Английская Википедия:Indo-European cosmogony

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Cleanup lang The Indo-European cosmogony refers to the creation myth of the reconstructed Proto-Indo-European mythology.

The comparative analysis of different Indo-European tales has led scholars to reconstruct an original Proto-Indo-European creation myth involving twin brothers, *Шаблон:PIE ('Man') and *Шаблон:PIE ('Twin'), as the progenitors of the world and mankind, and a hero named *Шаблон:PIE ('Third') who ensured the continuity of the original sacrifice.

Although some thematic parallels can be made with Ancient Near East (the primordial couple Adam and Eve), and even Polynesian or South American legends, the linguistic correspondences found in descendant cognates of *Manu and *Yemo make it very likely that the myth discussed here has a Proto-Indo-European (PIE) origin.Шаблон:Sfn

Historiography

Hermann Güntert, stressing philological parallels between the Germanic and Indo-Iranian texts, argued in 1923 for an inherited Indo-European motif of the creation of the world from the sacrifice and dismemberment of a primordial androgyne.Шаблон:Sfn

Following a first paper on the cosmogonical legend of Manu and Yemo, published simultaneously with Jaan Puhvel in 1975 (who pointed out the Roman reflex of the story), Bruce Lincoln assembled the initial part of the myth with the legend of the third man Trito in a single ancestral motif.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn

Since the 1970s, the reconstructed motifs of Manu and Yemo, and to a lesser extent that of Trito, have been generally accepted among scholars.[1]

Myths

Primordial state

The basic Indo-European root for the divine creation is *dheh1, 'to set in place, lay down, or establish', as attested in the Hittite expression nēbis dēgan dāir ("...established heaven (and) earth"), the Young Avestan formula kə huvāpå raocåscā dāt təmåscā? ("What skillful artificer made the regions of light and dark?"), the name of the Vedic creator god Dhātr, and possibly in the Greek name Thetis, presented as a demiurgical goddess in Alcman's poetry.Шаблон:Sfn The concept of the Cosmic Egg, symbolizing the primordial state from which the universe arises, is also found in many Indo-European creation myths.Шаблон:Sfn A similar depiction of the appearance of the universe before the act of creation is given in the Vedic, Germanic and, at least partly, in the Greek tradition.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn

Rigveda 10:129 (trans. Doniger):
There was neither non-existence nor existence then
there was neither the realm of space nor the sky which is beyond...
There was neither death nor immortality then.
There was no distinguishing sign of night nor of day.
Wessobrun Prayer (trans. Blind):
...neither earth there was, nor sky above;
Nor tree, nor hill there was.
Nor stars there were; nor shone the sun.
Nor moon-light there was, nor the salty sea.
Nothing there was: neither end, nor limit
Völuspá (trans. Bellows):
Sea nor cool waves nor sand there were
Earth had not been, nor heaven above,
But a yawning gap, and grass nowhere.

Although the idea of a created world is untypical of early Greek thinking, similar descriptions have been highlighted in Aristophanes's The Birds: "...there was Chasm and Night and dark Erebos at first, and broad Tartarus, but earth nor air nor heaven there was..." The analogy between the Greek Χάος ('Chaos, Chasm') and the Norse Ginnungagap ('Gaping abyss') has also been noted by scholars.Шаблон:Sfn The importance of heat in Germanic creation myths has also been compared with similar Indian beliefs emphasized in the Vedic hymn on 'cosmic heat'.Шаблон:Sfn

Cosmic sacrifice

The first man Manu and his giant twin Yemo are crossing the cosmos, accompanied by a primordial cow. To create the world, Manu sacrifices his brother and, with the help of heavenly deities (the Sky-Father, the Storm-God and the Divine Twins),Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn forges both the natural elements and human beings from his twin's remains.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn

Manu thus becomes the first priest after initiating sacrifice as the primordial condition for the world order. His deceased brother Yemo turns into the first king as social classes emerge from his anatomy (priesthood from his head, the warrior class from his breast and arms, and the commoners from his sexual organs and legs).Шаблон:Sfn

Although the European and Indo-Iranian versions differ on this matter, the primeval cow was most likely sacrificed in the original myth, giving birth to the other animals and vegetables.Шаблон:Sfn Yemo may have become the King of the Otherworld, the realm of the dead, as the first mortal to die in the primordial sacrifice, a role suggested by the Indo-Iranian and, to a lesser extent, in the Germanic, Greek and Celtic traditions.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn

First Warrior

To the third man Trito, the celestial gods offer cattle as a divine gift, which is stolen by a three-headed female serpent named *Шаблон:PIE ('serpent'; and the Indo-European root for negation).Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn

Trito first suffers at his hands, but fortified by an intoxicating drink and aided by a helper-god (the Storm-God or *Haner, 'Man'),Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn together they go to a cave or a mountain, and the hero finally manages to overcome the monster. Trito then gives the recovered cattle back to a priest for it to be properly sacrificed.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn He is now the first warrior, maintaining through his heroic deeds the cycle of mutual giving between gods and mortals.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn

Interpretations

Three Functions

According to Lincoln, Manu and Yemo seem to be the protagonists of "a myth of the sovereign function, establishing the model for later priests and kings", while the legend of Trito should be seen as "a myth of the warrior function, establishing the model for all later men of arms".Шаблон:Sfn He has thus interpreted the narrative as an expression of the priests's and kings's attempt to justify their role as indispensable for the preservation of the cosmos, and therefore as essential for the organization of society.Шаблон:Sfn The motif indeed recalls the Dumézilian tripartition of the cosmos between the priest (in both his magical and legal aspects), the warrior (the Third Man), and the herder (the cow).Шаблон:Sfn

Primeval hermaphrodite

Файл:Ymer dier koen Ødhumble.jpg
Ymir sucking the milk of the primeval cow Auðumbla. 1790.

Some scholars have proposed that the primeval being Yemo was depicted as a two-folded hermaphrodite rather than a twin brother of Manu, both forming indeed a pair of complementary beings entwined together.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn The Germanic names Ymir and Tuisto were understood as twin, bisexual or hermaphrodite, and some myths give a sister to the Vedic Yama, also called Yamī ('Twin').Шаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn The primordial being may therefore have self-sacrificed,Шаблон:Sfn or have been divided in two, a male half and a female half, embodying a prototypal separation of the sexes that continued the primordial union of the Sky Father (Dyēus) with the Mother Earth (Dhéǵhōm).Шаблон:Sfn

Cattle-raiding myth

The story of Trito served as a model for later cattle raiding epic myths and most likely as a moral justification for the practice of raiding among Indo-European peoples. In their legends, Trito is portrayed as only taking back what rightfully belongs to his people, those who sacrifice properly to the gods.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn Although cattle raiding is a common theme found in all societies keeping cattle, it was particularly popular among Indo-European peoples, as attested by the legends of Indra and the Panis, Beowulf and Grendel, the quest of Queen Medb for the Bull, or Odysseus hunting down the cattle of Helios.Шаблон:Sfn

The myth has been variously interpreted as a cosmic conflict between a heavenly hero and an earthly serpent; as a depiction of the male fellowships' struggle to protect society against external evil; or as an Indo-European victory over non-Indo-European people, the monster symbolizing the aboriginal thief or usurper.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn The Vedic serpent Vṛtrá is indeed described as a *dāsa, an aboriginal inhabitant who is inimical to the Indo-European invaders; the Iranian serpent Aži Dahāka carries in his name the pejorative suffix -ka; and the Latin inimical giant Cācus is depicted as a non-Indo-European aborigine (incola), hostile to Romans and Greeks alike.Шаблон:Sfn According to Martin L. West, the Proto-Indo-European name *Trito ('Third') may have been a "poetic or hieratic code-name, fully comprehensible only with specialized knowledge".Шаблон:Sfn

Linguistic evidence

Manu and Yemo

Cognates deriving from the Proto-Indo-European First Priest *Manu ('Man', 'ancestor of humankind') include the Indic Mánu, legendary first man in Hinduism, and Manāvī, his sacrificed wife; the Germanic Mannus (from Germ. *Manwaz), mythical ancestor of the West Germanic tribes; and the Persian Manūščihr (from Av. Manūš.čiθra, 'son of Manuš'), Zoroastrian high priest of the 9th century AD.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn

From the name of the sacrificed First King *Yemo ('Twin') derive the Indic Yama, god of death and the underworld; the Avestan Yima, king of the golden age and guardian of hell; the Norse Ymir (from Germ. *Yumiyáz), ancestor of the giants (jötnar); and most likely Remus (from Proto-Latin *Yemos), killed in the Roman foundation myth by his twin brother Rōmulus.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn Latvian jumis ('double fruit'), Latin geminus ('twin') and Middle Irish emuin ('twin') are also linguistically related.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn

Indo-European linguistic descendants (in bold) and thematic echoes (in italic) of the creation myth.[2]
Tradition First Priest First King First mammal Heavenly gods
Proto-Indo-European *Manu ('Man') *Yemo ('Twin') Primordial Cow Sky-Father, Storm-God, Divine Twins
Indian Mánu, Puruṣa Yama, (Manāvī) Manu's bull The Vedic gods
Iranian Ahriman, Spityura, Manūščihr Yima, Gayōmart Primordial Ox (Gōšūrvan)
Germanic Mannus Ymir, Tuisto Primordial Cow (Auðhumla) Óðinn and his brothers
Roman Rōmulus *Yemos (Remus) She-wolf The senators

Trito and Ngwhi

Cognates stemming from the First Warrior *Trito ('Third') include the Vedic Trita, the hero who recovered the stolen cattle from the serpent Vṛtrá; the Avestan Thraētona ('son of Thrita'), who won back the abducted women from the serpent Aži Dahāka; and the Norse þriði ('Third'), one of the names of Óðinn.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn Other cognates may appear in the Greek expressions trítos sōtḗr (τρίτος σωτήρ; 'Third Saviour'), an epithet of Zeus, and tritogḗneia (τριτογήνεια; 'Third born' or 'born of Zeus'), an epithet of Athena; and perhaps in the Slavic mythical hero Troyan, found in Russian and Serbian legends alike.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Efn

*Ngwhi, a term meaning 'serpent', is also related to the Indo-European root for negation (*ne-).Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn Descendent cognates can be found in the Iranian Aži, the name of the inimical serpent, and in the Indic áhi ('serpent'), a term used to designate the monstrous serpent Vṛtrá,Шаблон:Sfn both descending from Proto-Indo-Iranian *aj'hi.[3]

Indo-European linguistic descendants (in bold) and thematic echoes (in italic) of the myth of the First Warrior.[4]
Tradition First Warrior Three-headed Serpent Helper God Stolen present
Proto-Indo-European *Trito ('Third') *Шаблон:PIE The Storm-god or Hanēr ('Man') Cattle
Indian Trita Vṛtrá ('áhi') Indra Cows
Iranian Thraētona ('son of Thrita') Aži Dahāka *Vr̥traghna Women
Germanic þriði, Hymir Three serpents Þórr Goats (?)
Graeco-Roman Herakles Geryon, Cācus Helios Cattle

Comparative mythology

Many Indo-European beliefs explain aspects of human anatomy from the results of the original dismemberment of Yemo: his flesh usually becomes the earth, his hair grass, his bone yields stone, his blood water, his eyes the sun, his mind the moon, his brain the clouds, his breath the wind, and his head the heavens.Шаблон:Sfn The traditions of sacrificing an animal before dispersing its parts following socially established patterns, a custom found in Ancient Rome and India, has been interpreted as an attempt to restore the balance of the cosmos ruled by the original sacrifice.Шаблон:Sfn

In the Indo-Iranian version of the myth, his brother Manu also sacrifices the cow, and from the parts of the dead animal are born the other living species and vegetables. In the European reflexes, however, the cow (represented by a she-wolf in the Roman myth) serves only as a provider of milk and care for the twins before the creation.Шаблон:Sfn This divergence may be explained by the cultural differences between the Indo-Iranian and European branches of the Indo-European family, with the former still strongly influenced by pastoralism, and the latter much more agricultural, perceiving the cow mainly as a source of milk.Шаблон:Sfn According to Lincoln, the Indo-Iranian version best preserves the ancestral motif, since they lived closer to the original Proto-Indo-European pastoral way of life.Шаблон:Sfn

Indo-Iranian

Creation myth

Mánu ('Man, human') appears in the Rigveda as the first sacrificer and the founder of religious law, the Law of Mánu.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn He is the brother (or half-brother) of Yama ('Twin'), both presented as the sons of the solar deity Vivasvat. The association of Mánu with the ritual of sacrifice is so strong that those who do not sacrifice are named amanuṣāḥ, which means 'not belonging to Mánu', 'unlike Mánu', or 'inhuman'.Шаблон:Sfn The Song of Puruṣa (another word meaning 'man') tells how the body parts of the sacrificed primeval man led to the creation of the cosmos (the heaven from his head, the air from his navel, the earth from his legs) and the Hindu castes (the upper parts becoming the upper castes and the lower parts the commoners).Шаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn In the later Śatapatha Brāhmana, both a primordial bull and Mánu's wife Manāvī are sacrificed by the Asuras (demi-gods). According to Lincoln, this could represent an independent variant of the original myth, with the figure of Yama laying behind that of Manāvī.Шаблон:Sfn

Файл:Jamshid (The Shahnama of Shah Tahmasp).png
The Iranian mythical king Yima. c. 1522.

After a religious transformation led by Zarathustra around the 7th–6th centuries BC that degraded the status of prior myths and deities, *Manuš was replaced in the Iranian tradition with three different figures: Ahriman, who took his role as first sacrificer; Manūščihr ('son' or 'seed of Manuš'), who replaced him as ancestor of the priestly line; and Zarathustra himself, who took his role as priest par excellence. Manūščihr is described in the Greater Bun-dahišnīh as the ancestor of all Mōpats ('High Priests') of Pars, and it has been proposed that *Manuš was originally regarded as the First Priest instead of Zarathustra by pre-Zoroastrian tribes.Шаблон:Sfn

The Indo-Iranian tradition portrays the first mortal man or king, *YamHa, as the son of the solar deity, *Hui-(H)uas-uant.Шаблон:Sfn[5] Invoked in funeral hymns of the Rigveda, Yama is depicted as the first man to die, the one who established the path towards death after he freely chose his own departure from life.Шаблон:Sfn Although his realm was originally associated with feasting, beauty and happiness, Yama was gradually portrayed as a horrific being and the ruler of the Otherworld in the epic and puranic traditions.Шаблон:Sfn Some scholars have equated this abandonment (or transcendence) of his own body with the sacrifice of Puruṣa.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn In a motif shared with the Iranian tradition, which is touched in the Rigveda and told in later traditions, Yama and his twin sister Yamī are presented as the children of the sun-god Vivasvat. Discussing the advisability of incest in a primordial context, Yamī insists on having sexual intercourse with her brother Yama, who rejects it, thus forgoing his role as the creator of humankind.Шаблон:Sfn

In pre-Zoroastrian Iran, Yima was seen as the first king and first mortal. The original myth of creation was indeed condemned by Zarathustra, who makes mention of it in the Avesta when talking about the two spirits that "appeared in the beginning as two twins in a dream ... (and) who first met and instituted life and non-life".Шаблон:Sfn Yima in particular is depicted as the first to distribute portions of the cow for consumption,Шаблон:Sfn and is explicitly condemned for having introduced the eating of meat.Шаблон:Sfn After a brief reign on earth, the king Yima was said in a later tradition to be deprived of his triple royal nimbus, which embodied the three social classes in Iranian myths. Mithra receives the part of the Priest, Thraētona that of the Warrior, and Kərəsāspa that of the Commoner. The saga ends with the real dismemberment of Yima by his own brother, the daiwic figure Spityura.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn In another myth of the Younger Avesta, the primal man Gayōmart (Gaya marətan; 'Mortal Life') and the primeval world ox Gōšūrvan are sacrificed by the destructive spirit Ahriman (Aŋra Mainyu, 'Evil Spirit').Шаблон:Sfn From the ox's parts came all the plants and animals, and from Gayōmart's body the minerals and humankind.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn In the Vīdēvdāt, Yima is presented as the builder of an underworld, a sub-terrestrial paradise eventually ruled by Zarathustra and his son. The story, giving a central position to the new religious leader, is once again probably the result of a Zoroastrian reformation of the original myth, and Yima might have been seen as the ruler of the realm of the dead in the early Iranian tradition.Шаблон:Sfn Norbert Oettinger argues that the story of Yima and the Vara was originally a flood myth, and the harsh winter was added in due to the dry nature of Eastern Iran, as flood myths didn't have as much of an effect as harsh winters. He has argued that the Videvdad 2.24's mention of melted water flowing is a remnant of the flood myth, and mentions that the Indian Flood Myths originally had their protagonist as Yama, but it was changed to Manu later.[6]

Trita Atpya

Both the Rigveda and the Younger Avesta depict the slaying of a three-headed serpent by a hero named Trita Āptya or Thraēta(ona) Āthwya for the recovery of cattle or women. *Atpya may refer to the name of an Indo-Iranian family of heroes. Both heroes are known as the preparers of the Indo-Iranian sacred beverage, the *sauma, which *Trita Atpya probably drank to obtain god-like powers.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn The Greek story of Herakles recovering the stolen cattle from the three-headed monster Geryon is likely related, and a Germanic reflex may be found in the depiction of a three-head man fighting three serpents while holding a goat on the Golden Horns of Gallehus.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn

In the Vedic tradition, Trita Āptya and the god Indra maintain a relationship of mutual assistance, Trita giving soma to the god so that he can, in return, provide help to the hero in his fight against the monster Vṛtrá.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn The hero confronts the three-headed dragon (áhi-) and kills him to let the cows go out. Finally, Indra cuts off three heads of Vṛtrá and drives the cows home for Trita.Шаблон:Sfn

In the Younger Avestan, the stolen cattle was replaced with his two beautiful wives (vantā), said to have been abducted by the serpent Aži Dahāka and whom the hero Thraētona ('son of Thrita') eventually wins back after confronting the monster.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn Vantā, which means 'female who is desired', has been compared with Indo-Iranian *dhainu ('one who lactates, gives milk'), a frequent word for 'cow' also used to designate female humans.Шаблон:Sfn Although Thraētona was aided in his quest by several deities, the pre-Zoroastrian warrior-god *Vr̥traghna ('Smasher of Resistance') appears to be the most probable helper-god in the original Iranian myth, since it was the name borrowed as Vahagn in the Armenian version of the story.Шаблон:Sfn

Graeco-Roman

The Roman writer Livy relates the murder of Remus by his brother Rōmulus during the legendary founding of Rome following a disagreement about which hill to build the city on. In a version of the myth, Rōmulus himself is said to have been torn limb-from-limb by a group of senators for being a tyrant,Шаблон:Sfn which may represent a reflex of the gods who sacrificed the twin giant in the original motif.Шаблон:Sfn Like in the Proto-Indo-European myth, the sacrifice of Remus (Yemos) led to a symbolical creation of humankind, represented by the birth of the three Roman 'tribes' (the Ramnes, Luceres and Tities), and to the enthronement of his brother as the 'First King'.Шаблон:Sfn

Файл:Cr 20-1-Reverse.jpg
Rōmulus and Remus sucking at the udder of the mother she-wolf. c. 269–266 BC.

It is likely that Remus was originally seen as the main protagonist of the Latin myth, since the formula initially went by Remo et Romulo, and his name was often used as an elliptical replacement for the whole couple, such as in Remi nepotes ("descendants of Remus"), a poetic name for the Romans.Шаблон:Sfn While the name Rōmulus is interpreted as a back-formation of the city name Rōma, Remus is derived from PIE *Yemo, via an intermediary Proto-Latin form *Yemos or *Yemonos.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn The initial 'y' sound may have shifted to 'r' as a result of long and frequent associations with the names Roma and Rōmulus in Latin myths.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn In the legend reported by Livy, Rōmulus and Remus were nurtured as infants by a she-wolf, a motif that parallels the cow nourishing Ymir in the Old Norse version.Шаблон:Sfn

Some scholars have proposed that the original motifs of Yemo, the Proto-Indo-European sacrificed twin ancestor and ruler of the dead, have been transferred in Greek mythology to three different figures: Kronos, Rhadamanthys and Menealos.Шаблон:Sfn

A possible reflex of the original legend of the Third Man *Trito may be found in a Greek myth told by Hesiod. A three-headed monster named Geryon, the grandson of Medusa (the serpent-haired Gorgon), is said to have been killed by Herakles to recover a stolen cattle.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn The Greek hero is helped by the sun-god Helios, from whom he borrows the cup that helps him cross the western Ocean and reach the island of Erythea. Together with his herdsman Eurytion and his dog, Herakles finally overcomes the monster and drives the cattle back to Greece.Шаблон:Sfn

Roman versions of myth, which relied on earlier Greek texts, have been remodelled around an opposition between Hercules and a fire-breathing ogre named Cācus, who lives in a cave on the Aventine.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn They have nonetheless retained some features of the original three-headed monstrous opponent: Hercules' club, with which he kills Cācus with three strikes, is said to be three-noded; and Hercules runs around the mountain three times after finding the monster's cave, batters the door three times, and sits down to rest three times before finally breaking in.Шаблон:Sfn Like in the Iranian and Greek versions, Cācus is portrayed as the one who initially stole the cattle which rightfully belongs to the hero, Hercules.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn

Germanic

Файл:Small Gallehus horn images.png
A possible Germanic depiction of the myth of *Trito on the Golden Horns of Gallehus (second from top).Шаблон:Sfn

Ymir is depicted in the Eddas as the primal being and a frost jötunn ('giant'). After Óðinn and his brothers killed him, they made the earth out of his flesh, the mountains from his bones, the trees from his hair, the sky from his skull, and the sea and lakes from his blood; and from his two armpits came a man and a woman.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn The Germanic name Ymir means 'Twin', and some scholars have proposed that it was also understood as hermaphrodite or bisexual. In fact, one of his legs is said to make love to the other one, fathering a six-headed son, the ancestor of the giants.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn In another Old Norse story, the primeval cow Auðhumla is said to be formed from melting ice like Ymir, and she fed him with her milk.Шаблон:Sfn

In his book Germania (ca. 98 AD), Tacitus reports the existence of a myth involving an earth-born god named Tuisto ('Twin') who fathered Mannus ('Man'), the ancestor of West Germanic peoples.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn Tuisto has begotten Mannus on his own, and his name is also understood to mean hermaphrodite.Шаблон:Sfn Some scholars have proposed that the Germanic tribal name Alamanni meant 'Mannus' own people', although 'all-men' remains the most widely accepted etymology among linguists.[7]

A Germanic reflex of myth of Trito fighting the three-headed serpent Ngwhi may be found on the Golden Horns of Gallehus (5th c. AD), where a three-headed man is portrayed as holding a goat and confronting three serpents.Шаблон:Sfn One of the names of Óðinn, Þriði ('Third'), is also linguistically related to *Trito.Шаблон:SfnШаблон:SfnШаблон:Sfn Another reflex may be found in the Norse legend of the giant Hymir who employed an ox head to capture the serpent Jǫrmungandr with the help of the storm-god Thor.Шаблон:Sfn

Celtic

A possible Celtic reflex of the Proto-Indo-European myth of creation has been proposed in the Irish epic Táin Bó Cúailnge, where two mythical bulls, Donn Cúalnge ('the Dark [bull] of Cooley') and Findbennach Aí ('the White-horned bull of Aí'), fight each other. The battle ends with the former tearing his opponent limb from limb, creating the Irish landscape out of his body. Donn himself dies shortly after the fight from a broken heart, and thereafter also gives his body to form the island's landscape.Шаблон:Sfn Julius Caesar reported that the Gaulish believed in a mythical ancestor he compared to Dīs Pater, the Roman god of the underworld. According to some scholars, this could represent a reflex of the original Proto-Indo-European twin ancestor and ruler of the dead *Yemo, a function similar to that held by the Indo-Iranian Yama.Шаблон:Sfn

Parallels and legacy

The motif of Manu and Yemo has been influential throughout Eurasia following the Indo-European migrations. The Greek, Old Russian (Poem on the Dove King) and Jewish versions depend on the Iranian, and a Chinese version of the myth has been introduced from Ancient India.Шаблон:Sfn The Armenian version of the myth of the First Warrior Trito depends on the Iranian, and the Roman reflexes were influenced by earlier Greek versions.Шаблон:Sfn

Baltic mythology records a fertility deity Jumis,[8] whose name means 'pair, double (of fruits)'.[9] His name is also considered a cognate to Indo-Iranian Yama, and related to Sanskrit yamala 'in pairs, twice' and Prakrit yamala 'twins'.[10] Ranko Matasović cites the existence of Jumala as a female counterpart and sister of Jumis in Latvian dainas (folksongs), as another fertility deity,[11][12] and in the same vein, Zmago Smitek mentioned the pair as having "pronounced vegetational characteristics".[13] Jumis, whose name can also mean 'double ear of wheat', is also considered a Latvian chthonic deity that lived "beneath the plowed field".[14]

Later Iranian tradition (Pahlavi) attests a brother-sister pair named Jima (Yima) and Jimak (Yimak).[15][16] Yimak, or Jamag, is described as Yima's twin sister in the Bundahishn from Central Iran.[13][17] Yima consorts with his sister Yimak to produce humankind, but is later killed by Azi Dahaka.[18]

The name Yama is attested as a compound in personal names of the historical Persepolis Administrative Archives, such as Yamakka and Yamakšedda (from Old Persian *Yama-xšaita- 'majestic Yama', modern Jamshid).[19]

Nuristani deity Imra is also considered a reflex of Indo-Iranian Yama. The name Imra is thought to derive from *Yama-raja "King Yama",[20][21] a name possibly cognate to the Bangani title Jim Raza 'god of the dead'.[22] He is also known as Mara "Killer, Death".[23][24] This name may have left traces in other Nuristani languages: Waigali Yamrai,[25] Kalash (Urtsun) imbro,[26] Ashkun im'ra, Prasun yumr'a and Kati im'ro – all referring to a "creator god".[27][28] This deity also acts as the guardian to the gates of hell (located in a subterranean realm), preventing the return to the world of the living - a motif that echoes the role of Yama as the king of the underworld.[29]

Linguist and comparativist Jaan Puhvel proposed that the characters of "Man" and "Twin" are present in Proto-Latin under the names of Remus (from *Yemo(no)s) and Romulus. The latter was deified as god Quirinus, a name he considered to be ultimately derived from Шаблон:PIE ('man').[30][31]Шаблон:Efn

Following Puhvel's line of argument, Belarusian scholar Siarhiej Sanko attempted to find a Proto-Baltic related pair, possibly named Jumis ("twin") and Viras ("male, hero"). He saw a connection with (quasi-pseudo-)historical Prussian king Widewuto and his brother Bruteno. Related to them is a pair of figures named WirschaitosШаблон:Efn and Szwaybrutto (Iszwambrato, Schneybrato, Schnejbrato, Snejbrato) which he interprets as "Elder" and "His Brother", respectively.[32] These latter two would, in turn, be connected to the worship, by the Prussians, of stone statues erected during their expansion in the 12th and 13th centuries.[33]

Footnotes

Шаблон:Notelist

References

Шаблон:Reflist

Bibliography

Шаблон:Refbegin

Шаблон:Refend

Further reading

Шаблон:Refbegin

  • Böldl, Klaus. "Von Den Ersten Und Den Letzten Dingen: Kosmogonie, Kosmologie Und Eschatologie Der Edda." In Götter Und Mythen Des Nordens: Ein Handbuch, 93–141. München: Verlag C.H.Beck, 2013. doi:10.2307/j.ctv11693m7.7.
  • Fraschetti, Augusto, Marian Hill, and Kevin Windle. "The Disappearance of the Founder: Romulus 'cut into Pieces' or His Apotheosis." In: The Foundation of Rome. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005. pp. 85–112. Шаблон:Doi.
  • Шаблон:Cite journal
  • Шаблон:Cite journal
  • Kulikov, Leonid. "The First Woman Yamī, Her Origin and Her Status in Indo-Iranian Mythology: Demigoddess or Half-human? (Evidence from R̥gveda 10.10, Iranian Parallels and Greek Relatives)". In: Studia Ceranea 8, 2018, pp. 43–75. Шаблон:ISSN DOI: 10.18778/2084-140X.08.03
  • Lincoln, Bruce (1981). The Lord of the Dead. History of Religions. 20. pp. 224–41. 10.1086/462869.
  • Шаблон:Cite journal
  • Witzel, Michael. (2008). "Slaying the Dragon across Eurasia". In: In Hot Pursuit of Language in Prehistory. pp. 263–286. 10.1075/z.145.21wit.
  • Yama/Yima: Variations indo-iraniennes sur la geste mythique [Variations on the Indo-Iranian Myth of Yama/Yima]. Edited by Samra Azarnouche and Céline Redard with an introduction by Jean Kellens. College de France: Publications de l'Institut de Civilisation Indienne, fasc. 81. Paris: De Boccard, 2012.

Шаблон:Refend

Шаблон:Indo European Mythology

  1. See: Шаблон:Harvnb; Шаблон:Harvnb; Шаблон:Harvnb. Шаблон:Harvnb agrees with the reconstructed motif of Manu and Yemo, although he notes that interpretations of the myths of Trita and Thraētona are debated. According to Шаблон:Harvard citation no brackets, "some elements of the [Scandinavian myth of Ymir] are distinctively Indo-Europeans", but the reconstruction of the creation myth of the first Man and his Twin proposed by Шаблон:Harvard citation no brackets "makes too unprovable assumptions to account for the fundamental changes implied by the Scandinavian version".
  2. See: Шаблон:Harvnb; Шаблон:Harvnb; Шаблон:Harvnb; Шаблон:Harvnb; Шаблон:Harvnb.
  3. Шаблон:Cite book
  4. See: Шаблон:Harvnb; Шаблон:Harvard citation no brackets; Шаблон:Harvnb; Шаблон:Harvnb.
  5. Шаблон:Cite book. See entries vivásvant- and yamá- [2] (online database).
  6. N. Oettinger, Before Noah: Possible Relics of the Flood myth in Proto-Indo-Iranian and Earlier, [in:] Proceedings of the 24th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, ed. S.W. Jamison, H.C. Melchert, B. Vine, Bremen 2013, p. 169–183
  7. Шаблон:Cite book
  8. Шаблон:Cite book
  9. Oinas, Felix J. (1980). "A Balto-Finnic and Baltic fertility spirit". In: Journal of Baltic Studies, 11:3, pp. 207-211. DOI: 10.1080/01629778000000231
  10. Vainik, Ene. (2014). "Jumala jälgi ajamas" [Tracing back the word jumal 'god']. Mäetagused 58: 21. 10.7592/MT2014.58.vainik.
  11. Шаблон:Cite book
  12. Шаблон:Cite book
  13. 13,0 13,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  14. Шаблон:Cite book
  15. Шаблон:Cite journal
  16. Шаблон:Cite book
  17. Шаблон:Cite journal
  18. Шаблон:Cite book
  19. Шаблон:Cite book
  20. Шаблон:Cite journal
  21. Cacopardo, A.S. (2016). "A World In-between. The Pre-Islamic Cultures of the Hindu Kush". In: Pellò, S.(ed.). Borders. Itineraries on the Edges of Iran. Venezia, Eurasiatica Quaderni di studi su Balcani, Anatolia, Iran, Caucaso e Asia Centrale. Edizioni Ca' Foscari. p. 250. Шаблон:ISBN [DOI: 10.14277/6969-100-3/EUR-5-10]
  22. Zoller, Claus Peter. "Review Article: "Pagan Christmas: Winter feast of the Kalasha of the Hindu Kush" and the true frontiers of 'Greater Peristan'.". In: Acta Orientalia 2018, n. 79. 2018. pp. 217 and 232 (footnote nr. 174). Шаблон:ISSN
  23. Parpola, Asko. The Roots of Hinduism: The Early Aryans and the Indus Civilization. Oxford University Press. 2015. pp. 143 and 264. Шаблон:ISBN
  24. Cacopardo, A.S. (2016). "A World In-between. The Pre-Islamic Cultures of the Hindu Kush". In: Pellò, S.(ed.). Borders. Itineraries on the Edges of Iran. Venezia, Eurasiatica Quaderni di studi su Balcani, Anatolia, Iran, Caucaso e Asia Centrale. Edizioni Ca' Foscari. pp. 251 and 253. Шаблон:ISBN [DOI: 10.14277/6969-100-3/EUR-5-10]
  25. Klimburg, Max. "The Arts and Culture of Parun, Kafiristan's "Sacred Valley"". In: Arts asiatiques, tome 57, 2002. pp. 51-68. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/arasi.2002.1480]; www.persee.fr/doc/arasi_0004-3958_2002_num_57_1_1480
  26. Parkes, Peter. "Temple of Imra, Temple of Mahandeu: A Kafir Sanctuary in Kalasha Cosmology". Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. University of London 54, no. 1 (1991): 85. http://www.jstor.org/stable/617315.
  27. Zoller, Claus Peter. "Review Article: "Pagan Christmas: Winter feast of the Kalasha of the Hindu Kush" and the true frontiers of 'Greater Peristan'.". In: Acta Orientalia 2018, n. 79. 2018. p. 232 (footnote nr. 174). Шаблон:ISSN
  28. Шаблон:Cite book
  29. Boyce, Mary. "The Pre-Zoroastrian Religion of the Medes and the Persians". In: A History of Zoroastrianism, Zoroastrianism under the Achaemenians. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 1982. pp. 18-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004293908_003
  30. Puhvel, Jaan. "Devata-Dvandva in Hittite, Greek, and Latin". In: The American Journal of Philology 98, no. 4 (1977): 404-405. Accessed March 3, 2021. doi:10.2307/293802.
  31. Puhvel, Jaan. "Remus Et Frater". In: History of Religions 15, no. 2 (1975): 156-157. Accessed March 4, 2021. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1061928.
  32. SAŃKO, Siarhiej, and Aliaksej Shota. "PODSTAWOWE SKŁADNIKI BIAŁORUSKIEJ NARRACJI SAKRALNEJ W PERSPEKTYWIE PORÓWNAWCZEJ". In: Politeja, no. 22 (2012): 167-68. Accessed March 3, 2021. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24920134.
  33. Кулаков Владимир Иванович (2017). Каменные изваяния пруссов. Исторический формат, (1-2), 151-169. URL: (дата обращения: 03.03.2021).