Английская Википедия:Indian Slavery Act, 1843

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:Infobox legislation

The Indian Slavery Act, 1843, also known as Act V of 1843, was an act passed in British India under East India Company rule, which outlawed many economic transactions associated with slavery.

The act states how the sale of any person as a slave was banned, and anyone buying or selling slaves would be booked under the Indian Penal Code with an offence carrying strict punishment.[1][2]

Implementation and effect

Some East India Company officials opposed the act, citing Hindu and Muslim customs and maintaining the fact that the act would be seen as interference in traditional social structures.[3] Evangelical politicians who had led successful slavery abolition campaigns in the West Indies prevailed and the Act was implemented.[3]

Historians are divided on whether the Act was able to exclude caste and slavery.[4] The condition of workers in tea plantations in Tamil Nadu and Assam were compared to that of African, West Indian counterparts who worked in sugar plantations. Lack of alternatives meant tea plantation workers had become indentured labourers despite the Act,[4] which historian Amalendu Guha maintained was a new form of slavery.[5]

A 1996 Human Rights Watch report refers to Manjari Dingwaney's book, Unredeemed Promises: The Law and Servitude, and states:

Шаблон:Quote

Text

Шаблон:Center Шаблон:Center Шаблон:Center

  1. No public officer shall in execution of any decree or order of Court, or for the enforcement of any demand of rent or revenue, sell or cause to be sold any person, or the right to the compulsory labour or services of any person on the ground that such person is in a state of slavery.
  2. No rights arising out of an alleged property in the person and services of another as a slave shall be enforced by any Civil or Criminal Court or Magistrate within the territories of the East India Company.
  3. No person who may have acquired property by his own industry, or by the exercise of any art, calling or profession, or by inheritance, assignment, gift or bequest, shall be dispossessed of such property or prevented from taking possession thereof on the ground that such person or that the person from whom the property may have been derived was a slave.
  4. Any act which would be a penal offence if done to a free man shall be equally an offence if done to any person on the pretext of his being in a condition of slavery.

See also

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Further reading

  • Allen, Richard B. (2012) "European Slave Trading, Abolitionism, and “New Systems Of Slavery” in the Indian Ocean." PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies 9.1 (2012) online.
  • Bric, Maurice J. (2016) "Debating empire and slavery: Ireland and British India, 1820–1845." Slavery & Abolition 37.3 (2016): 561–577. * Hjejle, Benedicte. (1967) "Slavery and agricultural bondage in South India in the nineteenth century." Scandinavian Economic History Review 15.1-2 (1967): 71–126. online
  • Leonard, Zak. (2020) "‘A Blot on English Justice’: India reformism and the rhetoric of virtual slavery." Modern Asian Studies 1-46. online
  • Шаблон:Cite book
  • Scarr, D. (1998) Slaving and Slavery in the Indian Ocean. Macmillan, London.