Английская Википедия:Indigenous conflicts on the Mexico–United States barrier
Шаблон:Short description Several Indigenous peoples who live on the United States–Mexico border have objected to the construction of a border wall on their territories and the militarization of the border by the United States government. The US–Mexico border crosses several Indigenous territories and divides these communities. The barrier erected between the United States and Mexico cuts through and/or affects at least 29 Indigenous tribes, which include Kumeyaay Nation and Tohono O'odham.[1]
Increased efforts by the US government at border control, beginning in the 1980s, and the construction of a physical border wall, beginning in the 1990s, along the US-Mexico boundary, have significantly impacted tribal nations. Whether it be disrupting the movement of tribal members across the US-Mexico border by requiring the use of a specific port of entry or specific documentation or the destruction of Native territory, the border had significant implications. In response, the Tohono O'odham and the Kumeyaay nations, among others, have engaged in protests against the barrier.[2]
History
Creation of the US-Mexico border
The border between the United States and Mexico was formed through treaties and negotiations that often failed to include Indigenous peoples in the negotiations and conversations.[3]
In 1848, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed after the Mexican-American War, and it drew a demarcation between the United States and Mexico.[2][3] Additionally, Article XI of this treaty not only puts Indigenous tribes under the control of the United States but also allows preventing Indigenous movements across this border, and the treaty also honored the land claims of Mexican citizens.[2] Some tribal nations were able to obtain said land grants, but those tribes who did not live in established villages were unable to receive land grants. Thus, their territory rights were not honored in this treaty nor by the United States. Native Americans, including those who were impacted by this treaty, were excluded from conversations and negotiations between the United States and Mexico. Furthermore, these respective governments failed to consider their homelands and sacred grounds when reaching an agreement. With the creation of the border also came the creation of citizenship which led to the restriction of free travel and a plethora of other issues.[2][3]
Around five years after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed, the Gadsden Purchase further expanded the United States' border. For $10 million, the United States received 30,000 square miles, which makes up present-day southern Arizona and southern New Mexico. A primary reason for this purchase was the desire to build a transcontinental railroad. The same protections provided in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo still apply to the residents in this newly added tract of land.[4]
Border wall construction and militarization
Beginning in the 1990s, under the Bush administration, 14 miles of border wall were constructed near San Diego, California, and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act fortified that 14 mile stretch of wall. Other legislation, such as the Secure Fence Act, have expanded upon those initial 14 miles of wall.[5] Further expansion of wall construction occurred with President Donald Trump's Executive Order: Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements.[6] In order to reduce the amount of drugs and human-trafficking instances and to crack down on immigration, the United States began militarizing the border.[2] The war on drugs in the 1980s led to Border Patrol agents expanding their duties from immigration duties to drug enforcement, which included, at times, collaboration with the military.[7]
Tribal nations' borders
There are several explanations as to the formation of tribal lands, but many existed long before colonization. Migration is one such way that tribes found and established themselves in the present-day southern United States and northern Mexico. However, some tribes, such as the Kickapoo, were displaced due to colonial encroachment and have established themselves in these new locations, and they too are not immune to the effects of a border. Several nations, regardless of when they established themselves in the region, had sacred lands, resources, and members that extended beyond the border created after the Mexican-American War and the Gadsden Purchase, and with the creation of such a border also came the creation of citizenship which led to the restriction of free travel, jurisdictional issues, and a plethora of other issues.[2][3] For instance, a tribal nation that spans the border might offer citizenship to all people regardless of location, but the states in which they exist may not recognize them as citizens of their locale. This citizenship issue particularly along the United States and Mexico border has many implications including limiting travel amongst members of a tribal nations and providing resources and services to a fragment of the tribal population.[8]
Tribal nations that span the border include:[9]
- Apaches
- Cocopah / Cucapá
- Kickapoo / Kikapú
- Kumeyaay / Kumiai
- O’odham
- Pai
- Yaqui / Yoeme
Many of these tribes are units comprising multiple nations. For instance, the Kumeyaay nation is made up of thirteen reservations in the United States and four communities in Mexico.[9]
Kumeyaay
The Kumeyaay initially were located along the Pacific coastline, but they were later forced inland towards present-day San Diego and occupied territory that would later span the United States and Mexico border.[3] Kumeyaay initially responded to encounters with the Spaniards with violence, but after two of the Kumeyaay's raid attempts failed, they resorted to tolerance. However this short respite did not last long as Spanish missions began to interfere with the Kumeyaay peoples. Over the almost forty years (1768-1822) that missions were present in the Kumeyaay region, the relationship was characterized by intermittent violence and reshaping boundaries.[10] In 1821, Mexican Independence did not bring peace between the colonists and the Kumeyaay people. It did however mark a change in relationship as the Kumeyaay successfully raided surrounding ranchos and left the San Diego mission town weakened by 1846.[11] The Kumeyaay advances to the coast combined with Quechan resistance to the Colorado River, cut off land routes from Alta California to the rest of Mexico, further splitting Alta California from Mexico economically and unintentionally forming the formation of the state's southern border. In 1848, the Americans arrive to fight the Mexican American War; the Kumeyaay offered their assistance, but their services were declined. Although they were not allied with the Americans, the Kumeyaay people still took revenge against the Mexicans for wrongdoings towards the end of the war. The war between Mexico and the United States ended with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, but it failed to include the Kumeyaay and other tribes in negotiations.[12] Land disputes, violence, and territory loss lasted for many years after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo because of the massive influx of people participating in the California Gold Rush. The Kumeyaay, and more broadly American Indians, were subjected to legalized forced servitude for four months if an American Indian was unemployed. In 1851, the San Diego government required the Native Americans to pay taxes, and if not, their land may be confiscated. There were many legislative and political decisions made in an effort to obtain the territory of the Kumeyaay and other tribes.[13]
Tohono O’odham
The Tohono O'odham people were historically established in the Papagueria region, which spans across present-day state lines and national borders.[14] Similarly to the Kumeyaay peoples, the Tohono O'odham peoples were subjected to dealing with Spanish colonization, Mexican Independence, the Mexican-American War, and the Gadsden purchase, which created a border through their lands.[14] Spanish missionaries were present in the region, and helped protect the Tohono O'odham people from being subjected to forced servitude by Spanish colonists. However, when Mexican Independence was achieved, this protection diminished and Mexican colonist encroached upon their territory and violence ensued, yet the violence lessened between the 1830s and 1850s. Mexicans also began to further encroach upon the Tohono O'odham territory, which increased tensions and hostilities, but these concerns were reduced with the Gadsden Purchase. For the next few decades, the tensions and violence shifted from colonists to the Apache, but when the United States did not honor the land rights, the United States government established reservations to end land disputes, which did not encompass their entire traditional territory. On the other hand, the Mexican government did not initially create a reservation, so the Mexican people continued to encroach upon Tohono O'odham lands, which in turn led to violence. Many of the Tohono O'odham fled to the United States' Tohono O'odham territory, but a few remained in Mexico.[15]
Issues
Militarization of border
Border control has made it increasingly difficult for nations that extend beyond the border to travel freely. Racial profiling, requiring documentation, and fear have restricted free movement of Indigenous peoples to their counterparts across the border while also interrupting their daily practices and lives. A Supreme Court ruling upheld that "apparent Mexican ancestry" is reasonable suspicion to stop people near the United States and Mexico border. This has led to an increase of racial profiling and stops of Native Americans.[2] When an Indigenous individual is stopped and declares they are a member of a tribe, they often face further interrogation. In addition to racial profiling, documentation required to cross the border has led to a myriad of issues. For instance, the Tohono O'odham people in Mexico and the United States are citizens of a binational tribe, and they are able to utilize the tribal nation's services, such as healthcare. However, the militarization of the United States border control of this area makes it very difficult for them to cross and visit family, participate in ceremonies, and access resources and services. Whether they have to obtain specific documentation or drive hundreds of miles away to an official point of entry, the Tohono O'odham are restricted from free travel within their territories. The Tohono O'odham nation are willing to cooperate and discuss methods that would help protect the United States border while also protecting their members in northern Mexico.[8] The United States Border Control used to refuse or require frequent traditional tribal identification and thus not only restricted access to their counterparts across the border but also undermined tribal sovereignty. This necessity for proper documentation and specific ports of entry stemmed from hyper-fear of illegal immigrants as well as the "Drug War"; tribal nations are working with the United States government to create systems for crossing the border that work for both the tribal nation and the United States, such as enhanced technological security measure with tribal IDs that would be approved at ports of entry, but most legislative attempts by the United States Congress have not been enacted into law. In 1998, the Tohono O'odham Nation pursued legal means to ensure free passage through gates on traditional lands, which failed to pass in the United States Congress. In the mid 2010s, the Tohono O'odham Nation and the Pascua Yaqui tribe formed agreements with Homeland Security regarding the enhanced tribal ID cards.[3] However, the consequences of militarizing the United States and Mexico border still have effects that are felt in Indigenous communities.
Border wall
The physical border wall has violated acts and interrupted the lives of Indigenous peoples that exist along the United States and Mexico border. A frequent issue that arises with the building of a wall or fence is the destruction of Indigenous lands. Whether its resources or sacred sites, the building of a wall has altered the Native American territories.[8] The border wall violates, in certain instances, the American Indian Religious Freedom Act as it restricts access to elders and sacred sites to practice their religion.[3] For example, the physical border wall that was built between the Tohono O'odham territories was constructed through two burial sites in the Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument.[16] The wall, as it pertains to their territory, violates the American Indian Religious Freedom Act and it also threatens the continuance of the culture and religion as elders are having more difficulty passing on the culture and customs.[2]
Environment
Шаблон:More There are several environmental concerns that come with the construction of the border wall along the United States and Mexico border. One such impact is the threat to the wildlife, particularly endangered species. More specifically, it disrupts their migration patterns, roaming territory, water access, and more.[17] For endangered species, like the Mexican gray wolf and the Sonoran pronghorn, the border wall will fragment their habitat and make reestablish their populations near impossible.[18] Also by disrupting migration patterns, it will impact the distribution and fertilization of seeds.[19] The border wall will disrupt wildlife refuges and national parks, exacerbate flooding, and alter habitats. The border wall does not have to abide by over 30 significant federal environmental laws.[17]
Notable protests
Tohono O’odham
The Tohono O'odham people have been protesting the building of the border wall as it affects their sacred lands. The Tohono O'odham have historically been in opposition to the construction of a physical wall. The Tohono O’odham Nation Legislative Council has passed several resolutions reiterating the Nation's opposition. They have even gone so far to help in efforts in securing the border such as extensive vehicle barriers, in 2007–2008, and CBP highway checkpoints.[20] In early 2020, the Tohono O'odham tribal leaders approved the construction of integrated fixed tower that would have advanced technology in an effort to secure the border virtually. Some members of the tribal legislative council hoped that such towers would reduce the foot traffic of Border Control agents. However, these towers have sparked conflict within the tribal nation, as some are concerned that allowing the integrated fixed towers is only the beginning.[21]
The protests in September and October 2020 became violent. While protesting the destruction of a part of Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, a group of protesters set up a camp. They were asked to leave by National Park Service officers, and after ignoring warnings to leave the site, force was used. Border Patrol agents and park rangers pushed and shoved protesters; other officers threatened the use of paintball guns to disperse the crowd. The protesters were ultimately removed from the construction site, and no one was arrested.[22] The same cannot be said for a similar protest. Protesting in the same Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument region, two women were arrested, but they were able to temporarily halt construction of the wall. One woman sat inside a construction vehicle while the other blocked traffic. Both women face misdemeanor charges.[23] Similarly, on Indigenous Peoples' Day 2020, 12 people were arrested after protesters blocked the highway and refused to leave. Taking place near an immigration checkpoint on State Route 85, troopers fired tear gas, smoke canisters, and rubber bullets and used physical force, such as kneeling. This protest was also in response to the destruction of sacred lands brought forth by the wall, and the chairman of Tohono O'odham Nation, Ned Norris Junior, released a statement expressing his grievances and asking for a cease in construction of the wall.[24]
Kumeyaay
The proposed border wall cuts through a sacred and ancient burial site of the Kumeyaay nation. The tribe, in August, filed a lawsuit against the Trump Administration citing the importance of the site and the discovery of human remains. According to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection stated that the "remains" were construction materials while the San Diego medical examiner confirmed the sample was human. The construction moved forward citing the remains were outside of the construction zone. Before and after August, the Kumeyaay have had success temporarily halting construction.[25] On September 21, 2020, two individuals were arrested after refusing to leave the campsite, which had been an active protest camp for months, when the Bureau of Land Management issued a closure. Neither of the arrested individuals were charged with a crime.[26] Similarly, an arrest was not made against a woman who yelled obscenities at and physically assaulted some of the peaceful protesters at the camp the protesters had established because no one had reported it or filed a complaint.[27] As of October 18, 2020, the legal challenge to the construction of the Border Wall, filed by La Posta Band of Mission Indians, is in the Court of Appeals.[26]
Sources
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ 2,0 2,1 2,2 2,3 2,4 2,5 2,6 2,7 Шаблон:Cite journal
- ↑ 3,0 3,1 3,2 3,3 3,4 3,5 3,6 Шаблон:Cite journal
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite journal
- ↑ 8,0 8,1 8,2 Шаблон:Cite book
- ↑ 9,0 9,1 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ 14,0 14,1 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite news
- ↑ 17,0 17,1 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite journal
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ 26,0 26,1 Шаблон:Cite web
- ↑ Шаблон:Cite web
