the infrared and ultraviolet spectra. Occultations by Europa, Io and Jupiter provided data on the atmospheric profiles of Europa, Io and Jupiter, and measurements were made of Europa's gravitational field. On E11 from 2 to 9 November 1997, data was collected on the magnetosphere.Шаблон:Sfn Due to the problems with the HGA, only about two percent of the anticipated number of images of Europa were obtained by the primary mission.Шаблон:Sfn On the GEM, the first eight orbits, E12 through E19, were all dedicated to Europa, and Galileo paid it a final visit on E26 during the GMM.Шаблон:Sfn
Images of Europa also showed few impact craters. It seemed unlikely that it had escaped the meteor and comet impacts that scarred Ganymede and Callisto, so this indicated Europa has an active geology that renews the surface and obliterates craters.Шаблон:Sfn[57] Clark Chapman argued that if we assume that a Шаблон:Convert crater occurs in Europa once every million years, and given that only about twenty have been spotted on Europa, the implication is that the surface must only be about 10 million years old.Шаблон:Sfn With more data on hand, in 2003 a team led Kevin Zahle at NASA's Ames Research Center arrived at a figure of 30 to 70 million years.Шаблон:Sfn Tidal flexing of up to Шаблон:Convert per day was the most likely the culprit.[58] But not all scientists were convinced; Michael Carr, a planetologist from the US Geological Survey, argued that, on the contrary, the surface of Europa was subjected to less impacts than Callisto or Ganymede.Шаблон:Sfn
Evidence of surface renewal hinted at the possibility of a viscous layer below the surface of warm ice or liquid water. NIMS observations by Galileo indicated that the surface of Europa appeared to contain magnesium and sodium salts. A likely source was brine below the ice crust. Further evidence was provided by the magnetometer, which reported that the magnetic field was induced by Jupiter. This could be explained by the existence of a spherical shell of conductive material like salt water. Since the surface temperature on Europa was a chilly Шаблон:Convert, any water breaching the surface ice would instantly freeze over. Heat required to keep water in a liquid state could not come from the Sun, which had only 4 percent of the intensity of Earth, but ice is a good insulator, and the heat could be provided by the tidal flexing.[59]Шаблон:Sfn Galileo also yielded evidence that the crust of Europa had slipped over time, moving south on the hemisphere facing Jupiter, and north on the far side.[58]Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn
There was acrimonious debate among scientists over the thickness of the ice crust, and those who presented results indicating that it might be thinner than the Шаблон:Convert proposed by the accredited scientists on the Galileo Imaging Team faced intimidation, scorn, and reduced career opportunities.Шаблон:Sfn The Galileo Imaging Team was led by Michael J. Belton from the Kitt Peak National Observatory. Scientists who planned imaging sequences had the exclusive right to the initial interpretation of the Galileo data, most which was performed by their research students.Шаблон:Sfn The scientific community did not want a repetition of the 1979 Morabito incident, when Linda A. Morabito, an engineer at the JPL working on Voyager 1, discovered the first active extraterrestrial volcano on Io.Шаблон:Sfn The Imaging Team controlled the manner in which discoveries were presented to the scientific community and the public through press conferences, conference papers and publications.Шаблон:Sfn
Observations by the Hubble Space Telescope in 1995 reported that Europa had a thin oxygen atmosphere. This was confirmed by Galileo in six experiments on orbits E4 and E6 during occultations when Europa was between Galileo and the Earth. This allowed Canberra and Goldstone to investigate the ionosphere of Europa by measuring the degree to which the radio beam was diffracted by charged particles. This indicated the presence of water ions, which were most likely water molecules that had been dislodged from the surface ice and then ionized by the Sun or the Jovian magnetosphere. The presence of an ionosphere was sufficient to deduce the existence of a thin atmosphere on Europa.[60] On December 11, 2013, NASA reported, based on results from the Galileo mission, the detection of "clay-like minerals" (specifically, phyllosilicates), often associated with organic materials, on the icy crust of Europa. The presence of the minerals may have been the result of a collision with an asteroid or comet.[61] Шаблон:-
Ganymede
The largest of the Galilean moons with a diameter of Шаблон:Convert, Ganymede is larger than Earth's moon, the dwarf planet Pluto or the planet Mercury.Шаблон:Sfn It is the largest of the moons in the Solar system that are characterized by large amounts of water ice, which also includes Saturn's moon Titan, and Neptune's moon Triton. Ganymede has three times as much water for its mass as Earth has.Шаблон:Sfn
When Galileo entered Jovian orbit, it did so at an inclination to the Jovian equator, and therefore the orbital plane of the four Galilean moons. To transfer orbit while conserving propellant, two slingshot maneuvers were performed. On G1, the gravity of Ganymede was used to slow the spacecraft's orbital period from 21 to 72 days to allow for more encounters and to take Galileo out of the more intense regions of radiation. On G2, the gravity assist was employed to put it into a coplanar orbit to permit subsequent encounters with Io, Europa and Callisto.Шаблон:Sfn Although the primary purpose of G1 and G2 was navigational, the opportunity to make some observations was not missed. The plasma wave experiment and the magnetometer detected a magnetic field with a strength of about Шаблон:Convert, more than strong enough to create a separate magnetosphere within that of Jupiter. This was the first time that a magnetic field had ever been detected on a moon contained within the magnetosphere of its host planet.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn[62][63]
This discovery led naturally to questions about its origin. The evidence pointed to an iron or iron sulphide core and mantle Шаблон:Convert below the surface, encased in ice. Margaret Kivelson, the scientist in charge of the magnetometer experiment felt that the induced magnetic field required an iron core, and speculated that an electrically conductive layer was required, possibly a brine ocean Шаблон:Convert below the surface.Шаблон:Sfn[64] Galileo returned to Ganymede on orbits G7 and G9 in April and May 1997, and on G28 and G29 in May and December 2000 on the GMM.Шаблон:Sfn Images of the surface revealed two types of terrain: highly cratered dark regions, and grooved terrain sulcus. Images of the Arbela Sulcus taken on G28 made Ganymede look more like Europa, but tidal flexing could not provide sufficient heat to keep water in liquid form on Ganymede, although it may have made a contribution. One possibility was radioactivity, which might provide sufficient heat for liquid water to exist Шаблон:Convert below the surface.[64]Шаблон:Sfn Another possibility was volcanism. Slushy water or ice reaching the surface would quickly freeze over, creating areas of a relatively smooth surface.Шаблон:Sfn
Callisto
Callisto is the outermost of the Galilean moons, and the most pockmarked, indeed the most of any body in the Solar system. So many craters must have taken billions of years to accumulate, which gave scientists the idea that its surface was as much as four billion years old, and provided a record of meteor activity in the Solar system. Galileo visited Callisto on orbits C3, C9 and C100 during the prime mission, and then on C20, C21, C22 and C23 during the GEM. When the cameras observed Callisto close up, there was a puzzling absence of small craters. The surface features appeared to have been eroded, indicating that they had been subject to active geological processes.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn
GalileoШаблон:'s flyby of Callisto on C3 marked the first time that the Deep Space Network operated a link between its antennae in Canberra and Goldstone that allowed them to operate as a gigantic array, thereby enabling a higher bit rate despite the spacecraft's long distance from Earth. With the assistance of the antenna at Parkes, this raised the effective bandwidth to as much as 1,000 bits per second.[65]
Data accumulated on C3 indicated that Callisto had a homogeneous composition, with heavy and light elements intermixed. This was estimated to be composed of 60 percent rock and 40 percent ice.[66] This was overturned by further radio Doppler observations on C9 and C10, which indicated that rock had settled towards the core, and therefore that Callisto indeed has a differentiated internal structure, although not as much so as the other Galilean moons.Шаблон:Sfn[67]
Observations made with GalileoШаблон:'s magnetometer indicated that Callisto had no magnetic field of its own, and therefore lacked an iron core like Ganymede's, but that it did have an induced field from Jupiter's magnetosphere. Because ice is too poor a conductor to generate this effect, it pointed to the possibility that Callisto, like Europa and Ganymede, might have a subsurface ocean of brine.Шаблон:Sfn[68] Galileo made its closest encounter with Callisto on C30, when it made a Шаблон:Convert pass over the surface, during which it photographed the Asgard, Valhalla and Bran craters.Шаблон:Sfn This was used for slingshot maneuvers to set up the final encounters with Io on I31 and I32.[69] Шаблон:Multiple image
Amalthea
Although GalileoШаблон:'s main mission was to explore the Galilean moons, it also captured images of four of the inner moons, Thebe, Adrastea, Amalthea, and Metis. Such images were only possible from a spacecraft; to Earth-based telescopes they were merely specks of light.Шаблон:Sfn Two years of Jupiter's intense radiation took its toll on the spacecraft's systems, and its fuel supply was running low in the early 2000s. GalileoШаблон:'s cameras were deactivated on January 17, 2002, after they had sustained irreparable radiation damage.[70]
NASA engineers were able to recover the damaged tape recorder electronics, and Galileo continued to return scientific data until it was deorbited in 2003, performing one last scientific experiment: a measurement of Amalthea's mass as the spacecraft swung by it. This was tricky to arrange; to be useful, Galileo had to fly within Шаблон:Convert of Amalthea, but not so close as to crash into it. This was complicated by its irregular Шаблон:Convert potato-like shape. It was tidally locked, pointing its long axis towards Jupiter at all times. A successful flyby meant knowing which direction the asteroid was pointed in relative to Galileo at all times.Шаблон:Sfn
Galileo flew by Amalthea on November 5, 2002, during its 34th orbit, allowing a measurement of the moon's mass as it passed within Шаблон:Convert of its surface.Шаблон:Sfn The results startled the scientific team; they revealed that Amalthea weighed Шаблон:Convert, and with a volume of Шаблон:Convert, it therefore had a density of 857 ± 99 kilograms per cubic meter, less than that of water.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn
A final discovery occurred during the last two orbits of the mission. When the spacecraft passed the orbit of Amalthea, the star scanner detected unexpected flashes of light that were reflections from seven to nine moonlets. None of the individual moonlets were reliably sighted twice, so no orbits were determined. It is believed that they were most likely debris ejected from Amalthea and form a tenuous, and perhaps temporary, ring.Шаблон:Sfn
Star scanner
GalileoШаблон:'s star scanner was a small optical telescope that provided an absolute attitude reference. It also made several scientific discoveries serendipitously. In the prime mission, it was found that the star scanner was able to detect high-energy particles as a noise signal. This data was eventually calibrated to show the particles were predominantly >Шаблон:Convert electrons that were trapped in the Jovian magnetic belts, and released to the Planetary Data System.[71]
A second discovery occurred in 2000. The star scanner was observing a set of stars which included the second magnitude star Delta Velorum. At one point, this star dimmed for 8 hours below the star scanner's detection threshold. Subsequent analysis of Galileo data and work by amateur and professional astronomers showed that Delta Velorum is the brightest known eclipsing binary, brighter at maximum than even Algol. It has a primary period of 45 days and the dimming is just visible with the naked eye.[72]
Mission extension
After the primary mission concluded on December 7, 1997, most of the mission staff departed, including O'Neil, but about a fifth of them remained. The Galileo orbiter commenced an extended mission known as the Galileo Europa Mission (GEM), which ran until December 31, 1999. This was a low-cost mission, with a budget of $30 million (equivalent to $Шаблон:Inflation million in Шаблон:Inflation/year).Шаблон:Sfn The reason for calling it as the "Europa" mission rather than the "Extended" mission was political; although it might seem wasteful to scrap a spacecraft that was still functional and capable of performing a continuing mission, Congress took a dim view of requests for more money for projects it thought had already been fully funded. This was avoided through rebranding.Шаблон:Sfn
The smaller GEM team did not have the resources to deal with problems, but when they arose it was able to temporarily recall former team members for intensive efforts to solve them. The spacecraft performed several flybys of Europa, Callisto and Io. On each one the spacecraft collected only two days' worth of data instead of the seven it had collected during the prime mission. The radiation environment near Io, which Galileo approached to within Шаблон:Convert on November 26, 1999, on orbit I25, was very unhealthy for GalileoШаблон:'s systems, and so these flybys were saved for the extended mission when loss of the spacecraft would be more acceptable.Шаблон:Sfn
By the time GEM ended, most of the spacecraft was operating well beyond its original design specifications, having absorbed three times the radiation exposure that it had been built to withstand. Many of the instruments were no longer operating at peak performance, but were still functional, so a second extension, the Galileo Millennium Mission (GMM) was authorized. This was intended to run until March 2001, but it was subsequently extended until January 2003. GMM included return visits to Europa, Io, Ganymede and Callisto, and for the first time to Amalthea.Шаблон:Sfn The total cost of the original Galileo mission was about Шаблон:US$ (equivalent to $Шаблон:Inflation billion in Шаблон:Inflation/year). Of this, Шаблон:US$ (equivalent to $Шаблон:Inflation million in Шаблон:Inflation/year) was spent on spacecraft development.[34] Another $110 million (equivalent to $Шаблон:Inflation million in Шаблон:Inflation/year) was contributed by international agencies.[73]
Jupiter's uniquely harsh radiation environment caused over 20 anomalies over the course of GalileoШаблон:'s mission, in addition to the incidents expanded upon below. Despite having exceeded its radiation design limit by at least a factor of three, the spacecraft survived all these anomalies. Work-arounds were found eventually for all of these problems, and Galileo was never rendered entirely non-functional by Jupiter's radiation. The radiation limits for GalileoШаблон:'s computers were based on data returned from Pioneers 10 and 11, since much of the design work was underway before the two Voyagers arrived at Jupiter in 1979.Шаблон:Sfn
A typical effect of the radiation was that several of the science instruments suffered increased noise while within about Шаблон:Convert of Jupiter. The SSI camera began producing totally white images when the spacecraft was hit by the exceptional 'Bastille Day' coronal mass ejection in 2000, and did so again on subsequent close approaches to Jupiter.Шаблон:Sfn The quartz crystal used as the frequency reference for the radio suffered permanent frequency shifts with each Jupiter approach.Шаблон:Sfn A spin detector failed, and the spacecraft gyro output was biased by the radiation environment.Шаблон:Sfn
The most severe effects of the radiation were current leakages somewhere in the spacecraft's power bus, most likely across brushes at a spin bearing connecting rotor and stator sections of the orbiter. These current leakages triggered a reset of the onboard computer and caused it to go into safe mode. The resets occurred when the spacecraft was either close to Jupiter or in the region of space magnetically downstream of Jupiter. A change to the software was made in April 1999 that allowed the onboard computer to detect these resets and autonomously recover, so as to avoid safe mode.[74]
Tape recorder problems
Routine maintenance of the tape recorder involved winding the tape halfway down its length and back again to prevent it sticking.Шаблон:Sfn In November 2002, after the completion of the mission's only encounter with Jupiter's moon Amalthea, problems with playback of the tape recorder again plagued Galileo. About 10 minutes after the closest approach of the Amalthea flyby, Galileo stopped collecting data, shut down all of its instruments, and went into safe mode, apparently as a result of exposure to Jupiter's intense radiation environment. Though most of the Amalthea data was already written to tape, it was found that the recorder refused to respond to commands telling it to play back data.[75]
After weeks of troubleshooting of an identical flight spare of the recorder on the ground, it was determined that the cause of the malfunction was a reduction of light output in three infrared Optek OP133 light-emitting diodes (LEDs) located in the drive electronics of the recorder's motor encoder wheel. The gallium arsenide LEDs had been particularly sensitive to proton-irradiation-induced atomic lattice displacement defects, which greatly decreased their effective light output and caused the drive motor's electronics to falsely believe the motor encoder wheel was incorrectly positioned.Шаблон:Sfn
GalileoШаблон:'s flight team then began a series of "annealing" sessions, where current was passed through the LEDs for hours at a time to heat them to a point where some of the crystalline lattice defects would be shifted back into place, thus increasing the LED's light output. After about 100 hours of annealing and playback cycles, the recorder was able to operate for up to an hour at a time. After many subsequent playback and cooling cycles, the complete transmission back to Earth of all recorded Amalthea flyby data was successful.Шаблон:Sfn
End of mission and deorbit
When the exploration of Mars was being considered in the early 1960s, Carl Sagan and Sidney Coleman produced a paper concerning contamination of the red planet. In order that scientists could determine whether or not native life forms existed before the planet became contaminated by micro-organisms from Earth, they proposed that space missions should aim at a 99.9 percent chance that contamination should not occur. This figure was adopted by the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) of the International Council of Scientific Unions in 1964, and was subsequently applied to all planetary probes. The danger was highlighted in 1969 when the Apollo 12 astronauts returned components of the Surveyor 3 spacecraft that had landed on the Moon three years before, and it was found that microbes were still viable even after three years in that harsh climate. An alternative was the Prime Directive, a philosophy of non-interference with alien life forms enunciated by the original Star Trek television series that prioritized the interests of the life forms over those of scientists. Given the (admittedly slim) prospect of life on Europa, scientists Richard Greenberg and Randall Tufts proposed that a new standard be set of no greater chance of contamination than that which might occur naturally by meteorites.Шаблон:Sfn
Galileo had not been sterilized prior to launch and could have carried bacteria from Earth. Therefore, a plan was formulated to send the probe directly into Jupiter, in an intentional crash to eliminate the possibility of an impact with Jupiter's moons, particularly Europa, and prevent a forward contamination. On April 14, 2003, Galileo reached its greatest orbital distance from Jupiter for the entire mission since orbital insertion, Шаблон:Convert, before plunging back towards the gas giant for its final impact.[76] At the completion of J35, its final orbit around the Jovian system, Galileo impacted Jupiter in darkness just south of the equator on September 21, 2003, at 18:57 UTC. Its impact speed was approximately Шаблон:Convert.[77][78]
Major findings
- The composition of Jupiter differs from that of the Sun, indicating that Jupiter has evolved since the formation of the Solar System.[47][79]
- Galileo made the first observation of ammonia clouds in another planet's atmosphere. The atmosphere creates ammonia ice particles from material coming up from lower depths.[47]
- Io was confirmed to have extensive volcanic activity that is 100 times greater than that found on Earth. The heat and frequency of eruptions are reminiscent of early Earth.[47][79]
- Complex plasma interactions in Io's atmosphere create immense electrical currents which couple to Jupiter's atmosphere.[47][79]
- Several lines of evidence from Galileo support the theory that liquid oceans exist under Europa's icy surface.[47][79]
- Ganymede possesses its own, substantial magnetic field – the first satellite known to have one.[47][79]
- Galileo magnetic data provided evidence that Europa, Ganymede and Callisto have a liquid salt water layer under the visible surface.[47]
- Evidence exists that Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto all have a thin atmospheric layer known as a "surface-bound exosphere".[47][79]
- Jupiter's ring system is formed by dust kicked up as interplanetary meteoroids smash into the planet's four small inner moons. The outermost ring is actually two rings, one embedded with the other. There is probably a separate ring along Amalthea's orbit as well.[47][79]
- The Galileo spacecraft identified the global structure and dynamics of a giant planet's magnetosphere.[47]
Follow-on missions
There was a spare Galileo spacecraft that was considered by the NASA-ESA Outer Planets Study Team in 1983 for a mission to Saturn, but it was passed over in favor of a newer design, which became Cassini–Huygens.[80] While Galileo was operating, Ulysses passed by Jupiter in 1992 on its mission to study the Sun's polar regions, and Cassini–Huygens coasted by the planet in 2000 and 2001 en route to Saturn.Шаблон:Sfn New Horizons passed close by Jupiter in 2007 for a gravity assist en route to Pluto, and it too collected data on the planet.[81] The next mission to orbit Jupiter was the Juno spacecraft, which entered Jovian orbit in July 2016.[82]
Juno
NASA's Juno spacecraft, launched in 2011 and planned for a two-year tour of the Jovian system, successfully completed Jupiter orbital insertion on July 4, 2016.[83]
Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer
The European Space Agency is planning to return to the Jovian system with the Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer (JUICE), which is designed to orbit Ganymede in the 2030s.[84]
Europa Clipper
Even before Galileo concluded, NASA considered the Europa Orbiter,[85] which was a mission to Jupiter's moon Europa, but it was canceled in 2002.[86] After its cancellation, a lower-cost version was studied. This led to the Europa Clipper being approved in 2015; it is currently planned for launch in the mid-2020s.[87]
Europa Lander
A lander concept, simply called Europa Lander is being assessed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory.[88] Шаблон:As of, this lander mission to Europa remains a concept, although some funds have been released for instrument development and maturation.[89]
Footnotes
Notes
References
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite conference* Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite conference
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite report
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite report
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite report
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite journal
External links
- Galileo mission site by NASA's Solar System Exploration
- Galileo legacy site Шаблон:Webarchive by NASA's Solar System Exploration
- Galileo Satellite Image Mosaics by Arizona State University
- Galileo image album by Kevin M. Gill
Шаблон:Jupiter spacecraft Шаблон:Venus spacecraft Шаблон:Moon spacecraft Шаблон:Asteroid spacecraft Шаблон:Solar System probes Шаблон:NASA navbox Шаблон:Jet Propulsion Laboratory Шаблон:Orbital launches in 1989 Шаблон:Galileo Galilei Шаблон:Portal bar
Шаблон:Authority control Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Use American English
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ 8,0 8,1 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ 12,0 12,1 Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ 14,0 14,1 Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ 15,0 15,1 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ 16,0 16,1 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite magazine
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite report
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ 21,0 21,1 Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ 22,0 22,1 22,2 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ 23,0 23,1 23,2 23,3 23,4 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ 27,0 27,1 Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ 30,0 30,1 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ 31,0 31,1 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ 34,0 34,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег
<ref>; для сносокgalileo-arrivalне указан текст - ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ 43,0 43,1 43,2 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ 47,00 47,01 47,02 47,03 47,04 47,05 47,06 47,07 47,08 47,09 47,10 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ 57,0 57,1 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ 58,0 58,1 Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ 64,0 64,1 Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег
<ref>; для сносокspref20030919не указан текст - ↑ 79,0 79,1 79,2 79,3 79,4 79,5 79,6 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite book
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite conference
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite press release
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- Страницы с игнорируемыми отображаемыми названиями
- Страницы с неработающими файловыми ссылками
- Английская Википедия
- Galileo program
- Missions to Jupiter
- Missions to main-belt asteroids
- Galileo Galilei
- Articles containing video clips
- Страницы, где используется шаблон "Навигационная таблица/Телепорт"
- Страницы с телепортом
- Википедия
- Статья из Википедии
- Статья из Английской Википедии
- Страницы с ошибками в примечаниях
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
