Английская Википедия:International recognition of the State of Palestine

Материал из Онлайн справочника
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску

Шаблон:Short description Шаблон:Further Шаблон:Pp-extended Шаблон:Use dmy dates Шаблон:Use Oxford spelling

Файл:Palestine recognition only.svg
Шаблон:LegendШаблон:LegendШаблон:Legend

The State of Palestine has been accepted as an observer state of the United Nations General Assembly in November 2012.[1][2] Шаблон:Numrec of the Шаблон:UNnum United Nations (UN) member states have recognized the State of Palestine.

The State of Palestine had been officially proclaimed by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) on 15 November 1988, claiming sovereignty over the internationally recognized Palestinian territories: the West Bank, which includes East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip. By the end of 1988, the proclaimed Palestinian state was recognized by 78 countries.[3][4]

In an attempt to solve the decades-long Israeli–Palestinian conflict, the Oslo Accords were signed between Israel and the PLO in 1993 and 1995, creating the Palestinian Authority (PA) as a self-governing interim administration in the Gaza Strip and around 40% of the West Bank.[5] After the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin and Benjamin Netanyahu's ascension to power, negotiations between Israel and the PA stalled, which led the Palestinians to pursue international recognition of the State of Palestine without Israeli acquiescence.

In 2011, the State of Palestine was admitted into UNESCO; in 2012, after it was accepted as an observer state of the United Nations General Assembly with the votes of 138 member states of the United Nations, the PA began to officially use the name "State of Palestine" for all purposes.

Among the G20, nine countries (Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, and Turkey) have recognized Palestine as a state (Indonesia and Saudi Arabia recognize Palestine but not Israel), while ten countries (Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States) have not.[note 1] Although these countries generally support some form of a two-state solution to the conflict, they take the position that their recognition of a Palestinian state is conditioned to direct negotiations between Israel and the PA.

History

Background

Шаблон:Further On 22 November 1974, United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3236 recognised the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, national independence and sovereignty in Palestine. It also recognised the PLO as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people, and accorded it observer status in the United Nations. The designation "Palestine" for the PLO was adopted by the United Nations in 1988 in acknowledgment of the Palestinian declaration of independence, but the proclaimed state still has no formal status within the system.

Shortly after the 1988 declaration, the State of Palestine was recognised by many developing states in Africa and Asia, and from communist and non-aligned states.[6][7] At the time, however, the United States was using its Foreign Assistance Act and other measures to discourage other countries and international organisations from extending recognition.[8] Although these measures were successful in many cases,[9] the Arab League and the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC) immediately published statements of recognition of, support for, and solidarity with Palestine, which was accepted as a member state in both forums.[10][11][12]

In February 1989 at the United Nations Security Council, the PLO representative acknowledged that 94 states had recognised the new Palestinian state.[13][14] It subsequently attempted to gain membership as a state in several agencies connected to the United Nations, but its efforts were thwarted by U.S. threats to withhold funding from any organisation that admitted Palestine.[15]Шаблон:Failed verification For example, in April of the same year, the PLO applied for membership as a state in the World Health Organization, an application that failed to produce a result after the U.S. informed the organisation that it would withdraw funding if Palestine were admitted.[16] In May, a group of OIC members submitted to UNESCO an application for membership on behalf of Palestine, and listed a total of 91 states that had recognised the State of Palestine.[17]

In June 1989, the PLO submitted to the government of Switzerland letters of accession to the Geneva Conventions of 1949. However, Switzerland, as the depositary state, determined that because the question of Palestinian statehood had not been settled within the international community, it was therefore incapable of determining whether the letter constituted a valid instrument of accession.[16]

Due to the [uncertainty] within the international community as to the existence or the non-existence of a State of Palestine and as long as the issue has not been settled in an appropriate framework, the Swiss Government, in its capacity as depositary of the Geneva Conventions and their additional Protocols, is not in a position to decide whether this communication can be considered as an instrument of accession in the sense of the relevant provisions of the Conventions and their additional Protocols.[18]

Consequently, in November 1989, the Arab League proposed a General Assembly resolution to formally recognise the PLO as the government of an independent Palestinian state. The draft, however, was abandoned when the U.S. again threatened to cut off its financing for the United Nations should the vote go ahead. The Arab states agreed not to press the resolution, but demanded that the U.S. promise not to threaten the United Nations with financial sanctions again.[19]

Many of the early statements of recognition of the State of Palestine were termed ambiguously.[20] In addition, hesitation from others did not necessarily mean that these nations did not regard Palestine as a state.[16] This has seemingly resulted in confusion regarding the number of states that have officially recognized the state declared in 1988. Numbers reported in the past are often conflicting,[21] with figures as high as 130 being seen frequently.[9][22] In July 2011, in an interview with Haaretz, Palestinian ambassador to the United Nations, Riyad Mansour claimed that 122 states had so far extended formal recognition.[23] At the end of the month, the PLO published a paper on why the world's governments should recognize the State of Palestine and listed the 122 countries that had already done so.[24] By the end of September the same year, Mansour claimed the figure had reached 139.[25]

Israeli position

Between the end of the Six-Day War and the Oslo Accords, no Israeli government proposed a Palestinian state. During Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government of 1996–1999, he accused the two previous governments of Rabin and Peres of bringing closer to realisation what he claimed to be the "danger" of a Palestinian state, and stated that his main policy goal was to ensure that the Palestinian Authority did not evolve beyond an autonomy.[26]

In June 2003, Ariel Sharon was the first Israeli Prime Minister to proclaim that a Palestinian state was a possibility. Sharon adressed "the possibility of the establishment of a Palestinian state with temporary borders, if conditions permit" and claimed that interim Palestinian state would be "completely demilitarised, and this nation will be the home of the Palestinian diaspora and Palestinian refugees will not be allowed into Israeli territory."[27]

The government headed by Ehud Olmert repeated the same objective. Following the inauguration of the Netanyahu government in 2009, the government again claimed that a Palestinian state posed a danger for Israel.[28] The government position changed, however, following pressure from the Obama administration, and on 14 June 2009, Netanyahu for the first time made a speech in which he supported the notion of a demilitarized and territorially reduced Palestinian state.[29] This position met some criticism for its lack of commitment on the territories to be ceded to the Palestinian state in the future. Netanyahu in February 2023 said "I'm certainly willing to have them have all the powers that they need to govern themselves, but none of the powers that can threaten us, and this means that Israel should have the overriding security responsibility."[30]

Israel has refused to accept the 1967 borders, which Israeli military experts have argued are strategically indefensible.[31] It also opposes the Palestinian plan of approaching the UN General Assembly on the matter of statehood, as it claims it does not honor the Oslo Accords agreement in which both sides agreed not to pursue unilateral moves.[32]

Timeline of Palestine in the United Nations

Application for UN membership

Шаблон:Main After a two-year impasse in negotiations with Israel, the Palestinian Authority began a diplomatic campaign to gain recognition for the State of Palestine on the borders prior to the Six-Day War, with East Jerusalem as its capital.[38] The efforts, which began in late 2009, gained widespread attention in September 2011, when President Mahmoud Abbas submitted an application to the United Nations to accept Palestine as a member state. This would have constituted collective recognition of the State of Palestine, which would have allowed its government to pursue legal claims against other states in international courts.[39][40]

In order for a state to gain membership in the General Assembly, its application must have the support of two-thirds of member states with a prior recommendation for admission from the Security Council. This requires the absence of a veto from any of the Security Council's five permanent members.[39] At the prospect of a veto from the United States, Palestinian leaders signalled that they might opt instead for a more limited upgrade to "non-member state" status, which requires only a simple majority in the General Assembly but provides the Palestinians with the recognition they desired.

The campaign, dubbed "Palestine 194",[41] was supported by the Arab League in May,[42] and was officially confirmed by the PLO on 26 June.[43] The decision was labelled by the Israeli government as a unilateral step, while the Palestinian government countered that it was essential to overcoming the current impasse. Several other countries—such as Germany and Canada—also denounced the decision and called for a prompt return to negotiations. However, many others—such as Norway and Russia—endorsed the plan, as did Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, who stated: "UN members are entitled whether to vote for or against the Palestinian statehood recognition at the UN."[44]

Photo of Mahmoud Abbas and Brazilian President Lula da Silva in a joint press conference
President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of Brazil formally recognized the State of Palestine in December 2010.[45]

Diplomatic efforts to gain support for the bid gained momentum following a succession of endorsements from South America in early 2011.[45][46]Шаблон:Failed verification High-level delegations led by Yasser Abed Rabbo, Riyad al-Maliki, Saeb Erekat, Nabil Shaath and Riyad Mansour paid visits to many states. Palestinian ambassadors, assisted by those of other Arab states, were charged with enlisting the support of the governments to which they were accredited.[46] During the lead-up to the vote, Russia, China, and Spain publicly pledged their support for the Palestinian bid,[47][48] as did inter-governmental organisations such as the African Union,[49] and the Non-Aligned Movement.[50]

Israel took steps to counter the initiative,[51] and Germany, Italy, Canada and the U.S. announced publicly that they would vote against the resolution.[46] Israeli and U.S. diplomats began a campaign pressuring many countries to oppose or abstain from the vote.[46] However, because of the "automatic majority" enjoyed by the Palestinians in the General Assembly,[52] the Netanyahu administration stated that it did not expect to prevent a resolution from passing should it go ahead.[51][53] In August, Haaretz quoted the Israeli ambassador to the United Nations, Ron Prosor, as stating that Israel would be unable to block a resolution at the General Assembly by September. "The maximum that we can hope to gain is for a group of states who will abstain or be absent during the vote", wrote Prosor. "Only a few countries will vote against the Palestinian initiative."[54]

Instead, the Israeli government focused on obtaining a "moral majority" of major democratic powers, in an attempt to diminish the weight of the vote.[55][56] Considerable weight was placed on the position of the European Union,[57] which had not yet been announced. EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton stated that it was likely to depend on the wording of the resolution.[58] At the end of August, Israel's defence minister Ehud Barak said that "it is very important that all the players come up with a text that will emphasize the quick return to negotiations, without an effort to impose pre-conditions on the sides."[59]

Efforts from both Israel and the U.S. also focused on pressuring the Palestinian leadership to abandon its plans and return to negotiations.[57] In the U.S., Congress passed a bill denouncing the initiative and calling on the Obama administration to veto any resolution that would recognize a Palestinian state declared outside of an agreement negotiated by the two parties.[60] A similar bill was passed in the Senate, which also threatened a withdrawal of aid to the West Bank.[61][62] In late August, another congressional bill was introduced which proposes to block U.S. government funding for United Nations entities that support Palestinian membership in the UN.[63] Several top U.S. officials, including ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice and consul-general in Jerusalem Daniel Rubinstein, made similar threats.[64][65] In the same month, it was reported that the Israeli Ministry of Finance was withholding its monthly payments to the PNA.[66] Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman warned that if Palestine took unilateral action, Israel would consider the Oslo Accords null and void,[57] and would break off relations with the PA.[59]

Photo of Mahmoud Abbas and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in a joint press conference
President Dmitry Medvedev of Russia reconfirmed its support for the State of Palestine in January 2011.[67]

On 11 July 2011, the Quartet met to discuss a return to negotiations, but the meeting produced no result.[68] President Mahmoud Abbas claimed that he would suspend the bid and return to negotiations if the Israelis agreed to the 1967 borders and ceased the expansion of settlements in the West Bank.

The PNA's campaign saw an increasing level of support in grass-roots activism. Avaaz began an online petition urging all United Nations members to endorse the bid to admit Palestine; it reportedly attained 500,000 e-signatures in its first four days.[69] OneVoice Palestine launched a domestic campaign in partnership with local news agencies, with the aim of getting the involvement and support of Palestinian citizens.[70] Overseas, campaigns were launched in several nations, calling on their governments to vote "yes" in the resolution.[71][72] On 7 September, a group of Palestinian activists under the banner "Palestine: State No. 194" staged a demonstration outside the United Nations' office in Ramallah.[73] During the demonstration, they submitted to the office a letter addressed to Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, urging him to "exert all possible efforts toward the achievement of the Palestinian people's just demands". The following day, Ban told reporters: "I support ... the statehood of Palestinians; an independent, sovereign state of Palestine. It has been long overdue", but he also stated that "recognition of a state is something to be determined by the member states."[74]

Other United Nations organs had previously expressed readiness to see a Palestinian state. In April 2011, the UN's co-ordinator for the Middle East peace process issued a report on the Palestinian Authority's state-building progress, describing "aspects of its administration as sufficient for an independent state".[75] It echoed a similar assessment published the week prior by the International Monetary Fund.[76] The World Bank released a report in September 2010 that found the Palestinian Authority "well-positioned to establish a state" at any point in the near future. However, the report highlighted that, unless private-sector growth in the Palestinian economy was stimulated, a Palestinian state would remain donor dependent.[77]

Non-member observer state status

Шаблон:Further

Файл:UN Resolution of Palestine as Observer State.svg
UN observer state status voting results:
Шаблон:Legend inline Шаблон:Legend inline Шаблон:Legend inline Шаблон:Legend inline Шаблон:Legend inline

During September 2012, Palestine decided to pursue an upgrade in status from "observer entity" to "non-member observer state". On 27 November of the same year, it was announced that the appeal had been made officially and would be put to a vote in the General Assembly on 29 November, where the status upgrade was expected to be supported by a majority of states. In addition to granting Palestine "non-member observer state status", the draft resolution "expresses the hope that the Security Council will consider favorably the application submitted on 23 September 2011 by the State of Palestine for admission to full membership in the United Nations, endorses the two state solution based on the pre-1967 borders, and stresses the need for an immediate resumption of negotiations between the two parties."

On 29 November 2012, in a 138–9 vote (with 41 abstaining) General Assembly resolution 67/19 passed, upgrading Palestine to "non-member observer state" status in the United Nations.[78][79] The new status equated Palestine's with that of the Holy See. The change in status was described by The Independent as "de facto recognition of the sovereign state of Palestine".[80] Voting "no" were Israel, Canada, the Czech Republic, the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Panama and the United States.

The vote was an important benchmark for the partially recognized State of Palestine and its citizens, while it was a diplomatic setback for Israel and the United States. Status as an observer state in the UN allows the State of Palestine to join treaties and specialized UN agencies,[81] the Law of the Seas treaty, and the International Criminal Court. It permits Palestine to pursue legal rights over its territorial waters and air space as a sovereign state recognized by the UN, and allows the Palestinian people the right to sue for sovereignty over their territory in the International Court of Justice and to bring "crimes against humanity" and war-crimes charges, including that of unlawfully occupying the territory of State of Palestine, against Israel in the International Criminal Court.[82][83]

The UN has, after the resolution was passed, permitted Palestine to title its representative office to the UN as "The Permanent Observer Mission of the State of Palestine to the United Nations",[84] seen by many as a reflection of the UN's de facto position of recognizing the State of Palestine's sovereignty under international law,[78] and Palestine started to re-title its name accordingly on postal stamps, official documents and passports.[79][85] The Palestinian authorities also instructed its diplomats to officially represent the "State of Palestine", as opposed to the "Palestine National Authority".[79] Additionally, on 17 December 2012, UN Chief of Protocol Yeocheol Yoon decided that "the designation of "State of Palestine" shall be used by the Secretariat in all official United Nations documents",[37] recognizing the "State of Palestine" as the official name of the Palestinian nation.

On 26 September 2013 at the United Nations, Mahmoud Abbas was given the right to sit in the General Assembly's beige chair which is reserved for heads of state waiting to take the podium and address the General Assembly.[86]

Other positions

Diplomatic recognitions

UN member states

Of the Шаблон:UNnum member states of the United Nations, Шаблон:Numrec.[87] The list below is based on the list maintained by the Palestine Liberation Organization during the campaign for United Nations recognition in 2011,[24] and maintained by the Permanent Observer Mission to the UN.[88]

Some states, marked with an asterisk (*) below, expressly recognized the State of Palestine on the borders of 4 June 1967 (i.e., the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem), which constituted Arab territory prior to the Six-Day War.

States that maintain diplomatic relations with the State of Palestine
# Name[89] Date of recognition Diplomatic relations [note 2] Relevant membership, further details
1 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes[90] Arab League, African Union (AU), OIC; Algeria–Palestine relations
2 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes[91] Arab League, GCC, OIC; Bahrain–Palestine relations

Шаблон:Show

3 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes Arab League, OIC; Iraq–Palestine relations

Шаблон:Show

4 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes[92] Arab League, GCC, OIC[93]
5 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes Arab League, AU, OIC; Libya–Palestine relations

Шаблон:Show

6 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes ASEAN, OIC; Malaysia–Palestine relations
7 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes Arab League, AU, OIC
8 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes Arab League, AU, OIC;[94][95] Morocco–Palestine relations
9 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes Arab League,AU, OIC

Шаблон:Show

10 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes[96] Arab League, AU, OIC; Palestine–Tunisia relations
11 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes[97] NATO, OIC, OTS; Palestine–Turkey relations
12 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes Arab League, OIC; Palestine–Yemen relations

Шаблон:Show

13 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes[98] OIC, SAARC

Шаблон:Show

14 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes OIC, SAARC; Bangladesh–Palestine relations
15 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes Cuba–Palestine relations
16 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[99] Yes[99] ASEAN, OIC; Indonesia–Palestine relations
17 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes Arab League, OIC; Jordan–Palestine relations
18 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] No AU

Шаблон:Show

19 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes EU; Malta–Palestine relations
20 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes
21 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes OIC, SAARC; Pakistan–Palestine relations
22 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes Arab League, GCC, OIC
23 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes Arab League, GCC, OIC; Palestine–Saudi Arabia relations
24 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes Arab League, GCC, OIC; Palestine–United Arab Emirates relations
25 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes[100] —, Palestine–Serbia relations

Шаблон:Show

26 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU
27 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes[101] NATO, OIC; Albania–Palestine relations

Шаблон:Show

28 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes ASEAN, OIC[102]
29 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes Arab League, AU, OIC
30 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU

Шаблон:Show

31 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes Arab League, AU, OIC[103]
32 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts*[17] Yes EU; Cyprus–Palestine relations

Шаблон:Show

33 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes EU, NATO

Шаблон:Show

34 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes EU, NATO; Palestine–Slovakia relations

Шаблон:Show

35 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes Arab League, AU, OIC; Egypt–Palestine relations
36 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[88] Yes AU, OIC
37 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes[104] SAARC; India–Palestine relations
38 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU, OIC
39 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU
40 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes SAARC; Palestine–Sri Lanka relations
41 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes CSTO; Belarus–Palestine relations

Шаблон:Show

42 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU, OIC
43 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU

Шаблон:Show

44 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes[105] CSTO, UNSC (permanent); Palestine–Russia relations

Шаблон:Show

45 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes —; Palestine–Ukraine relations

Шаблон:Show

46 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes[106] ASEAN; Palestine–Vietnam relations
47 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes UNSC (permanent); China–Palestine relations
48 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU, OIC; Burkina Faso–Palestine relations
49 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes Arab League, AU, OIC

Шаблон:Show

50 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU, OIC
51 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU, OIC
52 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes ASEAN

Шаблон:Show

53 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes[107]

Шаблон:Show

54 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU, OIC
55 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes EU, NATO; Hungary–Palestine relations

Шаблон:Show

56 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes[108] AU
57 Шаблон:Sort Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes —, North Korea–Palestine relations
58 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU, OIC
59 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes EU, NATO; Palestine–Romania relations

Шаблон:Show

60 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU; Palestine–Tanzania relations
61 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes EU, NATO; Bulgaria–Palestine relations

Шаблон:Show

62 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes OIC, SAARC; Maldives–Palestine relations
63 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU
64 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes[109] AU, OIC
65 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU
66 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU, OIC
67 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes[110] ASEAN
68 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes[111] AU, OIC
69 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU, OIC
70 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU

Шаблон:Show

71 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes[112] AU

Шаблон:Show

72 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU, OIC

Шаблон:Show

73 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] No AU
74 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] No AU

Шаблон:Show

75 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU, OIC
76 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes Arab League, GCC, OIC; Oman–Palestine relations
77 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes EU, NATO; Palestine–Poland relations

Шаблон:Show

78 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes[113] AU
79 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] No SAARC

Шаблон:Show

80 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] No AU
81 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] No AU
82 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] No SAARC
83 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] No AU
84 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes AU

Шаблон:Show

85 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[17] Yes OIC; Iran–Palestine relations
86 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts or before[17][13] Шаблон:When Yes AU, OIC

Шаблон:Show

87 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts or before[17][13]Шаблон:When No AU
88 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts or before[17][13][114]Шаблон:When Yes AU
89 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[115] Yes MSG, PIF
90 Шаблон:Flag[116][117][118] Шаблон:Dts[119] Yes[119] ASEAN; Palestine–Philippines relations
91 Шаблон:Flag[120] Шаблон:Dts[121] Yes[122] AU

Шаблон:Show

92 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[123] Yes[123] CSTO, OIC, OTS; Kazakhstan–Palestine relations
93 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[124] Yes[124] OIC, OTS; Azerbaijan–Palestine relations
94 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[125] Yes[126][127] OIC[128]
95 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[129] Yes[130] —; Georgia–Palestine relations
96 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[131] Yes[131] Bosnia and Herzegovina–Palestine relations

Шаблон:Show

97 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[132] Yes[132][133] CSTO, OIC
98 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[134] Yes[134] OIC, OTS
99 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[135] Yes[135][136] MSG, PIF
100 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts Yes[137] AU; Palestine–South Africa relations
101 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts Yes[138][139] CSTO, OIC, OTS
102 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts*[140][141] Yes[142] AU
103 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[143] Yes[136][143]
104 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts*[144] Yes[144] OAS

Шаблон:Show

105 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[145] Yes[145] NATO; Montenegro–Palestine relations
106 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[146] Yes[147] OAS
107 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts Yes[148] Arab League, OIC; Lebanon–Palestine relations

Шаблон:Show

108 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[149] Yes AU, OIC
109 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[150] Yes —, Palestine–Venezuela relations
110 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[151] Yes[152] OAS
111 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts*[153][154] Yes[155] OAS; Brazil–Palestine relations
112 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts*[156] Yes[157][158][159] OAS; Argentina–Palestine relations[45]
113 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts*[160][161] Yes[162] OAS
114 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts*[163] Yes[164] OAS
115 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[165] Yes[166] OAS; Chile–Palestine relations
116 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts*[167] Yes CARICOM, OAS, OIC[164]
117 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[168] Yes[164] OAS; Palestine–Peru relations
118 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts*[169] No CARICOM, OAS, OIC
119 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[170] Yes[171] OAS; Palestine–Uruguay relations
120 Шаблон:Flag[172] Шаблон:Dts*[140] Yes[173] AU
121 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[174] Yes[175] AU
122 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts*[176] Yes[177] Arab League, OIC;

Palestine–Syria relations

123 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[149] No AU[39]
124 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[178] Yes[179] OAS; El Salvador–Palestine relations
125 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts*[180] Yes[181] OAS;[182] Honduras–Palestine relations
126 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts*[183][184] Yes[185] CARICOM, OAS
127 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts*[186] Yes CARICOM, OAS[187]
128 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[188][189][190] Yes[191] CARICOM, OAS[194]
129 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts*[195] No CARICOM, OAS
130 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts*[196] Yes EFTA, NATO; Iceland–Palestine relations
131 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts*[197] Yes[198] ASEAN; Palestine–Thailand relations
132 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[199] No OAS
133 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[200][201] Yes[200][201] CARICOM, OAS
134 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[200][201] Yes[200][201] CARICOM, OAS
135 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[202][203][204][205] Yes EU, NATO; Palestine–Sweden relations
136 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[206] Yes[206] CARICOM, OAS
137 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[207] Yes OAS
138 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[208] Yes[209] CARICOM, OAS

Not members of the UN

# Name Date of recognition Diplomatic relations
[note 2]
Relevant membership, further details
139 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[210] No AU
140 Шаблон:Flag Шаблон:Dts[211] Yes[212] —; Holy See–Palestine relations

No diplomatic recognition

UN member states

# Name Official position Relations
[note 2]
Relevant memberships
1 Шаблон:Flag In January 2011, Andorra co-sponsored a draft resolution guaranteeing the Palestinian people's right to self-determination.[213] In September, it argued for a proposed resolution to give the State of Palestine observer status in the United Nations.[214] No
2 Шаблон:Flag On 20 June 2011, Fatah representative Nabil Shaath met with Foreign Minister Eduard Nalbandyan to enlist the support of Armenia in the upcoming resolution.[215] Afterwards, Shaath announced that he had been informed by a number of countries that they would recognize Palestine in the following weeks, and that he expected Armenia to be the first of these.[216] However, the Armenian government did not release any statement regarding the meeting. The situation in Palestine is seen as analogous by the Armenian government to the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh, and that any recognition of a Palestinian state by Armenia would set a precedent for the right to self-determination in that region.[217] On similar situations, President Serzh Sargsyan previously stated, "Having the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Armenia can not recognize another entity in the same situation as long as it has not recognized the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic".[218] No Armenia–Palestine relations
3 Шаблон:Flag Australian policy calls for a two-state solution, but it has not supported calls toward Palestinian statehood in the past, insisting instead on a negotiated settlement. In regards to a resolution to admit Palestine as a UN non-member observer state, a division in positions emerged: Former Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd recommended abstaining from the vote, whilst former Prime Minister Julia Gillard declared strong support for Israel.[219] In response, Gillard noted: "There isn't a resolution available for people to read or respond to. If such a resolution does hit the deck, then in deciding how Australia will vote, we will bring our very long-standing principles about questions in the Middle East. That is, we are long-standing supporters of a two-state solution."[220] In 2014, Australia voted against a United Nations Security Council draft resolution proposing the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza and the West Bank by 2017.[221] In April 2021, the Australian Labor Party (Rudd and Gillard's party) passed an amendment to its policy platform recognising Palestine as a state.[222] Yes
4 Шаблон:Flag Austria conferred full diplomatic status on the PLO representation in Vienna on 13 December 1978, under then-chancellor Bruno Kreisky.[223] In June 2011, Foreign Minister Michael Spindelegger said that Austria "had not yet made up its mind whether to support a UN recognition of a Palestinian state", adding that he preferred to wait for a joint EU approach to the issue. "We will decide at the last moment because it might still give [the two parties] the opportunity to bring the Middle East peace process back on track."[224] Spindelegger also suggested that the EU draft its own version of the resolution.[225]

Шаблон:Show

Yes[226] EU
5 Шаблон:Flag The Barbadian government supports the right of Palestinians to self-determination in accordance with UN General Assembly resolutions like Resolution 181 (II) and Security Council resolutions such as Resolution 242. It also supports "a peacefully-negotiated two-state resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through the process of cooperation and dialogue."[227] In the wake of the 2021 Israel–Palestine crisis, members of the lobby group, Caribbean Against Apartheid in Palestine sent a letter to the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Foreign Trade, Jerome Walcott, requesting that government recognise the State of Palestine.[228] No
6 Шаблон:Flag On the issue of Palestinian statehood, Belgium supports the declarations of the European Union.[229] Prime Minister Yves Leterme called for the creation of a European consensus before September,[230] and the Senate urged the government on 15 July 2011 to recognize a Palestinian state with the pre-1967 borders.[231] The parties of the new centre right government agreed to recognize Palestine. The Chamber of Representatives has already adopted a resolution in favour on 5 February 2015. The left-wing opposition called for an unconditional recognition of Palestine.[232][233] Yes EU, NATO
7 Шаблон:Flag Cameroon officially supports a two-state solution.[234] Although a member of the OIC, President Paul Biya has developed strong ties with Israel since the mid-1980s.[235] This perceived friendship has soured the country's traditionally close ties with Arab states, many of whom have withdrawn longstanding economic development assistance and pressed Biya to support Palestinian interests.[236] Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu asked Biya to oppose the United Nations resolution that would admit Palestine as a member state.[237] Yes[234] AU, OIC[39]
8 Шаблон:Flag Canada supports the creation of a sovereign Palestinian state, but only as part of a "comprehensive, just and lasting peace settlement".[238] The Harper government (2006–2015) was regarded as a staunch supporter of Israel. In July 2011, the spokesman for Foreign Minister John Baird stated, "Our government's long-standing position has not changed. The only solution to this conflict is one negotiated between and agreed to by the two parties. ... One of the states must be a Jewish state and recognized as such, while the Palestinian state is to be a non-militarized one".[239] Yes NATO
9 Шаблон:Flag Croatia formalized relations with the PLO on 31 March 2011. Former Croatian Prime Minister Jadranka Kosor stated in 2011 that her government supported the co-existence of Israel and Palestine as two independent states,[240] however Croatia abstained during voting on upgrading Palestine to non-member observer state status in the United Nations and on admission of Palestine to UNESCO. Former Croatian Foreign Minister Vesna Pusić stated on 24 October 2014 that "Croatia will most likely recognize Palestine soon".[241] The Croatian government tends to favour Israel over Palestine as a commitment to the United States, to whom Croatia is aligned, and the central quarters of the European Union of which Croatia has been a member since 2013. Croatia believes that if it were to recognize Palestine, this would frustrate its position with the EU and ties to the US, and also because the situation in the Middle East is complicated it feels there is no guarantee that there would be peace and further existence of the Jewish state if Israel eventually decides to withdraw from the occupied territories.[242] Yes EU, NATO
10 Шаблон:Flag Danish Foreign Minister Lene Espersen met Abbas on 9 March 2011 to persuade him to return to negotiating with Israel. Espersen also extended Danish support to Palestinian national development.[243] During the campaign for the 2011 elections, the largest opposition party argued that Denmark should recognize the State of Palestine. Foreign Minister Lene Espersen, however, warned that such a unilateral decision could have "more negative than beneficial" consequences, and stressed the need to co-ordinate policy with the EU.[244] In December 2014, a bill that called on Denmark to recognize Palestine as a state was rejected in the Danish parliament.[245] Yes EU, NATO; Denmark–Palestine relations
11 Шаблон:Flag Eritrea is one of only two African countries that does not recognise Palestine, the other being Cameroon.[39][246] In October 2010, President Isaias Afewerki stated, "Israel needs a government, we must respect this. The Palestinians also need to have a dignified life, but it can not be the West Bank or Gaza. A two-state solution will not work. It's just to fool people. Israelis and Palestinians living in the same nation will never happen for many reasons. One option that may work is a Transjordan. Israel may be left in peace and the Palestinian and Jordanian peoples are brought together and can create their own nation".[247] In his address to the UN General Assembly in 2011, Afewerki stated that "Eritrea reaffirms its long-standing support to the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and an independent, sovereign state. It also upholds the right of Israel to live in peace and security within internationally recognized boundaries."[248] On 29 November 2012, Eritrea voted in favour of a resolution to make Palestine non-member observer state at the UN. Yes[249] AU
12 Шаблон:Flag During a meeting with Riyad al-Malki in June 2010, Minister Urmas Paet said the country approved an agreement between the two countries and a Palestine independence.[250] Officials stated that the government would not adopt a position regarding the United Nations bid until the final wording of the resolution was published.[251] Yes[252] EU, NATO
13 Шаблон:Flag Fijian policy on the Israeli–Palestinian conflict is largely based on United Nations resolutions.[253] No
14 Шаблон:Flag Finland supports a two-state solution to the conflict.[254] In October 2014, president Sauli Niinistö said that Finland would not follow Swedish decision in recognizing the State of Palestine.[255] Yes EU, NATO
15 Шаблон:Flag According to President Nicolas Sarkozy, "France supports the solution of two nation states living side-by-side in peace and security, within safe and recognized borders."[256] In May 2011, Sarkozy said that if peace talks with Israel had not resumed by September, he would recognize the State of Palestine as part of its bid at the United Nations.[257] This echoed statements made in March by Nabil Shaath, who claimed to have received a promise from France that it would recognize in September a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders.[258] According to Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, however, Sarkozy had said that France's support would require the Palestinians to recognize Israel as the state of the Jewish people.[256] This was confirmed in July, when Foreign Minister Alain Juppé stated that any solution to the conflict would require the recognition of "the nation-state of Israel for the Jewish people, and the nation-state of Palestine for the Palestinian people."[259] This broke with the European Union's traditional position, which adamantly opposes any mention of Israel as a Jewish state.[260] Sarkozy later turned around on this policy, reportedly saying that the idea of a Jewish state was "silly".[261] In August, Sarkozy stressed the importance of a united EU position on the September initiative, and proposed a compromise where the State of Palestine would be given observer status instead of full membership. The proposal, which was to prevent a split among members of the EU, included a promise from Paris and other members that they would vote for the resolution.[262] In October 2014, France's foreign minister said France would recognize a Palestinian state even if peace talks with Israel fails.[263] On 2 December 2014 the French National Assembly approved a non-binding motion calling on the government to recognise Palestine.[264] Yes EU, NATO, UNSC (permanent)
16 Шаблон:Flag In April 2011, Chancellor Angela Merkel labelled the Palestinian bid for recognition a "unilateral step",[265] and stated unequivocally that Germany will not recognize a Palestinian state without its prior acceptance by Israel. "Unilateral recognitions therefore definitely do not contribute to achieving this aim ... This is our stance now and it will be our stance in September. There needs to be mutual recognition, otherwise it is not a two-state solution".[266] She also reaffirmed her government's commitment to see an agreement reached as soon as possible. "We want a two-state solution. We want to recognize a Palestinian state. Let us ensure that negotiations begin. It is urgent".[267]

Шаблон:Show

Yes EU, NATO
17 Шаблон:Flag President Karolos Papoulias has stated that Greece ultimately supports the creation of a Palestinian state alongside Israel.[268] Under previous governments, Greece garnered a reputation as a staunch supporter of the Palestinian cause.[269] Within the wider Arab–Israeli conflict, Andreas Papandreou maintained a stronger stand against Israel than any other government in the European Community. Diplomatic relations were founded with the PLO in 1981, while relations with Israel were maintained only at the consular level until Greece's formal recognition of Israel in 1990 under Mitsotakis.[270] Since the formation of current foreign policy under George Papandreou, Greece has seen a rapid improvement in relations with Israel,[271] leading the media to mark the conclusion of Greece's pro-Palestinian era.[272] However, in December 2015, Greece's parliament voted in favour of a motion requesting that the government recognize Palestine.[273] Yes EU, NATO; Greece–Palestine relations
18 Шаблон:Flag In January 2011, Ireland accorded the Palestinian delegation in Dublin diplomatic status.[274] A few months later, their Foreign Affairs Minister stated that Ireland would "lead the charge" in recognizing Palestinian statehood, but that it would not come until the PNA was in full and sole control over its territories.[275] In October 2014, the Upper House of the Irish Parliament unanimously passed a motion calling on the Government to recognize the State of Palestine.[276] In December 2014, the Lower House of Ireland's Parliament followed suit.[277] Although the motion passed through both houses, the government wishes to recognise Palestine as part of a wider EU movement and as such does not officially recognise the state of Palestine.[278] On 26 May 2021, following the escalation of violence in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the lower house of Ireland's parliament, the Dáil, passed a resolution condemning Israel's "de facto annexation" of Palestine in contravention of international law.[279] Yes EU; Ireland–Palestine relations
19 Шаблон:Flag See above Yes
20 Шаблон:Flag In May 2011, at an event in Rome celebrating Israel's independence, then Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi pledged his country's support to Israel.[280] In June, he reiterated Italy's position against unilateral actions on either side of the conflict, stressing that "peace can only be reached with a common initiative through negotiations".[281] This position was shared by parliamentarians, who drafted a letter to the United Nations stating that "a premature, unilateral declaration of Palestinian statehood would [...] undermine rather than resolve the Israeli–Palestinian peace process".[282] Nevertheless, at the same time, Italy upgraded the diplomatic status of the Palestinian delegation in Rome to a mission, similarly to what other EU countries were doing, giving the head of the delegation ambassadorial status.[283] Moreover, on 31 October 2011, Italy did not oppose Palestine's UNESCO membership bid[284] and, on 29 November 2012, Italy voted in favour of UN Resolution 67/19, giving Palestine a non-member observer state status at the United Nations.[285] Italy's opposition to unilateral actions was reiterated on 21 December 2017, when it voted in favour of a UN draft resolution calling on all countries to comply with Security Council resolutions regarding the status of Jerusalem,[286] following the decision by the U.S. to move its embassy to Israel from Tel Aviv to the city.[287] Yes EU, NATO; Italy–Palestine relations
21 Шаблон:Flag Like other members of the Caribbean Community, Jamaica supports a two-state solution.[288] In 2010, Prime Minister Bruce Golding expressed hope for "a just, lasting and comprehensive peace in the Middle East that guarantees the security of Israel and the unquestioned recognition of a Palestinian state."[289] No
22 Шаблон:Flag Japan supports a two-state solution to the conflict,[290] and supports the establishment of a Palestinian state.[291] In October 2007, a Japanese Justice Ministry official said "Given that the Palestinian Authority has improved itself to almost a full-fledged state and issues its own passports, we have decided to accept the Palestinian nationality".[292] The Japanese government declared that it would not recognize any act that would jeopardize a Palestianian state with the pre-1967 borders nor the annexation of East Jerusalem by Israel.[293][294] Japan voted favorably for the United Nations General Assembly resolution to accord Palestine Non-member Observer State status in the United Nations in November 2012, and since then, refers to the country as "Palestine".[295] Yes
23 Шаблон:Flag During the summit of the Pacific Islands Forum in early September 2011, the foreign minister of Kiribati reportedly expressed support for the Palestinian position.[296] No
24 Шаблон:Flag Latvia supports a two-state solution to the conflict and provides development assistance to the Palestinian National Authority.[297][298] Yes EU, NATO
25 Шаблон:Flag Liechtenstein relies on Switzerland to carry out most of its foreign affairs.[299] In January 2011, it co-sponsored a draft resolution guaranteeing the Palestinian people's right to self-determination,[213] and stated that this right must be exercised with a view to achieving a viable and fully sovereign Palestinian state.[300] No EFTA
26 Шаблон:Flag Like the rest of the European Union, Lithuania supports a two-state solution including an independent Palestinian state.[301] Foreign Minister Audronius Ažubalis called for a strong, unanimous European position that encouraged both parties to resume peace talks.[302] Yes EU, NATO
27 Шаблон:Flag In an interview with Foreign Minister Jean Asselborn in March 2011, The Jerusalem Post stated that Luxembourg was considered among the "least friendly" countries to Israel in the EU.[303][304] In response to divisions within the EU regarding the Palestinians' September bid for UN membership, Asselborn reportedly urged the PNA to accept an upgrade in its observer status and not ask for membership. He insisted, "We cannot let the Palestinians leave New York at the end of the month with nothing",[305] He referred to the positions of four members in particular that stood as an obstacle to the achievement of a common position,[296] but that he "cannot agree to say no" to the Palestinian endeavour.[306] He noted that securing the support of all EU nations would have been a great moral advantage for Palestine.[305] In December 2019, Asselborn wrote to Josep Borrell, the head of EU foreign policy, urging a debate on recognising Palestinian statehood.[307] Yes EU, NATO; Luxembourg–Palestine relations
28 Шаблон:Flag The Marshall Islands has, like the US, long been a close voting ally of Israel at the United Nations. In December 2017, the Marshall Islands was one of just nine countries (including the US and Israel) to vote against a motion adopted by the UN General Assembly condemning the United States' recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital city.[308] Additionally, it was one of only five countries (the others being Israel, the US, Micronesia and Nauru) to oppose a UN draft resolution in November 2020 on the creation of a Palestinian state.[309]
29 Шаблон:Flag Mexico maintains a policy of supporting a two-state solution.[310] Palestinian and Israeli officials expected Mexico to follow South American countries in recognizing the State of Palestine in early 2011.[311][312] Its position on the matter is seen as influential in Latin America, and therefore critical to both proponents and opponents.[313] Opposition parties have urged the government to recognize a Palestinian state as part of the September initiative, putting down its hesitance to U.S. pressure.[314] Yes Mexico–Palestine relations
30 Шаблон:Sort The Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) is a consistent supporter of Israel, especially in international resolutions,[315] though this is due in part to its association with the United States.[299] Former FSM President Manny Mori said that the relationship goes back to 1986, when Israel made "[an] early decision to support Micronesia's membership in the UN".[316] During the summit of the Pacific Islands Forum in September 2011, the leader of the Micronesian delegation reportedly stated his country's solidarity with the Palestinian people's suffering and support for their right to self-determination. Regarding the PNA's endeavour to gain admission to the United Nations, however, the official stated that the agreements signed with the U.S. prevented the FSM from voting according to its government's wishes in cases where they conflicted with those of the U.S.[296] In reference to Israel's continued development assistance to Micronesians, another diplomat noted, "We need Israeli expertise, so I don't see a change in our policy anytime soon."[315] No
31 Шаблон:Flag Moldova maintains a policy of neutrality in international affairs. It has expressed full support for the Quartet principles for the settlement of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, which call for an independent Palestinian state. Yes
32 Шаблон:Flag No
33 Шаблон:Flag Myanmar is one of only two Asian members of the Non-Aligned Movement that has not recognized the State of Palestine, alongside Singapore.[197][317] Former foreign affairs minister Win Aung stated in 2000 that Myanmar supports a two-state solution within internationally recognized borders.[318] No ASEAN
34 Шаблон:Flag During the Pacific Islands Forum in early September 2011, Foreign Affairs Minister Kieren Keke confirmed his nation's solidarity with the Palestinian people and their right to self-determination.[319] The PNA's foreign ministry published a statement prior to the summit claiming that most Pacific island nations would vote against a United Nations resolution regarding the Palestinian state.[320] No
35 Шаблон:Flag In June 2011, Foreign Minister Uri Rosenthal stated that the request to admit Palestine at the United Nations would "not be supported by the Netherlands". He called instead for a resumption of negotiations: "We will continue to stress for a restart to direct negotiations."[321] He insisted that a peace deal must be based "on an agreement between all parties",[225] and that the Netherlands was opposed to anything done without the consent of both parties.[322] Abbas highlighted the importance of the Dutch role in the peace process, precisely because it maintained close ties with Israel: "It doesn't disturb us at all. They play a very important role and the Palestinian people are very appreciative of their help."[321] Yes EU, NATO
36 Шаблон:Flag New Zealand supports a two-state solution to the peace process.[323] It also maintains a policy of tacit rather than explicit recognition of new states. For Palestine, this would mean upgrading its accredited delegation to a diplomatic status.[324] In early September 2011, Foreign Minister Murray McCully said that the government would not make a decision until the wording of the resolution was released. "We've got a reputation for being fair minded and even handed on this matter and all we can do is wait to see the words.[323] He also told Riyad al-Malki that he had refused to give any pledges Israel to oppose to vote.[296] Since 2017, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has reiterated her support for a two-state solution and opposition to settler expansions.[325][326] Yes[136]
37 Шаблон:Sort North Macedonia is one of the few countries with no political or diplomatic relations with Palestine, of any kind. Whilst he was Macedonian Foreign Minister, Nikola Poposki stated that the Macedonian position will be built in accordance with the views of the European Union and its strategic partners.[327] No NATO
38 Шаблон:Flag The Norwegian government upgraded the Palestinian mission in Oslo to an embassy in December 2010 and called for the creation of a Palestinian state within the following year.[328] In January 2011, Støre stated that, should negotiations with Israel fail to make progress by September, his country would recognize Palestine within the United Nations framework.[329][330] Following a meeting with Abbas in July 2011, Støre claimed that it was "perfectly legitimate" for the Palestinians to seek a vote on recognition of statehood.[331] "The fundamental Norwegian view is that a people have the right to use UN institutions to clarify questions about the legitimacy of their status in the world. We are opposed to denying this to the Palestinians". The minister withheld full commitment until the request was officially announced,[332][333] after which, on 18 September, he confirmed that Norway would lend recognition to Palestine.[334] Yes EFTA, NATO
39 Шаблон:Flag Palau is one of four countries (alongside the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia and Nauru) that has almost always voted with the U.S. in bills at the UN. Palau, the Marshall Islands, Micronesia and the U.S. make up the Compact of Free Association,[335] which some observers have suggested amounts to "checkbook diplomacy", whereby the U.S. bought the tiny island states' votes for cash.[336] When the UN overwhelmingly voted to condemn Donald Trump's decision to recognise Jerusalem as Israel's capital and relocate the U.S. embassy there, Palau was one of only nine countries to support the move.[337][338] No
40 Шаблон:Flag Panama has not indicated its position regarding a vote on statehood,[339] and is reported to be undecided on the matter.[340] President Ricardo Martinelli has a record of supporting Israel in UN resolutions,[341] and has reportedly resisted pressure from other Latin American governments to recognize Palestine.[342] The Central American Integration System (SICA) was expected to adopt a joint position on the issue at its summit on 18 August,[343] but Panama insisted that discussion should retain a regional focus and the matter was not included on the final agenda.[344] In early September, Foreign Minister Roberto Henriquez said that the government's decision would not be made public until its vote is cast, but added, "It is very important that the birth of this country and its recognition in the international forum is previously accompanied by a full peace agreement with its neighbour, Israel."[345] On 4 July 2015, Panama's Vice President and Foreign Minister Isabel De Saint Malo de Alvarado said that her government is looking at ways to recognize the State of Palestine without affecting their "close relationship" with Israel.[346] No
41 Шаблон:Flag In February 2011, several parliamentary factions proposed resolutions calling on the government to recognize the State of Palestine.[347] However, these were dismissed by the two majority parties, which insisted on a prior settlement acceptable to both Palestinians and Israelis.[348] Foreign Minister Paulo Portas stated that Portugal supports the initiative to recognize Palestine, but that it must not forget the security of Israel: "We will do everything for Palestine, which deserves to have its state, and do nothing against Israel, which deserves to have its security."[349] In December 2014, the Portuguese Parliament passed a resolution that is non-binding calling on the government to recognize Palestine as an independent state with 9 of 230 members opposing the measure.[350] Yes EU, NATO
42 Шаблон:Flag Prime Minister Tuila'epa Sailele Malielegaoi has expressed support for a two-state solution to the conflict.[351] No
43 Шаблон:Flag No
44 Шаблон:Flag Singapore has not recognized the State of Palestine and has not announced a position regarding a resolution.[352] The island state has a strong relationship with Israel.[353] However, Singapore established a representative office in Ramallah as a move to improve coordination of capacity-building initiatives and fortify relations with the Palestinian National Authority.[354][355] Yes ASEAN
45 Шаблон:Flag On 28 November 2014, the Foreign Policy Committee rejected a motion to immediately recognize Palestine, but approved an alternative motion requiring the government to submit a proposal to recognize Palestine to the National Assembly.[356] Yes EU, NATO
46 Шаблон:Flag Foreign Minister Peter Shannel Agovaka met Riyad al-Malki in early September at the summit of the Pacific Islands Forum in Wellington. Agovaka reportedly confirmed his government's support of Palestinian efforts at the United Nations, and that possible recognition of the State of Palestine would be considered in the next cabinet meeting.[296] No
47 Шаблон:Flag The government of South Korea does not recognize the State of Palestine.[357] However, South Korea established a representative office in Ramallah. Yes
48 Шаблон:Flag On 1 July 2011, the Spanish parliament passed a resolution urging its government to recognize the State of Palestine on the 1967 borders.Шаблон:Citation needed Prior to this, Nabil Shaath had claimed in May that Spain intended to recognize the Palestinian state before September.[358] In late July, Foreign Minister Trinidad Jiménez said that Spain supports the bid, but that it would not determine its position until the proposal is made official.[359] In an interview with El País in August, Jiménez confirmed Spain's support: "We are working with the idea that there is a majority in the EU that will support moving forward with the recognition of Palestine." She added that it was the right time to do this, since it would give Palestinians much needed hope about their future state.[360] On 20 November 2014, the Spanish parliament approved a non-binding motion calling on the government to recognize Palestine by a vote of 319–2.[361] In November 2023, following his reelection as Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez announced the intention of his government to recognize "any second now" the State of Palestine, and told so to the Israel PM Benjamin Netanyahu.[362][363] Yes EU, NATO; Palestine–Spain relations
49 Шаблон:Flag Switzerland does not recognize Palestine as an independent state but voted in favor of granting it a non-member observer status at the UN in November 2014. Swiss President Simonetta Sommaruga voiced her support for a two-state solution, saying "Switzerland has worked for years for a solution to the conflict between Israel and Palestine. Our aim is to achieve peace."[364] Yes EFTA
50 Шаблон:Flag The Bahamas has not publicized an official position of its own regarding the State of Palestine.[340] As a member of the Caribbean Community, it supports a two-state solution along internationally recognized borders.[192] No
51 Шаблон:Flag In September 2011, following the summit of the Pacific Islands Forum in Wellington, the PNA's foreign ministry noted that it had made significant strides in its efforts to attain recognition from Tonga.[319] No
52 Шаблон:Flag In December 2017, Foreign Affairs Minister Dennis Moses said, "Trinidad and Tobago's policy has always been to support the two states policy which means steadfast recognition of the State of Israel with secure territorial borders as well as the establishment of a Palestinian State."[365] No
53 Шаблон:Flag On 10 September 2015, the United Nations General Assembly passed a Palestinian resolution to allow its flag to fly in front of the United Nations headquarters in New York. The vote was passed with 119 votes in support, 8 opposing, and 45 abstentions. Tuvalu was one of the eight opposing votes.[366] No
54 Шаблон:Flag In September 2011, the UK said it would recognize Palestine as a state, but only with non-member observer status, rather than full membership, at the United Nations.Шаблон:Citation needed In October 2014, the UK House of Commons passed a symbolic non-binding Motion by a vote of 274 in favour to 12 against which called on the Government to recognize Palestine.[367][368] Also in October 2014, the devolved government of Scotland called for recognition of Palestine as an independent state and for the UK to open an Embassy.[369] Shortly before the 47th G7 summit in June 2021, Labour Party leader Keir Starmer called on Prime Minister Boris Johnson to "press for renewed agreement to finally recognise a state of Palestine and to stop expansion of illegal settlements and to get a meaningful peace process back and running."[370] Yes NATO, UNSC (permanent); Palestine–United Kingdom relations.
55 Шаблон:Flag In September 2011, President Barack Obama declared U.S. opposition to the bid in his speech to the General Assembly, saying that "genuine peace can only be realized between Israelis and Palestinians themselves" and that "[u]ltimately, it is Israelis and Palestinians – not us – who must reach an agreement on the issues that divide them".[371] Obama told Abbas that they would veto any United Nations Security Council move to recognize Palestinian statehood.[372] Presidents Donald Trump and Joe Biden have since done the same.[373][374] Yes NATO, UNSC (permanent); Palestine–United States relations

Not members of the UN

# Name Official position Relations
[note 2]
Relevant memberships
Шаблон:Flag Yes
[375][376]

Multilateral treaties

The State of Palestine is a party to several multilateral treaties, registered with five depositaries: the United Kingdom, UNESCO, United Nations, the Netherlands and Switzerland. The ratification of the UNESCO conventions took place in 2011/2012 and followed Palestine becoming a member of UNESCO, while the ratification of the other conventions were performed in 2014 while negotiations with Israel were in an impasse.

Depositary Country/organization Depositary organ Number of treaties Examples Date of first ratification/accession
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs 1[377] Convention respecting the laws and customs of war on land Шаблон:Dts
Russia 1[378] Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Шаблон:Dts
Switzerland Federal Council 7[379][380] Geneva Conventions and Protocols Шаблон:Dts
UNESCO Director-General 8[381] Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage Шаблон:Dts
United Nations Secretary-General >50[382] Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations
Statute of the International Criminal Court
Шаблон:Dts
United Kingdom Foreign and Commonwealth Office 2[383][384] UNESCO Constitution
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons
Шаблон:Dts

In an objection of 16 May 2014, Israel informed the Secretary General of the United Nations that it did not consider that 'Palestine' (single quotation marks in original) met the definition of statehood and that its requested accession to the United Nations Convention against Torture as being "without legal validity and without effect upon Israel's treaty relations under the Convention".[385] The United States and Canada lodged similar objections.[386][387]

Palestine participated in the negotiation of the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons and voted in favour of its adoption on 7 July 2017.[388]

See also

Notes

Шаблон:Reflist

References

Шаблон:Reflist

External links

Шаблон:International recognition of states with limited recognition Шаблон:Foreign relations of Palestine Шаблон:Palestine topics Шаблон:Portal bar

  1. United Nations A/67/L.28 General Assembly Шаблон:Webarchive. 26 November 2012.
  2. Шаблон:Cite news
  3. Шаблон:Cite web The list contains 92 entries, including a number of states which no longer exist.
  4. Шаблон:Cite book "Within two weeks of the PNC meeting, at least fifty-five nations, including states as diverse as the Soviet Union, China, India, Greece, Yugoslavia, Sri Lanka, Malta, and Zambia, had recognised the Palestinian state."
  5. Шаблон:Cite web
  6. Шаблон:Cite book
  7. Шаблон:Cite news
  8. Шаблон:Cite book
  9. 9,0 9,1 Шаблон:Cite book "As I had predicted to the PLO, the creation of [a] Palestinian State was an instantaneous success. Palestine would eventually achieve de jure diplomatic recognition from about 130 states. The only regional hold-out was Europe and this was because of massive political pressure applied by the United States Government."
  10. Шаблон:Cite web
  11. Charter of the League of Arab States (22 March 1945): Annex regarding Palestine; available at University of the Basque Country. Retrieved 21 January 2011. Шаблон:Webarchive
  12. See the following:
  13. 13,0 13,1 13,2 13,3 Шаблон:Cite book
  14. Шаблон:Cite web
  15. Шаблон:Cite book
  16. 16,0 16,1 16,2 Шаблон:Cite journal
  17. 17,00 17,01 17,02 17,03 17,04 17,05 17,06 17,07 17,08 17,09 17,10 17,11 17,12 17,13 17,14 17,15 17,16 17,17 17,18 17,19 17,20 17,21 17,22 17,23 17,24 17,25 17,26 17,27 17,28 17,29 17,30 17,31 17,32 17,33 17,34 17,35 17,36 17,37 17,38 17,39 17,40 17,41 17,42 17,43 17,44 17,45 17,46 17,47 17,48 17,49 17,50 17,51 17,52 17,53 17,54 17,55 17,56 17,57 17,58 17,59 17,60 17,61 17,62 17,63 17,64 17,65 17,66 17,67 17,68 17,69 17,70 17,71 17,72 17,73 17,74 17,75 17,76 17,77 17,78 17,79 17,80 17,81 17,82 17,83 17,84 17,85 17,86 Шаблон:Cite web The list contains 92 entries, including a number of states which no longer exist.
  18. Шаблон:Cite press release
  19. Шаблон:Cite news
  20. Шаблон:Citation "...Declaration was quite widely recognized by states, although often in equivocal terms."
  21. Шаблон:Cite journal "Over 114 states have already recognized the newly proclaimed state of Palestine".
    • Шаблон:Cite book "117 UN member states recognized the declared State of Palestine ..."
    • Шаблон:Cite news "With recognitions in recent weeks by Brazil and Argentina, some 105 states now formally recognize Palestine at the diplomatic level."
  22. Шаблон:Cite news
  23. Шаблон:Cite news
  24. 24,0 24,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  25. Шаблон:Cite news
  26. Шаблон:Cite news
  27. Шаблон:Cite news
  28. Шаблон:Cite news
  29. Шаблон:Cite news
  30. Шаблон:Cite web
  31. Шаблон:Cite newsШаблон:Dead link
  32. Шаблон:Cite web
  33. UNGA, 14 October 1974; Resolution 3210 (XXIX). Invitation to the Palestine Liberation Organization (doc.nr.A/RES/3210 (XXIX)) Шаблон:Webarchive
  34. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3236
  35. UNGA, 22 November 1974; Resolution 3237 (XXIX). Observer status for the Palestine Liberation Organization (doc.nr. A/RES/3237 (XXIX)) Шаблон:Webarchive
  36. UNGA, 15 December 1988; Resolution 43/177. Question of Palestine (doc.nr. A/RES/43/177) Шаблон:Webarchive
  37. 37,0 37,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  38. Шаблон:Cite news
  39. 39,0 39,1 39,2 39,3 39,4 Шаблон:Cite book
  40. Шаблон:Cite news
  41. Шаблон:Cite news
  42. Шаблон:Cite news
  43. Шаблон:Cite news
  44. Шаблон:Cite news
  45. 45,0 45,1 45,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  46. 46,0 46,1 46,2 46,3 Шаблон:Cite news
  47. Шаблон:Cite news
  48. Шаблон:Cite news
  49. Шаблон:Cite news
  50. Шаблон:Cite news
  51. 51,0 51,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  52. Шаблон:Cite book
  53. Шаблон:Cite news
  54. Шаблон:Cite news
  55. Шаблон:Cite news
  56. Шаблон:Cite news
  57. 57,0 57,1 57,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  58. Шаблон:Cite news
  59. 59,0 59,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  60. Шаблон:Cite web
  61. Шаблон:Cite web
  62. Шаблон:Cite news
  63. Шаблон:Cite news
  64. Шаблон:Cite newsШаблон:Cbignore
  65. Шаблон:Cite news
  66. Шаблон:Cite news
  67. Шаблон:Cite news
  68. Шаблон:Cite news
  69. Шаблон:Cite news
  70. Шаблон:Cite web
  71. Шаблон:Cite web
  72. Шаблон:Cite web: "...to be printed in the Irish Times on 17th September 2011".
  73. Шаблон:Cite web
  74. Шаблон:Cite news
  75. Шаблон:Cite news
  76. Шаблон:Cite news
  77. Шаблон:Cite news
  78. 78,0 78,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  79. 79,0 79,1 79,2 Шаблон:Cite web
  80. Шаблон:Cite news
  81. Шаблон:Cite web
  82. Шаблон:Cite web
  83. Шаблон:Cite news
  84. Шаблон:Cite web
  85. Шаблон:Cite web
  86. Шаблон:Cite web
  87. Шаблон:Cite web
  88. 88,0 88,1 "Diplomatic Relations" Шаблон:Webarchive. Permanent Observer of the State of Palestine to the United Nations. Accessed March 2016
  89. Шаблон:Cite web
  90. Шаблон:Cite web "Ambassadeur extraordinaire et plénipotentiaire de l'État de Palestine".
  91. Шаблон:Cite web
  92. Шаблон:Cite web "دولة فلسطين".
  93. Шаблон:Cite web "Mr. Mahmoud Abbas is the President of the Palestinian National Authority (PNA) and the President of the State of Palestine."
  94. Шаблон:Cite web "État de Palestine".
  95. Шаблон:Cite web
  96. Шаблон:Cite webШаблон:Dead link "Les deux pays ont établi des relations diplomatiques en 1994. chacune des deux parties étant représentée par un bureau de liaison."
  97. Шаблон:Cite web "Turkey established official relations with the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) in 1975 and was one of the first countries that recognized the Palestinian State established in exile on 15 November 1988."
  98. Шаблон:Cite web "Embassy of Afghanistan in Damascus ... non-resident envoy to: Jordan, Lebanon and Palestine".
  99. 99,0 99,1 Шаблон:Cite web "Indonesia's formal recognition towards the recently established State of Palestine the very next day, on 16 November 1988 ... One year later, Indonesia and Palestine agreed to advance their bilateral relations through the signing of a Joint Communique on the Commencement of Indonesia-Palestine Diplomatic Relations at Ambassadorial Level, on 19 October 1988 ... Indonesia assigned its Head of Mission to the Republic of Tunisia as the Ambassador non-resident for Palestine until 1 June 2004, when the assignment was relegated to the Indonesia's Ambassador for the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan in Amman."
  100. Шаблон:Cite web
  101. Шаблон:Cite web "Embassy of the State of Palestina".
  102. Шаблон:Cite web "His Excellency Mahmoud Abbas, President of the State of the Palestine".
  103. Шаблон:Cite web "... representative of His Excellency the President of the State of Palestine".
  104. Шаблон:Cite web "In 1947, India voted against the partition of Palestine at the UN GA. India was first Non-Arab State to recognize PLO ... in 1974. India was one of the first countries to recognize the State of Palestine in 1988. In 1996, India opened its Representative Office to the Palestine Authority in Gaza, which later was shifted to Ramamllah in 2003".
  105. Шаблон:Cite web "Первое представительство ООП (Организации Освобождения Палестины) в Москве было открыто в 1974 г., и первым Главой Представительства стал Бригадный Генерал Мухаммад Аль-Шаер. В 1981г. Представительство было преобразовано в дипломатическую миссию. А 18 ноября 1988 г. СССР официально признал Палестинское Государство. В январе 1990г. Представительство было преобразовано в Посольство Государство Палестина."
  106. Шаблон:Cite web "1968: Viet Nam established ties with the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)... 19 November 1988: Viet Nam recognized the State of Palestine and officially transformed the PLO's resident Representative Office into the Embassy of the State of Palestine."
  107. Шаблон:Cite web "State of Palestine". Relations established with the PLO prior to the 1988 declaration of independence.
  108. Шаблон:Cite news
  109. Шаблон:Cite web
  110. Шаблон:Cite web "Palestine".
  111. Шаблон:Cite web
  112. Шаблон:Cite web
  113. Шаблон:Cite web
  114. Шаблон:Cite book
  115. Government of Vanuatu (21 August 1989). Letter to ambassador Ali Kazak (Ref: 8/3/3/nv-mf, 10/417/2). Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Accessed 30 May 2011.
  116. Шаблон:Cite web "...as non-resident Ambassador to Palestine to Palestinian National Authority President Mahmoud Abbas".
  117. Шаблон:Cite web "Consulate General of the State of Palestine".
  118. Шаблон:Cite news
  119. 119,0 119,1 Шаблон:Cite book, p219: "The State of Palestine is recognized by over one hundred states including the Republic of the Philippines. In September 1989, diplomatic relations were established between the two governments leading to the opening of the Embassy of the State of Palestine in Manila, May 1990."
  120. Шаблон:Cite news
  121. Шаблон:Cite news
  122. Шаблон:Cite news
  123. 123,0 123,1 Шаблон:Cite web Relations established on 6 April 1992. Palestinian Embassy in Kazakhstan was opened in 1993.
  124. 124,0 124,1 Шаблон:Cite web "The Republic of Azerbaijan has diplomatic relations with Palestine since 15.04.1992".
  125. Шаблон:Cite web
  126. Шаблон:Cite web
  127. Шаблон:Cite news
  128. Шаблон:Cite web "Niyazov sent a message of condolences to the government of the State of Palestine".
  129. Шаблон:Cite web "[Bezhuashvili] added that Georgia recognised the Palestinian state in 1992 and has official ties with it."
  130. Шаблон:Cite web Relations established 25 April 1992.
  131. 131,0 131,1 Шаблон:Cite web "Lista zemalja koje su priznale Bosnu i Hercegovinu i datumi uspostavljanja diplomatskih odnosa – Palestine – 27.05.1992, 30.10.1992".
  132. 132,0 132,1 Шаблон:Cite journal
  133. Шаблон:Cite web
  134. 134,0 134,1 Шаблон:Cite web "Diplomatic relations established with the State of Palestine 25 September 1994".
  135. 135,0 135,1 Government of Papua New Guina (4 October 2004). PNG establishes formal diplomatic relations with Palestine. Press release. Office of the Prime Minister. Accessed 30 May 2011.
  136. 136,0 136,1 136,2 Шаблон:Cite web "The Head of the General Delegation of Palestine to Australia and New Zealand and Ambassador to East Timor, Papua New Guinea and Vanuatu."
  137. Шаблон:Cite web "The establishment of full diplomatic relations with the State of Palestine was announced on 15 February 1995. ... South African Representation in Palestine – The South African Representative to the Palestinian National Authority ... State of Palestine Representation in South Africa – Embassy of the State of Palestine".
  138. Шаблон:Cite web
  139. Шаблон:Cite web
  140. 140,0 140,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  141. Шаблон:Cite news
  142. Шаблон:Cite web
  143. 143,0 143,1 Government of Timor-Leste (1 March 2004). Protocol on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations between the State of Palestine and the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste. Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Co-operation. Accessed 30 May 2011.
  144. 144,0 144,1 Шаблон:Cite press release "... estableció relaciones diplomáticas con Palestina el 25 de marzo de 2005 mediante el intercambio de Notas Reversales, acto que implicó su reconocimiento. ... Por esta declaración la República del Paraguay reitera expresamente el reconocimiento de ese Estado como libre e independiente con las fronteras del 4 de junio de 1967."
  145. 145,0 145,1 Шаблон:Cite web "Palestine, State of Palestine – Date of Recognition 24 July 2006; Date of Establishment of Diplomatic Relations 1 August 2006."
  146. Шаблон:Cite web "La República de Costa Rica y el Estado de Palestina acordaron hoy el establecimiento de relaciones diplomáticas".
  147. Шаблон:Cite news
  148. Шаблон:Cite news
  149. 149,0 149,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  150. Шаблон:Cite web
  151. Шаблон:Cite web
  152. Шаблон:Cite web "Presidente del Estado de Palestina".
  153. Шаблон:Cite web
  154. Шаблон:Cite web
  155. Шаблон:Cite web
  156. Шаблон:Cite web
  157. Шаблон:Cite web "Embajador Estado de Palestina".
  158. Шаблон:Cite web
  159. Шаблон:Cite web "...embajador del Estado de Palestina en Argentina".
  160. Шаблон:Cite web
  161. Шаблон:Cite news
  162. Шаблон:Cite web
  163. Шаблон:Cite web
  164. 164,0 164,1 164,2 Шаблон:Cite news
  165. Шаблон:Cite web
  166. Шаблон:Cite web
  167. Шаблон:Cite web "The Government of Guyana has today decided to formally recognize the State of Palestine as a free, independent, and sovereign state, based on its 1967 borders."
  168. Шаблон:Cite web
  169. Шаблон:Cite news
  170. Шаблон:Cite web
  171. Шаблон:Cite web
  172. Шаблон:Cite news
  173. Шаблон:Cite web
  174. Шаблон:Cite web
  175. Шаблон:Cite web
  176. Шаблон:Cite news
  177. Шаблон:Cite web
  178. Шаблон:Cite web
  179. Шаблон:Cite news
  180. Шаблон:Cite news
  181. Шаблон:Cite news
  182. Шаблон:Cite news
  183. Шаблон:Cite news
  184. Шаблон:Cite web
  185. Шаблон:Cite web
  186. Шаблон:Cite press release
  187. Шаблон:Cite web
  188. Шаблон:Cite web
  189. Шаблон:Cite web: "128 UN Member States recognize Palestine"
  190. Шаблон:Cite news
  191. Шаблон:Cite web
  192. 192,0 192,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  193. Шаблон:Cite web
  194. Dominica is a member of the Caribbean Community, which supports a two-state solution along internationally recognised borders.[192] It is also one of eight members of the Bolivarian Alliance, which issued a statement on 9 September 2011 expressing full support for the recognition of the State of Palestine by the United Nations.[193]
  195. Шаблон:Cite web
  196. Шаблон:Cite web
  197. 197,0 197,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  198. Шаблон:Cite web
  199. Шаблон:Cite journal
  200. 200,0 200,1 200,2 200,3 Шаблон:Cite web
  201. 201,0 201,1 201,2 201,3 Шаблон:Cite web
  202. Шаблон:Cite news
  203. Шаблон:Cite news
  204. Шаблон:Cite web
  205. Шаблон:Cite web
  206. 206,0 206,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  207. Шаблон:Cite news
  208. Шаблон:Cite news
  209. Шаблон:Cite news
  210. Шаблон:Cite journal "...the SADR was one of the first countries to recognise the state of Palestine ... on November 15."
  211. Шаблон:Cite web
  212. Шаблон:Cite news
  213. 213,0 213,1 Шаблон:Cite web
  214. Шаблон:Cite web
  215. Шаблон:Cite news
  216. Шаблон:Cite news
  217. Шаблон:Cite news
  218. Шаблон:Cite news
  219. Шаблон:Cite news
  220. Шаблон:Cite news
  221. Шаблон:Cite news
  222. Шаблон:Cite web
  223. Шаблон:Cite book
  224. Шаблон:Cite web
  225. 225,0 225,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  226. Шаблон:Cite web
  227. Шаблон:Cite web
  228. Шаблон:Cite news
  229. Шаблон:Cite web
  230. Шаблон:Cite news
  231. Шаблон:Cite news
  232. Шаблон:Cite web
  233. Шаблон:Cite web
  234. 234,0 234,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  235. Шаблон:Cite book
  236. Шаблон:Cite book
  237. Шаблон:Cite news
  238. Шаблон:Cite news
  239. Шаблон:Cite news
  240. Шаблон:Cite news
  241. Шаблон:Cite news
  242. Шаблон:Cite news
  243. Шаблон:Cite web
  244. Шаблон:Cite news
  245. Шаблон:Cite news
  246. Шаблон:Cite web
  247. Шаблон:Cite news Translation at Human Rights Concern Eritrea, accessed 15 August 2011.
  248. Шаблон:Cite web
  249. Шаблон:Cite web
  250. Шаблон:Cite web
  251. Шаблон:Cite news
  252. Шаблон:Cite web
  253. Шаблон:Cite web
  254. Шаблон:Cite web
  255. Шаблон:Cite news
  256. 256,0 256,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  257. Шаблон:Cite news
  258. Шаблон:Cite news
  259. Шаблон:Cite news
  260. Шаблон:Cite news
  261. Шаблон:Cite news
  262. Шаблон:Cite news
  263. Шаблон:Cite news
  264. Шаблон:Cite web
  265. Шаблон:Cite news
  266. Шаблон:Cite news
  267. Шаблон:Cite news
  268. Шаблон:Cite news
  269. Шаблон:Cite book
  270. Шаблон:Cite journal
  271. Шаблон:Cite news
  272. Шаблон:Cite news
  273. Шаблон:Cite news
  274. Шаблон:Cite news
  275. Шаблон:Cite news
  276. Шаблон:Cite news
  277. Шаблон:Cite web
  278. Шаблон:Cite news
  279. Шаблон:Cite news
  280. Шаблон:Cite news
  281. Шаблон:Cite news
  282. Шаблон:Cite news
  283. Шаблон:Cite news
  284. Шаблон:Cite web
  285. Шаблон:Cite web
  286. Шаблон:Cite web
  287. Шаблон:Cite news
  288. Шаблон:Cite web
  289. Шаблон:Cite web
  290. Шаблон:Cite web
  291. Шаблон:Cite news
  292. Шаблон:Cite web
  293. Шаблон:Cite web
  294. Шаблон:Cite web
  295. Шаблон:Cite web
  296. 296,0 296,1 296,2 296,3 296,4 Шаблон:Cite news
  297. Шаблон:Cite web
  298. Шаблон:Cite web
  299. 299,0 299,1 Шаблон:Cite book
  300. Шаблон:Cite web
  301. Шаблон:Cite news
  302. Шаблон:Cite news
  303. Шаблон:Cite news
  304. Шаблон:Cite news
  305. 305,0 305,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  306. Шаблон:Cite news
  307. Шаблон:Cite news
  308. Шаблон:Cite news
  309. Шаблон:Cite news
  310. Шаблон:Cite web
  311. Шаблон:Cite news
  312. Шаблон:Cite news
  313. Шаблон:Cite news
  314. Шаблон:Cite news
  315. 315,0 315,1 Шаблон:Cite book
  316. Шаблон:Cite news
  317. Шаблон:Cite news
  318. Шаблон:Cite web
  319. 319,0 319,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  320. Шаблон:Cite news
  321. 321,0 321,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  322. Шаблон:Cite news
  323. 323,0 323,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  324. Шаблон:Cite news
  325. Шаблон:Cite news
  326. Шаблон:Cite news
  327. Шаблон:Cite news
  328. Шаблон:Cite news
  329. Шаблон:Cite news
  330. Шаблон:Cite news
  331. Шаблон:Cite news
  332. Шаблон:Cite news
  333. Шаблон:Cite news
  334. Шаблон:Cite news
  335. Шаблон:Cite web
  336. Шаблон:Cite web
  337. Шаблон:Cite news
  338. Шаблон:Cite news
  339. Шаблон:Cite news
  340. 340,0 340,1 Шаблон:Cite news
  341. Шаблон:Cite news
  342. Шаблон:Cite news
  343. Шаблон:Cite web
  344. Шаблон:Cite news
  345. Шаблон:Cite news
  346. Шаблон:Cite web
  347. Шаблон:Cite news
  348. Шаблон:Cite news
  349. Шаблон:Cite news
  350. Шаблон:Cite news
  351. Шаблон:Cite news
  352. Шаблон:Cite news
  353. Шаблон:Cite book
  354. Шаблон:Cite web
  355. Шаблон:Cite news
  356. Шаблон:Cite news
  357. Шаблон:Cite web
  358. Шаблон:Cite news
  359. Шаблон:Cite news
  360. Шаблон:Cite news Original transcript Шаблон:In lang.
  361. Шаблон:Cite news
  362. Шаблон:Cite news
  363. Шаблон:Cite web
  364. Шаблон:Cite news
  365. Шаблон:Cite web
  366. Шаблон:Cite web
  367. Шаблон:Cite news
  368. Шаблон:Cite web
  369. Шаблон:Cite news
  370. Шаблон:Cite news
  371. Шаблон:Cite news
  372. Шаблон:Cite newsШаблон:Cbignore
  373. Шаблон:Cite news
  374. Шаблон:Cite web
  375. Шаблон:Cite web "Last September, we have opened relations with the Palestinian Authorities".
  376. Шаблон:Cite web "The Order of Malta has relations at Ambassador level with: Palestinian Authority".
  377. Шаблон:Cite web
  378. Шаблон:Cite web
  379. Шаблон:Cite web
  380. Шаблон:Cite web
  381. Шаблон:Cite web
  382. Шаблон:Cite web
  383. Шаблон:Cite web
  384. Шаблон:Cite web
  385. Шаблон:Cite web
  386. Шаблон:Cite web
  387. Шаблон:Cite web
  388. Шаблон:Cite web


Ошибка цитирования Для существующих тегов <ref> группы «note» не найдено соответствующего тега <references group="note"/>