Английская Википедия:History of the Kinetograph, Kinetoscope, and Kinetophonograph
Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Infobox book History of the Kinetograph, Kinetoscope, and Kinetophonograph is a book written by siblings William Kennedy Dickson and Antonia Dickson about the history of film. The brother Dickson wrote from his experiences working for Thomas Edison at his "Black Maria" studio in West Orange, New Jersey; Edison himself prefaced the book. Emphasis is placed on the eponymous devices: the kinetograph, the kinetoscope, and the kinetophonograph. Dickson helped to develop these devices, which facilitate the capturing and exhibition of motion pictures.
Considered the first book of history on the subject of film, it was published in 1895 as a monograph. The Museum of Modern Art acquired the book in 1940 and later reprinted it in 1970 and 2000. The book has been received positively by literary critics and film scholars, who saw it as a valuable primary source and early look at the film industry.
Conception and contents
History of the Kinetograph, Kinetoscope, and Kinetophonograph is a collection of essays on the history of film, written by the motion picture pioneer William Kennedy Dickson and his sister, science writer Antonia Dickson.Шаблон:Sfn The Dicksons had lived in England before moving to the United States in 1879. In 1883, at age 23, the brother Dickson earned the employment of Thomas Edison at his Machine Works company in New York City.Шаблон:Sfn In 1888, Edison commissioned Dickson for the development of what would become the kinetoscope, an early means of playing back motion picture film.Шаблон:Sfn Dickson moved later to Edison's "Black Maria" film production studio in West Orange, New Jersey; the bulk of History recounts his experiences working at this studio.Шаблон:Sfn
The 55-page monograph contains 54 illustrations rendered by William.Шаблон:Sfn The mechanics of primordial motion picture cameras and exhibition are explained,Шаблон:Sfn with eponymous emphasis given to the kinetograph, the kinetoscope, and the kinetophonograph. Dickson worked with Edison on the development of these devices, which respectively capture pictures on film, play films back, and combine picture with sound.Шаблон:Sfn Antonia and William give credit to the other architects of film and their works, as well as the performers and subjects who star in those works.Шаблон:Sfn A preface penned by Edison appears at the book's start.Шаблон:Sfn
Reception
History was published first in 1895.Шаблон:Sfn An early version of the book's contents appeared in the June 1894 issue of The Century Magazine.Шаблон:Sfn That year, the siblings had published a biography of Edison.Шаблон:Sfn For the time of its publishing, the book served as not only a history of film but also as advertisement and a directory pertaining to the subjects in the films addressed in it.Шаблон:Sfn The book fell out of knowledge since until the Museum of Modern Art acquired a copy in 1940. The museum's Film Library division gave it a reprinting thirty years later, in 1970; Arno Press published this reprinting in association with the New York Times Company.Шаблон:EfnШаблон:Sfn The book received another reprinting in 2000, this time published by the museum itself.Шаблон:EfnШаблон:Sfn
The book is considered by scholars of the medium the first published history on the subject of film,Шаблон:Sfnm with the art critic Nancy Mowll Mathews calling it unprecedented.Шаблон:Sfn The historian Lewis Jacobs called the book important as a primary source for the history of early film. From the authors' combined tone, Jacobs perceived the Dicksons' excitement at having the privilege to observe popular film actors and to have worked in his industry at its infancy.Шаблон:Sfn Jacobs defined the book as "intimate" and its closing words as an "eloquent prediction" on the expansion of kinetograph technology.Шаблон:Sfn Jacobs recommended the book for film scholars and historians for its wisdom and its emphasis on the beginning of film as both a technology and as an art form.Шаблон:Sfn The literary critic Laura Marcus found the book's scientific approach in tension with its purpose to market but conceded that the eponymous devices had a psychic nature intrinsically.Шаблон:Sfn Marcus noted the harmony of the Dicksons' view of film as both uncanny and natural and of their opinion of the "Black Maria" as both a nursery and a laboratory like that depicted in Frankenstein.Шаблон:Sfn Despite the book's promotional tone, Marcus called its imagery and motifs influential in shaping subsequent publications about film.Шаблон:Sfn
Stéphanie Côté of the Journal of Film Preservation recommended the book for its importance as well but noted the difficulty of the brother Dickson's writing. Côté called the sister Dickson's style similarly flamboyant.Шаблон:Sfn The film critic David Thomson regarded the book's prose as "plummy" from the brother Dickson's admiration for the film industry.Шаблон:Sfn Mathews called Dickson's front cover illustration mediocre but convincing.Шаблон:Sfn
Notes
Citations
References
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite journal
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite book
- Шаблон:Cite journal
Шаблон:Refend Шаблон:Authority control
