Английская Википедия:Ghost word

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description A ghost word is a word published in a dictionary or similarly authoritative reference work even though it had not previously had any meaning or been used intentionally. A ghost word generally originates from readers interpreting a typographical or linguistic error as a word they are not familiar with, and then publishing that word elsewhere under the misconception that it is an established part of the language.

Once authoritatively published, a ghost word occasionally may be copied widely and enter legitimate usage, or it may eventually be discovered and removed from dictionaries.

Origin

The term was coined by Professor Walter William Skeat in his annual address as president of the Philological Society in 1886:[1]

Шаблон:Quote

It turned out that "kimes" was a misprint for "knives", but the word gained currency for some time. A more drastic example followed, also cited in Skeat's address:[2]

Шаблон:Quote

One edition of The Monastery containing the misprint was published by the Edinburgh University Press in 1820.[3]

More examples

In his address, Skeat exhibited about 100 more specimens that he had collected.

Other examples include:

Speculative examples

Many neologisms, including those that eventually develop into established usages, are of obscure origin, and some might well have originated as ghost words through illiteracy, such as the term "okay". However, establishing the true origin often is not possible, partly for lack of documentation, and sometimes through obstructive efforts on the part of pranksters. The most popular etymology of the word pumpernickel bread—that Napoleon described it as "C'est pain pour Nicole!", being only fit for his horse—is thought to be a deliberate hoax. "Quiz" also has been associated with apparently deliberate false etymology. All these words and many more have remained in common usage, but they may well have been ghost words in origin.[18]

Distinguished from back-formation

A recent, incorrect use of the term "ghost word" refers to coining a new word inferred from a real word by falsely applying an etymological rule. The correct term for such a derivation is back-formation, a word that has been established since the late 19th century.[1] An example is "beforemath" derived from "aftermath", having an understandable meaning but not a commonly accepted word. A back-formation cannot become a ghost word; as a rule it would clash with Skeat's precise definition, which requires that the word forms have "no meaning".[1]

See also

References

Шаблон:Reflist

External links

Шаблон:Wiktionary

  1. 1,0 1,1 1,2 Skeat, Walter William; Presidential address on 'Ghost-Words' in: 'Transactions of the Philological Society, 1885-7, pages 343–374'; Published for the society by Trübner & Co., Ludgate Hill, London, 1887. May be downloaded at: https://archive.org/details/transact188500philuoft
  2. Wheatley, Henry Benjamin; Literary Blunders; A Chapter in the “History of Human Error”; Publisher: Elliot Stock, London 1893
  3. Scott, Walter. The Monastery. Chapter 10, page 156. Published by Edinburgh University Press. 1820. https://archive.org/details/monasteryaroman00scotgoog
  4. Шаблон:Cite web
  5. Шаблон:Cite book
  6. Шаблон:Cite web
  7. Шаблон:Cite web
  8. Шаблон:Cite book
  9. Шаблон:Cite book Available at: [1]
  10. Шаблон:Cite book
  11. Шаблон:Cite journal Carr (p. 40) suggests "vicious hair" for kusege (Шаблон:Lang) originated through false analogy from Kenkyusha's waraguse (Шаблон:Lang "bad/vicious habit; vice") entries.
  12. Шаблон:Cite web
  13. Шаблон:Cite book
  14. Шаблон:Cite journal
  15. Шаблон:Cite web
  16. Шаблон:Cite web
  17. Шаблон:Cite web
  18. Шаблон:Cite book Available at: [2]