Английская Википедия:Greenhouse gas emissions

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description

Файл:20210626 Variwide chart of greenhouse gas emissions per capita by country.svg
Annual greenhouse gas emissions per person (height of vertical bars) and per country (area of vertical bars) of the fifteen high-emitting countries[1]

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from human activities intensify the greenhouse effect. This contributes to climate change. Carbon dioxide (Шаблон:CO2), from burning fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas, is one of the most important factors in causing climate change. The largest emitters are China followed by the United States. The United States has higher emissions per capita. The main producers fueling the emissions globally are large oil and gas companies. Emissions from human activities have increased atmospheric carbon dioxide by about 50% over pre-industrial levels. The growing levels of emissions have varied, but have been consistent among all greenhouse gases. Emissions in the 2010s averaged 56 billion tons a year, higher than any decade before.[2] Total cumulative emissions from 1870 to 2017 were 425±20 Шаблон:Abbr (1558 Шаблон:Abbr) from fossil fuels and industry, and 180±60 Шаблон:Abbr (660 Шаблон:Abbr) from land use change. Land-use change, such as deforestation, caused about 31% of cumulative emissions over 1870–2017, coal 32%, oil 25%, and gas 10%.[3]

Carbon dioxide (Шаблон:CO2) is the main greenhouse gas resulting from human activities. It accounts for more than half of warming. Methane (CH4) emissions have almost the same short-term impact.[4] Nitrous oxide (N2O) and fluorinated gases (F-gases) play a lesser role in comparison.

Electricity generation, heat and transport are major emitters; overall energy is responsible for around 73% of emissions.[5] Deforestation and other changes in land use also emit carbon dioxide and methane. The largest source of anthropogenic methane emissions is agriculture, closely followed by gas venting and fugitive emissions from the fossil-fuel industry. The largest agricultural methane source is livestock. Agricultural soils emit nitrous oxide partly due to fertilizers. Similarly, fluorinated gases from refrigerants play an outsized role in total human emissions.

The current Шаблон:CO2-equivalent emission rates averaging 6.6 tonnes per person per year,[6] are well over twice the estimated rate 2.3 tons[7][8] required to stay within the 2030 Paris Agreement increase of 1.5 °C (2.7 °F) over pre-industrial levels.[9] Annual per capita emissions in the industrialized countries are typically as much as ten times the average in developing countries.[10]

The carbon footprint (or greenhouse gas footprint) serves as an indicator to compare the amount of greenhouse gases emitted over the entire life cycle from the production of a good or service along the supply chain to its final consumption.[11][12] Carbon accounting (or greenhouse gas accounting) is a framework of methods to measure and track how much greenhouse gas an organization emits.[13]Шаблон:TOC limit

Relevance for greenhouse effect and global warming

Шаблон:Excerpt

Overview of main sources

Файл:Global GHG Emissions by gas.png
Global greenhouse gas emissions by type of greenhouse gas.[14] The majority (74%) is Шаблон:CO2, followed by methane (17%), in 2016.

Relevant greenhouse gases

Шаблон:See also The major anthropogenic (human origin) sources of greenhouse gases are carbon dioxide (Шаблон:CO2), nitrous oxide (Шаблон:Chem), methane, three groups of fluorinated gases (sulfur hexafluoride (Шаблон:Chem), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and perfluorocarbons (PFCs, sulphur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3)).[15] Though the greenhouse effect is heavily driven by water vapor,[16] human emissions of water vapor are not a significant contributor to warming.

Although CFCs are greenhouse gases, they are regulated by the Montreal Protocol which was motivated by CFCs' contribution to ozone depletion rather than by their contribution to global warming. Ozone depletion has only a minor role in greenhouse warming, though the two processes are sometimes confused in the media. In 2016, negotiators from over 170 nations meeting at the summit of the United Nations Environment Programme reached a legally binding accord to phase out hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) in the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol.[17][18][19] The use of CFC-12 (except some essential uses) has been phased out due to its ozone depleting properties.[20] The phasing-out of less active HCFC-compounds will be completed in 2030.[21]

Human activities

Файл:Global climate forcing of the industrial era.png
The industrial era growth in atmospheric Шаблон:CO2-equivalent gas concentrations since 1750[22]

Starting about 1750, industrial activity powered by fossil fuels began to significantly increase the concentration of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Emissions have grown rapidly since about 1950 with ongoing expansions in global population and economic activity following World War II. As of 2021, measured atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide were almost 50% higher than pre-industrial levels.[22][23]

The main sources of greenhouse gases due to human activity (also called carbon sources) are:

Global estimates

Шаблон:See also Global greenhouse gas emissions are about 50 Gt per year[14] and for 2019 have been estimated at 57 Gt Шаблон:CO2 eq including 5 Gt due to land use change.[33] In 2019, approximately 34% [20 GtШаблон:CO2-eq] of total net anthropogenic GHG emissions came from the energy supply sector, 24% [14 GtШаблон:CO2-eq] from industry, 22% [13 GtШаблон:CO2-eq]from agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU), 15% [8.7 GtШаблон:CO2-eq] from transport and 6% [3.3 GtШаблон:CO2-eq] from buildings.[34]

The current Шаблон:CO2-equivalent emission rates averaging 6.6 tonnes per person per year,[6] are well over twice the estimated rate 2.3 tons[7][8] required to stay within the 2030 Paris Agreement increase of 1.5 °C (2.7 °F) over pre-industrial levels.[9]

While cities are sometimes considered to be disproportionate contributors to emissions, per-capita emissions tend to be lower for cities than the averages in their countries.[35]

A 2017 survey of corporations responsible for global emissions found that 100 companies were responsible for 71% of global direct and indirect emissions, and that state-owned companies were responsible for 59% of their emissions.[36][37]

China is, by a significant margin, Asia's and the world's largest emitter: it emits nearly 10 billion tonnes each year, more than one-quarter of global emissions.[38] Other countries with fast growing emissions are South Korea, Iran, and Australia (which apart from the oil rich Persian Gulf states, now has the highest per capita emission rate in the world). On the other hand, annual per capita emissions of the EU-15 and the US are gradually decreasing over time.[39] Emissions in Russia and Ukraine have decreased fastest since 1990 due to economic restructuring in these countries.[40]

2015 was the first year to see both total global economic growth and a reduction of carbon emissions.[41]

High income countries compared to low income countries

Файл:CO2 emissions vs GDP.svg
Шаблон:CO2 emissions per capita versus GDP per capita (2018): In general, countries with a higher GDP per capita also have higher greenhouse gas emissions per capita.[42]

Annual per capita emissions in the industrialized countries are typically as much as ten times the average in developing countries.[10]Шаблон:Rp Due to China's fast economic development, its annual per capita emissions are quickly approaching the levels of those in the Annex I group of the Kyoto Protocol (i.e., the developed countries excluding the US).[39]

Africa and South America are both fairly small emitters: accounting for 3-4% of global emissions each. Both have emissions almost equal in size to international aviation and shipping.[38]

Calculations and reporting

Шаблон:Further

Файл:1800- Global carbon dioxide emissions, per person.svg
Per capita Шаблон:CO2 emissions surged after the mid-20th century, but then slowed their rate of growth.[43]

Variables

There are several ways of measuring greenhouse gas emissions. Some variables that have been reported include:[44]

  • Definition of measurement boundaries: Emissions can be attributed geographically, to the area where they were emitted (the territory principle) or by the activity principle to the territory that produced the emissions. These two principles result in different totals when measuring, for example, electricity importation from one country to another, or emissions at an international airport.
  • Time horizon of different gases: The contribution of given greenhouse gas is reported as a Шаблон:CO2 equivalent. The calculation to determine this takes into account how long that gas remains in the atmosphere. This is not always known accuratelyШаблон:Clarify and calculations must be regularly updated to reflect new information.
  • The measurement protocol itself: This may be via direct measurement or estimation. The four main methods are the emission factor-based method, mass balance method, predictive emissions monitoring systems, and continuous emissions monitoring systems. These methods differ in accuracy, cost, and usability. Public information from space-based measurements of carbon dioxide by Climate Trace is expected to reveal individual large plants before the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference.[45]

These measures are sometimes used by countries to assert various policy/ethical positions on climate change.[46]Шаблон:RpThe use of different measures leads to a lack of comparability, which is problematic when monitoring progress towards targets. There are arguments for the adoption of a common measurement tool, or at least the development of communication between different tools.[44]

Reporting

Emissions may be tracked over long time periods, known as historical or cumulative emissions measurements. Cumulative emissions provide some indicators of what is responsible for greenhouse gas atmospheric concentration build-up.[47]Шаблон:Rp

National accounts balance

Шаблон:See also

The national accounts balance tracks emissions based on the difference between a country's exports and imports. For many richer nations, the balance is negative because more goods are imported than they are exported. This result is mostly due to the fact that it is cheaper to produce goods outside of developed countries, leading developed countries to become increasingly dependent on services and not goods. A positive account balance would mean that more production was occurring within a country, so more operational factories would increase carbon emission levels.[48]

Emissions may also be measured across shorter time periods. Emissions changes may, for example, be measured against the base year of 1990. 1990 was used in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) as the base year for emissions, and is also used in the Kyoto Protocol (some gases are also measured from the year 1995).[10]Шаблон:Rp A country's emissions may also be reported as a proportion of global emissions for a particular year.

Another measurement is of per capita emissions. This divides a country's total annual emissions by its mid-year population.[49]Шаблон:Rp Per capita emissions may be based on historical or annual emissions.[46]Шаблон:Rp

Embedded emissions

Шаблон:See also

One way of attributing greenhouse gas emissions is to measure the embedded emissions (also referred to as "embodied emissions") of goods that are being consumed. Emissions are usually measured according to production, rather than consumption.[50] For example, in the main international treaty on climate change (the UNFCCC), countries report on emissions produced within their borders, e.g., the emissions produced from burning fossil fuels.[51]Шаблон:Rp[52]Шаблон:Rp Under a production-based accounting of emissions, embedded emissions on imported goods are attributed to the exporting, rather than the importing, country. Under a consumption-based accounting of emissions, embedded emissions on imported goods are attributed to the importing country, rather than the exporting, country.

A substantial proportion of Шаблон:CO2 emissions is traded internationally. The net effect of trade was to export emissions from China and other emerging markets to consumers in the US, Japan, and Western Europe.[52]Шаблон:Rp

Carbon footprint

Шаблон:Excerpt

Emission intensity

Шаблон:Further

Emission intensity is a ratio between greenhouse gas emissions and another metric, e.g., gross domestic product (GDP) or energy use. The terms "carbon intensity" and "emissions intensity" are also sometimes used.[53] Emission intensities may be calculated using market exchange rates (MER) or purchasing power parity (PPP).[46]Шаблон:Rp Calculations based on MER show large differences in intensities between developed and developing countries, whereas calculations based on PPP show smaller differences.

Example tools and websites

Carbon accounting (or greenhouse gas accounting) is a framework of methods to measure and track how much greenhouse gas an organization emits.[13]

Climate TRACE

Шаблон:Excerpt

Historical trends

Cumulative and historical emissions

Шаблон:Multiple image Шаблон:Multiple image

Файл:CO2 Emissions by Source Since 1880.svg
Шаблон:CO2 emissions by source since 1880

Cumulative anthropogenic (i.e., human-emitted) emissions of Шаблон:CO2 from fossil fuel use are a major cause of global warming,[54] and give some indication of which countries have contributed most to human-induced climate change. In particular, Шаблон:CO2 stays in the atmosphere for at least 150 years and up to 1000 years,[55] whilst methane disappears within a decade or so,[56] and nitrous oxides last about 100 years.[57] The graph gives some indication of which regions have contributed most to human-induced climate change.[58][59]Шаблон:Rp When these numbers are calculated per capita cumulative emissions based on then-current population the situation is shown even more clearly. The ratio in per capita emissions between industrialized countries and developing countries was estimated at more than 10 to 1.

Non-OECD countries accounted for 42% of cumulative energy-related Шаблон:CO2 emissions between 1890 and 2007.[51]Шаблон:Rp Over this time period, the US accounted for 28% of emissions; the EU, 23%; Japan, 4%; other OECD countries 5%; Russia, 11%; China, 9%; India, 3%; and the rest of the world, 18%.[51]Шаблон:Rp

Overall, developed countries accounted for 83.8% of industrial Шаблон:CO2 emissions over this time period, and 67.8% of total Шаблон:CO2 emissions. Developing countries accounted for industrial Шаблон:CO2 emissions of 16.2% over this time period, and 32.2% of total Шаблон:CO2 emissions.

However, what becomes clear when we look at emissions across the world today is that the countries with the highest emissions over history are not always the biggest emitters today. For example, in 2017, the UK accounted for just 1% of global emissions.[38]

In comparison, humans have emitted more greenhouse gases than the Chicxulub meteorite impact event which caused the extinction of the dinosaurs.[60]

Transport, together with electricity generation, is the major source of greenhouse gas emissions in the EU. Greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector continue to rise, in contrast to power generation and nearly all other sectors. Since 1990, transportation emissions have increased by 30%. The transportation sector accounts for around 70% of these emissions. The majority of these emissions are caused by passenger vehicles and vans. Road travel is the first major source of greenhouse gas emissions from transportation, followed by aircraft and maritime.[61][62] Waterborne transportation is still the least carbon-intensive mode of transportation on average, and it is an essential link in sustainable multimodal freight supply chains.[63]

Buildings, like industry, are directly responsible for around one-fifth of greenhouse gas emissions, primarily from space heating and hot water consumption. When combined with power consumption within buildings, this figure climbs to more than one-third.[64][65][66]

Within the EU, the agricultural sector presently accounts for roughly 10% of total greenhouse gas emissions, with methane from livestock accounting for slightly more than half of 10%.[67]

Estimates of total Шаблон:CO2 emissions do include biotic carbon emissions, mainly from deforestation.[46]Шаблон:Rp Including biotic emissions brings about the same controversy mentioned earlier regarding carbon sinks and land-use change.[46]Шаблон:Rp The actual calculation of net emissions is very complex, and is affected by how carbon sinks are allocated between regions and the dynamics of the climate system.

Файл:Co2 growth log piecewise.png
Fossil fuel Шаблон:CO2 emissions on log (natural and base 10) scales

The graphic shows the logarithm of 1850–2019 fossil fuel Шаблон:CO2 emissions;[68] natural log on left, actual value of Gigatons per year on right. Although emissions increased during the 170-year period by about 3% per year overall, intervals of distinctly different growth rates (broken at 1913, 1945, and 1973) can be detected. The regression lines suggest that emissions can rapidly shift from one growth regime to another and then persist for long periods of time. The most recent drop in emissions growth - by almost 3 percentage points - was at about the time of the 1970s energy crisis. Percent changes per year were estimated by piecewise linear regression on the log data and are shown on the plot; the data are from The Integrated Carbon Observation system.[69]

Changes since a particular base year

Шаблон:See also

The sharp acceleration in Шаблон:CO2 emissions since 2000 to more than a 3% increase per year (more than 2 ppm per year) from 1.1% per year during the 1990s is attributable to the lapse of formerly declining trends in carbon intensity of both developing and developed nations. China was responsible for most of global growth in emissions during this period. Localised plummeting emissions associated with the collapse of the Soviet Union have been followed by slow emissions growth in this region due to more efficient energy use, made necessary by the increasing proportion of it that is exported.[70] In comparison, methane has not increased appreciably, and Шаблон:Chem by 0.25% y−1.

Using different base years for measuring emissions has an effect on estimates of national contributions to global warming.[59]Шаблон:Rp[71] This can be calculated by dividing a country's highest contribution to global warming starting from a particular base year, by that country's minimum contribution to global warming starting from a particular base year. Choosing between base years of 1750, 1900, 1950, and 1990 has a significant effect for most countries.[59]Шаблон:Rp Within the G8 group of countries, it is most significant for the UK, France and Germany. These countries have a long history of Шаблон:CO2 emissions (see the section on Cumulative and historical emissions).

Data from Global Carbon Project

Файл:Potential CO2 emissions from large fossil fuel projects 'carbon bombs' per country.jpg
Map of key fossil fuel projects ("carbon bombs"): proposed or existing fossil fuel extraction projects (a coal mine, oil or gas project) that would result in more than 1 gigaton of Шаблон:CO2 emissions if its reserves were completely extracted and burnt.[72]

The Global Carbon Project continuously releases data about Шаблон:CO2 emissions, budget and concentration.

Шаблон:CO2 emissions[73]
Year Fossil fuels

and industry (excluding cement carbonation) Gt C

Land use

change Gt C

Total

Gt C

Total

Gt Шаблон:CO2

2010 9.106 1.32 10.43 38.0
2011 9.412 1.35 10.76 39.2
2012 9.554 1.32 10.87 39.6
2013 9.640 1.26 10.9 39.7
2014 9.710 1.34 11.05 40.2
2015 9.704 1.47 11.17 40.7
2016 9.695 1.24 10.93 39.8
2017 9.852 1.18 11.03 40.2
2018 10.051 1.14 11.19 40.7
2019 10.120 1.24 11.36 41.3
2020 9.624 1.11 10.73 39.1
2021 10.132 1.08 11.21 40.8
2022

(projection)

10.2 1.08 11.28 41.3

Emissions by type of greenhouse gas

Шаблон:See also

Шаблон:Pie chart

Шаблон:Pie chartCarbon dioxide (Шаблон:CO2) is the dominant emitted greenhouse gas, while methane (Шаблон:CH4) emissions almost have the same short-term impact.[4] Nitrous oxide (N2O) and fluorinated gases (F-gases) play a lesser role in comparison.

Greenhouse gas emissions are measured in [[Global warming potential#Carbon dioxide equivalent|Шаблон:CO2 equivalents]] determined by their global warming potential (GWP), which depends on their lifetime in the atmosphere. Estimations largely depend on the ability of oceans and land sinks to absorb these gases. Short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs) including methane, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), tropospheric ozone and black carbon persist in the atmosphere for a period ranging from days to 15 years; whereas carbon dioxide can remain in the atmosphere for millennia.[74] Reducing SLCP emissions can cut the ongoing rate of global warming by almost half and reduce the projected Arctic warming by two-thirds.[75]

Greenhouse gas emissions in 2019 were estimated at 57.4 GtШаблон:CO2e, while Шаблон:CO2 emissions alone made up 42.5 Gt including land-use change (LUC).[76]

While mitigation measures for decarbonization are essential on the longer term, they could result in weak near-term warming because sources of carbon emissions often also co-emit air pollution. Hence, pairing measures that target carbon dioxide with measures targeting non-Шаблон:CO2 pollutants – short-lived climate pollutants, which have faster effects on the climate, is essential for climate goals.[77]

Carbon dioxide (Шаблон:CO2)

Methane (CH4)

Шаблон:See also

Файл:Historical and future temperature projections showing importance of mitigating short-lived climate pollutants.jpg
Historical and future temperature projections showing importance of mitigating short-lived climate pollutants like methane

Methane has a high immediate impact with a 5-year global warming potential of up to 100.[4] Given this, the current 389 Mt of methane emissions[78]Шаблон:Rp has about the same short-term global warming effect as Шаблон:CO2 emissions, with a risk to trigger irreversible changes in climate and ecosystems. For methane, a reduction of about 30% below current emission levels would lead to a stabilization in its atmospheric concentration.

  • Fossil fuels (32%), again, account for most of the methane emissions including coal mining (12% of methane total), gas distribution and leakages (11%) as well as gas venting in oil production (9%).[78]Шаблон:Rp[78]Шаблон:Rp
  • Livestock (28%) with cattle (21%) as the dominant source, followed by buffalo (3%), sheep (2%), and goats (1.5%).[78]Шаблон:Rp
  • Human waste and wastewater (21%): When biomass waste in landfills and organic substances in domestic and industrial wastewater is decomposed by bacteria in anaerobic conditions, substantial amounts of methane are generated.[78]Шаблон:Rp
  • Rice cultivation (10%) on flooded rice fields is another agricultural source, where anaerobic decomposition of organic material produces methane.[78]Шаблон:Rp

Nitrous oxide (Шаблон:Chem)

N2O has a high GWP and significant Ozone Depleting Potential. It is estimated that the global warming potential of N2O over 100 years is 265 times greater than Шаблон:CO2.[81] For N2O, a reduction of more than 50% would be required for a stabilization.

Most emissions (56%) of nitrous oxide comes from agriculture, especially meat production: cattle (droppings on pasture), fertilizers, animal manure.[78]Шаблон:RpFurther contributions come from combustion of fossil fuels (18%) and biofuels[82] as well as industrial production of adipic acid and nitric acid.

F-gases

Fluorinated gases include hydrofluorocarbons (HFC), perfluorocarbons (PFC), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3). They are used by switchgear in the power sector, semiconductor manufacture, aluminum production and a largely unknown source of SF6.[78]Шаблон:Rp Continued phase down of manufacture and use of HFCs under the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol will help reduce HFC emissions and concurrently improve the energy efficiency of appliances that use HFCs like air conditioners, freezers and other refrigeration devices.

Hydrogen

Hydrogen leakages contribute to indirect global warming.[83] When hydrogen is oxidized in the atmosphere, the result is an increase in concentrations of greenhouse gases in both the troposphere and the stratosphere.[84] Hydrogen can leak from hydrogen production facilities as well as any infrastructure in which hydrogen is transported, stored, or consumed.[85]

Black carbon

Black carbon is formed through the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels, biofuel, and biomass. It is not a greenhouse gas but a climate forcing agent. Black carbon can absorb sunlight and reduce albedo when deposited on snow and ice. Indirect heating can be caused by the interaction with clouds.[86] Black carbon stays in the atmosphere for only several days to weeks.[87] Emissions may be mitigated by upgrading coke ovens, installing particulate filters on diesel-based engines, reducing routine flaring, and minimizing open burning of biomass.

Emissions by sector

Шаблон:See also

Файл:Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Economic Sector.svg
Contributions to climate change broken down by economic sector as of 2019
Файл:Global GHG Emissions by Sector 2016.png
2016 global greenhouse gas emissions by sector.[88] Percentages are calculated from estimated global emissions of all Kyoto Greenhouse Gases, converted to Шаблон:CO2 equivalent quantities (GtШаблон:CO2e).

Global greenhouse gas emissions can be attributed to different sectors of the economy. This provides a picture of the varying contributions of different types of economic activity to climate change, and helps in understanding the changes required to mitigate climate change.

Greenhouse gas emissions can be divided into those that arise from the combustion of fuels to produce energy, and those generated by other processes. Around two thirds of greenhouse gas emissions arise from the combustion of fuels.[89]

Energy may be produced at the point of consumption, or by a generator for consumption by others. Thus emissions arising from energy production may be categorized according to where they are emitted, or where the resulting energy is consumed. If emissions are attributed at the point of production, then electricity generators contribute about 25% of global greenhouse gas emissions.[90] If these emissions are attributed to the final consumer then 24% of total emissions arise from manufacturing and construction, 17% from transportation, 11% from domestic consumers, and 7% from commercial consumers.[91] Around 4% of emissions arise from the energy consumed by the energy and fuel industry itself.

The remaining third of emissions arise from processes other than energy production. 12% of total emissions arise from agriculture, 7% from land use change and forestry, 6% from industrial processes, and 3% from waste.[89]

Electricity generation

Шаблон:See also

Файл:Global emissions gas 2015.png
Global greenhouse gas emissions by gas

Coal-fired power stations are the single largest emitter, with over 20% of global greenhouse gas emissions in 2018.[92] Although much less polluting than coal plants, natural gas-fired power plants are also major emitters,[93] taking electricity generation as a whole over 25% in 2018.[94] Notably, just 5% of the world's power plants account for almost three-quarters of carbon emissions from electricity generation, based on an inventory of more than 29,000 fossil-fuel power plants across 221 countries.[95] In the 2022 IPCC report, it is noted that providing modern energy services universally would only increase greenhouse gas emissions by a few percent at most. This slight increase means that the additional energy demand that comes from supporting decent living standards for all would be far lower than current average energy consumption.[96]

Agriculture, forestry and land use

Agriculture

Шаблон:See also Шаблон:Excerpt

Deforestation
Файл:Spatial pattern of forest carbon loss across the tropics.webp
Mean annual carbon loss from tropical deforestation[97]

Шаблон:Further

Deforestation is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. A study shows annual carbon emissions (or carbon loss) from tropical deforestation have doubled during the last two decades and continue to increase. (0.97 ±0.16 PgC per year in 2001–2005 to 1.99 ±0.13 PgC per year in 2015–2019)[98][97]

Land-use change

Шаблон:Main

Файл:2019 Greenhouse gas emissions per capita by region - variwide bar chart - IPCC AR6 WG3 - Fig SPM.2c.svg
Substantial land-use change contributions to emissions have been made by Latin America, Southeast Asia, Africa, and Pacific Islands. Area of rectangles shows total emissions for that region.[99]

Land-use change, e.g., the clearing of forests for agricultural use, can affect the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere by altering how much carbon flows out of the atmosphere into carbon sinks.[100] Accounting for land-use change can be understood as an attempt to measure "net" emissions, i.e., gross emissions from all sources minus the removal of emissions from the atmosphere by carbon sinks.[46]Шаблон:Rp

There are substantial uncertainties in the measurement of net carbon emissions.[101] Additionally, there is controversy over how carbon sinks should be allocated between different regions and over time.[46]Шаблон:Rp For instance, concentrating on more recent changes in carbon sinks is likely to favour those regions that have deforested earlier, e.g., Europe.

In 1997, human-caused Indonesian peat fires were estimated to have released between 13% and 40% of the average annual global carbon emissions caused by the burning of fossil fuels.[102][103][104]

Transport of people and goods

Файл:World fossil carbon dioxide emissions six top countries and confederations.png
Aviation and shipping (dashed line) produce a significant proportion of global carbon dioxide emissions.

Шаблон:FurtherTransportation accounts for 15% of emissions worldwide.[105] Over a quarter of global transport Шаблон:CO2 emissions are from road freight,[106] so many countries are further restricting truck Шаблон:CO2 emissions to help limit climate change.[107]

Maritime transport accounts for 3.5% to 4% of all greenhouse gas emissions, primarily carbon dioxide.[108][109] In 2022, the shipping industry's 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions made it "the sixth largest greenhouse gas emitter worldwide, ranking between Japan and Germany."[110][111][112]

Aviation

Шаблон:Further Jet airliners contribute to climate change by emitting carbon dioxide (Шаблон:CO2), nitrogen oxides, contrails and particulates.In 2018, global commercial operations generated 2.4% of all Шаблон:CO2 emissions.[113]

In 2020, approximately 3.5% of the overall human impacts on climate are from the aviation sector. The impact of the sector on climate in the late 20 years had doubled, but the part of the contribution of the sector in comparison to other sectors did not change because other sectors grew as well.[114]

Some representative figures for Шаблон:CO2 average direct emissions (not accounting for high-altitude radiative effects) of airliners expressed as Шаблон:CO2 and Шаблон:CO2 equivalent per passenger kilometer:[115]

Buildings and construction

In 2018, manufacturing construction materials and maintaining buildings accounted for 39% of carbon dioxide emissions from energy and process-related emissions. Manufacture of glass, cement, and steel accounted for 11% of energy and process-related emissions.[116] Because building construction is a significant investment, more than two-thirds of buildings in existence will still exist in 2050. Retrofitting existing buildings to become more efficient will be necessary to meet the targets of the Paris Agreement; it will be insufficient to only apply low-emission standards to new construction.[117] Buildings that produce as much energy as they consume are called zero-energy buildings, while buildings that produce more than they consume are energy-plus. Low-energy buildings are designed to be highly efficient with low total energy consumption and carbon emissions—a popular type is the passive house.[116]

The construction industry has seen marked advances in building performance and energy efficiency over recent decades.[118] Green building practices that avoid emissions or capture the carbon already present in the environment, allow for reduced footprint of the construction industry, for example, use of hempcrete, cellulose fiber insulation, and landscaping.[119]

In 2019, the building sector was responsible for 12 GtШаблон:CO2-eq emissions. More than 95% of these emissions were carbon, and the remaining 5% were Шаблон:CH4, Шаблон:Chem2, and halocarbon.[120]

The largest contributor to building sector emissions (49% of total) is the production of electricity for use in buildings.[121]

Of global building sector GHG emissions, 28% are produced during the manufacturing process of building materials such as steel, cement (a key component of concrete),[122] and glass.[121] The conventional process inherently related to the production of steel and cement results in large amounts of CO2 emitted. For example, the production of steel in 2018 was responsible for 7 to 9% of the global CO2 emissions.[123]

The remaining 23% of global building sector GHG emissions are produced directly on site during building operations.[121]

Embodied carbon emissions in construction sector

Embodied carbon emissions, or upfront carbon emissions (UCE), are the result of creating and maintaining the materials that form a building.[124] As of 2018, "Embodied carbon is responsible 11% of global greenhouse gas emissions and 28% of global building sector emissions ... Embodied carbon will be responsible for almost half of total new construction emissions between now and 2050."[125]

GHG emissions which are produced during the mining, processing, manufacturing, transportation and installation of building materials are referred to as the embodied carbon of a material.[126] The embodied carbon of a construction project can be reduced by using low-carbon materials for building structures and finishes, reducing demolition, and reusing buildings and construction materials whenever possible.[121]

Industrial processes

Шаблон:See also Шаблон:As of Secunda CTL is the world's largest single emitter, at 56.5 million tonnes Шаблон:CO2 a year.[127]

Mining

Flaring and venting of natural gas in oil wells is a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions. Its contribution to greenhouse gases has declined by three-quarters in absolute terms since a peak in the 1970s of approximately 110 million metric tons/year, and in 2004 accounted for about 1/2 of one percent of all anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions.[128]

The World Bank estimates that 134 billion cubic meters of natural gas are flared or vented annually (2010 datum), an amount equivalent to the combined annual gas consumption of Germany and France or enough to supply the entire world with gas for 16 days. This flaring is highly concentrated: 10 countries account for 70% of emissions, and twenty for 85%.[129]

Steel and aluminum

Steel and aluminum are key economic sectors for the carbon capture and storage. According to a 2013 study, "in 2004, the steel industry along emits about 590M tons of Шаблон:CO2, which accounts for 5.2% of the global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Шаблон:CO2 emitted from steel production primarily comes from energy consumption of fossil fuel as well as the use of limestone to purify iron oxides."[130]

Plastics

Plastics are produced mainly from fossil fuels. It was estimated that between 3% and 4% of global GHG emissions are associated with plastics' life cycles.[131] The EPA estimates[132] as many as five mass units of carbon dioxide are emitted for each mass unit of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) produced—the type of plastic most commonly used for beverage bottles,[133] the transportation produce greenhouse gases also.[134] Plastic waste emits carbon dioxide when it degrades. In 2018 research claimed that some of the most common plastics in the environment release the greenhouse gases methane and ethylene when exposed to sunlight in an amount that can affect the earth climate.[135][136]

Due to the lightness of plastic versus glass or metal, plastic may reduce energy consumption. For example, packaging beverages in PET plastic rather than glass or metal is estimated to save 52% in transportation energy, if the glass or metal package is single-use, of course.

In 2019 a new report "Plastic and Climate" was published. According to the report, the production and incineration of plastics will contribute in the equivalent of 850 million tonnes of carbon dioxide (Шаблон:CO2) to the atmosphere in 2019. With the current trend, annual life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of plastics will grow to 1.34 billion tonnes by 2030. By 2050, the life cycle emissions of plastics could reach 56 billion tonnes, as much as 14 percent of the Earth's remaining carbon budget.[137] The report says that only solutions which involve a reduction in consumption can solve the problem, while others like biodegradable plastic, ocean cleanup, using renewable energy in plastic industry can do little, and in some cases may even worsen it.[138]

Pulp and paper

Шаблон:Further The global print and paper industry accounts for about 1% of global carbon dioxide emissions.[139] Greenhouse gas emissions from the pulp and paper industry are generated from the combustion of fossil fuels required for raw material production and transportation, wastewater treatment facilities, purchased power, paper transportation, printed product transportation, disposal and recycling.

Various services

Digital services

Шаблон:See also In 2020, data centers (excluding cryptocurrency mining) and data transmission each used about 1% of world electricity.[140] The digital sector produces between 2% and 4% of global GHG emissions,[141] a large part of which is from chipmaking.[142] However the sector reduces emissions from other sectors which have a larger global share, such as transport of people,[143] and possibly buildings and industry.[144]

Mining for proof-of-work cryptocurrencies requires enormous amounts of electricity and consequently comes with a large carbon footprint.[145] Proof-of-work blockchains such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and Monero were estimated to have added between 3 million and 15 million tonnes of carbon dioxide (Шаблон:CO2) to the atmosphere in the period from 1 January 2016 to 30 June 2017.[146] By the end of 2021, Bitcoin was estimated to produce 65.4 million tonnes of Шаблон:CO2, as much as Greece,[147] and consume between 91 and 177 terawatt-hours annually. Bitcoin is the least energy-efficient cryptocurrency, using 707.6 kilowatt-hours of electricity per transaction.[148][149][150]

A study in 2015 investigated the global electricity usage that can be ascribed to Communication Technology (CT) between 2010 and 2030. Electricity usage from CT was divided into four principle categories: (i) consumer devices, including personal computers, mobile phones, TVs and home entertainment systems; (ii) network infrastructure; (iii) data center computation and storage; and lastly (iv) production of the above categories. The study estimated for the worst-case scenario, that CT electricity usage could contribute up to 23% of the globally released greenhouse gas emissions in 2030.[151]

Health care

The healthcare sector produces 4.4–4.6% of global greenhouse gas emissions.[152]

Based on the 2013 life cycle emissions in the health care sector, it is estimated that the GHG emissions associated with US health care activities may cause an additional 123,000 to 381,000 DALYs annually.[153]

Water supply and sanitation

Шаблон:Excerpt

Tourism

According to UNEP, global tourism is a significant contributor to the increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.[154]

Emissions by other characteristics

The responsibility for anthropogenic climate change differs substantially among individuals, e.g. between groups or cohorts.

By type of energy source

Файл:CO2 Emissions from Electricity Production IPCC.png
Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of electricity supply technologies, median values calculated by IPCC[155]
Файл:UNECE 2020 Lifecycle Emissions.png
Lifecycle GHG emissions, in g Шаблон:CO2 eq. per kWh, UNECE 2020[89]

Шаблон:Excerpt

By socio-economic class and age

Шаблон:Multiple image

Файл:2021 Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person versus GDP per person - scatter plot.svg
Scaling the effect of wealth to the national level: richer (developed) countries emit more Шаблон:CO2 per person than poorer (developing) countries.[156] Emissions are roughly proportional to GDP per person, though the rate of increase diminishes with average GDP/pp of about $10,000.

Fueled by the consumptive lifestyle of wealthy people, the wealthiest 5% of the global population has been responsible for 37% of the absolute increase in greenhouse gas emissions worldwide. It can be seen that there is a strong relationship between income and per capita carbon dioxide emissions.[38] Almost half of the increase in absolute global emissions has been caused by the richest 10% of the population.[157] In the newest report from the IPCC 2022, it states that the lifestyle consumptions of the poor and middle class in emerging economies produce approximately 5–50 times less the amount that the high class in already developed high-income countries.[158][159] Variations in regional, and national per capita emissions partly reflect different development stages, but they also vary widely at similar income levels. The 10% of households with the highest per capita emissions contribute a disproportionately large share of global household greenhouse gas emissions.[159]

Studies find that the most affluent citizens of the world are responsible for most environmental impacts, and robust action by them is necessary for prospects of moving towards safer environmental conditions.[160][161]

According to a 2020 report by Oxfam and the Stockholm Environment Institute,[162][163] the richest 1% of the global population have caused twice as much carbon emissions as the poorest 50% over the 25 years from 1990 to 2015.[164][165][166] This was, respectively, during that period, 15% of cumulative emissions compared to 7%.[167] The bottom half of the population is directly responsible for less than 20% of energy footprints and consume less than the top 5% in terms of trade-corrected energy. The largest disproportionality was identified to be in the domain of transport, where e.g. the top 10% consume 56% of vehicle fuel and conduct 70% of vehicle purchases.[168] However, wealthy individuals are also often shareholders and typically have more influence[169] and, especially in the case of billionaires, may also direct lobbying efforts, direct financial decisions, and/or control companies.

Based on a study in 32 developed countries, researchers found that "seniors in the United States and Australia have the highest per capita footprint, twice the Western average. The trend is mainly due to changes in expenditure patterns of seniors".[170]

Methods for reducing greenhouse gas emissions

Шаблон:See also Governments have taken action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate climate change. Countries and regions listed in Annex I of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (i.e., the OECD and former planned economies of the Soviet Union) are required to submit periodic assessments to the UNFCCC of actions they are taking to address climate change.[171]Шаблон:Rp Policies implemented by governments include for example national and regional targets to reduce emissions, promoting energy efficiency, and support for an energy transition.Шаблон:Excerpt

Projections for future emissions

Файл:Figure 3 from US Energy Information Administration IEO2023 report.png
FigureШаблон:Nbsp3 from the International Energy Outlook 2023 (IEO2023) report.[172] Aggregate energy‑related carbon emissions remain constant to 2050 under the low GDP growth case, otherwise emissions rise significantly.

Шаблон:See also Шаблон:Excerpt

In October 2023, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) released a series of projections out to 2050 based on current ascertainable policy interventions.[172][173][174] Unlike many integrated systems models in this field, emissions are allowed to float rather than be pinned to [[Net zero emissions|netШаблон:Nbhyphzero]] in 2050. AШаблон:Nbspsensitivity analysis varied key parameters, primarily future GDP growth (2.6%Шаблон:Nnbsppa as reference, variously 1.8% and 3.4%) and secondarily technological learning rates, future crude oil prices, and similar exogenous inputs. The model results are far from encouraging. In no case did aggregate energy-related carbon emissions ever dip below 2022 levels (see figureШаблон:Nbsp3 plot). The IEO2023 exploration provides a benchmark and suggests that far stronger action is needed.

Country examples

Lists of countries

Файл:Ghg-co2-2012.svg
The top 40 countries emitting all greenhouse gases, showing both that derived from all sources including land clearance and forestry and also the Шаблон:CO2 component excluding those sources. Per capita figures are included. Шаблон:Cite web Indonesia and Brazil show very much higher than on graphs simply showing fossil fuel use.

Шаблон:See also In 2019, China, the United States, India, the EU27+UK, Russia, and Japan - the world's largest Шаблон:CO2 emitters - together accounted for 51% of the population, 62.5% of global gross domestic product, 62% of total global fossil fuel consumption and emitted 67% of total global fossil Шаблон:CO2. Emissions from these five countries and the EU28 show different changes in 2019 compared to 2018: the largest relative increase is found for China (+3.4%), followed by India (+1.6%). On the contrary, the EU27+UK (-3.8%), the United States (-2.6%), Japan (-2.1%) and Russia (-0.8%) reduced their fossil Шаблон:CO2 emissions.[175]

2019 fossil Шаблон:CO2 emissions by country[175]
Country Total emissions
(Mton)
Share
(%)
Per capita
(ton)
Per GDP
(ton/k$)
Global Total 38,016.57 100.00 4.93 0.29
Шаблон:Flag 11,535.20 30.34 8.12 0.51
Шаблон:Flag 5,107.26 13.43 15.52 0.25
EU27+UK 3,303.97 8.69 6.47 0.14
Шаблон:Flag 2,597.36 6.83 1.90 0.28
Шаблон:Flag 1,792.02 4.71 12.45 0.45
Шаблон:Flag 1,153.72 3.03 9.09 0.22
International Shipping 730.26 1.92 - -
Шаблон:Flag 702.60 1.85 8.52 0.16
Шаблон:Flag 701.99 1.85 8.48 0.68
Шаблон:Flag 651.87 1.71 12.70 0.30
International Aviation 627.48 1.65 - -
Шаблон:Flag 625.66 1.65 2.32 0.20
Шаблон:Flag 614.61 1.62 18.00 0.38
Шаблон:Flag 584.85 1.54 15.69 0.32
Шаблон:Flag 494.86 1.30 8.52 0.68
Шаблон:Flag 485.00 1.28 3.67 0.19
Шаблон:Flag 478.15 1.26 2.25 0.15
Шаблон:Flag 433.38 1.14 17.27 0.34
Шаблон:Flag 415.78 1.09 5.01 0.18
Шаблон:Flag 364.91 0.96 5.45 0.12
Шаблон:Flag, Шаблон:Flag and the Holy See 331.56 0.87 5.60 0.13
Шаблон:Flag 317.65 0.84 8.35 0.25
Шаблон:Flag and Шаблон:Flag 314.74 0.83 4.81 0.10
Шаблон:Flag 305.25 0.80 3.13 0.39
Шаблон:Flag 277.36 0.73 14.92 0.57
Шаблон:Flag 276.78 0.73 11.65 0.23
Шаблон:Flag 275.06 0.72 3.97 0.21
Шаблон:Flag and Andorra 259.31 0.68 5.58 0.13
Шаблон:Flag 255.37 0.67 2.52 0.22
Шаблон:Flag 248.83 0.65 7.67 0.27
Шаблон:Flag 223.63 0.59 1.09 0.22
Шаблон:Flag 222.61 0.59 22.99 0.34
Шаблон:Flag 199.41 0.52 4.42 0.20
Шаблон:Flag 197.61 0.52 4.89 0.46
Шаблон:Flag 196.40 0.52 4.48 0.36
Шаблон:Flag 180.57 0.47 4.23 0.37
Шаблон:Flag 156.41 0.41 9.13 0.16
Шаблон:Flag 150.64 0.40 1.39 0.16
Шаблон:Flag 110.16 0.29 0.66 0.14
Шаблон:Flag 110.06 0.29 3.36 0.39
Шаблон:Flag 106.53 0.28 38.82 0.41
Шаблон:Flag 105.69 0.28 9.94 0.25
Шаблон:Flag 104.41 0.27 9.03 0.18
Шаблон:Flag 100.22 0.26 0.50 0.10
Шаблон:Flag 98.95 0.26 23.29 0.47
Шаблон:Flag 94.99 0.25 2.90 0.40
Шаблон:Flag 92.78 0.24 18.55 0.67
Шаблон:Flag 90.52 0.24 15.23 0.98
Шаблон:Flag 89.89 0.24 4.90 0.20
Шаблон:Flag 86.55 0.23 1.74 0.12
Шаблон:Flag 78.63 0.21 4.04 0.14
Шаблон:Flag 73.91 0.19 2.02 0.27
Шаблон:Flag 72.36 0.19 8.25 0.14
Шаблон:Flag 70.69 0.19 7.55 0.44
Шаблон:Flag and Шаблон:Flag 68.33 0.18 7.96 0.18
Шаблон:Flag 66.34 0.17 7.03 0.37
Шаблон:Flag 65.57 0.17 5.89 0.20
Шаблон:Flag 56.29 0.15 1.71 0.13
Шаблон:Flag 53.37 0.14 9.09 0.10
Шаблон:Flag 53.18 0.14 5.51 0.17
Шаблон:Flag 52.05 0.14 7.92 0.51
Шаблон:Flag 48.47 0.13 4.73 0.14
Шаблон:Flag 48.31 0.13 0.89 0.17
Шаблон:Flag 47.99 0.13 8.89 0.14
Шаблон:Flag 44.75 0.12 4.45 0.08
Шаблон:Flag 44.02 0.12 5.88 0.10
Шаблон:Flag 43.41 0.11 7.81 0.16
Шаблон:Flag 43.31 0.11 6.20 0.27
Шаблон:Flag 42.17 0.11 1.64 0.36
Шаблон:Flag 40.70 0.11 2.38 0.21
Шаблон:Flag and Шаблон:Flag 39.37 0.10 4.57 0.07
Шаблон:Flag 38.67 0.10 8.07 0.18
Шаблон:Flag 36.55 0.10 7.54 0.09
Шаблон:Flag 35.99 0.09 6.60 0.20
Шаблон:Flag 35.98 0.09 3.59 0.25
Шаблон:Flag 35.93 0.09 11.35 0.91
Шаблон:Flag 35.44 0.09 21.64 0.48
Шаблон:Flag 33.50 0.09 9.57 0.68
Шаблон:Flag 32.74 0.09 23.81 0.90
Шаблон:Flag 32.07 0.08 2.72 0.25
Шаблон:Flag 31.12 0.08 5.39 0.09
Шаблон:Flag 31.04 0.08 2.70 0.11
Шаблон:Flag 29.16 0.08 1.58 1.20
Шаблон:Flag 28.34 0.07 2.81 0.28
Шаблон:Flag 27.57 0.07 1.31 0.10
Шаблон:Flag 27.44 0.07 4.52 0.27
Шаблон:Flag 27.28 0.07 2.48 0.14
Шаблон:Flag 25.82 0.07 0.81 0.12
Шаблон:Flag 24.51 0.06 2.15 0.24
Шаблон:Flag and Шаблон:Flag 22.57 0.06 0.40 0.13
Шаблон:Flag 21.20 0.06 1.21 0.15
Шаблон:Flag 19.81 0.05 0.38 0.09
Шаблон:Flag 19.12 0.05 4.62 0.16
Шаблон:Flag 18.50 0.05 14.19 0.38
Шаблон:Flag 18.25 0.05 0.17 0.07
Шаблон:Flag 16.84 0.04 0.56 0.10
Шаблон:Flag 16.49 0.04 1.00 0.23
Шаблон:Flag 15.66 0.04 55.25 1.67
Шаблон:Flag 15.37 0.04 7.38 0.19
Шаблон:Flag 15.02 0.04 0.50 0.15
Шаблон:Flag 13.77 0.04 4.81 0.13
Шаблон:Flag 13.56 0.04 0.53 0.10
Шаблон:Flag 13.47 0.04 3.45 0.24
Шаблон:Flag 13.34 0.04 0.22 0.09
Шаблон:Flag 11.92 0.03 1.92 0.35
Шаблон:Flag 11.63 0.03 2.75 0.09
Шаблон:Flag 11.00 0.03 0.30 0.13
Шаблон:Flag 10.89 0.03 0.37 0.17
Шаблон:Flag 10.86 0.03 0.63 0.26
Шаблон:Flag 10.36 0.03 1.08 0.19
Шаблон:Flag 10.10 0.03 0.40 0.11
Шаблон:Flag 9.81 0.03 0.59 0.18
Шаблон:Flag 9.74 0.03 16.31 0.14
Шаблон:Flag 9.26 0.02 0.29 0.24
Шаблон:Flag 9.23 0.02 2.29 0.27
Шаблон:Flag 8.98 0.02 1.80 0.09
Шаблон:Flag 8.92 0.02 4.28 0.26
Шаблон:Flag 8.92 0.02 0.96 0.28
Шаблон:Flag 8.47 0.02 1.21 0.09
Шаблон:Flag 8.38 0.02 4.38 0.14
Шаблон:Flag 8.15 0.02 0.69 0.21
Шаблон:Flag 7.66 0.02 1.64 0.33
Шаблон:Flag 7.50 0.02 0.41 0.12
Шаблон:Flag 7.44 0.02 2.56 0.26
Шаблон:Flag 7.41 0.02 6.19 0.21
Шаблон:Flag 7.15 0.02 1.11 0.13
Шаблон:Flag 7.04 0.02 2.96 0.17
Шаблон:Flag 7.02 0.02 15.98 0.26
Шаблон:Flag 6.78 0.02 0.96 0.12
Шаблон:Flag 6.56 0.02 1.89 0.09
Шаблон:Flag 5.92 0.02 2.02 0.15
Шаблон:Flag 5.91 0.02 36.38 1.51
Шаблон:Flag 5.86 0.02 0.92 0.17
Шаблон:Flag 5.80 0.02 1.05 0.33
Шаблон:Flag 5.66 0.01 1.93 0.14
Шаблон:Flag 5.34 0.01 0.12 0.06
Шаблон:Flag 4.40 0.01 1.67 0.18
Шаблон:Flag 4.33 0.01 3.41 0.15
Шаблон:Flag 4.20 0.01 0.16 0.09
Шаблон:Flag 4.07 0.01 0.47 0.11
Шаблон:Flag 3.93 0.01 11.53 0.19
Шаблон:Flag 3.91 0.01 1.07 0.04
Шаблон:Flag 3.83 0.01 13.34 0.85
Шаблон:Flag 3.64 0.01 0.18 0.08
Шаблон:Flag 3.58 0.01 0.32 0.18
Шаблон:Flag 3.48 0.01 1.65 0.11
Шаблон:Flag 3.47 0.01 2.55 0.14
Шаблон:Flag 3.02 0.01 3.40 -
Шаблон:Flag 2.98 0.01 0.03 0.03
Шаблон:Flag 2.92 0.01 0.22 0.09
Шаблон:Flag 2.85 0.01 0.35 0.22
Шаблон:Flag 2.45 0.01 6.08 0.18
Шаблон:Flag 2.36 0.01 0.10 0.08
Шаблон:Flag 2.12 0.01 2.57 0.24
Шаблон:Flag 2.06 0.01 3.59 0.22
Шаблон:Flag 1.95 0.01 5.07 -
Шаблон:Flag 1.87 0.00 4.17 -
Шаблон:Flag 1.62 0.00 0.08 0.08
Шаблон:Flag 1.52 0.00 1.94 0.20
Шаблон:Flag 1.40 0.00 0.18 0.10
Шаблон:Flag 1.36 0.00 1.48 0.11
Шаблон:Flag 1.33 0.00 59.88 4.09
Шаблон:Flag 1.27 0.00 1.98 0.02
Шаблон:Flag 1.21 0.00 0.24 0.17
Шаблон:Flag 1.15 0.00 0.09 0.04
Шаблон:Flag 1.14 0.00 0.81 0.11
Шаблон:Flag 1.05 0.00 1.06 0.20
Шаблон:Flag 1.05 0.00 10.98 0.37
Шаблон:Flag 1.04 0.00 2.41 0.05
Шаблон:Flag 1.03 0.00 0.05 0.02
Шаблон:Flag 1.02 0.00 1.83 0.26
Шаблон:Flag 0.97 0.00 0.06 0.57
Шаблон:Flag 0.91 0.00 2.02 0.09
Шаблон:Flag 0.89 0.00 0.06 0.04
Шаблон:Flag 0.78 0.00 7.39 0.19
Шаблон:Flag 0.75 0.00 0.14 0.08
Шаблон:Flag 0.75 0.00 0.33 0.13
Шаблон:Flag 0.69 0.00 19.88 0.45
Шаблон:Flag 0.61 0.00 2.06 -
Шаблон:Flag 0.60 0.00 2.08 0.10
Шаблон:Flag 0.59 0.00 0.27 0.11
Шаблон:Flag 0.54 0.00 9.47 0.19
Шаблон:Flag 0.51 0.00 4.90 0.24
Шаблон:Flag 0.49 0.00 0.10 0.11
Шаблон:Flag 0.44 0.00 0.22 0.11
Шаблон:Flag 0.40 0.00 6.38 0.09
Шаблон:Flag 0.38 0.00 0.28 0.10
Шаблон:Flag 0.37 0.00 0.95 0.14
Шаблон:Flag 0.35 0.00 5.75 0.14
Шаблон:Flag 0.34 0.00 0.03 0.04
Шаблон:Flag 0.30 0.00 1.65 0.11
Шаблон:Flag 0.30 0.00 0.51 -
Шаблон:Flag 0.23 0.00 2.10 0.12
Шаблон:Flag 0.21 0.00 0.25 0.08
Шаблон:Flag 0.19 0.00 3.44 0.14
Шаблон:Flag 0.16 0.00 0.75 0.19
Шаблон:Flag 0.15 0.00 1.32 0.11
Шаблон:Flag 0.14 0.00 0.70 0.11
Шаблон:Flag 0.14 0.00 0.22 0.09
Шаблон:Flag 0.13 0.00 1.16 0.20
Шаблон:Flag 0.13 0.00 3.70 0.13
Шаблон:Flag 0.12 0.00 3.77 0.17
Шаблон:Flag 0.10 0.00 1.38 0.12
Шаблон:Flag 0.09 0.00 0.30 0.09
Шаблон:Flag 0.06 0.00 9.72 -
Шаблон:Flag 0.04 0.00 2.51 -
Шаблон:Flag 0.03 0.00 10.87 -
Шаблон:Flag 0.03 0.00 0.28 0.13
Шаблон:Flag 0.02 0.00 1.54 0.12
Шаблон:Flag, Шаблон:Flag and Шаблон:Flag 0.02 0.00 3.87 -
Шаблон:Flag 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00

United States

Файл:1990- Annual greenhouse gas emissions - U.S. - line chart.svg
Though the U.S.'s per capita and per GDP emissions have declined significantly, the raw numerical decline in emissions is much less substantial.[176]

Шаблон:Excerpt

China

Шаблон:Excerpt

India

Шаблон:Excerpt

Society and culture

Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic

Шаблон:Main

In 2020, carbon dioxide emissions fell by 6.4% or 2.3 billion tonnes globally.[177] In April 2020, [[NOx|Шаблон:NOx]] emissions fell by up to 30%.[178] In China, lockdowns and other measures resulted in a 26% decrease in coal consumption, and a 50% reduction in nitrogen oxide emissions.[179] Greenhouse gas emissions rebounded later in the pandemic as many countries began lifting restrictions, with the direct impact of pandemic policies having a negligible long-term impact on climate change.[177][180]

See also

Шаблон:Div col

Шаблон:Div col end Шаблон:Portal

References

Шаблон:Reflist

External links

Шаблон:Commons category

Шаблон:Climate change Шаблон:Authority control Шаблон:World topic Шаблон:World topic

  1. Шаблон:Cite web (choose "Chart view"; use download link)
    ● Data for 2020 is also presented in Шаблон:Cite news
    ● Source for country populations: Шаблон:Cite web
  2. Шаблон:Cite journal
  3. Шаблон:Cite web
  4. 4,0 4,1 4,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  5. Шаблон:Cite journal
  6. 6,0 6,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  7. 7,0 7,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  8. 8,0 8,1 Шаблон:Cite book
  9. 9,0 9,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  10. 10,0 10,1 10,2 Шаблон:Cite journal
  11. Шаблон:Cite web
  12. IPCC, 2022: Annex I: Glossary Шаблон:Webarchive [van Diemen, R., J.B.R. Matthews, V. Möller, J.S. Fuglestvedt, V. Masson-Delmotte, C. Méndez, A. Reisinger, S. Semenov (eds)]. In IPCC, 2022: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Шаблон:Webarchive [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, J. Malley, (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. doi: 10.1017/9781009157926.020
  13. 13,0 13,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  14. 14,0 14,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  15. Dhakal, S., J.C. Minx, F.L. Toth, A. Abdel-Aziz, M.J. Figueroa Meza, K. Hubacek, I.G.C. Jonckheere, Yong-Gun Kim, G.F. Nemet, S. Pachauri, X.C. Tan, T. Wiedmann, 2022: Chapter 2: Emissions Trends and Drivers. In IPCC, 2022: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, J. Malley, (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. doi: 10.1017/9781009157926.004
  16. Шаблон:Cite web
  17. Шаблон:Cite web
  18. Шаблон:Cite news
  19. Шаблон:Cite web
  20. Шаблон:Citation
  21. Montreal Protocol
  22. 22,0 22,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  23. Шаблон:Cite web
  24. Шаблон:Cite web
  25. Шаблон:Cite web
  26. Шаблон:Cite web
  27. Шаблон:Cite report
  28. Шаблон:Cite book
  29. Шаблон:Cite journal
  30. Шаблон:Cite web
  31. Шаблон:Cite web
  32. Шаблон:Cite web
  33. Шаблон:Cite web
  34. Шаблон:Cite journal
  35. Шаблон:Cite journal
  36. Шаблон:Cite web
  37. Шаблон:Cite news
  38. 38,0 38,1 38,2 38,3 Шаблон:Cite journal
  39. 39,0 39,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  40. Шаблон:Cite web
  41. Шаблон:Cite news
  42. Шаблон:Cite web
  43. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок ESSD_CarbonBudget_2022 не указан текст
  44. 44,0 44,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  45. Шаблон:Cite news
  46. 46,0 46,1 46,2 46,3 46,4 46,5 46,6 Шаблон:Cite book
  47. Шаблон:Cite book
  48. Шаблон:Cite journal
  49. Шаблон:Cite book
  50. Шаблон:Cite book
  51. 51,0 51,1 51,2 Шаблон:Citation
  52. 52,0 52,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  53. Шаблон:Cite book
  54. Шаблон:Cite journal
  55. Шаблон:Cite web
  56. Шаблон:Cite web
  57. Шаблон:Cite journal
  58. Шаблон:Cite web
  59. 59,0 59,1 59,2 Шаблон:Cite journal
  60. Шаблон:Cite web
  61. Шаблон:Cite web
  62. Шаблон:Cite web
  63. Шаблон:Cite web
  64. Шаблон:Cite web
  65. Шаблон:Cite journal
  66. Шаблон:Cite web
  67. Шаблон:Cite web
  68. Шаблон:Cite journal
  69. Шаблон:Cite web
  70. Шаблон:Cite journal
  71. The cited paper uses the term "start date" instead of "base year".
  72. Шаблон:Cite journal
  73. Шаблон:Cite web
  74. Шаблон:Cite web
  75. Шаблон:Cite web
  76. using 100 year global warming potential from IPCC-AR4
  77. Шаблон:Cite journal
  78. 78,0 78,1 78,2 78,3 78,4 78,5 78,6 78,7 78,8 78,9 Olivier J.G.J. and Peters J.A.H.W. (2020), Trends in global Шаблон:CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions: 2020 report Шаблон:Webarchive. PBL Netherlands Шаблон:Webarchive Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague.
  79. Шаблон:Cite news
  80. Шаблон:Cite report
  81. Шаблон:Cite journal
  82. Шаблон:Cite journal
  83. Шаблон:Cite web
  84. Шаблон:Cite journal
  85. Шаблон:Cite journal
  86. Шаблон:Cite journal
  87. Шаблон:Cite journal
  88. Шаблон:Cite web
  89. 89,0 89,1 89,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  90. IEA, Шаблон:CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2018: Highlights (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2018) p.98
  91. IEA, Шаблон:CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2018: Highlights (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2018) p.101
  92. Шаблон:Cite web
  93. Шаблон:Cite web
  94. Шаблон:Cite web
  95. Шаблон:Cite journal
  96. Emission Trends and Drivers, Ch 2 in "Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change" https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/ Шаблон:Webarchive
  97. 97,0 97,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  98. Шаблон:Cite news
  99. Fig. SPM.2c from Шаблон:Cite book GDP data is for 2019.
  100. Шаблон:Citation
  101. Шаблон:Cite book
  102. Шаблон:Cite journal
  103. Шаблон:Cite web
  104. Шаблон:Cite news
  105. Шаблон:Cite journal
  106. Шаблон:Cite web
  107. Шаблон:Cite news
  108. Шаблон:Cite book
  109. Шаблон:Cite news
  110. Шаблон:Cite web
  111. Шаблон:Cite web
  112. Шаблон:Cite web
  113. Шаблон:Cite web
  114. Шаблон:Cite news
  115. Шаблон:Cite web
  116. 116,0 116,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  117. Шаблон:Cite web
  118. Шаблон:Cite journal
  119. Шаблон:Cite web
  120. Шаблон:Cite web
  121. 121,0 121,1 121,2 121,3 Шаблон:Cite book
  122. Шаблон:Cite web
  123. Шаблон:Cite journal
  124. Шаблон:Cite web
  125. Шаблон:Cite web
  126. Шаблон:Cite journal
  127. Шаблон:Cite news
  128. Global, Regional, and National CO2 Emissions Шаблон:Webarchive. In Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change, Marland, G., T.A. Boden, and R. J. Andres, 2005, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
  129. Шаблон:Cite web
  130. Шаблон:Cite journal
  131. Шаблон:Cite journal
  132. Шаблон:Cite web
  133. Шаблон:Cite web
  134. Шаблон:Cite web
  135. Шаблон:Cite journal
  136. Шаблон:Cite news
  137. Шаблон:Cite web
  138. Шаблон:Cite book
  139. Шаблон:Cite web
  140. Шаблон:Cite web
  141. Шаблон:Cite arXiv
  142. Шаблон:Cite web
  143. Шаблон:Cite web
  144. Шаблон:Cite web
  145. Шаблон:Cite journal
  146. Шаблон:Cite journal
  147. Шаблон:Cite web
  148. Шаблон:Cite web
  149. Шаблон:Cite news
  150. Шаблон:Cite web
  151. Шаблон:Cite journal Файл:CC-BY icon.svg Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  152. Шаблон:Cite journal
  153. Шаблон:Cite journal
  154. Шаблон:Cite web
  155. Шаблон:Cite web
  156. Шаблон:Cite news
  157. Rapid Transition Alliance, 13 April 2021 "Cambridge Sustainability Commission Report on Scaling Behaviour Change" Шаблон:Webarchive p. 20
  158. Emission trends and drivers, Ch 2 in "Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change". http://www.ipcc.ch. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
  159. 159,0 159,1 Climate Change 2022 ipcc.chШаблон:Webarchive
  160. Шаблон:Cite journal
  161. Шаблон:Cite journal
  162. Шаблон:Cite web
  163. Шаблон:Cite web
  164. Шаблон:Cite news
  165. Шаблон:Cite web
  166. Шаблон:Cite web
  167. Шаблон:Cite web
  168. Шаблон:Cite journal
  169. Шаблон:Cite news
  170. Шаблон:Cite journal
  171. Шаблон:Cite book
  172. 172,0 172,1 Шаблон:Cite book Informally describes as a "narrative" and tagged IEO2023.
  173. Шаблон:Cite web Landing page.
  174. Шаблон:Cite AV media YouTube. Duration: 00:57:12. Includes interview with Joseph DeCarolis.
  175. 175,0 175,1 Шаблон:Cite web Шаблон:CC-notice
  176. Шаблон:Cite web
  177. 177,0 177,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  178. Шаблон:Cite journal
  179. Шаблон:Cite journal
  180. Шаблон:Cite journal