Английская Википедия:Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Use mdy dates Шаблон:Infobox SCOTUS case

Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins, 507 U.S. 604 (1993),[1] was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a disparate treatment claim cannot succeed unless the employee's protected trait had a determinative influence on the employer's decisionmaking.[2]

Background

Hazen Paper fired Biggins, 62, a few weeks before his service would have reached the required number of years for his pension to vest. Biggins sued Hazen Paper alleging a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967.[3]

See also

References

Шаблон:Reflist

External links


Шаблон:SCOTUS-stub

  1. Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок cornell2016 не указан текст
  2. Шаблон:Cite web
  3. Шаблон:Cite web