Английская Википедия:Historical definitions of races in India

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:For Шаблон:Pp-pc1

Various attempts have been made, under the British Raj and since, to classify the population of India according to a racial typology. After independence, in pursuance of the government's policy to discourage distinctions between communities based on race, the 1951 Census of India did away with racial classifications. Today, the national Census of independent India does not recognise any racial groups in India.[1]

Some scholars of the colonial epoch attempted to find a method to classify the various groups of India according to the predominant racial theories popular at that time in Europe. This scheme of racial classification was used by the British census of India, which was often integrated with caste system considerations.

Great races

Файл:The Races of Mankind Before European Expansion.jpg
The Races of Mankind Before European Expansion, published by Charles Scribner's Sons in 1891 depicting world races, in the era in which scientific racism was prevalent.
Файл:Gandhala- mother & child 28-6-04.jpg
Mother and child in the Indian state of Himachal Pradesh, of northern India (2004)

Scientific racism of the late 19th and early 20th centuries divided humans into three races based on "common physical characteristics": Caucasoid, Mongoloid, and Negroid.[2]

American anthropologist Carleton S. Coon wrote that "India is the easternmost outpost of the Caucasian racial region" and defined the Indid race that occupies the Indian subcontinent as beginning in the Khyber Pass.[3][4] John Montgomery Cooper, an American ethnologist and Roman Catholic priest, on 26 April 1945 in a hearing before the United States Senate "To Permit all people from India residing in the United States to be Naturalised" recorded:[2] Шаблон:Quotation

The theory propounded by German comparative philologists in the 1840s and 1850s "maintained that the speakers of Indo-European languages in India, Persia, and Europe were of the same culture and race."[5] This led to a distinction between the Indo-Aryan peoples of northern India and the Dravidian peoples, located mostly in southern India with pockets in the Baluchistan Province in the northwest and in the eastern corner of the Bihar Province.[5][6]

Although anthropologists classify Dravidians as Caucasoid with the "Mediterranean-Caucasoid" type being the most predominant,[7][8][9][10] the racial status of the Dravidians was initially disputed. In 1898, ethnographer Friedrich Ratzel remarked about the "Mongolian features" of Dravidians, resulting in what he described as his "hypothesis of their [Dravidians] close connection with the population of Tibet", whom he adds "Tibetans may be decidedly reckoned in the Mongol race".[11] In 1899, Science summarised Ratzel's findings over India with, Шаблон:Quote

Edgar ThurstonШаблон:Year needed named what he called Homo Dravida and described it close to Australoids, with Caucasoid (Indo-Aryan) admixture. As evidence, he adduced the use of the boomerang by Kallar and Maravar warriors and the proficiency at tree-climbing among both the Kadirs of the Anamalai hills and the Dayaks of Borneo.[12] In 1900, anthropologist Joseph Deniker said, Шаблон:Quote Deniker grouped Dravidians as a "subrace" under "Curly or Wavy Hair Dark Skin" in which he also includes the Ethiopian and Australian.[13] Also, Deniker mentions that the "Indian race has its typical representatives among the Afghans, the Rajputs, the Brahmins and most of North India but it has undergone numerous alterations as a consequence with crosses with Assyriod, Dravidian, Mongol, Turkish, Arab and other elements."[13]

In 1915, Arnold Wright said,

Шаблон:Quote

Wright also mentions that Richard Lydekker and Flowers classified Dravidians as Caucasian. Later, Carleton S. Coon, in his book The Races of Europe (1939), reaffirmed this assessment and classified the Dravidians as Caucasoid due to their "Caucasoid skull structure" and other physical traits such as noses, eyes and hair, and 20th century anthropologists classified Dravidians as Caucasoid with the "Mediterranean-Caucasoid" type being the most predominant.[7][8][9][10]

See also

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Шаблон:Historical definitions of race

  1. Kumar, Jayant. Indian Census Шаблон:Webarchive 2001. September 4, 2006.
  2. 2,0 2,1 Шаблон:Cite book
  3. Шаблон:Cite book
  4. Шаблон:Cite book
  5. 5,0 5,1 Шаблон:Cite book
  6. Шаблон:Cite book
  7. 7,0 7,1 Шаблон:Cite book
  8. 8,0 8,1 Шаблон:Cite book
  9. 9,0 9,1 Шаблон:Cite book
  10. 10,0 10,1 Шаблон:Cite book
  11. Ratzel, Freidrich. The History of Mankind. Macmillan and Co.:New York, 1898. Шаблон:ISBN p.358
  12. C. Bates, 'Race, Caste and Tribes in Central India' in: The Concept of Race, ed. Robb, OUP (1995), p. 245, cited after Ajay Skaria, Shades of Wildness Tribe, Caste, and Gender in Western India, The Journal of Asian Studies (1997), p. 730.
  13. 13,0 13,1 Ошибка цитирования Неверный тег <ref>; для сносок Deniker не указан текст