Английская Википедия:Hemiauchenia

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Italic title Шаблон:Automatic taxobox

Hemiauchenia[1] is a genus of laminoid camelids that evolved in North America in the Miocene period about 10 million years ago. This genus diversified and expanded into to South America in the Late Pliocene approximately 3 to 2 million years ago, as part of the Great American Biotic Interchange. The genus became extinct at the end of the Pleistocene. The monophyly of the genus has been considered questionable, with phylogenetic analyses finding the genus to paraphyletic or polyphyletic, with some species suggested to be more closely related to living lamines than to other Hemiaucenia species.[2][3]

Broad features of genus Hemiauchenia

The genus name is derived from the Шаблон:Lang-grc (Шаблон:Transliteration, "half"-)[4] and αὐχήν (Шаблон:Transliteration, "neck").[5]Шаблон:Refn Species are specified using Latin adjectives or Latinised names from other languages.

North American fossils

Файл:Rattlesnake Formation Mural.jpg
Restoration of Hemiauchenia (right) and other animals of the Rattlesnake Formation fleeing a volcanic eruption
Файл:Hemiauchenia macrocephala skull.png
Skull of Hemiauchenia macrocephala

Remains of these species have been found in assorted locations around North America, including Florida, Texas, Kansas, Nebraska, Arizona, Mexico, California, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Oregon, Colorado, and Washington.[6][7] The "large-headed llama", H. macrocephala, was widely distributed in North and Central America, with H. vera being known from the western United States and northern Mexico. H. minima has been found in Florida, and H. guanajuatensis in Mexico.[8]

South American fossils

Fossils of Hemiauchenia in South America are restricted to the Pleistocene and have been found in the Luján and Agua Blanca Formations of Buenos Aires Province and Córdoba Province, Argentina, the Tarija Formation of Bolivia, Pilauco of Osorno, Los Lagos, Chile and Paraíba, Ceará, and the Touro Passo Formation of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.[9] Hemiauchenia paradoxa is suggested to have been a browser.[10]

Distinguishing characteristics of members of Hemiauchenia

H. vera

  • Relatively low-crowned teeth (part of visible teeth ends close to gums)
  • Large caniniform (canine-like) upper first premolar
  • Retention of lower third premolar

H. blancoensis

H. macrocephala

  • Possesses a larger skull relative to other species
  • Long, robust limbs
  • Large skeletal size
  • Presence of a deciduous upper second premolar
  • Fully molariform deciduous second premolar (its infant bicuspids were like molars)
  • High-crowned molars
  • Thick layer of cementum on the teeth
  • Broad mandibular symphysis (line where the bones of the jaw join together) with incisors in a vertical fashion

Thought to have been browsers[11] and mixed feeders.[12] Suggested to be less closely related to modern Lama and Vicugna than H. paradoxa is.[3]

Native to the southern United States, spanning from California to Florida,[13] and as far north as Nebraska.[12] Also present in Mexico.[11]

H. minima

  • Despite being the earliest recognized species, general distinguishing characteristics for H. minima are little known.

Other species

Also, a few lesser known species, such as H. paradoxa, H. seymourensis, H. edensis and H. guanajuatensis, have been found. Depending on which source is consulted, these may or may not be considered legitimate taxa.Шаблон:Citation needed

Classification history

Prior to 1974, fossil specimens now thought to be Hemiauchenia were classified as Holomeniscus, Lama, and Tanupolama, until S. David Webb proposed that these North and South American fossil species were part of a single genus.[14] This has been accepted by all subsequent researchers, although in 2013, Carolina Saldanha Scherer questioned the inclusion of a certain North American species and suggested that Hemiauchenia is paraphyletic.[2]

Notes

Шаблон:Reflist

References

Шаблон:Portal Шаблон:Reflist

Further reading

  • Honey, J. H., J. A. Harrison, D. R. Prothero, and M. S. Stevens. 1998. Camelidae. pp. 439–462. In: Evolution of Tertiary Mammals of North America, Eds: C. M. Janis, K. M. Scott, and L. L. Jacobs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 691 pp.
  • Hulbert, R. C. 1992. A checklist of the fossil vertebrates of Florida. Papers in Florida Paleontology, no. 6:25-26.
  • Kurtén, B. and E. Anderson. 1980. Pleistocene Mammals of North America. Columbia University Press, NY, 442 pp. (camels - 301, 306-307).
  • Meachen, Julie A. "A New Species of Hemiauchenia (Camelidae; Lamini) Шаблон:Webarchive" Diss. University of Florida, 2003. Abstract
  • McKenna, M. C. and S. K. Bell. 1997. Classification of Mammals above the Species Level. Columbia University Press, NY, 631 pp. (camels - pp. 413–416).
  • Nowak, R. M. 1999. Walker's Book of Mammals, vol. 1. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 837 – 1936. (camels - pp. 1072–1081)

Шаблон:Taxonbar

  1. Paleobiology Database - Hemiauchenia basic info
  2. 2,0 2,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  3. 3,0 3,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  4. Шаблон:LSJ
  5. Шаблон:LSJ
  6. Шаблон:Cite web
  7. Шаблон:Cite web
  8. Шаблон:Cite journal
  9. Hemiauchenia at Fossilworks.org
  10. Шаблон:Cite journal
  11. 11,0 11,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  12. 12,0 12,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  13. Grayson, D. K. 1994. The extinct Late Pleistocene mammals of the Great Basin. Pages 55–85 inNatural history of the Colorado Plateau and Great Basin ( K. T. Harper, J. L. ST. Clair, K. H. Thorne, and W. M. Hess, editors). University Press of Colorado, Niwot.
  14. Шаблон:Cite web