Английская Википедия:Great American Novel

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:About Шаблон:Use American English Шаблон:Use mdy dates

Файл:Edwin Longsden Long - Uncle Tom and Little Eva.JPG
Uncle Tom's Cabin (1852) by Harriet Beecher Stowe is commonly cited as the Great American Novel—John William De Forest saw it as the closest possible novel.

The Great American Novel (sometimes abbreviated as GAN) is the term for a canonical novel that generally embodies and examines the essence and character of the United States. The term was coined by John William De Forest in an 1868 essay and later shortened to GAN. De Forest noted that the Great American Novel had most likely not been written yet.

Practically, the term refers to a small number of books that have historically been the nexus of discussion, including Moby-Dick (1851), Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884), The Great Gatsby (1925), and Gone with the Wind (1936). Exactly what novel or novels warrant the title is without consensus and an assortment have been contended as the idea has evolved and continued into the modern age, with fluctuations in popular and critical regard. William Carlos Williams, Clyde Brion Davis and Philip Roth have written novels about the Great American Novel—titled as such—the latter in the 1970s, a time of prosperity for the concept.

Equivalents to and interpretations of the Great American Novel have arisen. Writers and academics have commented upon the term's pragmatics, the different types of novels befitting of title and the idea's relation to race and gender.

History

Background and origin of the term

Шаблон:Multiple image

The development of American literature coincided with the nation's development, especially of its identity.[1] Calls for an "autonomous national literature" first appeared during the American Revolution,[2] and, by the mid-18th century, the possibility of American literature exceeding its European counterparts began to take shape, as did that of the Great American Novel, this time being the genesis of novels that would later be considered the Great American Novel.[3][4][5]

The term "Great American Novel" originated in an 1868 essay by American Civil War novelist John William De Forest. De Forest saw it serving as a "tableau" of American society,[6] and said that the novel would "paint the American soul" and capture "the ordinary emotions and manners of American existence".[7] Similarly, Daniel Pierce Thompson said it had to be distinctly American.[8] Although De Forest espoused praise and critique for contemporaneous novels, he ultimately concluded that the Great American Novel had yet to be written.[4][9] The essay's publication coincided with the rising prestige of the novel. Previously, only five percent of American books were marked as novels, with most fictional works given the self-effacing title of a "tale".[10] In 1880, writer Henry James simplified the term with the initialism "GAN".[7]

Development

The term soon became popular, its ubiquity considered a cliché and disparaged by literary critics.[11] Lawerence Buell stated that the concept was seen as a part of a larger national, cultural and political consolidation.[12] According to JSTOR Daily's Grant Shreve, as the concept grew, concrete criteria for the Great American Novel developed:

  • It must encompass the entire nation and not be too consumed with a particular region.
  • It must be democratic in spirit and form.
  • Its author must have been born in the United States or have adopted the country as his or her own.
  • Its true cultural worth must not be recognized upon its publication.

Additionally, Shreve states, referencing Buell, that "several 'templates' or 'recipes' for the Great American Novel emerged.Шаблон:Nbsp... Recipe 1 is to write a novel that is 'subjected to a series of memorable rewritings.'Шаблон:Nbsp... Recipe 2 is what Buell calls 'the romance of the divide.' Novels of this kindШаблон:Nbsp... imagine national (and geographic) rifts in the 'form of a family history and/or heterosexual love affair.'Шаблон:Nbsp... Recipe 3, a 'narrative centering on the lifeline of a socially paradigmatic figureШаблон:Nbsp... whose odyssey tilts on the one side toward picaresque and on the other toward a saga of personal transformation, or failure of such.'"[4]

From the turn of the century to the mid-twentieth century, the idea eluded serious academic consideration, being dismissed as a "naively amateurish age-of-realism pipe dream" not aligned with the culture of that time.[13][14][3] Writers such as William Dean Howells and Mark Twain were equally blasé. Frank Norris too saw the concept as not befitting the time, stating that the fact of a great work being American should be incidental.[14] Edith Wharton complained that the Great American Novel concept held a narrow view of the nation, simply being concerned with "Main Street".[14] At this time, it also grew to become associated with masculine values.[15]

A cover the Roth's novel reading "The Great American Novel"
Philip Roth satirized the term with his 1973 novel The Great American Novel.

Despite this critical disregard, many writers, prepped with "templates" and "recipes" for the matter, sought to create the next Great American Novel; Upton Sinclair and Sinclair Lewis both sought to create the Great American Novel with The Jungle (1906) and Babbit (1924), respectively.[16][4] William Carlos Williams and Clyde Brion Davis released satirical explorations both entitled The Great American Novel – Philip Roth would later release a novel of the same name.[14][17][18] Bernard F. Jr. Rogers said that Kurt Vonnegut's "entire career might be characterised as an attempt to produce something like "the GAN", but of its own time".[3] The 1970s saw a general resurgence of the concept, with The New York Times using the phrase the most in their history, a total of 71 times.[19]Шаблон:Efn The revival was perhaps the result of social change and related anxieties and the pursuit of a plateau between them.[19]

In the 21st century, retaining its contention and derision, the concept has moved towards a more populist attitude, functioning as "catnip for a listicle-obsessed internet".[4][20][21]Шаблон:Efn Adam Kirsch noted that books such as Roth's American Pastoral (1997) indicate that writers are still interested in creating the Great American Novel.[22] Commenting upon the Great American Novel's place in the 21st century, Stephens Shapiro said that "Maybe the GAN is a theme that rises in interest when the existing world system is amidst transformation, as America's greatness of all kinds swiftly fades away."[5] When asked in a 2004 interview if the Great American Novel could be written, Norman Mailer—who had long been interested in the idea[23]—said it could not, for United States had become too developed of a nation.[24] Tony Tulathimutte similarly dismissed it as "a comforting romantic myth, which wrongly assumes that commonality is more significant than individuality".[25]

Analysis

Racial and gender commentary

Multiple commentators have noted the concept's relation to racial and national identity, be it influence from by large-scale immigration, which brought forth authors closely aligned with the Great American Novel or novels detailing marginalized peoples, some furthermore trying to "bridge the racial divide".[20][26][22] Commenting upon the idea's racial aspects and presence in popular conscious, Hugh Kenner wrote in a 1953 issue of Perspective that:

Шаблон:Blockquote

Шаблон:Multiple image

Perrin, Andrew Hoberek and Barbara Probst Solomon all noted that the 70s saw Jews pursue the GAN. Perrin said it was a boom decade for, what Hoberek, called the "Jewish GAN". Solomon was by 1972 sick of "nice Jewish sons who are writing the GAN". Aaron Latham, in a 1971 article, highlighted Roth and Mailer as Jews who wanted to the write the next GJN and GAN, respectively.[19]

The Great American Novel's relation to masculinity was seen as a problem by female writers. Gertrude Stein once lamented that, as a lesbian Jewish woman, she would be unable to compose the Great American Novel. Joyce Carol Oates similarly felt that "a woman could write it, but then it wouldn't be the GAN".[15] Viet Thanh Nguyen said that Шаблон:Nowrap of the unspoken silences of the Great American Novel is the assumption that it can only be written by white men".[27] Laura Miller wrote, in a Salon article, that "The presumption and the belligerence embodied in this ideal have put off many American women writers". She also noted that many characters in Great American Novel candidates are male: "the notion that a female figure might serve the same purpose undermines the very concept of the Great American Novel".[23] Although British analyst Faye Hammill noted that Gentlemen Prefer Blondes by Anita Loos, was one of the few that 'doesn't stink'.[28] Emily Temple of Literary Hub suggested that if the protagonist of Sylvia Plath's The Bell Jar (1963) were male it would likely be considered more seriously as a Great American Novel contender.[29]

Interpretations

There are several different interpretations of what makes a Great American Novel. Some say that it depicts a diverse group facing issues representative of "epoch-defining public events or crises."[7] John Scalzi felt that for a novel to be the Great American Novel it had to be ubiquitous and notable, and analyze United States through a moral context.[30] De Forest, similarly saw the Great American Novel as having to capture the "essence" of America, its quality irrelevant.[31] Norris considered the musings upon what made a novel "great" and/or "American" to showcase patriotic insecurity.[14] Mohsin Hamid echoed the idea that the GAN is indicative of insecurity, connecting it to a "colonial legacy".[32]

Commentators have said that the concept is exclusively American in nature.[31] Journalist John Walsh offered a national equal in the form of Russian writer Leo Tolstoy's War and Peace (1869); Buell felt that Australia was the only country to replicate America's search.[20][5]Шаблон:Efn Scholes said that the Great American Novel has always been thought of adjacent to European literature.[20] David Vann was of the belief that they had to be "anti-American".[33] Rogers felt that it does not need to have American protagonists or be set in United States and should not espouse patriotism or nationalism.[3]

Buell identifies multiple types of Great American Novels. First is one who is subject to mysticism and stands the test of time.[34] The second is "the romance of the divide", which imagines national rifts in the "form of a family history and/or heterosexual love affair"—race often plays a role.[4][34] The third variety encapsulates the American Dream and see its protagonist rise from obscurity.[19] Fourthly, novels which are composed of a diverse cast of characters "imagined as social microcosms or vanguards" and who are placed with events and crises that serve to "constitute an image of 'democratic' promise or dysfunction". Buell also said speculative science fiction may be the basis for a possible fifth archetype.[5]

Kasia Boddy wrote that, Шаблон:Nowrap its initial formulation", the concept "has always been more about inspiration than achievement; the very fact that it has been attempted but remains 'unwritten' providing a spur to future engagement with both nation and national literature".[15] Speculating on De Forest's intentions when devising the notion of the Great American Novel and commenting upon its development, Cheryl Strayed wrote that:

Шаблон:Blockquote

Denoting an apocryphal state, film critic A. O. Scott compared the GAN to the Yeti, the Loch Ness monster and the Sasquatch.[35]

Notable candidates

Шаблон:Dynamic list

Шаблон:Sronly
Year Cover or
title page
Novel Portrait Author Commentary Шаблон:Abbr
1826 Файл:The Last of the Mohicans 1826.jpg Шаблон:Sort A drawn portrait of James Fenimore Cooper, based on a photograph Шаблон:Sort Although De Forest critiqued Cooper's writing as boring, many consider The Last of the Mohicans to be the first GAN. It was influential in defining American literature and addresses themes which are common in later American works, including rugged individualism and freedom. [36][37]
1850 Файл:Title page for The Scarlet Letter.jpg Шаблон:Sort A black-and-white photograph of Nathaniel Hawthorne, bearing a mustache and medium-length hair Шаблон:Sort Although De Forest specifically labelled The Scarlet Letter as not being worthy of the label of GAN, it is now widely included on most lists.[38] Buell recognized it as a "reluctant master text"—his first GAN script.[34] [39][40]
1851 Файл:Moby-Dick FE title page.jpg Moby-Dick A photograph of Herman Melville seated at a chair, arms crossed and sporting combed-back hair and a blocky beard Шаблон:Sort According to Hester Blum of Penn State University, "What makes Moby-Dick the Greatest American Novel, in other words, is that Melville can invoke the preposterous image of a sobbing, heart-stricken moose and we think, yes, I have come to know exactly what that sounds like, and I know what world of meaning is contained within that terrific sound".[41] [12][22]
1852 Файл:UncleTomsCabinCover.jpg Uncle Tom's Cabin A photograph of a seated Harriet Beecher Stowe, wearing a dress and a shawl Шаблон:Sort Buell claimed it to be the first novel to receive the acclaim of the GAN and that it was widely accepted that it was 'nearest approach to the desired phenomenon'.[15][42] De Forest noted it as the only possible contender and as "a picture of American life".[9] [43]
1868 Файл:Houghton AC85.Aℓ194L.1869 pt.2aa - Little Women, title.jpg Шаблон:Sort A hazy photograph of Louisa May Alcott, with dark hair wearing a dress Шаблон:Sort According to Marlowe Daly-Galeano, what makes Little Women "such an amazing novel [and possible contender for the GAN] is that it gives women's voices and women's stories the prime position in a way that...[was] very new and fresh to readers in the...late 1860s," and suggests that the "strongest mark of Little WomenШаблон:'s influence" lies in subsequent stories told about "circles of women" and "cool girl protagonists" which all seem to have a "direct link" to Little Women. Gregory Eiselein remarks that several aspects of Little Women (its inclusion of colloquialisms and grammatical errors in its dialogue, the familiarity of the March girls' struggles, etc.) make it "one of the founding documents of American literary realism." [44]
1884 Файл:Huckleberry Finn book.JPG Adventures of Huckleberry Finn A hazy photograph of Mark Twain, with white hair and mustache in a light-colored suit Шаблон:Sort The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn was one of the first American novels to utilize a regional vernacular.[45] In 1935, Ernest Hemingway stated that "All modern American literature comes from one book by Mark Twain called 'Huckleberry Finn'."[46] William van O'Connor wrote, in a 1955 issue of College English, that "we are informed, from a variety of critical positions, that [it] is the truly American novel".[47] [48][49][41]
1895 Файл:TheRedBadgeOfCourage.jpg Шаблон:Sort A photograph Stephen Crane in a suit, with parted hair and a mustache Шаблон:Sort Crane was among the earliest generation of American novelists to be influenced by De Forest and consciously strove to produce a "National Novel".[50] Critic Robert Barr had named him the "most likely to produce the great American novel" only two years before Crane died suddenly at the age of 28.[51] According to Yale professor of literature Jay Martin, Crane's war novel The Red Badge of Courage, set during the Civil War, "marks the culmination of the Great American Novel".[52] [52]
1899 Файл:McTeague First Edition cover.jpg McTeague A photograph of a seated Frank Norris, wearing a casual suit and sporting parted hair Шаблон:Sort McTeague was declared a GAN as early as 1899.[53] The librarian Faith Lee puts McTeagueШаблон:'s status as a GAN beyond doubt.[54] Norris's novel The Octopus has been declared one of the three GANs by Bill Kauffman. [53]
1925 Файл:The Great Gatsby Cover 1925 Retouched.jpg Шаблон:Sort A photograph of F. Scott Fitzgerald with a slight smile and parted, slicked-back hair Шаблон:Sort Emory Elliott wrote, in 1991, that it is "still frequently nominated as the GAN".[55] Kirsch, in 2013, said it to be "one of the first titles to come to mind whenever the Great American Novel is mentioned".[22] Deirdre Donahue of USA Today and Fitzgerald scholar James L. W. West III felt that its "embodiment of the American spirit", relevance and prose were the reasons as to why it's the GAN.[56] [57][58][59]
1925 Файл:Gentlemen Prefer Blondes Cover 1926 Restored.jpg Шаблон:Sort A photograph of Anita Loos, wearing a fur-lined dress and a large dress hat Шаблон:Sort Edith Wharton and Frank Crowninshield proclaimed the novel to be the GAN.[60][28] [60][28]
1936 Файл:Absalom, Absalom! (1936 1st ed cover).jpg Absalom, Absalom! A photograph of William Faulkner in a suit and with a mustached, reclined against a brick wall Шаблон:Sort Absalom, Absalom! has been said to represent Buell's "romance of the divide".[22] [61][22]
1939 Файл:The Grapes of Wrath (1939 1st ed cover).jpg Шаблон:Sort A photo of John Steinbeck. His hair is slicked-back and closely shaved on the sides. He has a mustache and facial hair on his chin. Шаблон:Sort Jay Parini identified it as "a great American novel" due to its focus on United States during a crisis and the eclectic depiction of American life. Richard Rodriguez, similarly, felt that it was "the great American novel that everyone keeps waiting for" because of how it showed "the losers in America".[62] Bill Kauffman declared it one of three possible candidates for the GAN. [62][63]
1951 Файл:The Catcher in the Rye (1951, first edition cover).jpg Шаблон:Sort A photograph of J.D. Salinger, wearing a suit and sporting dark, combed hair Шаблон:Sort The Catcher in the Rye is an example of a writer setting out to write the GAN and receiving such praise.[64] [65][64]
1952 Файл:Invisible Man (1952 1st ed jacket cover).jpg Invisible Man Ralph Ellison is pictured sitting in a chair before a bookcase. He is wearing a suit and has a mustache and receding hair-line. Шаблон:Sort Joseph Fruscione said that Invisible Man was the GAN because it can be "many things to many readers".[41] [66][67]
1953 Файл:The Adventures of Augie March Cover.jpg Шаблон:Sort A photograph of Saul Bellow with an open book before a bookcase. He is wearing a suit and has somewhat curly hair. Шаблон:Sort Amis felt that The Adventures of Augie March was the GAN because of its "fantastic inclusiveness, its pluralism, its qualmless promiscuity".[29] [20][68]
1955 Файл:Lolita 1955.JPG Lolita A photograph of Vladimir Nabokov. Wearing a collared shirt, Nabokov is pictured in his later years, with aging skin and white hair. Шаблон:Sort Mary Elizabeth Williams called Lolita the GAN because of its prose and says "'Lolita' forever remains a thing of timeless beauty."[41] [41][69]
1960 Файл:To Kill a Mockingbird (first edition cover).jpg To Kill a Mockingbird A photograph of Harper Lee in an outdoor setting. She has short hair and appears to be examining something in the sand and grass. Шаблон:Sort Scalzi calls it a GAN in that it is a notable and ubiquitous work that also deals with morality and the American experience.[30] Oprah Winfrey described it as "our national novel."[70] [71][30]
1973 The silhouette of a row of buildings is situated at the bottom of this bright orange cover. "Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon" is printed in bold text in the center. Gravity's Rainbow Файл:Thomas Pynchon, Navy Sailor.jpg Шаблон:Sort Pynchon's postmodern novel of World War II is commonly cited as "the most important American novel" of the post-war era.[72] It has been said to conform to Buell's fourth type of GAN.[19] [73]

[74][75]

1985 Файл:Blood Meridian (1985 1st ed half title page).jpg Blood Meridian A title page reading "Blood Meridian or The Evening Redness in the West" with the author's name, "Cormac McCarthy", positioned below the title. Шаблон:Sort Vann felt that Blood Meridian was a GAN because it explored America's genocidal past.[41] Dalrymple states "this book the Great American Novel. It's a beautifully written, dark, bleak western—but unlike any western I'd ever known." [76][33]
1987 Файл:Beloved (1987 1st ed dust jacket cover).jpg Beloved Toni Morrison is pictured in a turtle-neck. She is sporting an afro. Шаблон:Sort The novel is noted for its depiction of the psychological effects of slavery and racism. When Beloved topped a poll seeking "the best work of American fiction" published from 1980 to 2005, A. O. Scott remarked that "Any other outcome would have been startling, since Morrison's novel has inserted itself into the American canon more completely than any of its potential rivals."[35] Beloved has been noted to align with Buell's third type of GAN.[19] [35][77]
1991 Файл:American Psycho Title.jpg American Psycho Bret Easton Ellis is pictured standing on front of a stone wall and greenery. He is wearing a blazer over a blue collared shirt and has a lanyard on his neck. Шаблон:Sort Julia Keller saw the novel's inclusion of "brand names and sex and social anxiety" as part of the reason why it is the GAN.[78] [78][79]
1996 Файл:Infinite Jest 2.jpg Infinite Jest David Foster Wallace is pictured with shoulder-length hair and a short beard. Wearing frameless glasses, he is speaking at a microphone and is wearing a black denim jacket over a t-shirt. Шаблон:Sort Buell noted that "For an appreciable number of turn-of-the-twenty-first-century readers...Infinite Jest [is] the GAN of our days".[80] [80][29]
1997 Файл:Underworld 4.jpg Underworld An elderly and spectacled Don DeLillo is pictured reading from paper at a microphone. He is wearing a sweater over a collared shirt. Шаблон:Sort According to Robert McCrum, it developed a reputation as the GAN almost immediately after its publication.[81] [20][81][82]
2010 Файл:Freedom (2010 title page, signed by Jonathan Franzen).jpg Freedom A spectacled Jonathan Franzen is pictured in a tuxedo on a Time magazine red carpet. His short hair is somewhat untidy. Шаблон:Sort Buell described it as the "most widely acclaimed GAN contender...post-9/11".[16] [83][20]
2012 Файл:Telegraph Avenue 2.jpg Telegraph Avenue Michael Chabon is pictured wearing glasses, shoulder-length hair and a beard. Speaking at a microphone, his collared shirt is decorated with celestial bodies. Шаблон:Sort John Freeman of the Boston Globe, praised Chabon for "imagining the Great American Novel with a multiracial cast."[84] [85][86]

Шаблон:Portal

See also

Notes and references

Notes

Шаблон:Notelist

Citations

Шаблон:Reflist

Works cited

Further reading


External links

Шаблон:Wikiquote

Шаблон:United States topics Шаблон:English literature

  1. Baym, Nina, ed. The Norton Anthology of American Literature. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2007. Print.
  2. Buell (2014), p. 25.
  3. 3,0 3,1 3,2 3,3 Шаблон:Cite journal
  4. 4,0 4,1 4,2 4,3 4,4 4,5 Шаблон:Cite web
  5. 5,0 5,1 5,2 5,3 Шаблон:Cite journal
  6. Buell (2014), p. 24.
  7. 7,0 7,1 7,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  8. Шаблон:Cite journal
  9. 9,0 9,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  10. Buell (2014), pp. 24—25.
  11. Шаблон:Cite book
  12. 12,0 12,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  13. Шаблон:Cite journal
  14. 14,0 14,1 14,2 14,3 14,4 Шаблон:Cite journal
  15. 15,0 15,1 15,2 15,3 Шаблон:Cite journal
  16. 16,0 16,1 Buell (2014), pp. 3—4.
  17. Шаблон:Cite journal
  18. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок :5 не указан текст
  19. 19,0 19,1 19,2 19,3 19,4 19,5 Шаблон:Cite book
  20. 20,0 20,1 20,2 20,3 20,4 20,5 20,6 Шаблон:Cite web
  21. Buell (2014), pp. 5,9.
  22. 22,0 22,1 22,2 22,3 22,4 22,5 Шаблон:Cite magazine
  23. 23,0 23,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  24. Шаблон:Cite web
  25. Шаблон:Cite news
  26. Шаблон:Cite web
  27. Шаблон:Cite web
  28. 28,0 28,1 28,2 "One of the few books that doesn't stink': The Intellectuals, the Masses and Gentlemen Prefer Blondes" by Faye Hammill. Critical Survey. Vol. 17, No. 3. 2005. Accessed March 24, 2021.
  29. 29,0 29,1 29,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  30. 30,0 30,1 30,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  31. 31,0 31,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  32. Шаблон:Cite news
  33. 33,0 33,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  34. 34,0 34,1 34,2 Шаблон:Cite journal
  35. 35,0 35,1 35,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  36. Шаблон:Cite news
  37. Шаблон:Cite news
  38. Шаблон:Cite news
  39. Шаблон:Cite magazine
  40. Шаблон:Cite news
  41. 41,0 41,1 41,2 41,3 41,4 41,5 Шаблон:Cite web
  42. Buell (2014), p. 4.
  43. Шаблон:Cite news
  44. Шаблон:Cite web
  45. Шаблон:Cite journal
  46. Шаблон:Cite news
  47. Шаблон:Cite journal
  48. Шаблон:Cite web
  49. Шаблон:Cite news
  50. Martin (1967), p. 55.
  51. Martin (1967), p. 56, fn. 68.
  52. 52,0 52,1 Martin (1967), p. 35.
  53. 53,0 53,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  54. Шаблон:Cite web
  55. Emory Elliott et al. (eds.) (1991). The Columbia History of the American Novel Шаблон:Webarchive. Columbia University Press. p. 323. "The Great Gatsby (1925), a work still frequently nominated as 'the great American novel' ..."
  56. Шаблон:Cite web
  57. Шаблон:Cite news
  58. Шаблон:Cite news
  59. Шаблон:Cite magazine
  60. 60,0 60,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  61. Шаблон:Cite news
  62. 62,0 62,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  63. Шаблон:Cite web Nixon quotes John Springer, author of The Fondas (Citadel, 1973), a book about Henry Fonda and his role in film version of The Grapes of Wrath: "The Great American Novel made one of the few enduring Great American Motion Pictures."
  64. 64,0 64,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  65. Шаблон:Cite news
  66. Шаблон:Cite news
  67. Шаблон:Cite news
  68. Шаблон:Cite news
  69. Шаблон:Cite web
  70. Шаблон:Cite news
  71. Шаблон:Cite news (Lee has since published a sequel, Go Set a Watchman.)
  72. Buell (2014), p. 426.
  73. Buell (2014), pp. 426—427.
  74. Weisenburger (2006), pp 1—2.
  75. Шаблон:Cite web
  76. Шаблон:Cite web
  77. Buell (2014), pp. 317—348.
  78. 78,0 78,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  79. Шаблон:Cite web
  80. 80,0 80,1 Buell (2014), p. 57.
  81. 81,0 81,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  82. Шаблон:Cite web
  83. Шаблон:Cite web
  84. Шаблон:Cite web
  85. Шаблон:Cite web
  86. Шаблон:Cite web