Английская Википедия:International Psychoanalytical Association

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Psychoanalysis The International Psychoanalytical Association (IPA) is an association including 12,000 psychoanalysts as members and works with 70 constituent organizations. It was founded in 1910 by Sigmund Freud, from an idea proposed by Sándor Ferenczi.[1]

History

Шаблон:Multiple image In 1902 Sigmund Freud started to meet every week with colleagues to discuss his work, thus establishing the Psychological Wednesday Society. By 1908 there were 14 regular members and some guests including Max Eitingon, Carl Jung, Karl Abraham, and Ernest Jones, all future Presidents of the IPA.[2] The Society became the Vienna Psychoanalytical Society.

In 1907 Jones suggested to Jung that an international meeting should be arranged. Freud welcomed the proposal. The meeting took place in Salzburg on April 27, 1908. Jung named it the "First Congress for Freudian Psychology". It is later reckoned to be the first International Psychoanalytical Congress. Even so, the IPA had not yet been founded.

The IPA was established at the next Congress held at Nuremberg in March 1910.[3] Its first President was Carl Jung, and its first Secretary was Otto Rank. Sigmund Freud considered an international organization to be essential to advance his ideas. In 1914 Freud published a paper entitled The History of the Psychoanalytic Movement.

The IPA is the international accrediting and regulatory body for member organisations. The IPA's aims include creating new psychoanalytic groups, conducting research, developing training policies and establishing links with other bodies. It organizes a biennial Congress.

Regional organizations

There is a Regional Organisation for each of the IPA's 3 regions:

  • Europe—European Psychoanalytical Federation (or EPF), which also includes Australia, India, Israel, Lebanon, South Africa and Turkey;
    • The IPA is incorporated in England, where it is a company limited by guarantee and also a registered charity. Its administrative offices are at The Lexicon in Central London.
  • Latin America—Federation of Psychoanalytic Societies of Latin America (or FEPAL);
  • North America—North American Psychoanalytic Confederation (or NAPSAC), which also includes Japan and Korea.

Each of these three bodies consists of Constituent Organisations and Study Groups that are part of that IPA region. The IPA has a close working relationship with each of these independent organisations, but they are not officially or legally part of the IPA.

Constituent organizations

The IPA's members qualify for membership by being a member of a "constituent organisation" (or the sole regional association).

Constituent Organisations Шаблон:Columns-list

Provisional Societies

  • Guadalajara Psychoanalytic Association (Provisional Society)
  • Moscow Psychoanalytic Society (Provisional Society)
  • Psychoanalytic Society for Research and Training (Provisional Society)
  • Vienna Psychoanalytic Association

Regional associations

  • American Psychoanalytic Association ("APsaA") is a body which has in membership societies which cover around 75% of psychoanalysts in the United States of America (the remainder are members of "independent" societies which are in direct relationship with the IPA).

IPA Study Groups

"Study Groups" are bodies of analysts which have not yet developed sufficiently to be a freestanding society, but that is their aim.

  • Campinas Psychoanalytical Study Group
  • Center for Psychoanalytic Education and Research
  • Croatian Psychoanalytic Study Group
  • Fortaleza Psychoanalytic Group
  • Goiania Psychoanalytic Nucleus
  • Korean Psychoanalytic Study Group
  • Latvia and Estonia Psychoanalytic Study Group
  • Lebanese Association for the Development of Psychoanalysis
  • Minas Gerais Psychoanalytical Study Group
  • Northern Ireland Psychoanalytic Society
  • Portuguese Nucleus of Psychoanalysis
  • Psychoanalytical Association of Asuncion SG
  • South African Psychoanalytic Association
  • Study Group of Turkey: Psike Istanbul
  • Turkish Psychoanalytical Group
  • Vermont Psychoanalytic Study Group
  • Vilnius Society of Psychoanalysts

Allied Centres

"Allied Centres" are groups of people with an interest in psychoanalysis, in places where there are not already societies or study groups.

  • Korean Psychoanalytic Allied Centre
  • Psychoanalysis Studying Centre in China
  • Taiwan Centre for The Development of Psychoanalysis
  • The Centre for Psychoanalytic Studies of Panama

International Congresses

The first 23 Congresses of IPA did not have a specific theme.

Number Year City President Theme
1 1908 Шаблон:Flagicon Salzburg
2 1910 Шаблон:Flagicon Nuremberg C. G. Jung
3 1911 Шаблон:Flagicon Weimar C. G. Jung
4 1913 Шаблон:Flagicon Munich C. G. Jung
5 1918 Шаблон:Flagicon Budapest Karl Abraham
6 1920 Шаблон:Flagicon The Hague Sándor Ferenczi
7 1922 Шаблон:Flagicon Berlin Ernest Jones
8 1924 Шаблон:Flagicon Salzburg Ernest Jones
9 1925 Шаблон:Flagicon Bad Homburg K Abraham / M Eitingon
10 1927 Шаблон:Flagicon Innsbruck Max Eitingon
11 1929 Шаблон:Flagicon Oxford Max Eitingon
12 1932 Шаблон:Flagicon Wiesbaden Max Eitingon
13 1934 Шаблон:Flagicon Lucerne Ernest Jones
14 1936 Шаблон:Flagicon Marienbad Ernest Jones
15 1938 Шаблон:Flagicon Paris Ernest Jones
16 1949 Шаблон:Flagicon Zürich Ernest Jones
17 1951 Шаблон:Flagicon Amsterdam Leo H. Bartemeier
18 1953 Шаблон:Flagicon London Heinz Hartmann
19 1955 Шаблон:Flagicon Geneva Heinz Hartmann
20 1957 Шаблон:Flagicon Paris Heinz Hartmann
21 1959 Шаблон:Flagicon Copenhagen William H. Gillespie
22 1961 Шаблон:Flagicon Edinburgh William H. Gillespie
23 1963 Шаблон:Flagicon Stockholm Maxwell Gitelson
24 1965 Шаблон:Flagicon Amsterdam Gillespie/Greenacre Psychoanalytic Treatment of the Obsessional Neurosis
25 1967 Шаблон:Flagicon Copenhagen P.J. van der Leeuw On Acting Out and its Role in the Psychoanalytic Process
26 1969 Шаблон:Flagicon Rome P.J. van der Leeuw New Developments in Psychoanalysis
27 1971 Шаблон:Flagicon Vienna Leo Rangell The Psychoanalytical Concept of Aggression
28 1973 Шаблон:Flagicon Paris Leo Rangell Transference and Hysteria Today
29 1975 Шаблон:Flagicon London Serge Lebovici Changes in Psychoanalytic Practice and Experience
30 1977 Шаблон:Flagicon Jerusalem Serge Lebovici Affects and the Psychoanalytic Situation
31 1979 Шаблон:Flagicon New York City Edward D. Joseph Clinical Issues in Psychoanalysis
32 1981 Шаблон:Flagicon Helsinki Edward D. Joseph Early Psychic Development as Reflected in the Psychoanalytic Process
33 1983 Шаблон:Flagicon Madrid Adam Limentani The Psychoanalyst at Work
34 1985 Шаблон:Flagicon Hamburg Adam Limentani Identification and its Vicissitudes
35 1987 Шаблон:Flagicon Montreal Robert S. Wallerstein Analysis Terminable and Interminable – 50 Years Later
36 1989 Шаблон:Flagicon Rome Robert S. Wallerstein Common Ground in Psychoanalysis
37 1991 Шаблон:Flagicon Buenos Aires Joseph J. Sandler Psychic Change
38 1993 Шаблон:Flagicon Amsterdam Joseph J. Sandler The Psychoanalyst's Mind – From Listening to Interpretation
39 1995 Шаблон:Flagicon San Francisco R. Horacio Etchegoyen Psychic Reality – Its Impact on the Analyst and Patient Today
40 1997 Шаблон:Flagicon Barcelona R. Horacio Etchegoyen Psychoanalysis and Sexuality
41 1999 Шаблон:Flagicon Santiago Otto F. Kernberg Affect in Theory and Practice
42 2001 Шаблон:Flagicon Nice Otto F. Kernberg Psychoanalysis – Method and Application
43 2004 Шаблон:Flagicon New Orleans Daniel Widlöcher Working at the Frontiers
44 2005 Шаблон:Flagicon Rio de Janeiro Daniel Widlöcher Trauma: New Developments in Psychoanalysis
45 2007 Шаблон:Flagicon Berlin Cláudio Laks Eizirik Remembering, Repeating and Working Through in Psychoanalysis & Culture Today
46 2009 Шаблон:Flagicon Chicago Cláudio Laks Eizirik Psychoanalytic Practice - Convergences and Divergences
47 2011 Шаблон:Flagicon Mexico City Charles Hanly Exploring Core Concepts: Sexuality, Dreams and the Unconscious
48 2013 Шаблон:Flagicon Prague Charles Hanly Facing the Pain: Clinical Experience and the Development of Psychoanalytic Knowledge
49 2015 Шаблон:Flagicon Boston Stefano Bolognini Changing World: the shape and use of psychoanalytic tools today
50 2017 Шаблон:Flagicon Buenos Aires Stefano Bolognini Intimacy
51 2019 Шаблон:Flagicon London Virginia Ungar The Feminine
52 2021 Шаблон:Flagicon Vancouver Virginia Ungar The infantile: its multiple dimensions
53 2023 Шаблон:Flagicon Cartagena Harriet Wolfe Mind in the Line of Fire

Criticism

In 1975, Erich Fromm questioned this organization and found that the psychoanalytic association was "organized according to standards rather dictatorial".[4]

In 1999, Elisabeth Roudinesco noted that the IPA's attempts to professionalize psychoanalysis had become "a machine to manufacture significance". She also said that in France, "Lacanian colleagues looked upon the IPA as bureaucrats who had betrayed psychoanalysis in favour of an adaptive psychology in the service of triumphant capitalism".[5] She wrote of the "IPA['s] Legitimist Freudianism, as mistakenly called "orthodox" ".[6]

On the other hand, most criticisms laid against the IPA tend to come from a 1950s Lacanian point of view,[7] unaware of recent developments, and of the variety of schools and training models within the association in recent decades.[8] One of the three training models in the IPA (the French Model), is mostly due to Lacan's ideas and their perspectives regarding the training.[9]

Homophobia

Among Roudinesco's other criticisms, was her reference to "homophobia" in the IPA, considered a "disgrace of psychoanalysis.[10]

According to psychiatrist Albert Le Dorze too, this association is homophobic[11]

Archives

The archive of the International Psychoanalytical Association is held at Wellcome Collection (ref no: SA/IPA).

See also

References

  1. Шаблон:Cite webШаблон:Dead link
  2. Шаблон:Cite web
  3. How did the IPA begin? Шаблон:Webarchive
  4. "La mission de Sigmund Freud : une analyse de sa personnalité et de son influence'", Erich Fromm, translation from English by Paul Alexandre. Bruxelles : Complexe, 1975 and in Grandeurs et limites de la pensée freudienne, édition Laffont, 1980
  5. Elisabeth Roudinesco, "Pourquoi la psychanalyse ?" chapter four, « critiques des institutions psychanalytiques ». Fayard, Paris, 1999
  6. E.Roudinesco "Genealogy", p.60
  7. J. Lacan, The situation of psychoanalysis and the training of psychoanalysts in 1956, Ecrits, the first complete edition in English, translated by Bruce Fink, in collaboration with Heloise Fink and Russel Crigg. W. W. Norton & Company, New York, London; Copyright © 1966, 1970, 1971, 1999 by Editions du Seuil - English translation copyright © 2006, 2002 by W. W. Norton & Company.
  8. Peter Loewenberg & Nellie L. Thompson, 100 years of the IPA, The Centenary History of the International Psychoanalytical Association, 1910-2010; Evolution and change. First published in 2011 by The International Psychoanalytical Association, Broomhills, Woodside Lane, London N12 8UD, United Kingdom. London, Karnac books. Шаблон:ISBN
  9. Gilbert Diatkine, Les lacanismes, les analystes français et l'Association psychanalytique internationale, Revue française de psychanalyse, hors-série, "Courants de la psychanalyse contemporaine", 2001, 389-400.
  10. E. Roudinesco « la famille en désordre », in Eric Fassin, « L'inversion de la question homosexuelle » Revue française de psychanalyse, 2003/1 (Vol. 67).
  11. La politisation de l'ordre sexuel by Albert Le Dorze, Editions L'Harmattan, Paris, january 2009 - 238 pages

External links

Шаблон:Commonscat

Шаблон:Authority control