Английская Википедия:Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску
Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:More citations needed
Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the one person, one vote principle under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment allows a state's redistricting commission slight variances in drawing of legislative districts provided that the variance does not exceed 10 percent.[1] The Court found that the map, created by a bipartisan commission on the basis of the 2010 census, was constitutional.[2]
See also
- Evenwel v. Abbott
- Reynolds v. Sims — a United States Supreme Court case that ruled that state legislature districts had to be roughly equal in population.
References
External links
- ↑ Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm'n, Шаблон:Ussc.
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
Категории:
- Английская Википедия
- United States electoral redistricting case law
- United States One Person, One Vote Legal Doctrine
- United States Supreme Court cases
- United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
- 2016 in United States case law
- Redistricting in the United States
- Congressional districts of Arizona
- Страницы, где используется шаблон "Навигационная таблица/Телепорт"
- Страницы с телепортом
- Википедия
- Статья из Википедии
- Статья из Английской Википедии