Английская Википедия:Iceland–European Union relations

Содержание

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Текст

Iceland is heavily integrated into the European Union via the Agreement on the European Economic Area and the Schengen Agreement, despite its status as a non-EU member state. Iceland applied for membership in 2009. The Minister for Foreign Affairs sent a letter in 2015 that ended the application process.

Comparison

	Шаблон:Flag	Шаблон:Flag
Population	447,206,135	364,134
Area	Шаблон:Convert	102,775 km2 (39,682 sq mi)
Population density	115/km2 (300/sq mi)	3.5/km2 (9.1/sq mi)
Capital	Brussels (de facto)	Reykjavík
Global cities	Paris, Amsterdam, Milan, Frankfurt, Madrid, Brussels, Warsaw, Stockholm, Vienna, Dublin, Luxembourg, Munich, Lisbon, Prague	None
Government	Supranational parliamentary democracy based on the European treaties	Unitary parliamentary republic
Current leaders	Шаблон:Ubl	Шаблон:Ubl
Official languages	24 official languages, of which 3 considered "procedural" (English, French and German)	Icelandic
Main religions	72% Christianity 48% Catholic Church 12% Protestantism 8% Eastern Orthodoxy 4% Other Christianity 23% Non-religious 3% Other 2% Islam	63.47% Church of Iceland (Protestant) 2.75% Free Lutheran Church in Reykjavík 1.98% Free Lutheran Church in Hafnarfjörður 0.89% Independent Lutheran Congregation 4.02% Catholic Church 2.05% Other Christian denominations 1.31% Шаблон:Lang 0.96% Zuism 0.42% Buddhism 0.35% Islam 14.30% Other and unspecified 7.17% Unaffiliated
Ethnic groups	Germans (c. 83 million), French (c. 67 million) Italians (c. 60 million) Spanish (c. 47 million) Poles (c. 46 million) Romanians (c. 16 million) Dutch (c. 13 million) Greek (c. 11 million) Portuguese (c. 11 million) and others	89% Icelanders 5% Poles 1% Lithuanians 5% others
GDP (nominal)	$16.477 trillion, $31,801 per capita	$27 billion, $75,700 per capita

Integration

Файл:Iceland keflavik exit.jpg

Though Iceland is not in the EU, it is a member of the Schengen area

Iceland is a member of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), a grouping of four non-EU European countries, and is also part of the European Economic Area (EEA). Through the EEA, Iceland participates with a non-voting status in certain EU agencies and programmes, including enterprise, environment, education (including the Erasmus Programme) and research programs. Iceland also contributes funds to "social and economic cohesion" in the EU/EEA. Iceland also frequently consults the EU on foreign affairs and frequently aligns itself to EU foreign policy. Iceland also participates in EU civilian peacekeeping missions.

Iceland is a member of the Nordic Passport Union and the Schengen Area, which now is under EU law, as a non-voting participant. Iceland's participation in the Schengen Area allows free movement of people between Iceland and the rest of the Schengen Area. Several thousand Icelanders travel to and study or work in the EU. A large majority of foreigners in Iceland come from the EU. Iceland is also associated with the Dublin Convention on justice and home affairs cooperation. Iceland also has links to several EU member states through its membership of the Nordic Council.

Use of the euro

During the 2008–2011 Icelandic financial crisis, instability in the Icelandic króna led to discussion in Iceland about adopting the euro. However, Jürgen Stark, a Member of the executive board of the European Central Bank, has stated that "Iceland would not be able to adopt the EU currency without first becoming a member of the EU". As of the ECB's May 2012 convergence report, Iceland did not meet any of the convergence criteria. One year later, the country managed to comply with the deficit criteria and had begun to decrease its debt-to-GDP ratio, but still suffered from elevated HICP inflation and long-term governmental interest rates.

Explanations for Iceland's non-membership of the European Union

Academics have proposed several explanations for why Iceland has not joined the European Union:

• The importance of the fishing industry to Iceland's economy and the perception that EU membership (and its Common Fisheries Policy) will have an adverse effect on the fishing industry.
• The perception that EU membership will have an adverse effect on Iceland's agricultural sector.
• Iceland's strong ties with the United States, which included significant economic, diplomatic and military assistance, decreased Iceland's dependence on European countries.
• The victories in the Cod Wars may have strengthened Icelandic nationalism and boosted the perception that Iceland can succeed through unilateral or bilateral means rather than compromise in multilateral frameworks.
• The Icelandic electoral system favors rural areas, which are more eurosceptic.
• The tendency for Icelandic elites to pursue education in the United States or eurosceptic European countries (such as the United Kingdom or the Nordic countries), and to cooperate more closely with political elites from those countries.
• Icelandic nationalism and the legacy of Iceland's past as a colonial entity.
• The impact of the Icesave dispute with the Netherlands and the UK.

Trade relations

Файл:Iceland Reykjavík Port Whaling Ships.jpg

In fisheries, the most important sector of the Icelandic economy, Iceland has a €879 million trade surplus with the EU.

Файл:Iceland Export Treemap 2020.png

The exports of Iceland in 2020 - the dominance of fisheries and aluminum (among others) is clearly visible

Economic relations between Iceland and the European Union are primarily governed by two agreements: a bilateral free trade agreement signed in 1972, and the agreement on the EEA in 1994. The EEA was established to give Iceland, among other European countries outside the EU, access to the EU market. Iceland's access to the EU market in respect of agriculture and fisheries is dealt with by separate bilateral agreements. Iceland is legally bound to implement into its own law all EU directives applicable to the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital. This is complemented by regular meetings between EU and Icelandic officials, including a twice-yearly meeting of EEA foreign ministers.

Icelandic-European trade

Direction of trade	Goods (2016)	Services (2016)	Investment (2016)
EU to Iceland	€2.9 billion	€1.4 billion	€8.5 billion
Iceland to EU	€3.6 billion	€1.2 billion	€-0.8 billion

78% of Iceland's exports went to the EU and 52% of Iceland's imports came from it, making the EU Iceland's most important trading partner, followed by Norway. Traditionally, Iceland's economy has focused on fisheries and renewable energy (primarily hydroelectricity and geothermal energy - see energy in Iceland for more details), but it has been diversifying into aluminium production, pharmaceuticals, information technologies, tourism and the financial sector. Iceland is still a large exporter of fish (the third largest exporter to the EU after Norway and China) with a world trade surplus of €1.1 billion in 2008. In fisheries, the EU had a 2009 trade deficit of €879 million. Until Iceland's 2009 financial crisis, its commercial services sector had been growing rapidly, accounting for almost 35% of total exports (goods and services combined).

Accession of Iceland to the European Union

Шаблон:Infobox EU accession bid Iceland applied to join the European Union on 16 July 2009 and formal negotiations began on 27 July 2010. However, on 13 September 2013 the Government of Iceland dissolved its accession team and suspended its application to join the EU. On 12 March 2015, Foreign Minister of Iceland Gunnar Bragi Sveinsson stated that he had sent a letter to the EU withdrawing the application for membership, without the approval of the Althing, though the European Union stated that Iceland had not formally withdrawn the application.

If negotiations were to resume, Iceland would face controversial issues on fisheries which could potentially derail an agreement, despite already being a member of the European Economic Area (which excludes fishery). If an agreement were to be concluded, the accession treaty would be subject to a national referendum in Iceland and require ratification by every EU state.

Pre-2008 opinion

Шаблон:Politics of Iceland From 1995 to 2007 the government coalition of the conservative Independence Party (Sjálfstæðisflokkurinn) and the conservative Progressive Party (Framsóknarflokkurinn), opposed joining the EU, while the opposition Social Democratic Alliance (Samfylkingin) supported membership negotiations. In 1994, the Social Democratic Party (Alþýðuflokkurinn) became the first Icelandic political party to include the intention to apply to join the EU in its policy statement. Despite this hostility towards EU membership, the Independence Party was forced to accept some of the constraints associated with participation in the European project. Iceland sought shelter provided by the EEA, EFTA and Schengen because non-membership of the EEA and EFTA would have threatened its key economic interests, and non-membership of Schengen would have imposed burdens on Icelandic individuals.

Former Prime Minister Halldór Ásgrímsson predicted on 8 February 2006 that the country would join the EU by 2015. He added that the decisive factor would be the future and the size of the Eurozone, especially whether Denmark, Sweden and the UK would have adopted the euro or not. His prediction received some criticism, not the least from people within his own government.

Another former Prime Minister, Geir H. Haarde, has on a number of occasions stated his opposition to EU membership, both as Foreign Minister under Halldór Ásgrímsson and after taking office as Prime Minister. In response to Halldór Ásgrímsson's earlier prediction, Haarde said, "I don't share that point of view. Our policy is not to join in the foreseeable future. We are not even exploring membership." In a speech at a conference at the University of Iceland on 31 March 2006, Geir Haarde repeated what he had said on a number of occasions—that no special Icelandic interests demanded membership of the EU. In the same speech he further explained in detail why it would not be in the interest of Iceland to adopt the euro.

Following the 2007 election, the Independence Party and the Social Democratic Alliance formed a new coalition with a policy of not applying for membership, but setting up a special committee to monitor the development within the EU and suggest ways to respond to that.

Due to Iceland's limited currency,Шаблон:Clarify the government has explored the possibility of adopting the euro without joining the European Union. The EU, however, says that Iceland cannot join the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) without becoming a full EU member state (all other non-EU states that use the euro do so because they previously used a member state currency that was replaced by the euro).

Effect of 2008 financial crisis

At a meeting of members of his party on 17 May 2008, Geir Haarde said that in his opinion the cost of joining the EU outweighed the benefits, and therefore he was not in favour of membership. However, in October 2008, during talks to repatriate a portion of Iceland's foreign invested pension funds—Iceland having been particularly hard hit by the financial crisis of September 2008—the unions demanded that Iceland apply for EU membership in return for wage restraint.

On 30 October 2008, Þorgerður Katrín Gunnarsdóttir, minister of education, said that "Iceland has to define its long-term national interests and part of that is a revision of the currency regime, including a possible EU application" and that an application for membership needed to be discussed "in weeks rather than months".

Two weeks later, on 17 November 2008, the Independence Party announced it would hold its party congress in January 2009 instead of Autumn 2009, to reconsider the possibility of applying for EU membership; the Progressive Party also announced it would hold its party congress in January, after two anti-EU MPs (including the party leader) resigned and were replaced by MPs more positive towards EU application.

The Progressive Party accepted at its congress to support application for EU membership but with very strict conditions including one demanding full authority for Iceland over its fishing grounds and other national resources. When the government headed by the Independence Party was dissolved in January the party decided to postpone its congress until March. The congress eventually decided on an unchanged opposition to EU membership but also claimed that if the issue were opened by others both an application and an initial accession treaty with the EU should be put to a referendum.

The US denied Iceland's financial request for financial support after the 2008 economic crash. Iceland turned to the EU for assistance, but they also turned Iceland's request for aid down. This seriously damaged the efforts of the Europhiles in Iceland to sell the EU as a shelter provider to Iceland. The Europhiles mainly focused on the potential economic benefits of EU membership and the adoption of the euro, emphasizing the benefits of cheaper goods for consumers and enterprises, and access to aid from the EU structural funds for rural areas, agriculture and the tourism industry. There was, however, no mention of the EU as a soft security shelter provider. After a speedy economic recovery and considerable domestic opposition to membership, the application was put on hold in 2013. At present, the Icelandic government does not regard the country as a candidate to join the EU, though it has not withdrawn its membership application. Iceland's membership of the European Economic Area (EEA) and Schengen provide Iceland with partial political, economic and societal shelter but it is secondary to formal membership of the EU. Iceland's membership of the EU is unlikely to materialize in the present domestic and European environment. A dramatic change is needed to alter Iceland's present European policy. Domestic features of each and every state need to be taken into consideration in order to fully understand its calculations of cost and benefits of a potential shelter relationship.

2009 election and parliamentary debate

Iceland's finance minister, Steingrímur J. Sigfússon, ahead of the country's first elections since the financial crisis, stated that "any decision for Iceland to join the European Union and the single currency must be taken by its people, not one political party", on the subject that the issue of EU membership was the greatest threat to a stable coalition.

The 2009 election, which followed the financial crisis, saw the Progressive Party switch to supporting EU membership but the Independence Party called for a referendum prior to the start of negotiations. The Social Democratic Alliance made joining the EU a key issue in their campaign.

After the win of the pro-EU Social Democratic Alliance in the election, Prime Minister Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir spoke of an immediate application to the European Union and adoption of the euro within four years as a way to deal with the country's debt.

In late April 2009, it was announced that the United Kingdom, which at the time was a member state of the European Union with whom Iceland has had a long history of fishing and territorial water disputes, supported Iceland joining the EU.

In early May 2009, it was leaked that the issue of application for EU membership would likely be left to the parliament, in which the Alliance, the Progressive Party and the Citizens' Movement together already had enough seats to approve the application. Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson, the leader of the Progressive Party, strongly objected to the suggestion that his party would assist the government in this matter, however. The anti-EU Left-Green coalition partner accepted that in spring 2010, the minister for foreign affairs would present to the parliament a bill on talks with the EU.

On 10 May 2009, Prime Minister Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir announced that the government intended to move towards membership more quickly than previously expected. She announced that a bill would be introduced in parliament on 15 May 2009, authorising the opening of accession talks with the EU. She also stated that she was confident that the legislation would pass, and that she had secured a parliamentary majority on the issue, despite the official opposition to talks by one of her coalition partners. She went on to say that she expected an official application to be submitted no later than July 2009. This seemed to leave Iceland on course to join the EU along with Croatia in 2011, as predicted by EU Enlargement Commissioner, Olli Rehn. The government has stated that the issue will be put to a vote once an accession agreement has been negotiated.

The motion to file an application for membership was officially introduced in parliament on 25 May 2009. Voting was to have been held on 13 July, but was postponed until 16 July. First, a proposal by the Independence Party to hold a referendum on the membership application was defeated by 32 to 30 with one abstention. Then the Social Democratic Alliance's proposal to apply for membership immediately was approved with a narrow majority of 33 to 28 votes with 2 abstentions.

Application for membership

Файл:European Union future possible members 2.0.png

Countries that could join the European Union Шаблон:Legend Шаблон:Legend Шаблон:Legend Шаблон:Legend

To become a member, a country must first apply and then be recognised as a candidate country. For that to happen the country must satisfy the first of the Copenhagen criteria: it must be a politically stable democracy that respects human rights. Then negotiations will take place which will consider the country's fulfilment of economic criteria, the country's degree of adoption of EU legislation, and whether there shall be any exceptions.

EU Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn has claimed that negotiations on an accession treaty would take less than a year, because Iceland has already adopted two-thirds of EU legislation in relation to the EEA. He has on other occasions claimed that the negotiations could take up to four years.

On 30 January 2009, Rehn commented that Iceland could enter the European Union promptly in 2011, at the same time as Croatia, saying that Iceland is an old democracy but also that it should not get special treatment. Fishing quotas and Icelandic whaling may be the toughest issues in any such negotiations.

On 16 July 2009, the Althing voted in favour of accession talks with the EU (with 33 votes in favour, 28 against, and 2 abstentions). The head of the parliamentary committee on EU affairs, Árni Þór Sigurðsson, has stated that Iceland will not be ready to join the EU any earlier than 2013. However the government stated that it planned to complete negotiations by the end of 2010.

On 17 July 2009, the application for Icelandic membership of the EU was handed to the government of Sweden, which then held the presidency of the Council of the European Union, by the ambassador of Iceland in Stockholm. The application was again handed over by the Icelandic foreign minister to the Swedish one in a ceremony in Stockholm on 23 July 2009.

The letter of application was dated 16 July 2009. The application was acknowledged by the Council of the European Union on 27 July 2009.

Accession negotiations

Sweden, then holder of the EU presidency, announced that it would prioritise Iceland's EU accession process. On 24 July, the Lithuanian Parliament unanimously approved and gave full support for Iceland's membership application to join the European Union. Later, on 27 July, Malta also announced that it supports Iceland's EU bid.

In September 2009, the Spanish foreign minister visited Iceland to discuss the progress of the Icelandic application; Spain chaired the EU from January–June 2010. On 8 September, the EU commission sent a list of 2,500 questions to Iceland about its fulfilment of political and economic criteria and adoption of EU law. Iceland returned answers to them on 22 October 2009. On 2 November, Iceland selected a chief negotiator for the membership negotiations with the EU: Stefán Haukur Jóhannesson, Iceland's Ambassador to Belgium.

In January 2010 the Icesave dispute became an issue. The United Kingdom and the Netherlands want the Icelandic government to repay them the costs incurred in covering their citizens' losses due to the bankruptcy of some Icelandic banks. If Iceland does not pay, obstacles to membership could be laid by the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. If Iceland agrees to repay the UK and the Netherlands, the added debt will make it difficult to adopt the euro, a major reason for Iceland to join the EU, because of the convergence criteria. Spanish Foreign Minister Miguel Ángel Moratinos, who then held the Presidency of the European Union, has said that the Icesave dispute does not impact Iceland's application. David Miliband, then British Foreign Minister, reaffirmed the UK's continued support for Iceland's EU application. Additionally, the Dutch Foreign Minister Maxime Verhagen has stated that while the opening of negotiations will not be blocked by the Icesave dispute, it must be resolved before Iceland's accession.

In February 2010, the European Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy recommended to the Council of the European Union to start accession negotiations with Iceland. While it was expected that Iceland would be considered for official candidate status at the EU summit in March, this was delayed to allow the German national parliament, which has the authority to debate important EU policy such as enlargement before action is taken by the government, to consider the matter. The German Parliament voted in favour of opening membership negotiations on 22 April 2010. The European Council decided in June to begin negotiations, and on 17 June 2010, the EU granted official candidate status to Iceland by formally approving the opening of membership talks.

Negotiations for membership of the EU started on 27 July 2010, with screening of specific acquis chapters beginning on 15 November 2010. Iceland became eligible for pre-accession funding from the EU through the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) since July 2010.

The first annual report on negotiations was published in November 2010: the main issues at stake remained the fisheries sector and whale hunting, while progress has been made concerning the Icesave dispute.

The screening process ended and formal negotiations began on 27 June 2011. Four chapters were opened: science and research; education and culture; public procurement; information society and media. The first two were immediately closed, a first in accession history. Iceland aimed to open half of the remaining chapters under the Polish presidency (the second half of 2011) and the other half under the following Danish presidency (first half of 2012). Despite disputes over Icesave and fishing, and the fact there was then no majority in favour of membership in Iceland, Icelandic Foreign Minister Össur Skarphéðinsson was confident Iceland would join and looked to the EU's flexibility in negotiations with Norway during the 1990s as hope. He did however claim that ultimately it was the major fishing countries of the EU who would influence the outcome of the application.

In February 2013, the Icelandic chief negotiator stated that the main driving force for Iceland joining the EU was the benefit to the country of adopting the euro to replace the inflation-plagued Icelandic króna. Iceland's HICP inflation and related long-term government interest rates were both recorded to be around 6 per cent on average for 2012. Most importantly, however, while the country retained the Icelandic kronur, it was unable to lift the capital controls recently introduced in the turmoil of the economic crisis. Introduction of the euro, a far stronger currency, would allow the country to lift these capital controls and achieve an increased inward flow of foreign economic capital, which ultimately would ensure higher and more stable economic growth. To be eligible to adopt the euro, Iceland would need to join the EU, as unilateral euro adoption had previously been refused by the EU.

2013 election and withdrawal of application

The Icelandic Parliamentary committee on foreign affairs tabled a proposal on 18 December 2012 to suspend accession negotiations. The motion also called for an "application referendum" to be held to determine the will of the Icelandic people prior to any resumption of negotiations. A similar proposal was submitted to the Icelandic parliament in May 2012, but was rejected by a vote of 25 for and 34 against. The Icelandic parliament had yet to vote on the new proposal, which were supported primarily at the time by the opposition Independence Party and Progressive Party. The leaders of both governing parties, the Social Democratic Alliance and Left-Green Movement, stated that they did not support the motion. However, some MPs from the Left-Green Movement declared their support for the measure. On 10 January 2013, the proposal was formally adopted by the Foreign Affairs committee.

On 14 January, the Icelandic government announced that negotiations would be slowed, and that an accession agreement would not be reached before the parliamentary election in April. No new chapters would be opened prior to the election, though negotiations would continue on chapters that had already been opened. In February 2013, the national congress of both the Independence Party and Progressive Party reconfirmed their policy that further membership negotiations with the EU should be stopped and not resumed unless they are first approved by a national referendum, while the national congresses of the Social Democratic Alliance, Bright Future and Left-Green Movement reiterated their support for the completion of EU accession negotiations.

On 19 March 2013, Þorgerður Katrín Gunnarsdóttir, an Independence Party MP, put forward a motion in the Althing calling for a referendum asking the Icelandic public whether EU accession negotiations should continue. She proposed that the referendum be held during the upcoming parliamentary election in April if possible, or else during local elections in the spring of 2014. In response to Gunnarsdóttir and other proponents of EU integration within the Independence Party, Bjarni Benediktsson, the leader of the party, reiterated the party's policy of stopping negotiations with the EU, but promised to hold a referendum on continuing the negotiations in the first half of their term if they form government.

The ruling left-wing parties suffered a major defeat in the parliamentary elections that were held on 27 April 2013, while the centrist Progressive Party had a large victory. The leaders of the Progressive Party and the Independence Party began negotiating the formation of a coalition government, and on 22 May it was announced that a coalition platform had been agreed to that would suspend all accession talks with the EU and not resume them unless approved by a referendum. However, under Icelandic law, it is not the Government but the Icelandic Parliament which decides to end negotiations. On 13 June, Iceland's Foreign Minister Gunnar Bragi Sveinsson informed the European Commission that the newly elected government intended to "put negotiations on hold". European Commission President Manuel Barroso responded on 16 July 2013 by requesting that the new Icelandic Prime Minister make a decision on the continuation of their accession bid "without further delay", and stressed that the EU remained "committed to continue the accession negotiations process, which I'm certain could address Iceland's specificities".

In August 2013 the Icelandic government revealed that it had received a legal opinion that the 2009 Parliamentary vote did not oblige it to continue accession negotiations with the EU. In light of this, the Foreign Ministry stated that it had "decided to consider dissolving the negotiation committee". A few weeks later the committee was officially dissolved. Foreign Minister Gunnar Bragi Sveinsson said that "the process has been suspended. But nothing has been closed down." In October 2013 Benediktsson stated that no decision on ending Iceland's membership bid would be made until a report being prepared by the government on negotiations and "the recent changes within the union" was completed, expected to be by the end of 2013. Benediktsson went on to say that "we will see if a proposal will be put before the parliament or not." On 12 March 2015, Foreign Minister of Iceland Gunnar Bragi Sveinsson stated that he had sent a letter to the EU withdrawing the application for membership, without the approval of the Althing, though the European Union stated that Iceland had not formally withdrawn the application.

In 2017, Iceland's newly elected government announced that it would hold a vote in parliament on whether to hold a referendum on resuming EU membership negotiations. However, in November 2017 that government was replaced by a coalition of the Independence Party, the Left Green Movement and the Progressive Party; all of whom oppose membership. Only 11 out of 63 MPs are in favour of EU membership.

There was a renewed call in 2022 for a referendum on resuming EU membership negotiations.

Timeline

EU affiliation ahead of membership application

• 1970-01-01: Iceland joins EFTA.
• 1992-05-02: Iceland signs EU Association Agreement (entering the EEA).
• 1994-01-01: EU Association Agreement entry into force.
• 2001-03-25: Iceland joins the Schengen Area.

EU membership application and the preparational phase

• 2009-07-17: Iceland submits EU membership application.
• 2009-09-08: European Commission presents legislative questionnaire to Iceland.
• 2009-10-22: Iceland responds to questionnaire.
• 2010-02-24: European Commission recommended that the Council open accession negotiations with Iceland.
• 2010-06-17: Iceland officially recognised as an accession candidate by the European Council.Шаблон:Citation needed
• 2010-07-26: The Council approved the framework for accession negotiations with Iceland.
• 2010-07-27: Preparational phase of the membership negotiation process starts (Accession Conference nr.1).
• 2010-11-15: Screening process started.
• 2011-06-21: Screening process ended.

EU membership negotiations

• 2011-06-27: Accession Conference nr.2. Real negotiations started with the first four chapters being opened, of which two were completed and closed on the same day.
• 2011-10-19: Accession Conference nr.3. Two chapters were opened and closed immediately. In total 6 out of 33 chapters have now been opened (of which 4 have been closed).
• 2011-12-12: Accession Conference nr.4. Five chapters were opened, four were closed immediately. In total 11 out of 33 chapters have now been opened (of which 8 have been closed).
• 2012-03-30: Accession Conference nr.5. Four chapters were opened and two chapters were closed. In total 15 out of 33 chapters have now been opened (of which 10 have been closed).
• 2012-05-24: Proposal for a national referendum on discontinuing accession talks with the European Union rejected with 34 votes against and 25 in favour.
• 2012-06-22: Accession Conference nr.6. Three new chapters opened. In total 18 out of 33 chapters have now been opened (of which 10 have been closed).
• 2012-10-24: Accession Conference nr.7. Three new chapters opened. In total 21 out of 33 chapters have now been opened (of which 10 have been closed).
• 2012-12-18: Accession Conference nr.8. Six new chapters opened and one more chapter closed. In total 27 out of 33 chapters have now been opened (of which 11 have been closed).

Negotiation progress

Acquis chapter	EC assessment (2012)	Screening started	Screening completed	Chapter opened	Chapter closed
1. Free movement of goods	Generally already applies the acquis	2010-12-07	2010-12-08	2012-12-18	–
2. Freedom of movement for workers	Generally already applies the acquis	2011-02-09	2011-02-09	2011-10-19	2011-10-19
3. Right of establishment & freedom to provide services	Generally already applies the acquis	2010-12-09		–	–
4. Free movement of capital	Some level of preparation	2010-12-10	2010-12-10	–	–
5. Public procurement	Generally already applies the acquis	2010-11-15	2010-11-15	2011-06-27	–
6. Company law	Generally already applies the acquis	2010-11-16	2010-11-16	2011-12-12	2011-12-12
7. Intellectual property law	Generally already applies the acquis	2010-12-20	2010-12-20	2011-10-19	2011-10-19
8. Competition policy	Generally already applies the acquis	2010-12-06	2010-12-06	2012-03-30	2012-12-18
9. Financial services	Generally already applies the acquis	2010-11-18	2010-12-15	2012-10-24	–
10. Information society & media	Generally already applies the acquis	2010-11-17	2010-11-17	2011-06-27	–
11. Agriculture & rural development	Early stage	2010-11-30	2011-01-27	–	–
12. Food safety, veterinary & phytosanitary policy	Moderately prepared	2011-02-14	2011-03-31	–	–
13. Fisheries	Some level of preparation	2010-12-16	2011-03-02	–	–
14. Transport policy	Good level of preparation	2011-05-04	2011-06-09	2012-06-22	–
15. Energy	Moderately prepared	2011-05-12	2011-06-20	2012-03-30	–
16. Taxation	Moderately prepared	2011-02-03	2011-03-04	2012-12-18	–
17. Economic & monetary policy	Generally already applies the acquis	2011-03-17	2011-05-17	2012-12-18	–
18. Statistics	Moderately prepared	2011-05-02	2011-06-07	2012-10-24	–
19. Social policy & employment	Generally already applies the acquis	2011-02-07	2011-03-16	2012-06-22	–
20. Enterprise & industrial policy	Generally already applies the acquis	2011-04-12	2011-05-25	2011-12-12	2011-12-12
21. Trans-European networks	Generally already applies the acquis	2011-05-06	2011-06-10	2011-12-12	2011-12-12
22. Regional policy & coordination of structural instruments	Good level of preparation	2011-01-31	2011-02-22	2012-12-18	–
23. Judiciary & fundamental rights	Generally already applies the acquis	2011-01-11	2011-02-11	2011-12-12	2011-12-12
24. Justice, freedom & security	Good level of preparation	2011-04-14	2011-05-24	–	–
25. Science & research	Generally already applies the acquis	2010-11-25	2011-01-14	2011-06-27	2011-06-27
26. Education & culture	Generally already applies the acquis	2010-11-26	2011-01-14	2011-06-27	2011-06-27
27. Environment	Good level of preparation	2010-11-22	2011-01-19	2012-12-18	–
28. Consumer & health protection	Generally already applies the acquis	2011-04-11	2011-05-16	2012-03-30	2012-03-30
29. Customs union	Good level of preparation	2011-03-08	2011-04-06	2012-10-24	–
30. External relations	Generally already applies the acquis	2011-04-08	2011-05-19	2012-12-18	–
31. Foreign, security & defence policy	Generally already applies the acquis	2011-04-07	2011-05-20	2012-03-30	2012-03-30
32. Financial control	Moderately prepared	2010-11-29	2011-02-02	2012-06-22	–
33. Financial & budgetary provisions	Good level of preparation	2011-03-07	2011-04-04	2011-12-12	–
34. Institutions	Nothing to adopt	–	–	–	–
35. Other issues	Nothing to adopt	–	–	–	–
Progress		33 out of 33	33 out of 33	27 out of 33	11 out of 33

• A document explaining the general process and each chapter
• Situation of policy area at the start of membership negotiations is according to the 2010 EC Opinion.
• Timetable for screening meetings 2010–2011

The screening is a series of meetings between the commission and the applicant country examining the level of fulfilment of the EU acquis. It allows candidate countries to familiarise themselves with the acquis and it allows the commission and the member States to evaluate the degree of preparedness of candidate countries prior to negotiations.

Political parties' stances

Party		Position	Main argument as stated on party websites
Шаблон:Party color cell	Bright Future	Шаблон:Yes	Supports the continuation of accession negotiations and a referendum on joining the EU.
Шаблон:Party color cell	Centre Party	Шаблон:No
Шаблон:Party color cell	Independence Party	Шаблон:No	"The Independence Party puts forth the clear demand that the application for Iceland's membership of the European Union will be withdrawn without delay."
Шаблон:Party color cell	Left-Green Movement	Шаблон:No	"EU-membership would diminish the independence of Iceland even more than the EEA Agreement does and jeopardise Iceland's control over its resources."
Шаблон:Party color cell	Pirate Party Iceland	Шаблон:Okay	The party concludes that it should not be up to politicians to decide whether Iceland joins the European Union but to the general population after transparent and informative accession talks.
Шаблон:Party color cell	Progressive Party	Шаблон:No	"The Progressive Party believes the interests of the country and the nation are best secured outside the EU."
Шаблон:Party color cell	Reform Party	Шаблон:Yes
Шаблон:Party color cell	Social Democratic Alliance	Шаблон:Yes	"We want to apply for an EU-membership and start negotiations. We will seek a national unity in this matter and use the national referendum as the highest court."

2009–2013

Group	Party		Position
Government	Шаблон:Party color cell	Social Democratic Alliance	Шаблон:Yes
	Шаблон:Party color cell	Left-Green Movement	Шаблон:No
Opposition	Шаблон:Party color cell	Independence Party	Шаблон:No
	Шаблон:Party color cell	Progressive Party	Шаблон:No
	Шаблон:Party color cell	The Movement	Шаблон:Okay
No seats in the parliament	Шаблон:Party color cell	Citizens' Movement	Шаблон:Yes
	Шаблон:Party color cell	Liberal Party	Шаблон:No
	Шаблон:Party color cell	Best Party	Шаблон:Okay

2013–2016

Group	Party		Position
Government	Шаблон:Party color cell	Progressive Party	Шаблон:No
	Шаблон:Party color cell	Independence Party	Шаблон:No
Opposition	Шаблон:Party color cell	Social Democratic Alliance	Шаблон:Yes
	Шаблон:Party color cell	Left-Green Movement	Шаблон:No
	Шаблон:Party color cell	Bright Future	Шаблон:Yes
	Шаблон:Party color cell	Pirate Party Iceland	Шаблон:Okay
	Шаблон:Party color cell	Reform Party	Шаблон:Yes

2016–2017

Group	Party		Position
Government	Шаблон:Party color cell	Independence Party	Шаблон:No
	Шаблон:Party color cell	Reform Party	Шаблон:Yes
	Шаблон:Party color cell	Bright Future	Шаблон:Yes
Opposition	Шаблон:Party color cell	Left-Green Movement	Шаблон:No
	Шаблон:Party color cell	Pirate Party Iceland	Шаблон:Okay
	Шаблон:Party color cell	Progressive Party	Шаблон:No
	Шаблон:Party color cell	Social Democratic Alliance	Шаблон:Yes

2017–present

Group	Party		Position
Government	Шаблон:Party color cell	Independence Party	Шаблон:No
	Шаблон:Party color cell	Left-Green Movement	Шаблон:No
	Шаблон:Party color cell	Progressive Party	Шаблон:No
Opposition	Шаблон:Party color cell	Social Democratic Alliance	Шаблон:Yes
	Шаблон:Party color cell	Centre Party	Шаблон:No
	Шаблон:Party color cell	Pirate Party Iceland	Шаблон:Okay
	Шаблон:Party color cell	People's Party	Шаблон:No
	Шаблон:Party color cell	Reform Party	Шаблон:Yes

Public opinion

A poll released in January 2014 found that 67.5% of Icelanders support holding a referendum on the continuation of accession negotiations. On 22 February, the governing parties agreed to formally withdraw the membership application, without first holding a referendum on the matter, and submitted a bill to parliament seeking their approval to do so. The decision led to thousands of protesters taking to the streets outside of the Parliament buildings in Reykjavík. By 28 February 82% were in favour of holding the referendum. More than 40,000 people (16.5% of Iceland's voters) have signed a petition demanding that the promised referendum be held. On 25 February, Ragnheiður Ríkharðsdóttir, chairman of the parliamentary group of the Independence Party, announced her intention not to vote in favour of the proposal. In early March, the EU ambassador to Iceland said that the country could keep its application suspended rather than having to decide between resuming negotiations or formally withdrawing the application, "but of course not for an unlimited period of time". The bill was not approved before parliament's summer recess.

Various polls have been taken on the public opinion of starting accession negotiations, joining the EU or adopting the euro.

Date	Poller	Question	Yes	No	Unsure
May 1999	DV	Start negotiations	57,1%	27,7%	15,2%
March 2002	Capacent-Gallup	Start negotiations	91%	5%	4%
		Join	57%	25%	23%
		Adopt Euro	66%	33%	12%
August 2005	Capacent-Gallup	Start negotiations	55%	37%	8%
		Join	43%	37%	20%
		Adopt Euro	37%	54%	9%
February 2006	Fréttablaðið	Join	34%	42%	24%
September 2007	Capacent-Gallup	Start negotiations	59%	26%	15%
		Join	48%	34%	18%
		Adopt Euro	53%	37%	10%
February 2008	Fréttablaðið	Join	55.1%	44.9%	–
		More reasons than last year	54.7%	7.3%	38.1%
18 October 2008	Capacent Gallup	Referendum on application	70%	17.5%	12.5%
24 November 2008	Fréttablaðið	Submit application	60%	40%	–
January 2009	Capacent Gallup	Join	38%	38%	24%
26 January 2009	Fréttablaðið	Submit application	40%	60%	–
March 2009		Start negotiations	64%	28%	8%
11 April 2009	Fréttablaðið	Submit application	45.6%	54.4%	0%
5 May 2009	Capacent Gallup	Start negotiations	61%	27%	12%
		Join	39%	39%	22%
10 June 2009	Capacent Gallup	Referendum on application	76.3%	17.8%	5.8%
30 July 2009	Fréttablaðið	Start negotiations	51%	36%	13%
4 August 2009	Capacent Gallup	Join	34.7%	48.5%	16.9%
15 September 2009	Capacent Gallup	Join	32.7%	50.2%	17%
		If referendum now, how would you vote	38.5%	61.5%	0%
		Happy with application?	39.6%	43.2%	17.1%
5 November 2009	Bifröst University Research Institute	Join	29.0%	54%	17%
		Start negotiations	50.5%	42.5%	7%
28 February 2010	Capacent Gallup	Join	33.3%	55.9%	10.8%
5 March 2010	Capacent Gallup	Join	24.4%	60%	15.5%
		If referendum now, how would you vote	30.5%	69.4%	0%
14 June 2010	MMR	Maintain EU application	24.3%	57.6%	18.1%
6 July 2010	Capacent Gallup	Join	26%	60%	14%
2 September 2010	Capacent Gallup	Start negotiations	38.8%	45.5%	15.7%
29 September 2010	Fréttablaðið	Continue with negotiations	64.2%	32.8%	3%
24 January 2011	Fréttablaðið	Continue with negotiations	65.4%	34.6%	0%
10 March 2011	Capacent Gallup	Join	31.4%	50.5%	18%
		If referendum now, how would you vote	38.9%	61.1%	0%
17 March 2011	MMR	Join	30%	55.7%	14.2%
16 June 2011	Capacent Gallup	Join	37.3%	50.1%	12.6%
30 June 2011	Capacent Gallup	Maintain EU application	38.5%	51.0%	10.5%
11 August 2011	Capacent Gallup	Join	35.5%	64.5%	0%
12 September 2011	Fréttablaðið	Continue with negotiations	63.4%	36.6%	0%
16 November 2011	MMR	Maintain EU application	35.3%	50.5%	14.2%
17 November 2011	Capacent Gallup	Continue with negotiations	53.1%	46.9%	0%
12 December 2011	Fréttablaðið	Continue with negotiations	65.3%	34.7%	0%
19 January 2012	Capacent Gallup	Join	31.5%	53.5%	15%
19 January 2012	MMR	Adopt Euro	28%	52%	20%
22 February 2012	Capacent Gallup	Join	26.3%	56.2%	17.5%
		If referendum now, how would you vote	32.6%	67.4%	0%
		Maintain EU application	42.6%	43.6%	13.9%
27 April 2012	University of Iceland	Join	27.5%	53.8%	18.7%
15 October 2012	Capacent Gallup	Join	27.3%	57.6%	15.0%
12 November 2012	Capacent Gallup	Maintain EU application	36.4%	53.5%	9.9%
18 January 2013	Fréttablaðið	Continue with negotiations	48.5%	36.4%	15%
13 February 2013	MMR	Join	24.2%	63.3%	12.5%
6 March 2013	Capacent Gallup	Join	25.1%	58.5%	16.5%
		If referendum now, how would you vote	30%	70%	0%
		Maintain EU application	43.5%	44.6%	11.9%
15 March 2013	Capacent Gallup	Continue and complete negotiations	54%	35%	11%
23 April 2013	University of Iceland	Join	27.6%	52.2%	20.2%
		Continue with negotiations	52.7%	30.7%	16.5%
5 March 2014	Capacent Gallup	Join	37%	47%	16%
		Hold referendum on resuming negotiations	72%	21%	7%
February 2016	Gallup	Join	40.9%	59.1%
		Resume negotiations	45.4%	40.3%
September 2016	MMR	Join	28.2%	50.6%
November 2016	MMR	Join	20.9%	57.8%	21.3%
February 2017	MMR	Join	25.9%	54%	20.1%
12–26 March 2019	Maskína	Join	31.6%	43.0%	25.4%
30 January–3 February 2020	Maskína	Join	31.4%	39.4%	29.3%
21 January–1 February 2021	Maskína	Join	30%	42%	29%
March 2022	Gallup	Join	47%	33%	20%
June 2022	Prósent	Join	48.5%	34.9%	16.7%
November 2022	Prósent	Join	42.8%	35.1%	22.1%
December 2022	Maskína	Hold referendum on resuming negotiations	47.9%	24.4%	27.5%
3–7 February 2023	Maskína	Join	40.8%	35.9%	23.3%
24–28 April 2023	Maskína	Hold referendum on resuming negotiations	59%	18%	23%
		Join	44%	34%	22%
17–22 August 2023	Maskína	Hold referendum on resuming negotiations	57%	19%	24%
		Join	40%	33%	27%

Comparison with EU countries

If Iceland were admitted to the EU, it would be the smallest member state in terms of population. Its area (103,000 km²) is somewhat close to the average for EU countries (165,048 km²), but it would be the least densely populated country in the EU. The table below shows its population and population density in comparison to some of the other member states.

Population figures			Population density
EU rank	Country	Population	EU rank	Country	Density
	Шаблон:Flagicon Iceland	329,100		Шаблон:Flagicon Iceland	3.3
27	Шаблон:Flagicon Malta	519,562	27	Шаблон:Flagicon Finland	18.0
26	Шаблон:Flagicon Luxembourg	562,958	26	Шаблон:Flagicon Sweden	23.8
25	Шаблон:Flagicon Cyprus	847,008	25	Шаблон:Flagicon Estonia	30.3
14	Шаблон:Flagicon Sweden (EU median)	9,747,355	14	Шаблон:Flagicon Slovenia (EU median)	102.4
	Шаблон:Flagicon EU average	18,149,682		Шаблон:Flagicon EU average	117.5
2	Шаблон:Flagicon France	66,415,161	2	Шаблон:Flagicon Netherlands	500.7
1	Шаблон:Flagicon Germany	83,157,201	1	Шаблон:Flagicon Malta	1,352.4

Iceland's GDP per capita is among the highest in Europe as is shown in the following tables:

EU ranking	Country	GDP per capita (PPP)
1	Шаблон:Flagicon Luxembourg	$140,694
2	Шаблон:Flagicon Ireland	$124,596
3	Шаблон:Flagicon Denmark	$69,273
4	Шаблон:Flagicon Netherlands	$68,572
5	Шаблон:Flagicon Austria	$64,751
	Шаблон:Flagicon Iceland	$64,621
	Шаблон:Flagicon EU average	$53,201
27	Шаблон:Flagicon Bulgaria	$28,593

The Icelandic language would be one of the official languages of the EU with the least speakers in terms of native speakers (together with Irish and Maltese).

Comparison to the EU and impact of joining

Member countries	Population	Area (km2)	GDP (billions, PPP)	GDP per capita (PPP)	Languages
Шаблон:ISL	321,857	103,001	$19.800	$64,621	Icelandic
EU27	446,824,564	4,138,881			24
EU27+1	447,146,421 (+0.07%)	4,241,882 (+2.48%)			25

Iceland's foreign relations with EU member states

• Шаблон:Flagicon Austria
• Шаблон:Flagicon Belgium
• Шаблон:Flagicon Bulgaria
• Шаблон:Flagicon Croatia
• Шаблон:Flagicon Cyprus
• Шаблон:Flagicon Czech Republic
• Шаблон:Flagicon Denmark
• Шаблон:Flagicon Estonia
• Шаблон:Flagicon Finland
• Шаблон:Flagicon France
• Шаблон:Flagicon Germany
• Шаблон:Flagicon Greece
• Шаблон:Flagicon Hungary
• Шаблон:Flagicon Ireland
• Шаблон:Flagicon Italy
• Шаблон:Flagicon Latvia
• Шаблон:Flagicon Lithuania
• Шаблон:Flagicon Luxembourg
• Шаблон:Flagicon Malta
• Шаблон:Flagicon Netherlands
• Шаблон:Flagicon Poland
• Шаблон:Flagicon Portugal
• Шаблон:Flagicon Romania
• Шаблон:Flagicon Slovakia
• Шаблон:Flagicon Slovenia
• Шаблон:Flagicon Spain
• Шаблон:Flagicon Sweden

Diplomatic relations between Iceland and EU member states

Country	Icelandic embassy	Reciprocal embassy	Notes
Шаблон:AUT		Copenhagen, Denmark	Icelandic Permanent Mission to CTBTO, IAEA and OSCE
Шаблон:BEL	Brussels	Oslo, Norway	Icelandic Mission to the EU and Permanent Delegation to NATO in Brussels
Шаблон:DEN	Copenhagen Consulates General: Tórshavn, Nuuk	Reykjavík
Шаблон:FIN	Helsinki	Reykjavík
Шаблон:FRA	Paris	Reykjavík	Icelandic Mission to OECD, UNESCO and Council of Europe
Шаблон:DEU	Berlin	Reykjavík
Шаблон:ITA	Paris, France	Oslo	Icelandic Permanent Mission to FAO, IFAD and WFP
Шаблон:POL	Berlin, Germany	Reykjavík
Шаблон:ESP	Paris, France	Oslo
Шаблон:SWE	Stockholm	Reykjavík

See also

• Foreign relations of the European Union
• Foreign relations of Iceland
• Icelandic European Union membership referendum
• Greenland–European Union relations
• Future enlargement of the European Union
• Liechtenstein–European Union relations
• Norway–European Union relations
• Faroe Islands and the European Union
• United Kingdom–European Union relations
• Arctic policy of the European Union
• European Union–NATO relations

Further reading

• Baldur Thorhallsson. 2019. "Iceland and European Integration." in the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.

External links

Official websites

• Iceland's application to the EU, Icelandic Ministry for Foreign Affairs
• Icelandic mission to the EU, Icelandic Ministry for Foreign Affairs
• European Union – Iceland relations, European External Action Service
• European Union delegation to Iceland, European External Action Service
• European Union – Icelandic trade relations, European Commission

News Portal

• All related news on the Icelandic negotiations for EU membership Шаблон:In lang, MBL

Lobbyist organisations

• Iceland's EU Debate Шаблон:In lang
• Evrópusamtökin, cross-political organisation of Icelandic EU supporters Шаблон:In lang
• Evrópusamtökin, Euroblog Шаблон:In lang
• Heimssýn, the cross-political organisation of Icelandic eurosceptics Шаблон:In lang
• Icelandic Pro-EU membership website Шаблон:In lang
• Icelandic Anti-EU Membership Шаблон:In lang
• Yes-movement of Icelandic EU supporters Шаблон:Webarchive Шаблон:In lang